Fed's policy rate should stay on hold for now, Schmid says
"With the economy still showing momentum, growing business optimism, and inflation still stuck above our objective, retaining a modestly restrictive monetary policy stance remains appropriate for the time being," Schmid said in remarks prepared for delivery to an economic development conference in Oklahoma. "While increased tariffs seem to be having a limited effect on inflation, I view this as a rationale for keeping policy on hold rather than an opportunity to ease the stance of policy."
Schmid said his "patient approach" to changing the policy rate, currently in the 4.25%-4.50% range, shouldn't be seen as a "wait and see" approach because he does not think that it will be clear in the next few months whether tariffs are pushing up on prices temporarily or persistently.
Rather, he said, he feels the current policy rate is not very far above the neutral rate, where activity is neither stimulated nor restrained, and the labor market is still looking solid despite a sharp drop in job growth in recent months.
And while the cooling labor market is keeping a lid on the pass-through of tariffs into inflation, boosting demand aggressively could raise the risk of an outsized increase in price pressures, Schmid said. "In my view, and in discussion with my contacts, growth remains solid, inflation remains too high, and therefore policy should remain modestly restrictive," he said. "That said, as I stated earlier, inflation is determined by the balance of supply and demand, and if I see indications that demand growth is weakening significantly, I will adjust my views accordingly."
(Reporting by Ann Saphir; Editing by Paul Simao)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Zawya
23 minutes ago
- Zawya
Fed more hamstrung by murky data than Trump interference: McGeever
(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.) ORLANDO, Florida - It's widely believed that U.S. President Donald Trump's insistence on lower interest rates is what's making life most difficult for Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell and his colleagues. But what's causing the biggest headache for Fed officials is, in fact, probably more prosaic: economic data. The key challenges facing Powell were encapsulated perfectly on Tuesday by the release of an inconclusive U.S. inflation readout followed by Trump's latest verbal attack – and threats of a "major lawsuit." Politics aside, most Fed officials agree that rates will fall this year, with the median "dot plot" in the Fed's June Summary of Economic Projections pointing to 50 basis points of easing through December. Traders are betting heavily that the first move will be in September. But it's tough to justify that confidence based purely on economic data. While some indicators suggest policy should be eased sooner rather than later, others indicate that would be a high-risk move. Looking at the "totality of the data," to borrow a phrase from Powell, there is no clear signal either way. PLENTY NOISE, FEW SIGNALS Consider the latest U.S. inflation and employment reports, the two most important data sets. On their own, they don't appear soft enough to warrant the Fed trimming rates right now, but they also aren't firm enough to dispel the notion that policy easing is only a question of "when" not "if." Annual headline CPI inflation held steady in July at 2.7%, contrary to an expected rise, with month-on-month increases in line with forecasts. But annual core inflation rose more than expected to 3.1%, the highest level since February and still meaningfully above the Fed's 2% target. Economists calculate that durable goods prices rose 1.7% in the first six months of the year – the biggest six-month rise since 1987, excluding the COVID-19 pandemic. They warn there is likely more of that to come as Trump's tariffs kick in. "July's CPI data are probably more worrying under the surface than in the headlines, and we expect the upward pressure to goods inflation to build in the coming months," James Pomeroy, a global economist at HSBC, wrote on Tuesday. Meanwhile, last week's employment report showed job growth in July was much weaker than anticipated, and, more importantly, downward revisions to the previous two months were among the biggest on record. But these ominous signals were offset by accelerating wage growth, an increase in hours worked, and a meager rise in the unemployment rate. Hardly signs of a shaky labor market. Nevertheless, markets focused more on the softer elements in the jobs data, suggesting investors think the Fed's bar to easing is much lower than the bar to standing pat. Indeed, the rates market is now pricing in a near-100% chance of a cut at the U.S. central bank's September 16-17 meeting. RISK MANAGEMENT But markets may be getting ahead of themselves. Powell has indicated that a rise in the unemployment rate is needed for the Fed to act. But that rate is potentially being distorted by post-pandemic labor supply issues - employers' reluctance to fire workers and Trump's immigration policies are limiting the number of people looking for work. Regardless, cutting before seeing a meaningful rise in the unemployment rate would be tough to justify, creating a significant communications problem for Powell. And on a more fundamental level, as economist Phil Suttle noted on Tuesday, is preparing to cut rates at full employment just as inflation is accelerating good risk management? This is a particularly apt question when looking at financial markets: the S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite indexes, gold, and bitcoin are all near record highs, and corporate bond spreads are the tightest in years. This hardly looks like a restrictive policy environment. In that light, patience and caution would appear justified, especially given the added risk of appearing to buckle under Trump's political pressure. If the Fed wants to cut, Powell could use some cover. Unfortunately for him, he's unlikely to find that in this noisy data. (The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters) (By Jamie McGeever Editing by Paul Simao)
