Cafes, small businesses fear brunt of surcharge cut
The exercise could become even trickier after the Reserve Bank of Australia proposed to remove surcharges on EFTPOS, Mastercard and Visa card transactions, which could save consumers $1.2 billion a year.
But the inner-Sydney cafe owner feels small businesses have been left out of the equation.
Every cent counts with a necessary $12,000-$15,000 a year collected through surcharges on the volume of sales Mr Low's cafe does.
"There's nothing that is actually cheap for us," he told AAP.
"There has to be one way that is actually to help us substitute it out
"There's no way for us to absorb the cost anymore ... and the last thing we want is to jack up the prices for customers."
Lowering the cap on interchange fees - another RBA recommendation - could save the sector $1.2 billion.
The fee is paid by a business to a customer's card issuer when a transaction occurs.
But for Mr Low - who rattled off a list of exorbitant expenses ranging from electricity, wages and insurance - the expected changes could have an impact.
Small business owners face the same inflationary pressures that have hit consumers in recent years, he said.
The cafe's margins have taken a hit as workers come into the city less frequently and residential buildings eat up spaces.
The peak hospitality body also slammed the RBA's decision, saying it does not go far enough to help small businesses out.
"To put it bluntly, it's a political fix – not a solution," Australian Hotels Association chief executive Stephen Ferguson said.
"The RBA policy to ban surcharges just covers up the problem."
But RMIT academic Angel Zhong was more upbeat, arguing the changes would overhaul an outdated transaction system and foster competition in payment services.
"Small businesses stand to gain significantly from both the surcharge ban and interchange fee caps," she said.
"With lower processing costs and simplified pricing, they can focus on serving customers rather than navigating complex payment fees."
Dr Zhong warned "the transition needs careful monitoring" and it remains to be seen if and when actual savings filter down to businesses and consumers.
Following news of the proposed changes, three-quarters of more than 3000 customers surveyed by financial comparison site Canstar said the fees should be banned.
A survey of more than 1000 people commissioned by Visa earlier in July reported 85 per cent would prefer surcharges be built into upfront prices rather than charged separately.
The payments provider said reducing interchange fees risked hampering local investment in fraud protection.
"This is a dramatic shift that would have ripple effects far beyond payments," Visa Oceania manager Alan Machet said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
21 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
RBA 'made a mistake' with shock interest rate hold, KPMG's Brendan Rynne declares after unemployment rate rises in June
A leading economist has torn into the Reserve Bank of Australia's recent decision to hold the cash rate after it was revealed the unemployment rate rose in June. Fresh data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics showed the unemployment rate rose 0.2 per cent to 4.3 per cent after it sat near historic lows following the pandemic. The unemployment rate is a critical piece of data for the RBA's cash rate decision, and a rise would typically mean the central bank would lower rates. After the central bank held the cash rate at 3.85 per cent, despite money markets overwhelmingly factoring in a 0.25 per cent cut, many lashed out over the shock decision. The fresh jobs data led to heightened backlash, with KPMG's chief economist Brendan Rynne joining the chorus during an appearance on Sky News Business Now. "I think they made a mistake in keeping the cash rate at 3.85 per cent," Mr Rynne said. "The risk associated with dropping that cash rate down - in terms of getting an inflation bounce compared to providing some support into the private side of the economy - we think that risk trade-off is one that should have been associated with the dropping the cash rate down to 3.6 per cent. "In the next meeting, we know that the Reserve Bank was saying it's not a matter of if rates are going to drop, it's just going to be a matter when rates drop. "We fully expect now that 25 basis points to come off at the next meetings." After holding the rate earlier this month, RBA governor Michele Bullock said the decision was due to "timing" as it awaited further data on inflation. 'The board decided to wait a few weeks to confirm that we're still on track to meet our inflation and employment objectives," she told reporters after the decision. Mr Rynne predicted annual trimmed mean inflation - the middle 70 per cent of price changes core to the RBA's decision - would come in a 2.5 per cent for the June quarter, which is in the RBA's target band. He did forecast headline inflation - which examines everything in the ABS' consumer price index - will shift as government rebates phase out. "Headline inflation will bounce over the remainder of this year, coming back up a little as the full effect of the electricity rebates and cost of living rebates start to roll off," "Notwithstanding those, we do think that that inflation is still pretty weak, particularly goods inflation, and it's going to be that further rolling off of services inflation that's going bring it down in total." If the RBA had cut rates in July, it would have been the first consecutive rate cut since the central bank delivered an emergency cut in 2020 during the onset of the pandemic. Every major bank forecasted a 25 basis point cut in July while money markets at one pointed priced in a 99 per cent chance of a cut. If the RBA is to cut rates in August, it will be the third rate cut this year and will bring the cash rate down to 3.6 per cent.
