Lego's first buildable Decepticon Transformer is a talking Soundwave
At $189.99, Soundwave will also be Lego's most expensive Transformers set to date when it goes on sale starting on August 1st for Lego Insiders (the company's free loyalty program) and August 4th for everyone else. Optimus Prime is currently $179.99, while the much smaller Bumblebee is $89.99.
As with Optimus, Lego's Soundwave converts from robot mode to cassette player mode without requiring any disassembly. It's also fully posable in bot mode thanks to articulated joints and includes accessories like a rocket pod and laser blaster that transform into batteries — similar to what was included with Hasbro's original Soundwave figure in the '80s.
There are two features that set this Lego model apart from its other Transformers sets. The first is the inclusion of an electronic sound brick that 'activates specially recorded voice and sound effects.' In the '80s cartoon, Soundwave's distinct monotone synthesized voice, performed by Frank Welker, helped make the character a fan favorite. The sound brick includes snippets of the cartoon's music and the character speaking. It's not Welker, but it's still fun that Lego has gone the extra mile to re-create this character's most memorable feature.
The other thing that makes this set unique is that it actually includes three Transformers. In addition to Soundwave, you get buildable versions of Ravage and Laserbeak that transform into cassette tapes that can fit inside Soundwave's chest compartment. Lego also includes a display plaque showing the Decepticon's power statistics alongside a tiny model of Soundwave in cassette player mode.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Did money or politics cause Colbert cancellation? Either way, the economics are tough for TV
CBS says its decision to end Stephen Colbert's late-night comedy show is financial, not political. Yet even with the ample skepticism about that explanation, there's no denying the economics were not working in Colbert's favor. The network's bombshell announcement late Thursday that the 'Late Show' will end next May takes away President Donald Trump's most prominent TV critic and the most popular entertainment program in its genre. The television industry's declining economic health means similar hard calls are already being made with personalities and programming, with others to be faced in the future. For the late-night genre, there are unique factors to consider. As recently as 2018, broadcast networks took in an estimated $439 million in advertising revenue for its late-night programs, according to the advertising firm Guidelines. Last year, that number dwindled to $220 million. Once a draw for young men, now they've turned away Late-night TV was a particular draw for young men, considered the hardest-to-get and most valuable demographic for advertisers. Increasingly, these viewers are turning to streaming services, either to watch something else entirely or catch highlights of the late-night shows, which are more difficult for the networks to monetize. More broadly, the much-predicted takeover of viewers by streaming services is coming to pass. The Nielsen company reported that during the last two months, for the first time ever, more people consumed programming on services like YouTube and Netflix than on ABC, CBS and NBC or any cable network. Networks and streamers spent roughly $70 billion on entertainment shows and $30 billion for sports rights last year, said Brian Wieser, CEO of Madison & Wall, an advertising consultant and data services firm. Live sports is the most dependable magnet for viewers and costs for its rights are expected to increase 8% a year over the next decade. With television viewership declining in general, it's clear where savings will have to come from. Wieser said he does not know whether Colbert's show is profitable or not for CBS and parent company Paramount Global, but he knows the direction in which it is headed. 'The economics of television are weak,' he said. In a statement announcing the cancellation, George Cheeks, Paramount Global's president and chief executive officer, said that 'This is purely a financial decision against a challenging backdrop in late night. It is not related in any way to the show's performance, content or other matters happening at Paramount.' Cheeks' problem is that not everyone believes him. Colbert is a relentless critic of Trump, and earlier this week pointedly criticized Paramount's decision to settle Trump's lawsuit against CBS over a '60 Minutes' interview with Kamala Harris. He called Paramount's $16 million payment to Trump a 'big fat bribe,' since the company is seeking the administration's approval of its merger with Skydance Media. On Friday, the Writers Guild of America called for an investigation by New York's attorney general into whether Colbert's cancellation is itself a bribe, 'sacrificing free speech to curry favor with the Trump administration as the company looks for merger approval.' CBS' decision made this a pivotal week for the future of television and radio programming. Congress stripped federal funding for PBS and NPR, threatening the future of shows on those outlets. Journey Gunderson, executive director of the National Comedy Center, called the decision to end Colbert's show the end of an era. 