logo
What's The Best Cinema Format For ‘Thunderbolts*'?

What's The Best Cinema Format For ‘Thunderbolts*'?

Forbes02-05-2025

As inevitable as the sun rising, another MCU Marvel movie is never too far away, and as of this weekend, the latest instalment, Thunderbolts*, has arrived in theaters. As you would expect for a major studio release, there's a wide variety of formats to choose from, which brings us to the perennial question: which format is best to watch it in?
While 'superhero fatigue' has been much discussed, this group of cynical, reluctant, rag-tag team seems to represent the zeitgeist of our current fractured world. Ostensibly an ensemble cast, Florence Pugh is effectively the lead, and she does a great job. It amazes me how effortlessly she brings roles such as this to life, as much as more naturalistic fare.
For all the sound and fury of its action, Thunderbolts* is essentially a movie about navigating mental health struggles, and for that I admire it ­— it's good to see an MCU movie that, amongst all the smashy-crashy, attempts to be about something human.
Director Jake Schreier and cinematographer Andrew Droz Palermo shot the movie using a new Arri Alexa 265 digital camera. Like its predecessor, the Alexa 65, this is a digital camera featuring a 6.5K sensor. Where it differs is its native aspect ratio of 2.12:1, close to that of 5-perf 70mm film. It's also three times smaller than the 65 and, thanks to a new sensor, offers greater dynamic range and improved image quality with better contrast, reduced noise, and richer, more defined colors.
As an IMAX-certified camera, it's no surprise that the movie has been framed with IMAX in mind, and for much of its running time, primarily the action sequences, it expands to the 1.90:1 aspect ratio of digital IMAX theatres. This is used well and makes it the default way to see the film. There are caveats, however. I would always recommend an IMAX Laser theatre over one that uses Xenon lamps, as laser projectors provide a brighter and clearer picture.
In some early showings, Thunderbolts* is even being presented in IMAX 3D — a rare occurrence these days. I am one of the few who still are willing to champion the format, though with the caveat that that's only if you can see it in IMAX Laser, thanks to the increased brightness, which normally compensates for the light loss from the 3D glasses.
However, having just returned from an IMAX Laser 3D showing, I have to say that the image was the dimmest 3D IMAX presentation I've seen. Why this is, I'm not certain, but I don't think it's the fault of SDFX, the effects studio that did the 3D conversion. I suspect rather it's the choice of Panavision lenses, which are known to give a more vintage look and the general desaturated color grading. While this fits the tone, I don't think it serves the 3D well. Some elements work, such as snow forest scenes, establishing shots of New York, and the falling from skyscraper sections. But there are no 3D frame-breaks or other creative uses of 3D that I noticed, and while I do love the true depth it provides, overall, for Thunderbolts*.I would recommend a 2D presentation.
On the audio side, the IMAX 12-channel mix was as solid and immersive as I've come to expect.
A great alternative to IMAX is always Dolby Cinema. The film will be shown in a scope aspect ratio of 2.39:1, which, if the Dolby screen is 1.85:1, will mean black bars top and bottom. But the strong black levels and high contrast of the Dolby Vision format will suit the movie's restrained color palette, while the pinpoint precision of the Dolby Atmos surround audio will draw you in.
If there isn't an IMAX or Dolby screen near you, then seek out a premium larger format screen. There doesn't appear to be an HDR by Barco version of the film, but the regular SDR projector is at least 4K, and you'll get the benefits of a large screen, Dolby Atmos and comfier seats. Each chain has a different name for what is, essentially, the same thing, and in the USA, you'll find these branded as Cinemark XD, Cineplex UltraAVX, Xtreme Xscape, Prime at AMC and Regal RPX. In the UK, the brands include Odeon iSense and Cineworld Superscreen.
You'll also find Thunderbolts* in 4DX, which involves seats that move in time with the action on screen and kick you in the back, along with air blasts, jets of water, and flashing lights. It's not for the faint of heart, and how well it works depends on the movie. I chose to see the rerelease of Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith in 4DX and was delighted with how well it worked – it certainly gave me an experience I couldn't replicate at home. However, with Thunderbolts* it's paired with 3D and, with my IMAX 3D experience as reference, I would not expect this to fare better here.
The final two non-standard formats will be ICE, which offers images from the movie showing on panels running down the sides of the theater. I've never experienced it, so I can't vouch for it, but you can find locations worldwide on its website.
ScreenX has additional footage specially formatted for larger screens that run down the sides of the theater to give you a more wrap-around experience. This worked tremendously for the racing movie Gran Turismo, but less so for every other movie I've tried, so I tend to avoid this.
The last format will be standard 2D, in 5.1 sound with a 1080p projector. Fine if you must, and it will be the budget option, but it's not going to provide the immersiveness that this effects-heavy and emotion-heavy movie deserves.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