News.com.au
2 hours ago
- News.com.au
Surprise detail after run down Rhodes house sold by development holdout couple for $8m
A pair of Sydney property owners have turned a portion of their multimillion-dollar property portfolio into cold, hard cash after they finally sold a tiny red-brick home that developers have yearned after for years for a whopping $8.1m. Veteran real estate agent Vanessa Kim, who was tasked with selling the Rhodes property, told NewsWire she had never observed a sale quite like this one. 'Before we put the property on the market, I thought maybe only developers would be interested,' Ms Kim said. 'After I did some advertising, we had people from all different kinds of backgrounds messaging about the house.' Ms Kim said aged care companies, fitness centres, childcare groups and even a church group were interested in the plot of land, which sits nestled in between three skyscrapers 'because of the location'. While Ms Kim was unable to provide the name of the buyers, it has been reported by other outlets that a hotel is slated to be constructed on the site after the home is demolished. It is understood the developers who constructed Rhodes Central, the large shopping centre that looms over the left-hand side of the minuscule property, made an offer to the owners, Yuen Yee Lai and John Kwong Lee, when the centre was still a construction project in the mid-2010s. The owners told developers they could have the property for $20m and, understandably, the developers declined the offer. As more large developments began to pop up around the property, it began to accumulate in value, eventually garnering a large amount of interest from several prospective buyers by the time it re-entered the market in early 2025. When the auction was held on Saturday, around 170 people attended to see how much the place would eventually go for, and which of the eight bidders would seal the deal. The house was auctioned off with an $8.1 million price-tag to a 'hotel business' according to Ms Kim, but data shows the home to be a mere fraction of the value of Mr Lee and Ms Lai's property portfolio. According to RP Data, the pair own five properties across the inner-west and the City of Sydney, not including the recently-sold Rhodes house. Two apartments in Rhodes, a manor house in Strathfield, a high-rise apartment in Haymarket and a waterfront apartment in Barangaroo make up the enviable portfolio, which according to value estimates from CoreLogic and realEstimate, could have a combined worth of up to $14.25 million. All of the properties owned by the pair were purchased between 2009 and 2014, and have been steadily accumulating value over the last decade. The Strathfield home was one of the earliest purchases made by the former owners of the Rhodes house, and estimates suggest its value has tripled since it was bought for $2.7 million in December 2009. The decadent red-brick mini-mansion sports a two-car garage, well-trimmed hedges, a pool in the backyard and a large open-plan kitchen, dining and living area which backs onto the rear end of the property. The second feather in the pair's expensive cap is the Barangaroo property – a waterfront-facing apartment which peers over the Wharf's famous Wulugul Walk. Purchased for $940,000 in 2014, the luxury apartment is now estimated to be worth almost $2 million. A post which reported the sale of 16 Walker Street on r/AusPropertyChat went viral earlier in the week, with over 115 commenters weighing in on the once-in-a-lifetime purchase. 'The seller is so lucky. They'll be set for life,' said one user. 'I knew this one had development potential, but I'd estimated about 4 mil,' said another. 'It's a smallish block and very heavily overshadowed. i thought the ability to get a good return from apartments there would be limited.'
