Bloomberg: US reduces its participation in countering Russian ways to circumvent sanctions
Source: Bloomberg, as reported by European Pravda
Details: The officials, who asked not to be named, said the United States was practically absent from several working groups set up by allies to combat attempts to circumvent sanctions imposed on the Kremlin.
The officials said the US had largely been unresponsive to the activities of one group, which focuses on preventing the Russians from obtaining parts and equipment used to make weapons. Another group, in which the US does not participate, is dedicated to monitoring and enforcing the G7's price cap on Russian oil.
The sources noted that it was unclear whether the US had made an active decision to wind down its participation or whether it simply lacked key personnel. They added that some of the meetings had been attended by junior officials with little decision-making power.
The sanctions imposed on Russia after its full-scale invasion of Ukraine are becoming a major point of tension between Washington and Kyiv's European allies as President Donald Trump presses for an end to the conflict.
Trump said he would be ready to increase sanctions against Russia if Moscow did not seriously engage in peace talks. European officials said there had been few signs of preparations for such a move, and it is unclear what actions, if any, the US is taking to combat the circumvention of existing measures.
However, earlier this month, the Trump administration did tighten its restrictions by allowing some banks to suspend their licences to make energy-related payments. The US had already withdrawn from the KleptoCapture working group, established by the Biden administration with a broad mandate to take action against Russia, in February.
Since the sanctions regime took shape in 2022, the US and its allies have created a number of working groups and task forces to coordinate their efforts to ensure compliance. All of them see limiting Moscow's access to technology and parts needed for warfare goods as a top priority and pay particular attention to cutting off trade routes through third countries, such as the United Arab Emirates and India, that Russia uses.
This work includes joint activities, sanctions against companies in third countries that help Moscow, and diplomatic pressure on these countries to close trade routes. The officials said the UK, the European Union and other G7 allies continue to coordinate these efforts.
Background:
It was reported earlier that several US national security agencies had stopped working on coordinated efforts to counter Russian sabotage, disinformation and cyberattacks, easing pressure on Moscow amid the Trump administration's efforts to end the war in Ukraine.
At the end of February, it was reported that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth ordered US Cyber Command, a Pentagon unit, to stop planning offensive cyber operations against Russia. Other news outlets soon confirmed this report.
However, the Pentagon later denied this information.
Support Ukrainska Pravda on Patreon!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Newsom calls Nov. 4 special election to counter GOP redistricting push
California Gov. Gavin Newsom announced Thursday that his state would hold a special election on Nov. 4 to ask voters to approve a mid-decade redistricting plan. 'We can't stand back and watch this democracy disappear district by district," said Gov. Gavin Newsom in a press conference on Aug. 14 to announce the vote on California's Election Rigging Response Act. The proposed redrawn district maps could be released as early as Friday, Aug. 15, according to media reports. For weeks, Newsom and California Democratic lawmakers have been floating plans for this mid-decade redistricting. It's in response to Trump and White House officials who've urged Texas Republican leaders to redraw voting maps to gain five new Republican-friendly seats to the U.S. House of Representatives, USA TODAY reported. In California, congressional district maps are drawn by the independent California Citizens Redistricting Commission — not legislators — which was created when voters passed the Voters First Act in 2008. California has 52 congressional districts, nine of which are currently represented by Republican congressmen. 'We tried to play by a higher set of standards and rules with our independent redistricting, and we believe in that and we are not talking about eliminating that commission,' Newsom said in an earlier press conference on Aug. 8. 