logo
State Farm sparks backlash in blue state with record rate jump

State Farm sparks backlash in blue state with record rate jump

Daily Mail​7 days ago
State Farm has sparked fierce backlash by hiking home insurance rates in Illinois by 27.2 percent, adding $746 to the average bill.
The insurer insists the hike is unavoidable, claiming it's paying out far more in claims than it collects in premiums in the state.
For every $1 collected in the state in 2024, the company says it paid out $1.26. The year before, the sum it paid out was even higher, at $1.30.
Hail damage is the main culprit, the company said, with Illinois trailing only Texas for the number of hail-related claims last year.
Rising labor and material costs have also driven up repair expenses.
But lawmakers have blasted the price hikes, which could hit policyholders as soon as August 15.
Illinois Governor JB Pritzker called the increases 'unfair and arbitrary', promising to work to deliver more protections for homeowners in the face of soaring costs.
Illinois is one of the few states where insurers can raise rates without approval from regulators.
The state has no meaningful rate review process for homeowners insurance, Realtor.com reported.
This means that once a company files new rates with the Department of Insurance, that is typically the end of the story.
State Farm already raised rates 12.3 percent in 2024 — and it is not alone.
Allstate also hiked prices for policyholders in Illinois by 14.3 percent earlier this year, and 12.7 percent in 2024.
With the latest increase, Democratic Governor Pritzker accused State Farm of raising costs in the state to subsidize losses elsewhere in the US.
'Hardworking Illinoisans should not be paying more to protect beach houses in Florida,' he said.
Illinois House Speaker Emanuel Chris Welch also called the hike 'wrong.'
But other lawmakers have questioned whether regulation to protect consumers from rising costs could end up driving insurers out of the market.
Illinois Governor JB Pritzker called the increases 'unfair and arbitrary', promising to work to deliver more protections for homeowners in the face of soaring costs
Republican State Representative Jeff Keicher, who is also a longtime State Farm agent, used California as an example, saying that regulatory constraints have led insurers to flee the state.
'The worst thing we can do is force insurers to underprice and go out of business,' Keicher told The Chicago Tribune, 'and leave homeowners without a way to get their home fixed if the worst happens.'
Several large insurers, including State Farm, have cut back or limited their coverage in California amid worsening climate disasters, leaving many people struggling to find home cover.
Over half of Californians said in 2024 that they had been affected by rising premiums for property coverage or had been dropped by their insurer entirely.
In the wake of State Farm's proposal for Illinois, lawmakers are fast-tracking a series of proposals designed to give consumers more protection.
Last year, Pritzker signed legislation requiring rate review for large group health insurance, allowing the state to block excessive increases, Realtor.com reported.
Now some lawmakers want to apply that same framework to home insurance policies where companies must justify hikes with years of data.
Increases will then be rejected if they are deemed 'excessive, inadequate, or unfairly discriminatory.'
Instead of regulation, the insurance industry itself is pushing for measures to make properties more resilient against future natural disasters, including more comprehensive home construction standards.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Dem Sen Elizabeth Warren is roasted on CNBC over apocalyptic economic warnings in face of surging markets
Dem Sen Elizabeth Warren is roasted on CNBC over apocalyptic economic warnings in face of surging markets

Daily Mail​

time19 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Dem Sen Elizabeth Warren is roasted on CNBC over apocalyptic economic warnings in face of surging markets

CNBC anchors Rick Santelli and Joe Kernen were quick to slam Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren on a recent broadcast of Squawk Box for her grim economic predictions as the stock market rises. Kernen presented statistics demonstrating a strong gross domestic product reading for the second quarter and accused Democrats of partisanship on economic statistics. He argued that people on the left and those who dislike President Donald Trump refuse to acknowledge positive economic trends. 'Senator Elizabeth Warren will come on and say " Inflation is out of control, and the economy is getting killed by what's happening by these tariffs,' Kernen said. He added that inflation has been below 3 percent and the stock market was hitting new highs, refuting Warren's stance that the economy is in turmoil. Santelli said that there was an 'important lesson' in Kernen's argument, joking that you shouldn't pick a Congress member to be your money manager. The US economy returned to growth in the second quarter. US GDP, the value of all goods and services produced across the economy, rose at a 3 percent annual rate, according to the Commerce Department. It came after a first quarter where GDP shrank at 0.5 percent. The wild swings have been attributed by analysts to Trump's tariffs. Santelli, the US editor for CNBC, argued that Congress members often have ulterior motives when pointing to certain measurements over others to illustrate economic growth. 'The Democrats don't want to see the current administration have some success, but there's no doubt that this is some success,' Santelli said. He argued that inflation has stayed steady over the past year and cited recent rising equities. Fears have loomed that Trump's aggressive tariff policy will raise prices, negatively impact inflation, and shock the market. Warren has been a staunch critic of Trump's economic stances, arguing that tariffs will give companies free rein to increase prices and take advantage of consumers. She introduced a bill titled the Price Gouging Prevention Act of 2025 alongside Democratic Senator Tammy Baldwin and representatives Jan Schakowsky and Chris Deluzio to prevent companies from increasing prices. The bill would make price gouging illegal and give the Federal Trade Commission, along with state attorneys general the power to litigate potential abuses of power. Warren argued that large-scale companies could use Trump's global trade war as an excuse to increase prices and gouge the consumer. In an interview with Fortune, the senator doubled down on her prediction, arguing that her biggest concern with Trump's tariffs was the long-term effects. 'The impact of six months of Donald Trump will be felt for two generations, as more nations blink hard at what's happening in the US and conclude that we are simply not a reliable trading partner,' she told the publication. 'That hurts us now and it will hurt our children and our grandchildren.' While the White House argued that tariffs are intended to create new export opportunities and level the playing field, Warren said Trump's economy is setting the market up for a crash. She introduced a similar price-gouging bill last year and sparred with Kernen in a tense on-air interview at the time. Kernen dismissed price gouging legislation as 'flawed' to which Warren replied, 'Where have you been for the last 30 years as three dozen states have price gouging laws and they use them effectively?' 'This is why you never lose an argument - because no one can ever say anything back to you, senator, and it's frustrating,' he replied.

