The Science Council of Japan Has Failed — Now Shut It Down
The Lower House Cabinet Committee approved the latest reform bill targeting the SCJ on May 9. Proposing turning the SCJ into a government-supported independent corporation, it received support from the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), Komeito, and Nippon Ishin no Kai. However, rather than resolve the Council's chronic problems, the bill merely rebrands a broken institution.
Despite receiving nearly ¥1 billion JPY ($46.4 million USD) in annual public funding, the SCJ has failed to contribute meaningfully to national priorities or public needs. When Japan needed scientific clarity on matters such as the Fukushima ALPS treated water release or Russia's invasion of Ukraine, the Council offered no meaningful guidance.
Takaaki Kajita, former SCJ president and Nobel laureate, admitted during Diet testimony on May 7 that the Council failed to issue a clear position.
"There were no special requests from the government for deliberation before the policy was decided," Kajita said. He further acknowledged that while most members agreed with the International Atomic Energy Agency's assessment of safety, the Council did not make that position public.
In 2020, then-Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga refused to appoint six of the SCJ's recommended nominees, citing concerns over its ideological uniformity and the lack of transparency in the selection process. This triggered backlash from academics and opposition parties, but it also exposed how insular and partisan the SCJ had become.
The concern deepened in April 2024, when, during an SCJ general meeting, an unnamed member voiced anxiety about the 2025 reform bill. While staying anonymous, the member warned that "people on the right will start joining the Council." LDP Diet member Hitoshi Kikawada reported this quote during a Diet session on May 7, 2025. Chairperson of the National Public Safety Commission Manabu Sakai answers questions at the House of Representatives Cabinet Committee. May 9.
Responding, SCJ's former president Kajita tried to defend the Council's diversity, stating: "We considered diversity in the selection process. The presence of members with a range of views is a strength." However, as Kikawada pointed out, the very fact that such comments were made shows that "certain individuals have been excluding those with differing views."
Nippon Ishin no Kai member Keie Miki also condemned the internal SCJ remark. "Whether someone leans left or right shouldn't matter. Science progresses precisely because it includes a variety of perspectives," she stated on May 9 during the Cabinet Committee hearing.
Critics of the bill claim it endangers academic independence. One of the loudest voices has been Sayaka Oki, a University of Tokyo professor specializing not in science, but in the history of science.
On social media, Oki accused the government of trying to "dismantle" the SCJ. She also warned that Japan might follow Russia's path, where President Vladimir Putin allegedly muzzled scientists and rewrote history education ahead of his invasion of Ukraine.
Oki's claims were swiftly criticized in the media and online. Scholar and commentator Yosuke Naito likened Oki and the SCJ to the palm tree in Russian writer Vsevolod Garshin's short story Attalea Princeps. As it grows proudly in a greenhouse, the tree mocks the lowly shrubs, only to wither when it breaks through the glass ceiling and is confronted with the real world.
Cabinet Minister Manabu Sakai, who oversees the SCJ legislation, has repeatedly stated that the bill aims to "fundamentally strengthen the SCJ's independence and self-governance." Yet the bill retains ¥1 billion in annual public funding and creates new government-appointed roles: auditors and evaluators.
Meanwhile, six former SCJ presidents — led by Kiyoshi Hirose — issued a joint statement in February 2024 demanding the bill's withdrawal.
Yet Hirose's own political neutrality came into question when MP Keie Miki revealed that Hirose had previously appeared on Japanese Communist Party platforms and endorsed unified opposition candidates. "Including his name on such a statement shows the Council's lack of self-discipline," Miki remarked.
In its early days, the SCJ was guided by a postwar vision of using science for peace. But in recent years, it has been more notable for what it won't do: no clear statements on security threats, no serious contributions to dual-use technology debates, and an outdated refusal to engage in any military-related research, even if it is for peace in an age of Chinese expansionism and North Korean missile threats. Science Council of Japan. Minato Ward, Tokyo (©Sankei by Ikue Mio)
The SCJ has become a publicly funded platform for ideological activism. It offers little scientific contribution to national policy and no accountability to the public. Unfortunately, the proposed reforms are merely cosmetic. What Japan needs isn't a rebranded council — it needs a clean break.