'We are talking about emergency measures to respond to what's happening in Texas and we will nullify what happens in Texas. We will pick up five seats with the consent of the people.' Polling shows that most Californians do not favor Newsom's proposed legislative redistricting, as they support the 2008 and 2010 initiatives that separated legislative officials from the drawing of congressional districts. Thus, Newsom is rallying Californians to support this initiative and trust officials to draw the state's lines. Here's what to know about the proposed plan to redistrict California. Newsom officially launches California's Election Rigging Response Act 'Today is liberation day in the state of California,' Newsom said at the beginning of his press conference speech. The Election Rigging Response Act would require a two-thirds vote in both chambers of the Legislature to appear on the ballot. If approved for the ballot, it would need a simple majority of voters to pass and would impact congressional elections in 2026, 2028, and 2030. Newsom made it clear that this proposal is a temporary pathway to combat the redistricting efforts of other states. Newsom emphasized that legislative control over redistricting in California is temporary and intended solely to counter Republican efforts to gain additional Congressional seats. He added that California would withdraw from this approach if Texas were to end its redistricting maneuvers. The move isn't just for California's benefit—it's meant to set an example for other states, Newsom said. He hopes blue states will respond to red-state redistricting in kind. While the plan shifts redistricting power to the government, Newsom emphasized it ultimately empowers voters. California's process will be transparent and public, unlike Texas's more private approach. Voters will see the proposed maps before casting ballots and have the final say on their adoption. 'We are about to get power back to the people. You have, on Nov. 4 in California, the power to stand up to Trump. You have the power to declare that you support a system that is not rigged." Who among California's elected officials support the Election Rigging Response Act? California Senators Alex Padilla and Adam Schiff both spoke at the conference in support of Newsom and the act. Padilla and Schiff agreed that California must fight against Donald Trump to defend democracy. Schiff said, 'You come after our votes in California, and we will fight you tooth and nail. Donald Trump, you do not poke the bear. Not while we are around.' Assembly member Isaac Bryan, member-elect of the California State Senate Sabrina Cervantes, and chairman of the House Democratic Caucus Pete Aguilar also gave speeches before Newsom's appearance. Cervantes said that if other states had established independent election committees like California's, this strategic redistricting would not be happening in red states. She also stated that the upcoming midterms could be the "last chance to check Trump's abuse of power." Who is not in support of the Election Rigging Response Act? In response to Newsom's announcement, Assemblywoman Alexandra Macedo, Vice Chair of the Assembly Committee on Elections, issued a statement calling the act a "power-grab" to make national headlines. 'Californians demand and deserve transparency from their government. Governor Newsom's sinister redistricting scheme is the opposite. There is no public input," read the statement. Additionally, Macedo said in the statement that Newsom is attempting to dismiss and take power away from the California Citizens Redistricting Commission. Who else spoke at Newsom's press conference? In addition to members of the California legislature, a series of speakers representing a diverse number of interest groups spoke at the press conference. Each speaker explained how different Americans could be affected if Republicans successfully take control of the House through redistricting measures. Jodie Hicks, president of Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California, spoke about the overturn of Roe v. Wade. She said that a federal abortion ban could happen if Republican states successfully redistrict to rig elections. To protect reproductive freedom, she said, fighting back with legislative redistricting is the answer. Hicks said, 'You take away our freedoms? We'll take away your seats.' Erika Jones, elementary school teacher and Secretary Treasurer of the California Teachers Association, spoke to how students are under the threat of ICE and Trump is defunding education. She said that, with more Republicans in the House, these conditions would worsen for her students. Lorena Gonzalez, president of the California Federation of Labor Unions, said that Trump is not pro-worker, and David Huerta, president of the Service Employees International Union, California, had a similar sentiment. He said that Republicans' goal is to silence working people and serve corporations. Huerta said, 'California voters must be allowed to save our democracy. And I trust that California voters will save our democracy.' When will the special election for the Election Rigging Response Act take place? Newsom called for a special election on Nov. 4, 2025, for voters to decide on the congressional maps before the 2026 midterms. These maps would remain through the 2030 elections. It would take a simple majority of voters to pass