Perth Now
2 hours ago
- Perth Now
The debt burden stalking Aussies in retirement
More and more Australians are delaying retirement as the dream of home ownership becomes a nightmare at the end of their working life. The number owning their home outright has halved in the past 20 years, census data shows, while the proportion of over-65 households with a mortgage has more than tripled. Home price increases have outstripped wage growth for decades, delaying the average age of home ownership and leaving some with mortgage debt greater than their superannuation nest egg at retirement. "We're going to see this continued pressure on people working for longer because the next generation, their mortgages are even bigger than the last generation," Digital Finance Analytics founder Martin North tells AAP. "There is an increasingly large cohort of people who are still sitting on very large mortgages in retirement and that has been building." Housing costs were by far the leading reason over-60s contacted the National Debt Helpline's chat service last financial year, with one in three users feeling the pain from mortgage payments, council rates, rent or strata costs. The number of households delaying retirement because of their mortgage liability tripled to 51,000 in the past five years, according to Mr North's data. Australians are also borrowing against their home to pay for renovations, trips or giving their children a boost into the housing market via the 'bank of mum and dad'. Debt restructuring, reverse mortgages and unplanned factors like sudden illness, death or divorce also leave retirees in tough positions. Some people are working later in life because as a whole they're fitter but the correlation between retirement delay and increased debt stress can't be ignored, Mr North says. "People are postponing retirement because they've still got this mortgage debt overhanging and they're concerned about how they're going to actually service it." Using superannuation to pay down debt and hang onto equity has become increasingly popular but this ultimately counteracts one of super's core intentions - to take pressure off the taxpayer-funded Age Pension. A co-ordinated, multi-level government approach would be required to reverse the trend, which, for now, is hamstrung by a circle of blame, Mr North says. "Federal government blames the states for lack of housing supply, everybody blames the Reserve Bank for putting interest rates up and interest rates are high because the inflation surged after the government handed out lots of money," he explains. "Nobody really wants to take responsibility and this is another classic example where there are unintended consequences of a generation or two of bad policy, which included negative gearing, which included extended low interest rates, first time buyer grants, Home Builder, all the other stuff that was thrown into the system. "None of this actually helps." Around one in five Australians are still paying off mortgages in retirement, National Seniors Australia estimates. The organisation's chief executive Chris Grice also notes the trend of tapping into superannuation to pay down debt, which often leaves retirees in a poorer position to fund services like private health insurance. "It's not unusual to have someone paying $4000 or $5000 a year for private health and as you get older you want to maintain that," he says. "Let alone insurance costs for home insurance and car insurance and the rest." Downsizing is a common goal but a lack of suitable housing stock and transaction costs like stamp duty mean many retirees are wary of selling. "If you're going to downsize, you're going to go into something that actually is fit for purpose to allow you to age in place," Mr Grice says. With 710,000 Australians expected to retire in the next four years, public policy settings which don't lock retirees in the big family home are essential, Retirement Living Council executive director Daniel Gannon says. "Retirement villages are part of the solution to accommodate this silver tsunami of ageing Australians," he tells AAP. "On average, the cost of a retirement village home is 41 per cent cheaper than the median house price in the same suburb - easing the financial burden and freeing up equity to support a secure retirement that older Australians deserve." The Council is calling for an increase to the Age Pension Assets threshold, an end to roadblocks for retirees who "rightsize" into retirement villages and for the housing type to be included in the Home Equity Access Scheme. According to Solace Financial principal and adviser Scott Quinlan, carrying mortgage debt into retirement puts pressure on retirees' ability to pay for essentials but also impacts quality of life, lifestyle flexibility and long-term financial security. "If they have superannuation, they could withdraw some of their superannuation to pay off the debt," he says. "The other way to go is keep your money in superannuation and then keep your debt, hoping the superannuation will earn a better rate of return than what your mortgage is but that is more of a risky strategy." Prioritising debt repayment is crucial to financial stability in retirement and while reverse mortgages could help provide income for living and healthcare costs, retirees have to consider risks such as high fees and potentially having less inheritance to leave behind.