Costco customers give surprising verdict on door receipt checkers after one shopper is left floored
Costco customers give surprising verdict on door receipt checkers after one shopper is left floored

Daily Mail​

time21 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Costco customers give surprising verdict on door receipt checkers after one shopper is left floored

They're often treated like mall cops and met with eye-rolls — but Costco's door receipt checkers may be doing more than just slowing you down on the way out. Turns out, the employees many shoppers love to hate are actually saving people money. Costco members are sharing surprising stories of how receipt checkers have caught errors and saved them cash — sometimes more than $40 in a single visit. One viral Reddit post praised a worker who noticed a shopper had been charged for a three-pack of houseplants at $16.99 each, even though they only grabbed two. 'At the exit when my receipt was checked, the employee hesitated and said, 'You only got two plants but you paid for a 3-pack,' the shopper wrote. 'He called someone over, refunded the extra, and I got the third plant. THIS is why they check receipts.' Other Costco members quickly piled on with their own examples: 'They've caught accidental double scans before — saved me $45 last time,' one shopper said. Another wrote:'I missed an item and was about to walk out without paying — they sent me back and let me keep it free,' another wrote. The Reddit user made their claims after another shopper praised Costco door receipt checkers Even when mistakes slip through, shoppers said customer service is quick to fix them. Some noted these errors are easy to miss in the moment — especially during big hauls where the final total already feels high. While some still grumble that receipt checks feel nosy or unnecessary, many Costco regulars are starting to see them differently: not just as security guards stopping theft, but as a final line of defense against checkout mistakes. Employees say that's part of the point. Receipt checks help prevent shrink, the industry term for lost inventory — whether from theft, mis-scans, or human error. And by reducing that loss, Costco keeps its famously low prices intact. Legal experts also say the practice is all above board — membership terms include consent to exit receipt checks. Not everyone is a fan. Shoppers have been known to debate the practice online, with some arguing Costco should simply add more checkout staff instead of relying on exit policing. Several Reddit users have shared their own experiences with Costco receipt errors Costco is often in the news. Shoppers threatened to boycott Costco earlier this year after the chain swapped Pepsi for Coca-Cola drinks. Other customers have complained about price hikes at food courts. Slow-moving shoppers travelling around in groups is another of Costco shoppers' biggest gripes. Costco shoppers also debating new food court items or complaining about limits on gold bars. Meanwhile, a little-known policy is also going vital. Costco shoppers have long loved the chain's famous free samples — but few knew the real rules. For years, the big‑box giant has lined its warehouses with stations handing out free bites of everything from frozen pizza to imported chocolates. Most members figured the perk came with an unspoken limit — maybe one sample per person. But it has emerged Costco — which has standard memberships costing $65 and Executive memberships $130 — has no cap on the number of samples its members can take.

Zillow sued by Homes.com owner CoStar for 'massive' copyright violations
Zillow sued by Homes.com owner CoStar for 'massive' copyright violations

Reuters

time21 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Zillow sued by Homes.com owner CoStar for 'massive' copyright violations

NEW YORK, July 30 (Reuters) - Zillow (ZG.O), opens new tab was sued on Wednesday by owner CoStar Group (CSGP.O), opens new tab, which accused the largest U.S. online real estate portal of publishing at least 46,979 copyrighted photos without permission. The complaint filed in Manhattan federal court seeks unspecified compensatory and punitive damages, which Arlington, Virginia-based CoStar estimated could exceed $1 billion. CoStar, whose real estate listing websites also include and accused Seattle-based Zillow of exploiting the photos, many of which contain watermarks, to boost its rental listings business. Zillow did not immediately respond to requests for comment. According to the complaint, Zillow uses CoStar's photos to induce property managers and landlords to "claim" properties that are not actively listed for rent, and then sells advertising packages and tools to generate revenue. CoStar said Zillow also distributes some photos under syndication agreements to rival portals and Redfin, owned respectively by News Corp (NWSA.O), opens new tab and Rocket Cos (RKT.N), opens new tab. Zillow's "free-riding" on the photos results in infringement "on a massive scale, however measured," CoStar said. CoStar said it provides limited licenses of its photos to real estate professionals and does not allow sublicensing. In 2019, CoStar obtained a $500 million judgment against the bankruptcy estate of real estate listing platform Xceligent over the publication of 38,489 copyrighted photos, court records show. Xceligent had filed to liquidate two years earlier. CoStar threatened to sue and Redfin if they do not remove its copyrighted photos. and Redfin declined to comment. CoStar did not immediately respond to a request for additional comment. In June, Compass (COMP.N), opens new tab, the largest U.S. residential real estate brokerage by sales volume, sued Zillow for allegedly trying to monopolize private home listings, violating federal antitrust law. Zillow has called Compass' claims unfounded. The case is CoStar Group Inc et al v Zillow Group Inc et al, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 25-06248.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store