the redistricting act. What do California polls say about redistricting proposal? A recent POLITICO-Citrin Center-Possibility Lab poll shows that nearly two-thirds of Californians prefer to retain the independent commission, with only 36% supporting legislative control over redistricting. Newsom acknowledged the uphill battle but argued that 'inaction is not an option' if partisan gerrymandering continues unchecked in other states. What do current California congressional district maps look like? Sarah Sadhwani, commissioner from the California Redistricting Commission, spoke about how she drew the district lines that are currently in place. She claimed the maps are fair, nonpartisan, and competitive, but she said they must be redrawn to "level the playing field" in the next election cycle. Sadhwani said she is in support of Newsom's legislation 'with the expectation that this is a one-time occurrence. That this does not subvert the will of California.' See the current congressional district maps in California: Which California Congressional districts are represented by Republicans? California has 52 congressional districts, nine of which are currently represented by Republican congressmen: Doug LaMalfa, 1st Congressional District of California Kevin Kiley, 3rd Congressional District of California Tom McClintock, 5th Congressional District of California Vince Fong, 20th Congressional District of California David Valadao, 22nd Congressional District of California Jay Obernolte, 23rd Congressional District of California Young Kim, 40th Congressional District of California Ken Calvert, 41st Congressional District of California Darrell Issa, 48th Congressional District of California These lawmakers said in a joint statement in late July that they'd 'fight any attempt to disenfranchise California voters by whatever means necessary to ensure the will of the people continues to be reflected in redistricting and in our elections.' 'The Commission received feedback from tens of thousands of Californians as to their communities of interest, which shaped the current set of congressional districts,' they said. 'Districts that represent the local communities that they live in, rather than the whims of one political party. A partisan political gerrymander is NOT what the voters of California want, as they clearly stated when they passed the VOTERS FIRST Act and participated in the Citizens Redistricting Commission process.' This article originally appeared on Palm Springs Desert Sun: Newsom Announces Nov. 4 Vote on California Redistricting Plan
New York Post
28 minutes ago
- New York Post
The week in whoppers: Bernie Sanders defends Hamas, Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson's nutty hit on Trump and more
Diary of disturbing disinformation and dangerous delusions This response: CNN's Dana Bash, Sunday: 'Would you say that Hamas has some culpability in people starving?' Sen. Bernie Sanders: 'No.' Advertisement We say: Huh? Hamas started the war that's led to Gaza's suffering. It steals food from civilians. It could end the war, and food shortages, tomorrow — by releasing hostages and surrendering. But, no, per Sanders, the terror group has zero culpability for starvation in Gaza. What's wrong with this guy? Advertisement This remark: 'I don't want to hear about this bulls–t about what y'all's constitutions [say about redistricting].' — Rep. Marc Veasey (D-Texas), Saturday We say: Oops. In urging 'blue states' to ignore their constitutions' rules on redistricting and 'redraw [GOPers'] asses out,' Veasey accidentally confirmed what Republicans have long charged: Democrats don't care about law and democracy; they just want power. And will do whatever it takes to get it, legal or not. Advertisement This claim: 'Trump . . . has always been intimidated by the intellectual prowess of black men.' — Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson, Wednesday We say: Wow, Johnson sure pulled this out of nowhere — except maybe his own obsessions with race. Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters Advertisement Anyway, Trump took a bullet and never lost a beat, was hit with 91 criminal charges plus a civil fine of nearly a half billion bucks — and won the presidency decisively. He doesn't seem 'intimidated' by anyone. This statement: 'Frankly, I don't care if al-Sharif was in Hamas or not.' — Foreign Press Association president Ian Williams, Tuesday We say: Williams only cares that Anas al-Sharif was a journalist, as if that makes a crime out of the IDF attack that killed him. As for Israel saying he was a Hamas member, Williams blurs that 'Hamas is a political organization — as well as a terrorist organization, perhaps.' Perhaps? Hamas massacred 1,200 innocent Israelis in a single day; there's no doubt it's a terrorist group, and al-Sharif was fair game. — Compiled by The Post Editorial Board
New York Post
28 minutes ago
- New York Post
Polls show what Trump knew — the Jeffrey Epstein saga is an elite obsession