If scientists want to express opinions or form associations, they are free to do so in the private sector, without demanding public money. But taxpayers should not be made to fund an insular, partisan group that sees itself as above scrutiny.
Let the Science Council be dissolved, and allow real science to flourish without political baggage.
Author: Daniel Manning
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Japan Forward
8 hours ago
- Japan Forward
How Japan's Generals Defended the Homeland Against the Soviet Invasion
August 15 marks the anniversary of the end of World War II. But 80 years ago that day, fighting still raged as the Soviet Union unilaterally declared war against Japan on August 8, 1945, and began its invasion the next day. One of those conflicts was the Battle of Shumshu Island, reported on August 10 in The Sankei Shimbun . Even after Japan accepted the Potsdam Declaration, the Soviet army pressed on with its invasion. In response, Lieutenant General Kiichiro Higuchi, commander of the 5th Army, ordered, "Resolutely counterattack and crush the landing forces." Shumshu Island, located at the northern tip of the Kuril Islands. After a fierce battle on Shumshu Island, located in the northeasternmost of the Kuril Islands, a ceasefire was reached, with Japan maintaining the upper hand. Also facing active aggression from Russia, Lieutenant General Hiroshi Nemoto, then commander of the army stationed in Mongolia, refused to disarm in the face of the Soviet army's continued advancement through Manchuria and China. General Nemoto's gravesite in Sukagawa, Fukushima Prefecture. (©Robert D Eldridge) While holding back their attacks, Nemoto protected Japanese civilians until the last group fled by train. It is said that the Soviet Union had plans to occupy the northern half of Hokkaido. Without such acts of self-defense, the very map of Japan might have been altered. This is a piece of history worth remembering on the 80th anniversary of the war's end. Author: The Sankei Shimbun (Read this in Japanese )
CTV News
14 hours ago
- CTV News
Israeli flag installed outside town hall in Hampstead, Que. stirs local debate
Outside the Hampstead Town Hall, the addition of the flag of Israel is raising concerns among some residents. The Israeli flag has flown outside Hampstead's town hall since October 2023 — and it's getting mixed reactions from residents of the Montreal suburb. Among them is 25-year-old Adam Ben David, who says the flag doesn't belong on the municipal property. 'I think it's inflammatory to have a foreign flag that is not representative of every single person in this community, which is very diverse,' he said in an interview. The flag replaced Hampstead's municipal banner, taking its place alongside the Canadian and Quebec flags. Mayor Jeremy Levi told CTV News the move was suggested by the town's then–director general and supported by council. 'Every other government across the world had done so,' Levi said. 'We never told the DG how to do it or to remove the Hampstead flag. If Hampstead residents feel so patriotic towards the Hampstead flag, we can always install a fourth flagpole — I just don't think it's a great use of resources.' Residents split on the issue For some residents, the flag is a symbol of solidarity, but for others it's an inappropriate political statement for municipal grounds. CTV News approached several people outside town hall and in a nearby park, but the vast majority declined to speak publicly. Among those who did, opinions were divided. One woman, who asked not to be identified, said she supports keeping the flag. She described it as a sign of support, acknowledging how many communities in the Middle East are going through tragic times. 'I see nothing wrong in putting it up because it's reflecting that there's something terrible going on in Israel and we're all in mourning for that situation, collectively,' she said. Sisters Keren and Bénédicte Paka, who have lived in Hampstead for two years, saw it differently. 'It's problematic because there are many international students here, international workers, Quebecers and other people — I don't think it has its place here,' said Keren. Bénédicte added: 'I think to make everyone feel comfortable, the flag should be taken down — so that each person feels free and not oppressed by one community or another.' While there's division, Levi has been clear that he will not remove the flag. 'It doesn't matter to me if there's two signatures or 2,000 signatures,' he wrote in a statement to CTV News. 'My position will not change.' He also said he has never received a formal complaint from residents about it and, on the contrary, has received 'many compliments.' Petition for flag removal Ben David began knocking on doors this summer to build support for removing the flag. He has gathered roughly 40 signatures so far and said he plans to continue canvassing as the weather cools. 