ANDOR Creator Tony Gilroy Had to Fight Disney For Season 2 Budget After Being Told "Streaming is Dead" — GeekTyrant
ANDOR Creator Tony Gilroy Had to Fight Disney For Season 2 Budget After Being Told "Streaming is Dead" — GeekTyrant

Geek Tyrant

time4 hours ago

  • Geek Tyrant

ANDOR Creator Tony Gilroy Had to Fight Disney For Season 2 Budget After Being Told "Streaming is Dead" — GeekTyrant

Andor is one of this shows that raised the bar for the Star Wars franchise. But, getting to that second season? That didn't come easy. Tony Gilroy, the creator of Andor and the mind behind Rogue One , opened up at the ATX Television Festival about the uphill battle he faced securing proper funding for Season 2 of the critically acclaimed series. While you'd think Disney would be all-in after Season 1's success, Gilroy revealed a much grimmer outlook from the studio: "I mean, [for] Disney this is $650 million. For 24 episodes, I never took a note. We said 'F*ck the Empire' in the first season, and they said, 'Can you please not do that?' … In season 2, they said, 'Streaming is dead, we don't have the money we had before,' so we fought hard about money, but they never cleaned anything up. That [freedom] comes with responsibilities." 'Streaming is dead,' according to what Gilroy was told during Season 2's production. Kind of a surprise, considering this is Disney we're talking about, owners of Disney+, the home of Andor, The Mandalorian , and every Marvel show. But, this internal sentiment makes a bit more sense when you look at the recent slowdown in Disney's streaming content pipeline. Marvel shows have slowed down. Star Wars shows are fewer and farther between. The emphasis, for now, seems to be shifting, toward theatrical releases. I'm glad to hear that Gilroy 'fought hard' for the budget and to preserve the scope and freedom of the show. It was a massive creative swing that kept its integrity intact despite the studio's shifting priorities. Even with all the struggles behind the scenes, Andor remains the most critically lauded live-action Star Wars project to date. It was an impressive show that hit a nerve with fans, elevating the franchise in a way no other Star Wars project has. As for what's next : The Mandalorian & Grogu is headed to the big screen with Pedro Pascal and Sigourney Weaver. Shawn Levy and Ryan Gosling are confirmed to be teaming on the Starfighter movie. Ahsoka 's second season is underway for a 2026 release, and a Darth Maul series is also coming.

SPIDER-MAN: BRAND NEW DAY Could Reportedly See Spidey and The Punisher Fight Hulk — GeekTyrant
SPIDER-MAN: BRAND NEW DAY Could Reportedly See Spidey and The Punisher Fight Hulk — GeekTyrant

Geek Tyrant

time4 hours ago

  • Geek Tyrant

SPIDER-MAN: BRAND NEW DAY Could Reportedly See Spidey and The Punisher Fight Hulk — GeekTyrant