One month ago, Jeffrey Epstein appeared to be the most important electoral player in the United States of America. Judging by mainstream media coverage, podcast chatter, and the comments of politicians on both the left and the right, you'd have thought nothing was more important than the saga of the deceased sexual predator: CNN mentioned Epstein 2,220 times over the last four weeks; MSNBC, 2,871. And no wonder: It was a way to smear President Donald Trump, after his administration declined to release (despite his campaign promise to do so) what have come to known as 'the Epstein files.' Advertisement Trump's term was finished, his coalition fractured, his agenda terminated, shouted pundits from both extremes, after Trump himself dismissed the frenzy as a 'hoax' based on crackpot-generated hype. But the hysterics were wrong. Advertisement Even as the brouhaha was at its height, polling showed the Epstein story was more of a tempest in a Twitter teacup than an actual concern of the American people. And now it's clear that once again Trump was right — not just about the feelings of his most ardent supporters, but about those of the country at large. CNN reported this week that Google searches for 'Epstein' are down 89% from three weeks ago — and that it's no longer the top term input alongside 'Donald Trump.' 'This is, from at least a political point of view, quickly turning into a dud of a story,' the network's Harry Enten noted. Advertisement Meanwhile, Trump's approval rating has held steady, and is significantly better than it was in August of 2017. And the percentage of Americans who say the Epstein case is America's 'top issue'? That number in CNN's latest poll was a grand total of . . . zero. Once again, Trump knew better than the pundits and podcasters and politicians — because he knows why his base voted for him. He knows this country isn't truly thirsty for a fictional Epstein list, but for a real shot at the American Dream for the hardest-working Americans. Advertisement Trump won the 2024 election not with cultural or symbolic issues like releasing Epstein's client list, but on a policy agenda of using the tools at the government's disposal to protect the value of labor. He promised to end the free flow of illegal immigrants through the southern border, millions of whom secured jobs that drove down the wages of working-class Americans — and he immediately did it. More than 1 million foreign-born workers have exited the workforce since January, a recent study found, while 2.5 million native-born Americans entered it. Turns out, they were taking American jobs. As a result, the wages of blue-collar Americans have already started to climb, which makes perfect sense — a tight labor market is always good for workers. Similarly, Trump's tariff program will incentivize the return of US manufacturing, a stick to prod the corporations whose offshoring destroyed entire Rust Belt counties to reinvest in the American worker. Who cares about Jeffrey Epstein when you have more money in your pocket each month? The elites, that's who. The Epstein scandal is a luxury belief shared by podcasters who make money off content and Democrats who want Trump to fail. (Oh, and Hunter Biden, whose continued accusations could earn him a defamation lawsuit courtesy of Melania Trump.) Advertisement It's the equivalent of climate activists blocking traffic or Nancy Pelosi kneeling in kente cloth after George Floyd was killed — something the privileged engage in because they have no real-world problems to worry about. Democrats hemorrhaged working-class voters for decades as they catered to their base of over-credentialed college-educated elites. They adopted a series of policies that actively harmed the working class — like open borders that slashed blue-collar wages, or climate standards that drove up the cost of driving and powering homes, or Defund the Police, which sentenced working-class people to live with rising crime. Advertisement They could do all this because the well-off were immune from the negative consequences of the Democrats' bad policies, and sometimes even benefited from them. The same is happening on the right, but in reverse: Podcasters who make loads of money off viral, conspiratorial content are immune to the positive consequences of Trump's economic policy — ergo the luxury of obsessing over Jeffrey Epstein. Many Americans are still feeling the squeeze of inflation, and the effects of some Trump decisions remain to be seen. Advertisement Yet in the last eight months the southern border has been closed, corporations and foreign countries have committed trillions to US manufacturing, Iran has lost its nuclear capabilities for years to come, criminals are being deported, trans athletes are being kicked out of girls' sports, and peace in Eastern Europe could be on the way. Jeffrey who? Batya Ungar-Sargon is the author of 'Second Class: How the Elites Betrayed America's Working Men and Women.'
