
Turning US tariffs into opportunities for the Middle East
Gulf Cooperation Council nations, along with Egypt, Morocco, Lebanon and Sudan, are facing a 10 percent US tariff on exports to the US under Trump's new trade policy, targeting what the president described as long-standing unfair practices.
While GCC states were spared the steepest penalties, other Arab countries were hit harder: Syria with 41 percent, Iraq with 39 percent, Libya with 31 percent and Algeria with 30 percent.
Tunisia and Jordan received 28 percent and 20 percent tariffs, respectively.
Despite the levies being on US imports, most GCC countries have trade deficits with America, importing more than they export.
According to the Office of the US Trade Representative, goods imports from MENA to America totaled $61.3 billion in 2024, down 1.6 percent, or $1 billion, from 2023. The US goods trade surplus with the Middle East was $19.1 billion in 2024, a 39.8 percent increase, or $5.4 billion, on 2023.
Strategic intent signals
When the US imposes tariffs, the impact extends far beyond the balance sheets of exporters and importers. These policy tools, while often presented as economic levers, also serve as clear messages about strategic intent.
The most recent round of US tariffs on a variety of goods has sparked concern across global markets, including among trade experts in the Middle East.
Tamer Al-Sayed, chief financial officer at the Future Investment Initiative Institute, told Arab News that the move was part of a broader shift in tone, saying: 'Tariffs have never just been about taxes. They are signals. And the message coming from Washington right now is: 'We're prioritizing domestic protection.''
While such a stance may make political sense in the White House, Al-Sayed believes it introduces a layer of complexity to long-standing economic ties between the US and the Gulf region.Historically, he said, the region has had strong energy and defense trade channels with the US, but in areas such as petrochemicals, aluminum and even some tech-linked components, there is some discomfort.
Tariffs have never just been about taxes. They are signals. And the message coming from Washington right now is: 'We're prioritizing domestic protection.'
Tamer Al-Sayed, chief financial officer at the Future Investment Initiative Institute
He emphasized that the issue extends beyond immediate cost increases, highlighting a broader shift in the tone of the relationship — from collaborative to transactional.
Describing the scene in the region, he noted that it is only natural for businesses and governments to begin asking 'tough' questions — such as whether they are overly exposed to a single market, and how they can future-proof their trade strategies.
'That might lead to a bit of a cooling-off in certain sectors while we explore new or alternative partnerships,' he said.
Minor impact on exports, rising diplomatic tensions
Yaseen Ghulam, an associate professor of economics and director of research at Al-Yamamah University, Riyadh, told Arab News that US diplomatic relations with their allies in the region are under significant strain due to blanket tariffs on goods imported from these countries.
'Some countries are impacted more due to higher rates and a larger volume of trade. When it comes to Middle Eastern countries, the negative direct impact is not significant,' Ghulam said.
However, he said that a tariff of 10 percent on exports to the US will not significantly change their volume of exports to the US.
Ghulam pointed out that incidents and related shocks such as these are not common when one looks at the history of the international trade mechanism developed after World War II.
'The superpowers have always had the muscle to press a reset button. However, the speed and magnitude with which these tariffs have been introduced by the US is in fact unparalleled,' he said.
The economist added that the US is a country that has dominated in politics and trade, but senses its dominance is in decline due to emerging larger trading powers such as China.
Domestically, he added, the significant trade deficit the US has had over an extended period has been cited as a reason for the government's inability to upgrade infrastructure and services over the past two decades. He believes that the global community must address US concerns while preparing for a changed trade regime.
'There is also a need for dialogue to come up with arrangements that do not hurt international trade and global consumers, and that also do not give unfair advantages to some countries that have used protective policies for various economic sectors, such as agriculture and automobile manufacture, to the detriment of some exporting countries such as the US,' Ghulam said.
New regional opportunities
Among the sectors feeling the brunt of the US tariffs are aluminum and petrochemicals — industries in which Gulf countries such as Bahrain and the UAE have long held competitive advantages.
According to Al-Sayed, these sectors are now grappling with diminishing price competitiveness in global markets with countries such as Bahrain and the UAE having built competitive export ecosystems around these industries.