'The Israeli flag represents a whole host of things: politically, religiously, ethnically,' Ben David said. 'In my opinion, it's unfair for the mayor to hoist it on behalf of 7,000 people — because a flag can incite all sorts of things: happiness and joy, but also fear and despair.' Ben David told CTV News that some residents who agreed with him refused to sign publicly. 'They're afraid of either being chastised by the mayor or other people in our community,' he said, emphasizing that 'it's an incredibly difficult time to be Jewish.' He also questioned why the flag needed to remain permanently. 'I don't understand why it has to be permanent considering that we are a diverse plurality here,' he said. For his part, Levi rejected the allegation that residents feared harassment. 'I have never harassed or shamed a private resident and would never do so,' Levi wrote, adding that he believed the petition was politically motivated ahead of municipal elections in less than three months. He said residents who want the flag removed should take it up with council, which holds the vote. He insisted he will 'never back down from supporting Israel and the Jewish community,' adding: 'If residents are unhappy with that position, November 2, 2025, is their chance to make a change.' It's a position Levi also made clear in a post on X in late July, in which he wrote: 'I will never take down the Israeli flag, if that's a problem for you, vote me out next election.' Despite him standing firm on the decision, others, like Ben David, say they intend to push forward with their demand for the flag to come down. Ben David said he intends to bring the matter to town council next week. With the latest census data showing about 40 per cent of Hampstead residents are not Jewish, the flag remains a lightning rod in the small, predominantly Jewish suburb.
Calgary Herald
17 hours ago
- Calgary Herald
Former Calgary councillor rewarded costs in court battle with development family
Article content Council amended its indemnification policy at its Feb. 8, 2021 meeting. Terrigno, in his lawsuit, argued that Farrell violated Section 172(1) of the MGA by voting for the amendment to be discussed in closed session at that meeting, claiming she had a pecuniary interest in the matter due to her use of the indemnity fund. Article content Angotti did concede in her memorandum of decision that 'it is undisputed' that Farrell had a pecuniary interest, but noted she had declared the conflict properly and abstained from voting on the amendment itself. Article content 'Ms. Farrell denies that she did or failed to do anything that violated the MGA, as she properly declared her pecuniary interest,' Angotti wrote. 'She believes that Mr. Terrigno is bringing this application for vindictive reasons or simply to obtain costs.' Article content After Farrell resigned from her council seat ahead of the 2021 election, the Terrignos sought a declaration that their application be deemed moot, because it would entitle them to apply to recover costs against Farrell. Article content In 2023, Justice Michel Bourque ruled the fact Farrell was no longer on council did not make the Terrignos' application to force her resignation moot. Article content But while Farrell will be awarded costs for the indemnification suit, the defamation action from the Terrignos against her remains active. Article content Mike Terrigno, in a statement Friday, said the family is pleased the judge's decision confirmed that Farrell 'breached her duties as a councillor in preferring her own financial interest over her duties to the public.' Article content He added he expects the defamation action against her to go to trial in 2026. Article content 'Our family is looking forward to having this matter behind us as it has caused serious harm to our family which is the basis of the lawsuit,' he wrote. Article content 'We are particularly concerned that taxpayer funds are being used to defend Ms. Farrell for her malicious and defamatory statements about our family although the whistle-blowers who have come forward to give evidence against her clearly remember the defamatory statements she made to them.' Article content Article content Striking the opposite tone, a statement from Farrell's legal counsel said Angotti's decision reflects that the former councillor's violation of the MGA was merely technical and committed in good faith. Article content 'The court dismissed all of Mr. Terrigno's many other allegations against her,' the statement read, noting that because Farrell was found to be the winning party, the court awarded costs against Terrigno for bringing this action in the first place. Article content 'Ms. Farrell will continue to defend herself against any and all claims that she acted inappropriately or allegations that she caused anyone damages.' Article content In early 2024, the Terrigno family resurrected their plans to develop on the site of their former restaurant in Kensington.