Well, this one's wild, but just plausible enough to keep us on edge. There's a new rumor making the rounds that Spider-Man: Brand New Day might see Tom Holland's Peter Parker teaming up with Jon Bernthal's Frank Castle aka the Punisher, to take on none other than Mark Ruffalo's Hulk. But not the yoga-doing, taco-sharing version of Hulk we've seen lately. No, this rumor points to the return of a full-on rage monster. Smash first, maybe think later. This all comes from scooper Jeff Sneider, who recently chatted about it with John Rocha on The Hot Mic podcast. Rocha, for his part, mentioned this very scenario back in January, saying he heard from a 'very connected' source in the industry that Spider-Man: Brand New Day would be 'ground-based' and would have Peter teaming up with the Punisher to fight a newly savage Hulk. Rocha explained: 'So it's gonna be ground-based. But he's going to fight Hulk because Marvel wants to move away from the intelligent Hulk that we saw in the Avengers movies and make him much more of the brutish Hulk, the violent Hulk, the rage Hulk.' There's no denying that fans have been divided on Professor Hulk. While some appreciated the evolution of the character, others missed the raw chaos and destruction that defined Hulk's earlier appearances. Rocha acknowledged that, syaing: 'A lot of people have been complaining about the more intelligent and calmer version of the character.' Of course, the Marvel machine is constantly shifting gears. Rocha also admitted that this concept may no longer be locked in: 'I don't know if that's what Tom Holland was reading and jumping around with Zendaya in his room… because we know it's going back into rewrites.. but that was the plan they told me about a couple of weeks ago.' So, take this with a grain. Given the upcoming Daredevil: Born Again and a 2026 special presentation featuring Bernthal's Punisher, Marvel's clearly not done with Frank Castle. Whether that means he's showing up to help Spidey rein in the Hulk remains to be seen, but I sure do hope it's true! Still, a street-level battle with Hulk, Spider-Man, and Punisher? That's the kind of chaotic escalation fans could get behind!

Tim Miller Opens Up About The X-MEN Horror Movie He Almost Made: 'Home Alone Meets Alien' — GeekTyrant
Tim Miller Opens Up About The X-MEN Horror Movie He Almost Made: 'Home Alone Meets Alien' — GeekTyrant

Geek Tyrant

time4 hours ago

  • Geek Tyrant

Tim Miller Opens Up About The X-MEN Horror Movie He Almost Made: 'Home Alone Meets Alien' — GeekTyrant

While Marvel fans eagerly await the full-fledged return of the X-Men in the MCU, there's always a lingering curiosity about the mutant stories that never made it to screen. One of those lost gems was a Kitty Pryde horror movie pitched by Deadpool director Tim Miller, something he described as 'Home Alone meets Alien.' In a recent chat with The Hollywood Reporter, Miller revealed that he had once been developing an X-Men film based on Uncanny X-Men #143 by Chris Claremont and John Byrne. The story centers on a young Kitty Pryde left alone in the X-Mansion during the holidays. As the rest of the team takes a break, a demonic N'Garai creature infiltrates the house, leaving Kitty to face off against it in a terrifying solo survival scenario. No backup. No Wolverine. Just Kitty and a whole lot of monster-induced chaos. Miller talked about the project, calling Marvel's mutants their 'secret weapon,' and shared how passionate he was about the opportunity: 'The X-Men are my favorite characters, and I wrote to Kevin Feige like, 'If there was anything you'd ever let me do in the Marvel universe, the X-Men would be it.'' At one point, the project was actually taking shape. Miller was set to direct, and the script came from comic book legend Brian Michael Bendis. This was around 2018, right when Kitty was enjoying a run as Star-Lord in the Guardians of the Galaxy comics written by Bendis himself. But timing is everything, and this project was swept away during the Fox-Disney merger, joining the ranks of never-made X-projects like Gambit , Multiple Man , and a Fantastic Four crossover. While Fox's New Mutants flirted with horror, Miller's take would've been something totally different… intimate, suspenseful, and creature-focused. A mutant monster movie set entirely inside the X-Mansion? It's hard not to imagine what could've been. Still, Miller isn't dwelling in regret. He's grateful for the wild ride he's already had: 'I didn't expect to have my own studio, or to do Terminator: Dark Fate. Being able to do Love Death + Robots is probably my achievement I'm most proud of. I'm old, but I'm not done yet.' I love the idea of Kitty vs. Demon in a Haunted Mansion! That sounds like a fun flick and the kind of genre twist superhero movies still need.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store