Zawya
23 minutes ago
- Zawya
BOJ faces pressure to ditch obscure inflation gauge, clear path to tighter policy
TOKYO - Pressure is mounting within the Bank of Japan to ditch a vaguely defined gauge of inflation as worries about second-round price effects prompt some board members to call for a more hawkish communication of policy and a clearer path to future rate hikes. BOJ Governor Kazuo Ueda has justified going slow on rate hikes by explaining that "underlying inflation," which focuses on the strength of domestic demand and wages, remains short of the central bank's 2% target. The trouble is that there is no single indicator that gauges "underlying inflation", making it a target for critics who say the BOJ is overly reliant on an obscure reading to guide monetary policy despite both headline inflation and core measures exceeding its target for years. Now, even some members of the BOJ board - worried that second-round price effects were becoming embedded in pricing behaviour and public perceptions of future inflation - are calling for a change to the bank's communication to a more hawkish one that focuses on headline inflation, which hit 3.3% in June. "We're at a phase where we should shift the core of our communication away from underlying inflation to actual price moves and their outlook, as well as the output gap and inflation expectations," one member said, according to a summary of opinions at the bank's July policy meeting. Another member said the BOJ must put more emphasis on upside risks to prices, and consider tweaking its communication to one that is based on the view Japan will hit 2% inflation. Some members of the government's top economic council also warned this month the BOJ might be too complacent of mounting price pressure, a clear nudge to the central bank to steer a more hawkish policy path in the wake of growing public alarm over persistent inflation. "I'm worried that monetary policy is already behind the curve," one panel member was quoted as saying at a meeting last week, adding that prolonged price rises were already affecting people's livelihood and their inflation expectations. OCTOBER POLICY TILT? The BOJ exited a decade-long, radical stimulus programme last year and raised short-term interest rates to 0.5% in January on the view that Japan was on the cusp of sustainably hitting its 2% inflation target. While the central bank has signalled its readiness to raise rates further, the economic impact of higher U.S. tariffs forced it to cut its growth forecasts in May and complicated decisions around the timing of the next rate increase. With Japan having agreed on a trade deal with the U.S. in July, the BOJ has shed some of its gloom over the economic outlook. Of the BOJ's nine board members, Naoki Tamura, Hajime Takata and Junko Koeda have highlighted the risk of persistent rises in food prices leading to broader-based, sustained inflation. To be sure, there is no consensus within the board yet on whether a communication overhaul is needed, with one member quoted as saying in the summary that underlying inflation remained an "important concept in guiding policy." But the fact some members openly called for a tweak to the dovish communication highlights the board's growing attention to broadening inflationary pressure that may pave the way for rate hikes in coming months and into 2026, some analysts say. Annual core consumer inflation hit 3.3% in June, exceeding the BOJ's 2% target for well over three years, due largely to a 8.2% spike in food costs. Such price pressures led the board to revise up its core inflation estimates last month, and cast doubt on the BOJ's view that underlying inflation - measured by a mix of proxies such as public expectations of future price moves - has yet to reach 2%. The BOJ may gradually phase out the concept of underlying inflation from its communication, as it gears up for the next rate hike that could happen as soon as in October, said veteran BOJ watcher Naomi Muguruma. "I think many BOJ officials are beginning to realise that the idea doesn't fit quite well with reality," she said. "We might hear less of this concept when the timing of the next rate hike draws near."
Gulf Business
23 minutes ago
- Gulf Business
Gold rises higher: Is a $3,400 breakout next as dollar stumbles?
Image credit: Getty Images Gold extended gains to a third straight session on Thursday, supported by rising expectations of an interest rate cut by the US Federal Reserve in September following tame inflation data, which also weighed on the dollar. Spot gold rose 0.4 per cent to $3,367.53 per ounce as of 0156 GMT. US gold futures for December delivery added 0.3 per cent to $3,416.70. Read- 'Markets are pricing in the chance that the Fed cuts 50 basis points in September. So the dollar's weakening, gold's going up as a result, yields are also down,' said Kyle Rodda, financial market analyst. 'The technical setup of The dollar languished near multi-week lows against its rivals, making gold less expensive for holders of other currencies. Benchmark US 10-year Treasury yields held near a one-week low. US consumer prices rose only marginally in July, strengthening expectations of a Fed rate cut next month, with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent noting there is a good chance the central bank will opt for a 50 bps reduction. Traders now see a cut on September 17 as a near certainty, according to data compiled by LSEG, and even lay around 6 per cent odds on a super-sized half-point trim. Non-yielding gold thrives in a low-interest-rate environment. Investors are awaiting the US economic data due later this week, including the US Producer Price Index, weekly jobless claims and retail sales data for clues into the Fed's rate path.