'Late-night television has historically been one of comedy's most audience-accessible platforms — a place where commentary meets community, night after night,' Gunderson said. 'This isn't just the end of a show. It's the quiet removal of one of the few remaining platforms for daily comedic commentary. Trump celebrates Colbert's demise Trump, who has called in the past for CBS to terminate Colbert's contract, celebrated the show's upcoming demise. 'I absolutely love that Colbert got fired,' the president wrote on Truth Social. 'His talent was even less than his ratings.' Some experts questioned whether CBS could have explored other ways to save money on Colbert. NBC, for example, has cut costs by eliminating the band on Seth Meyers' late-night show and curtailing Jimmy Fallon's 'Tonight' show to four nights a week. Could CBS have saved more money by cutting off the show immediately, instead of letting it run until next May, which sets up an awkward 'lame duck' period? Then again, Colbert will keep working until his contract runs out; CBS would have had to keep paying him anyway. CBS recently cancelled the 'After Midnight' show that ran after Colbert. But the network had signaled earlier this year that it was prepared to continue that show until host Taylor Tomlinson decided that she wanted to leave, noted Bill Carter, author of 'The Late Shift.' 'It is a very sad day for CBS that they are getting out of the late-night race,' Andy Cohen, host of Bravo's 'Watch What Happens Live," told The Associated Press. 'I mean, they are turning off the lights after the news.' Colbert, if he wanted to continue past next May, would likely be able to find a streaming service willing to pay him, Wieser said. But the future of late-night comedy on the entertainment networks is genuinely at risk. Trump, in fact, may outlast his fiercest comic critics. Jon Stewart, once a weeknight fixture, works one night a week at 'The Daily Show' for Paramount's Comedy Central, a network that seldom produces much original programming any more. ABC's Jimmy Kimmel, who was chided on social media by Trump on Friday — 'I hear Jimmy Kimmel is next' — has a contract that also runs out next year. Kimmel, 57, openly wondered in a Variety interview before signing his latest three-year contract extension how long he wanted to do it. He's hosted his show since 2003. 'I have moments where I go, I cannot do this anymore,' Kimmel told Variety in 2022. 'And I have moments where I go, what am I gonna do with my life if I'm not doing this anymore?' It's a very complicated thing ... I'm not going to do this forever.' Colbert, Kimmel and Stewart were all nominated for Emmy awards this week. ___ AP journalist Liam McEwan in Los Angeles contributed to this report. David Bauder writes about the intersection of media and entertainment for the AP. Follow him at and Sign in to access your portfolio
Gizmodo
28 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
A Brief Guide to All the Taika Waititi Projects We're Still Waiting For
It's just part of Hollywood that projects will be announced with a lot of fanfare and then fade away, with suspects both usual (scheduling conflicts, creative differences, budget concerns) and unusual (global pandemics, industry-wide strikes) to blame. But certain creators seem to attach their names to movies or TV shows that never materialize with greater frequency—including Taika Waititi. His diverse career includes writing, directing, producing, and acting (Our Flag Means Death forever), and he already has an Oscar on his shelf. So it's no surprise that he's seemingly being pulled in a lot of different directions and moves on to new endeavors faster than most. But since his TBD list is full of things we'd actually like to see one day, here's a reminder of the best sci-fi and fantasy stuff that's on it. News broke this week that Waititi is attached to helm a new live-action take on the violent comic book character, previously seen in movies made in 1995 (with Sylvester Stallone) and 2012 (with Karl Urban). The Hollywood Reporter noted there's a script by Drew Pearce (Fall Guy; Mission: Impossible – Rogue Nation) but no studio attached yet. According to the trade, 'sources say Pearce and Waititi both grew up with the books and are friends who have been trying to find a project to work on together for years.' THR further notes that 'the pitch is said to take inspiration more from the comics than the previous screen iterations, leaning into the world-building and dark humor,' which sounds great, though this detail does not: 'The desire is to see the movie launch a Dredd universe that could be explored with additional movies and shows across various platforms.' Why though? Probably just a fleeting dream at this point, given that this werewolf-focused sequel to What We Do in the Shadows (the movie) was being talked about before What We Do in the Shadows (the TV