'When tariffs hit, our price advantage starts to erode, and in a global market, that matters. But it is not all negative. Whenever there is a shake-up like this, new opportunities emerge. For example, sectors like agribusiness or food processing in the region could benefit as supply chains adjust and prices in the US climb,' he said.
The FII official added that he sees a potential boost in re-export and logistics hubs such as Jebel Ali. 'They can step in to serve rerouted flows,' he said.
Al-Sayed also highlighted the growing promise of the region's tech and green economy sectors. 'As global players look to hedge their trade exposure, they will want partners who are agile, well-positioned, and policy-stable. That is where we have an edge,' he said.
Tariffs amid diversification, regional integration shift
Countries in the region are increasingly prioritizing economic diversification to lessen their dependence on traditional income sources.
While US tariffs have not created an immediate need for diversification, they have certainly accelerated the process. 'Diversification did not start with these tariffs. It is just accelerating now,' said Al-Sayed.
He pointed out that there is also a shift toward a more regional integration, with the GCC states starting to tighten their economic cooperation.
'In times like these, neighbors matter. So, the US will remain a key player, but the region is clearly tilting toward a more balanced, multi-polar trade approach,' he said.
Moreover, he added, these countries, especially under frameworks such as Vision 2030, have been on a mission to reduce overreliance on single markets.
'The current tariff situation just reinforces that urgency. You will notice stronger trade missions and deals being signed with China, India, Southeast Asia, and increasingly with Africa,' he said.
Rise of strategic, sector-specific alliances
Looking ahead, Al-Sayed foresees a wave of targeted, sector-specific trade agreements taking shape across the globe. Green energy partnerships with Europe, digital and AI cooperation with Asia, and food security initiatives with African nations, are all part of this evolving trade blueprint.
Al-Sayed said that there is a new mindset emerging, particularly among Gulf sovereign funds and trade ministries, focused not only on importing and exporting but also on influence, access and long-term positioning.
'So, when we invest, we are thinking what market this opens and what network it unlocks. For example, do not be surprised to see strategic joint ventures in logistics, tech manufacturing, or even rare earths, where we co-own supply chains rather than just buy from them,' he said.
The financial expert said that the world is rebalancing, and tariffs may seem like small policy tools, but their aftershocks are redrawing global trade maps. 'The Middle East, if it plays this right, could come out not just as a player but as a connector,' Al-Sayed said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Arab News
3 hours ago
- Arab News
Arab, Islamic foreign ministers condemn Netanyahu's ‘Greater Israel' remark
RIYADH: The foreign ministers of Arab and Muslim nations on Saturday denounced statements about a "Greater Israel" that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was reported to have made in the wake of pronouncements by his far-right allies to annex Palestinian territories. In a joint statement, the ministers said the pronouncements by Netanyahu and his ministers were "a blatant and dangerous violation" of international law. "They also constitute a direct threat to Arab national security, to the sovereignty of states, and to regional and international peace and security," said the statement carried by the Saudi Press Agency, or SPA. (Developing story)


Saudi Gazette
5 hours ago
- Saudi Gazette
Trump, Putin announce ‘understanding' on Ukraine after Alaska summit
ALASKA — US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin said they had reached an "understanding" on ending the war in Ukraine following a nearly three-hour meeting in Alaska — but offered no specifics and left the summit without answering questions from reporters. The two leaders met for about 2 1/2 hours behind closed doors on Friday at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage. The summit began with a warm handshake on the tarmac beneath a sign reading "Alaska 2025" and concluded with brief statements from both leaders. They described the talks as productive and constructive, but declined to elaborate on what had been agreed. 'We have a very good chance of getting there,' Trump said during a joint press conference, referring to ending the war. 'We didn't get there, but we have a very good chance.' Putin said the two sides 'reached an understanding' and emphasized the need to 'restore a fair balance' in global security. He added that Moscow was 'ready to work' on Ukrainian security but did not explain how that would be achieved. He also thanked Trump for the 'friendly' tone of the talks and proposed holding the next meeting in Moscow. Neither leader took questions after their remarks. Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said the statements were 'comprehensive,' which is why they chose not to engage with the press. Putin's envoy for investment, Kirill Dmitriev, said the summit was 'definitely productive,' citing potential economic cooperation, though no details were disclosed. Trump, in a post-summit interview with Fox News' Sean Hannity, avoided directly answering whether he had sized up Putin's intent within the first two minutes of the meeting — something he previously promised he could do. Instead, Trump praised their longstanding relationship and repeated claims that the U.S. investigation into Russian election interference in 2016 had obstructed closer cooperation. Both leaders departed separately after the summit. Putin later visited Fort Richardson National Cemetery to lay flowers on the graves of Soviet WWII pilots and referenced the historic Alaska-Siberia air route, used to deliver U.S. aircraft to the USSR during the war. Putin reiterated Moscow's position that peace can only come when all 'root causes' of the conflict are addressed — including halting Western arms deliveries and addressing Russia's security concerns. Trump said he would call Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and other NATO leaders to update them on the meeting's outcome, though Zelenskyy was not invited to the summit. While Trump said there are only 'a very few' issues still unresolved, he acknowledged that 'one is probably the most significant.' Putin, echoing Trump's campaign rhetoric, said there would have been no war in Ukraine had Trump remained president. 'I can confirm that,' he said. No joint communique or formal agreement was issued at the end of the summit. The leaders left open the possibility of another meeting, with Trump responding to Putin's invitation by saying, 'I could see it possibly happening.' — Agencies


Arab News
6 hours ago
- Arab News
Trump says no agreement on ending Russia's war in Ukraine as Putin says there was an ‘understanding'
JOINT BASE ELMENDORF-RICHARDSON, Alaska: President Donald Trump said he and Vladimir Putin didn't reach a deal to end Russia's war in Ukraine after meeting on Friday, though Putin suggested they had hammered out 'an understanding' as both provided scant details but offered effusive praise of the other. Speaking moments later, Trump said he planned to speak with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and European leaders soon to brief them on the discussions. 'There's no deal until there's a deal,' Trump said. He said that while there were many points where agreement was reached, they fell short on others. The two leaders met for about 2 1/2 half hours on Friday at a summit in Alaska that started with a handshake, a smile and a ride in the presidential limousine — an unusually warm reception for a US adversary responsible for launching the largest land war in Europe since 1945. They planned to hold a joint news conference after talking together with top advisers behind closed doors on efforts to end Russia's war in Ukraine. When they greeted each other, they gripped hands for an extended period of time on a red carpet rolled out at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage. As they chatted, Putin grinned and pointed skyward, where B-2s and F-22s — military aircraft designed to oppose Russia during the Cold War — flew overhead. Reporters nearby yelled, 'President Putin, will you stop killing civilians?' and Russia's leader put his hand up to his ear as though to indicate he couldn't hear them. Trump and Putin then shared the US presidential limo known as 'The Beast' for a short ride to their meeting site, with Putin offering a broad smile as the vehicle rolled past the cameras. It was the kind of reception typically reserved for close US allies and belied the bloodshed and suffering in the war Putin started in Ukraine. Although not altogether surprising considering their longtime friendly relationship, such outward friendliness before hours of closed-door meetings is likely to raise concerns from Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and European leaders, who fear that Trump is primarily focusing on furthering US interests and not pressing hard enough for Ukraine's. Zelensky and European leaders were excluded from Trump and Putin's discussions, and Ukraine's president was left posting a video address in which he expressed his hope for a 'strong position from the US' 'Everyone wants an honest end to the war. Ukraine is ready to work as productively as possible to end the war,' he said, later adding, 'The war continues and it continues precisely because there is no order, nor any signals from Moscow, that it is preparing to end this war.' The summit was a chance for Trump to prove he's a master dealmaker and peacemaker. He likes to brag about himself as a heavyweight negotiator and has boasted that he could easily find a way to bring the slaughter to a close — a promise he's been unable to keep so far. For