A Watchdog Group Told People to Not Buy Maine Lobster. Now It's Facing a Lawsuit.
A lawsuit related to Maine's lobster industry is no longer stuck in the claws of the legal system.
A federal judge recently ruled that the Maine Lobstermen's Association and others can proceed with their defamation suit against the nonprofit Seafood Watch, The New York Times reported on Monday. The lobstermen's group initially sued the nonprofit, which is run by the Monterey Bay Aquarium, almost two years ago, following Seafood Watch's downgrading of Maine lobster from yellow to red in its sustainability ratings.
More from Robb Report
The Couple Behind N.Y.C.'s Hit Restaurants Dame and Lord's Opens a New Seafood Spot
This Beloved N.Y.C. Restaurant Is Reportedly Being Forced Out to Make Room for Prada
Chef Michael White Returns to N.Y.C. With a New Modern Italian Restaurant
'This ruling is a crucial step in holding the Monterey Bay Aquarium accountable for misleading statements that have unfairly targeted our industry,' Patrice McCarron, the executive director of the Maine Lobstermen's Association, said in a statement. 'Maine lobstermen have been stewards of the ocean for generations, and we are committed to defending our livelihood against baseless claims.'
Back in 2022, Seafood Watch changed the sustainability rating for American lobsters caught off Maine, telling consumers that they should no longer buy the crustaceans, the Times noted. At the time, the nonprofit said that the fishing gear used to catch lobsters was posing a threat to endangered North Atlantic right whales. Around the same time, the Marine Stewardship Council similarly announced that it was no longer considering Maine lobster sustainable because of those fishing-gear issues.
However, the fishermen suing Seafood Watch say that the group's rating was based on irrelevant and outdated data, and that the industry has worked to modify its gear, The New York Times wrote. They also say that the rating downgrade led some customers to cancel their contracts and the average price of a pound of lobster to fall 40 percent.
'Reputation and goodwill cannot be adequately replaced through awarding damages and this injury lingers as long as the 'red listing' does,' Judge John A. Woodcock Jr. wrote in his decision.
In response to Woodcock Jr.'s ruling, Seafood Watch has filed an appeal, the Times reported. The Monterey Bay Aquarium said in a statement cited by the newspaper that the lawsuit should be dismissed according to a Maine law meant to protect free speech.
For now, though, the Maine Lobstermen's Association will proceed with its fight against Seafood Watch, in the hopes that the nonprofit will amend its rating of Maine lobster. As we gear up for the summer season, lobster-roll lovers will likely be watching closely to see how the rest of the case plays out.
Best of Robb Report
Why a Heritage Turkey Is the Best Thanksgiving Bird—and How to Get One
9 Stellar West Coast Pinot Noirs to Drink Right Now
The 10 Best Wines to Pair With Steak, From Cabernet to Malbec
Click here to read the full article.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
36 minutes ago
- Axios
Exclusive: Bub and Pop's will soon reopen in NoMa with spiked sodas and bowling
Beloved sandwich shop Bub and Pop's will soon open in a new, larger location in NoMa after a decade-plus in Dupont Circle, the owner exclusively tells Axios. Why it matters: Bub's seemingly abrupt shutter last week sparked fear of a permanent closure among its fanbase, but don't worry — the new version in the former Eleanor space promises to be bigger and better than ever. State of play: Chef/owner Jon Taub tells Axios he's aiming to open in about two weeks. He's keeping the bones of the Eleanor's barcade, meaning plenty of room to settle in with a beer and play throwback games or duck pin bowling. And the core menu of Philly-style hoagies and cheesesteaks will live on, as will the " Lil' Petey" sandwich-eating challenge. Dig in: Taub tells Axios he's looking forward to expanding the offerings — with plenty of nostalgic nods to his favorite hometown Philly spots. A custom soda fountain inspired by Nifty Fifty's will turn out egg creams, floats and malts, which customers can spike with booze (also look for wine, Champagne and beer). Taub is working on a new pizza menu, as well as fun bar snacks for game days. Diners will also have a few lighter options for times when a huge Italian hoagie or braised beef brisket sandwich won't fly. Context: Taub says the move has been in the works for a while after their landlord decided to double the rent on the small, mostly takeout shop. "It would have shuttered our business overnight," he says. The landlord filed an eviction lawsuit earlier this year, seeking nearly $250,000 in unpaid rent and fees, which Taub tells Axios is erroneous, and that they've been "following legal counsel" since. Between the lines: Taub has been making his own breads and hoagie rolls for a year-plus — which, along with homemade pickles and sauces, sets Bub's apart. Now he's upping the game with a new Polin oven. "It's how Angelo's in Philly achieves that perfect crust and bronze color," he says. All of the homemade accoutrements will be available to take away. "I know Trader Joe's is right down the street, but I wanted people to be able to come home with a container of our marinara and have a nice dinner."