show) arrived. But the show ended late last year after six triumphant seasons, with many fans still wishing it could continue. Might We're Wolves emerge from the darkness after all? Just a few weeks ago, we learned that Warner Bros.' long-teased Akira movie was being taken off the table. Waititi's name was one of many bandied about to direct when it was still in play, and he certainly seemed enthusiastic—although in 2019 he explained he'd had to step back from it due to his Marvel commitments. But just because Warner Bros. isn't going to tackle Akira doesn't mean the manga adaptation won't ever happen; another studio might well pick up the newly available rights. Maybe Waititi will circle back when and if that happens? Picture it: summer, 2021. We received an intriguing update on the animated Flash Gordon movie Waititi had first teased in 2019. The game changed, and now it was going to be a live-action Flash Gordon movie! Even a few years later, it still seems like an ideal outlet for Waititi's irreverent style and bombastic approach to superhero action, but so far there's been no fresh momentum on this one. In late 2021, Waititi teased another fascinating project: an adaptation of The Incal, Alejandro Jodorowsky and Jean Giraud's (aka Moebius) sci-fi masterpiece. 'The films and graphic novels of Alejandro Jodorowsky have influenced me and so many others for so long,' Waititi told the Hollywood Reporter at the time. 'I was stunned to be given the opportunity to bring his iconic characters to life.' We're not mad at it either, other than the fact that it hasn't happened yet. In 2020, io9 had cause to run a post with the headline 'Oompa-Loompa Doom-Pa-Da-Dee-Tee, Get Pumped for Roald Dahl by Taika Waititi,' on the occasion of Waititi announcing two planned Netflix series set in the world of Charlie and the Chocolate Factory. Including one all about Oompa-Loompas! As we know, Netflix sunk a lot of dough into acquiring Dahl's story catalog a few years back, but hasn't done terribly much with the IP since; in the meantime, the Timothée Chalamet-starring Wonka movie, whose conception pre-dated the Netflix acquisition, sort of took over the cultural conversation on magical chocolate factories. Still, the streamer is still holding onto Dahl, so maybe Waititi will return to this one eventually. This one's a whole galaxy bigger than just Waititi, because pinning down Lucasfilm's future big-screen plans has been no easy task since the sequel trilogy ended. But amid the sure things (The Mandalorian and Grogu, Ryan Gosling's Starfighter) and the handful of projects that seem to still be on track (like James Mangold's 'Dawn of the Jedi' movie), Waititi's long-teased Star Wars movie, which would reunite The Mandalorian season one star with the franchise, is one that's never been ruled out. We still have no idea if it will happen, though. Which percolating Taika Waititi projects are you hoping actually materialize? Do you think Judge Dredd will move forward, or will it join these other titles in Waititi limbo? And will he ever make his Star Wars movie? Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what's next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.
New York Times
30 minutes ago
- New York Times
Not Even ‘The Late Show' Could Defy Gravity
Stephen Colbert's announcement on Thursday night that 'The Late Show' was being canceled by CBS stunned the entertainment industry, the public and even his staff. But the writing had been on the wall for some time. 'The Late Show,' a fixture of the network for over three decades, was racking up losses of tens of millions of dollars a year, and the gap was growing fast, according to two people familiar with the show's finances. Like other late-night shows before it, 'The Late Show' was canceled when the network could not figure how to make the finances work in an entertainment world increasingly dominated by streaming. So as CBS executives mapped out the schedule and budget for next year, George Cheeks, CBS's president, decided in recent weeks that the network couldn't take those losses any more, the two people said. Mr. Colbert learned of the decision on Wednesday night. Shari Redstone, the controlling shareholder of Paramount, CBS's parent company, learned about it on Thursday, according to two other people. The cancellation underscores just how rapidly the late-night genre has fallen. Not even 'The Late Show,' the highest rated of those network talk shows, was safe, as many in the entertainment industry assumed it was. Nevertheless, questions lingered on Friday about whether political calculations — not strictly financial ones — had played a role in the decision as well. Paramount is closing a multibillion-dollar merger with the movie studio Skydance, a deal that still requires approval from the Trump administration. Early this month, Paramount agreed to pay President Trump $16 million to settle a lawsuit over an interview on CBS's '60 Minutes.' Mr. Colbert, a longtime critic of Mr. Trump, called that settlement 'a big fat bribe' on his show this week. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