Putin, it was an opportunity to try to negotiate a deal that would cement Russia's gains, block Kyiv's bid to join the NATO military alliance and eventually pull Ukraine back into Moscow's orbit. Not meeting one-on-one anymore White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said shortly before Air Force One touched down that the previously planned one-on-one meeting between Trump and Putin was now a three-on-three discussion including Secretary of State Marco Rubio and special envoy Steve Witkoff. Putin was joined by Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and foreign affairs adviser Yuri Ushakov. The change seemed to indicate that the White House was taking a more guarded approach than it did during a 2018 meeting in Helsinki, where Trump and Putin met privately with their interpreters and Trump then shocked the world by siding with the Russian leader over US intelligence officials on whether Russia meddled in the 2016 campaign. The two leaders began their meeting Friday by sitting with their aides in front of a blue backdrop printed with 'Alaska' and 'Pursuing Peace.' The pair are expected to hold a joint press conference at the end of the summit. There are significant risks for Trump. By bringing Putin onto US soil — America bought Alaska from Russia in 1867 for roughly 2 cents per acre — the president is giving him the validation he desires after his ostracization following his invasion of Ukraine 3 1/2 years ago. Zelensky's exclusion is also a heavy blow to the West's policy of 'nothing about Ukraine without Ukraine' and invites the possibility that Trump could agree to a deal that Ukraine does not want. Any success is far from assured, meanwhile, since Russia and Ukraine remain far apart in their demands for peace. Putin has long resisted any temporary ceasefire, linking it to a halt in Western arms supplies and a freeze on Ukraine's mobilization efforts, which are conditions rejected by Kyiv and its Western allies. Trump said earlier in the week there was a 25 percent chance that the summit would fail, but he also floated the idea that if the meeting succeeds he could bring Zelensky to Alaska for a subsequent meeting with himself and Putin. He said during an interview on Air Force One that he might walk out quickly if the meeting wasn't going well, but that didn't happen. Trump said before arriving in Alaska that he would push for an immediate ceasefire while expressing doubts about the possibility of achieving one. He has also suggested working for a broad peace deal to be done quickly. Russia has long favored a comprehensive deal to end the fighting, reflecting its demands, and not a temporary halt to hostilities. Trump has offered shifting explanations for his meeting goals Trump previously characterized the sit-down as ' really a feel-out meeting.' But he's also warned of 'very severe consequences' for Russia if Putin doesn't agree to end the war. Trump said his talks with Putin will include Russian demands that Ukraine cede territory as part of a peace deal, and that Ukraine has to decide on those — but he also suggested Zelensky should accept concessions. 'I've got to let Ukraine make that decision. And I think they'll make a proper decision,' Trump told reporters traveling with him to Anchorage. Trump said there's 'a possibility' of the United States offering Ukraine security guarantees alongside European powers, 'but not in the form of NATO.' Putin has fiercely resisted Ukraine joining the trans-Atlantic security alliance, a long-term goal for Ukrainians seeking to forge stronger ties with the West. Gen. Alexus Grynkewich, NATO's supreme allied commander Europe, is also in Alaska to provide 'military advice' to Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, according to a senior NATO military official who wasn't authorized to speak publicly and spoke on the condition of anonymity. Grynkewich's presence is likely to be welcomed by European leaders who have tried to convince Trump to be firm with Putin and not deal over Kyiv's head. War still raging Foreign governments are watching closely to see how Trump reacts to Putin, likely gauging what the interaction might mean for their own dealings with the US president, who has eschewed traditional diplomacy for his own transactional approach to relationships. The meeting comes as the war has caused heavy losses on both sides and drained resources. Ukraine has held on far longer than some initially expected since the February 2022 invasion, but it is straining to hold off Russia's much larger army, grappling with bombardments of its cities and fighting for every inch on the over 600-mile (1,000-kilometer) front line. Alaska is separated from Russia at its closest point by just 3 miles (less than 5 kilometers) and the international date line. Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson was crucial to countering the Soviet Union during the Cold War. It continues to play a role today, as planes from the base still intercept Russian aircraft that regularly fly into US airspace.