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
How a female Ukrainian hacker exposed a botched SEC case against day traders
A Ukrainian hacker who was held at gunpoint by a gang of cocaine-sniffing cybercriminals helped the Securities and Exchange Commission blow the lid of of a high-profile breach case that had wrongly accused American day traders, according to a report. Olga Kuprina, known by her online persona 'Ghost in the Shell,' became a whistleblower for the federal agency in the shocking cyberattack that infiltrated the SEC's Edgar filing system in 2016, Bloomberg News reported on Monday. Surrounded by cocaine, laptops and armed men, Kuprina was trapped by a local crime boss, Artem Radchenko, in her Kyiv apartment and ordered to hack perhaps the world's biggest repository of corporate filings, according to the outlet. Advertisement Radchenko allegedly hoped to sell unpublished filings for $200,000 apiece. 4 Kuprina was known by her online persona 'Ghost in the Shell.' Instagram/sky31337 But as the doped-up Radchenko barked commands at Kuprina, she plotted her escape — desperate to return to her 7-year-old daughter and expose the cybercrime, according to Bloomberg News. Advertisement When she demanded payment for the hack, Radchenko allegedly broke her nose and refused to allow her to leave, according to Bloomberg News. Kuprina, 34, later fled, contacted US authorities, and turned over hard drives and handwritten notes proving how she had accessed the SEC data. 'There were so many vulnerabilities there you cannot f–king imagine,' she told investigators. Edgar, she said, was an outdated, patched-together system that hadn't been properly secured in years. Kuprina, who had also hacked Citigroup, Nasdaq, Dow Jones and NASA, signed a plea deal with the feds and fled to the US in 2018, leaving her mother and daughter behind. Advertisement 4 Olga Kuprina is a Ukrainian hacker who turned whistleblower. Instagram/sky31337 In 2019, the SEC wrongfully scapegoated American day traders who were accused of pocketing $4.1 million from insider trades linked to the massive cyberattack that breached the Edgar filing system. It turns out those Americans may have simply been guilty of making smart, lucky bets. 'Today's action shows the SEC's commitment and ability to unravel these schemes and identify the perpetrators even when they operate from outside our borders,' the agency's head of enforcement said in a press release. Advertisement Sungjin Cho, a Los Angeles-based day trader, was startled to find federal agents banging on his door before dawn. They confiscated his devices, grilled him about foreign hackers, and accused him of profiting off stolen data. 'I don't know what we were expecting to find, but he didn't seem like a high-rolling criminal at all,' one FBI agent told Bloomberg News. Kuprina's cooperation with US authorities would reveal a months-long breach of the SEC's core system — and upend the agency's narrative. What the SEC didn't say in its official version of events was that the breach of Edgar had lasted far longer than publicly acknowledged — and had been exposed not by agency sleuthing but by Kuprina. Despite her central role in exposing the breach — and continuing to download documents as late as March 2017 — Kuprina wasn't mentioned in the SEC's complaint. 4 In 2019, the SEC brought charges against US traders over a hack that was perpetrated by Ukrainian cybercriminals, according to a report. Christopher Sadowski Instead, the commission zeroed in on Cho and his associates: David Kwon, a friend who traded through Cho's accounts, and Ivan Olefir, a Ukrainian client connected to Cho's trading firm. While the three made trades that aligned with earnings announcements, investigators found no direct evidence they had been in contact with the hackers, nor that they ever knowingly received stolen documents. Advertisement Still, the SEC charged them, citing high win rates on earnings trades and circumstantial connections. The Department of Justice, which was conducting a parallel criminal probe, ultimately declined to prosecute the traders — a move that signaled doubts about the strength of the case, Bloomberg News reported. Cho maintained that he and his colleagues were simply tracking unusual trading activity — looking for signs that others had inside information, then piggybacking on their bets. 'Any earnings or any market-moving announcement…there will always be some leak,' Cho told investigators. Advertisement 4 Gorodenkoff – 'And if you could detect that movement, that's the strategy.' Critics say the SEC needed a win — and chose easy targets. The agency faced pressure to respond after being hacked itself, and rather than focus on the Ukrainian masterminds still at large, it trained its firepower on traders who were within reach. In the end, Cho settled for $175,000 — a fraction of what the SEC claimed he made. He did not admit wrongdoing, but under SEC rules, he is not allowed to publicly say he's innocent either. Advertisement 'I'm not allowed to say I'm innocent, but I'll give you all the facts and people can decide for themselves,' he later said. In 2020, Kuprina pleaded guilty to federal charges related to Edgar and five other hacks, according to Bloomberg. She served a short jail stint before being released as she cooperated with investigators. A judge sentenced her to time served in 2023 in recognition of her cooperation, according to Bloomberg. Advertisement The skilled hacker now works for cybersecurity company Recorded Future Inc. — and was reunited with her mother and daughter, who were flown out of war-torn Ukraine by the US government. Meanwhile, hackers like Radchenko are still at large. And the SEC's Edgar system, though updated in parts, remains vulnerable according to cybersecurity experts. The Post has sought comment from the SEC, Kuprina, Cho and Kwon.
Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
Donald Trump's plan for pirate mining
On April 24, President Trump issued another questionable executive order, this one calling for deep-sea mining in both federal and international waters. The former is within his control; the latter would be a violation of international law. Although the U.S. is not a signatory to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea — the 1982 treaty ratified by 169 other nations that regulates maritime activities, including deep-sea mining, on and in the high seas — the U.S. has always abided by it. Until now. 'You know we're sometimes an outlier on things like the Law of the Sea treaty,' says Rep. Jared Huffman (D-San Rafael), ranking member on the House Natural Resources Committee. 'And what [Trump's] doing with deep-sea mining is just making us even more of a lone ranger, if not a pariah.' Global mining consortiums have been eyeing mineral-rich nodules on the ocean floor since the 1970s. Sometimes as large as potatoes, the nodules form around a hard nucleus, such as a grain of sand or a shark's tooth, accumulating minerals out of seawater and sediment over millions of years in the deep benthic zone, the least-studied of the ocean's fragile ecosystems. Given the limits of 20th century technology, mining two to three miles below the ocean's surface proved commercially impractical, to the relief of environmentalists and oceanographers. But a bad idea that promises quick returns never gets old. Today, tech-driven mining corporations, such as the Metals Company of Canada, known as TMC, are leading the way back into the deep. The UN's International Seabed Authority, established under the Law of the Sea treaty, has granted TMC and other companies exploratory permits for deep-sea mining. Using massive mother ships, the companies deploy tank-tread 'robotic excavators' (essentially, underwater bulldozers) or giant vacuum crawlers connected to pipes, pumps and miles of power cable. The Metals Company alone has recovered 4,500 tons of nodules. Now, TMC and the Trump administration are claiming that a novel interpretation of an obscure American law allows the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to issue commercial mining permits in waters the rest of the world considers outside American jurisdiction. In 1960, U.S. Navy Capt. Don Walsh was one of the first two humans to reach the deepest part of the ocean — the so-called Challenger Deep — along with Jacques Piccard, who piloted their bathysphere. Two years before Walsh died in 2023, he explained why opening large swaths of international waters to deep-sea mining would be a mistake. 'It's kind of like clear-cutting the forest,' Walsh told me. 'It doesn't differentiate between the ore and the things that live on the seafloor. And these are organisms that take thousands of years to populate an area. So, I can't support awarding mining permissions or licenses to areas that have not been carefully studied.' That's also the assessment of more than 900 marine scientists and policy experts from 70 nations who have signed a statement urging the United Nations to hold off on licensing mining operations 'that could result in the loss of biodiversity and ecosystem functioning.' What we don't know about the deep ocean is astonishing. Just last year, a paper in the journal Nature showed that the nodule-covered seafloor in a 1.7-million-square-mile area between Hawaii and Mexico — where mining companies are already exploring — was producing 'dark oxygen.' Until that revelation, scientists had considered sunlight, for photosynthesis, essential for ocean oxygen. The 'huge' discovery, as described by the lead researcher, needs more study. Understanding the dark oxygen process could translate into the ability to sustain life on other planets or remake our understanding of how life began on Earth. Mining the seabed raises other concerns besides the need to preserve dark oxygen. The oceans are a carbon sink. If the sediments are constantly stirred up, as they would be in mining, we 'may be reintroducing that carbon back into the water column — and then ultimately back into the atmosphere,' NOAA Administrator Rick Spinrad cautioned me back when he ran the agency in 2023. His remarks stand in sharp contrast to the headline on a recent fawning news release from the current NOAA — ''The next gold rush': President Trump unlocks access to critical deep seabed minerals' — and its subhead: 'Historic executive order will boost economic growth, support national security.' The mining companies like to argue that scraping the bottom of the deep ocean is itself a climate solution and can be accomplished with appropriate ecosystem safeguards. The nodules are rich in manganese, copper, nickel and cobalt, key constituents of battery-powered clean energy, such as EVs. 'You've got to have a planetary perspective,' the Metal Company's chief scientist Greg Stone insists, but critics question the environmental vision of the mining industry. Thirty-three nations, including France and New Zealand, have called for a moratorium on deep-sea mining until the world's largest habitat is better understood. Corporate customers including Google, Samsung, Philips, Volvo and BMW have pledged to keep deep-sea minerals out of their electric cars and other products. The United States during the Biden administration supported a take-it-slow approach. Deep-sea mining 'is not ready for prime time,' Monica Medina, assistant secretary of State for oceans and international environmental and scientific affairs, told me two years ago. For the present, Trump's Secretary of State Marco Rubio is retaining that post but not that policy position. Like Trump's America, China and India have shown keen interest in quickly bringing commercial mining operations to the planet's last physical frontier. The tiny Pacific Island nation of Nauru, which has a contract with the Metals Company, has been pushing the Seabed Authority to finalize its deep-sea regulations and issue commercial permits. Under Trump's executive order, the United States is barreling ahead regardless, circumventing the Law of the Sea and the best advice of scientists who are pleading for a better understanding of what dredging the sea floor could destroy or unleash. On the high seas in the 21st century, the U.S. may prove to be the world's newest pirate threat. David Helvarg is the executive director of Blue Frontier, an ocean policy group. He co-hosts 'Rising Tide: The Ocean Podcast.'
