Ashley Tisdale Says Daughter Jupiter Is Yet Watch Phineas And Ferb, Here's Why
Last Updated:
The actress further stated that her daughter knows that her mom is on the show, but she has not seen a full episode yet.
Singer and actress Ashley Tisdale is best known for her role in High School Musical and as the voice behind Candace Flynn in the popular animated series Phineas and Ferb. Recently, the actress revealed that though she is a part of the Disney channel show as a voice artist, her four-year-old daughter Jupiter has never watched a single episode of Phineas and Ferb. And there's a good reason behind it.
At the Bush's Bluey Baked Beans launch event at CAMP in New York City on Wednesday, May 14, the 39-year-old actress spoke with People and revealed that Jupiter is aware of the characters Phineas and Ferb. 'I haven't (watched the show with Jupiter). I mean, she's seen (the characters) Phineas and Ferb." Explaining the reason, Ashley added, 'It might be a little bit more for the older age range."
The actress further stated that her daughter knows that her mom is on the show, but she has not seen a full episode yet. 'She knows that I'm on it, and she has seen that, but I haven't shown her the new episodes," Ashley said. While she might not have gotten a chance to watch the show yet, Jupiter did get a peek behind the scenes when Ashley took her to a recording studio last year.
FYI, a decade after Phineas and Ferb concluded in 2015, the beloved animated series is making a return. At New York's Comic Con in October last year, the show's makers announced its return to the screens once more. Phineas and Ferb's fifth season is set to premiere on June 5, with new episodes airing on both Disney Channel and Disney XD and streaming on Disney+ the next day.
In the same conversation, Ashley expressed her excitement about the new episodes of Phineas and Ferb, especially because her character Candace is now 16. 'The new episodes are amazing, and I'm so excited because my character finally has aged a little bit. She's 16, and so I really can't wait for everybody to see it. It's one of those things where (creators Dan Povenmire and Jeff 'Swampy' Marsh) did not go far from the DNA of it, which is so great."
Speaking of Ashley Tisdale, she and her husband, singer Christopher French welcomed their daughter Jupiter in March 2021 after seven years of marriage. Last year, in September, the couple welcomed their second daughter, whom they lovingly named Emerson.
First Published:
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
Kim Soo Hyun's hit drama My Love from the Star airs in Brazil despite Kim Sae Ron controversy. Is his comeback on the horizon?
Kim Soo Hyun's iconic drama My Love from the Star is officially making its debut in Brazil today (June 2), marking its first broadcast in South America 11 years after it originally aired in Korea. The move is being seen not just as a nostalgic rewatch, but as a sign that the drama's enduring popularity is being recognised for its cultural value, separate from current celebrity controversies. The development comes as a rare win for Kim Soo Hyun, who has recently faced global backlash and boycott calls following resurfaced allegations about his past relationship with the late actress Kim Sae Ron. He has been accused of dating her when she was underage—claims he has denied—clarifying instead that they were briefly involved only after she reached the legal age of consent. SBT launches a dedicated K-drama time slot for My Love from the Star. According to K-media outlet BNT News, Brazil's largest private broadcaster, SBT, announced that it will air the hit K-drama at 4:45 p.m. local time. This broadcast marks the start of its new 'Asian Production Line' programming block, created in response to the rising demand for Korean and Asian content in Brazil. SBT explained the choice by saying, 'The demand for Korean popular culture content in Brazil is increasing explosively.' My Love from the Star broke ratings history First aired in Korea from December 2013 to February 2014, My Love from the Star tells the story of Do Min Jun, an alien who crash-landed on Earth during the Joseon Dynasty, and his relationship with top star Cheon Song Yi, played by actress Jun Ji Hyun. The 21-episode fantasy rom-com became a massive hit in Korea, starting at 15.6% viewership and climbing to a high of 28.1%, averaging an impressive 24.3%. After the global Hallyu wave took the world by storm, the drama was recognised as one of the cult classics, cementing Kim Soo Hyun's position as one of the top drama stars. Is Kim Soo Hyun ready for his big comeback? With renewed global attention on his most famous work, fans are speculating whether this could signal a comeback for Kim Soo Hyun. Despite recent controversy involving Kim Sae Ron, many supporters continue to stand by him, separating his acting legacy from personal matters. His longtime followers and fan club have been organising events in his support, sending strong messages, and defending his legacy, even as the actor faces boycotts from all corners in South Korea. Uncertainty still surrounds Disney+ drama 'Knock Off' While My Love from the Star is enjoying a resurgence, the status of Kim Soo Hyun's new Disney+ project Knock Off remains unclear. No release date or official update has been confirmed, leaving fans waiting to see what direction his career takes next.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
YouTube's victory in the TV wars depends on parents
HighlightsYouTube commands 12.4% of audience time spent watching television, surpassing Disney's 10.7% and significantly outpacing Amazon's 3.5%. Concerns arise over YouTube's algorithm, which prioritizes quantity over quality, leading to potential exposure to harmful content for younger viewers. The platform's unregulated environment, including its comments section, contributes to the spread of misinformation and targeted harassment, raising distrust among parents. Here's a stat that might come as a shock to casual observers of the media ecosystem: The media company that commands the largest percentage of our eyeballs is not the mighty Netflix Inc., the Walt Disney Co. juggernaut or the omnipresent Amazon .com Inc. Prime. It's YouTube . The platform represents 12.4% of audiences' time spent watching television, according to Nielsen Holding Ltd.'s Media Distributor Gauge report for April. That beats Disney's 10.7% (which includes not only the platforms and channels that bear its name but ESPN and Hulu to boot), nearly doubles the 6.8% and 6.7% for Fox and Warner Bros. Discovery , respectively, and pummels the puny 3.5% share for Amazon. But before we hail the platform as another nail in traditional TV's coffin, it needs to accomplish something else: earn the trust of its users, particularly parents. There are real problems with the way YouTube works and the suggestions it makes to viewers (especially younger ones). It sets the entertainment powerhouse up for the kind of backlash we're seeing against other dominant but problematic tech companies. If you're old enough to remember a pre-YouTube world or when the platform struggled through its initial era of low-res user-generated videos and one-joke viral breakouts, the idea of consuming media primarily through that portal sounds absurd. For example, Gen Xers like me may use it as little more than a last resort destination: a place to find a clip from a movie that isn't streaming, an episode of a show that we forgot to DVR, the badly-dated music video for a song that was briefly popular when we were in high school or various other goofy little things that aren't substantial enough to exist anywhere else. But I can also tell you, as the father of a tween, that this is not how younger people think of YouTube. For many of them, it (and other social media sites) is the window through which they see the world and the door though which they travel to find whatever they're seeking. The beauty of YouTube circa 2025 is that it has everything, from rentable movies to full, free seasons of television to vast musical archives to daily updates from your favorite influencers. The horror of YouTube circa 2025 is also that it has everything, from unhinged conspiracy theories to casual racism and misogyny to hours-long videos of ideological indoctrination to sexually suggestive material. Its everything-and-the-kitchen-sink approach might not be such a concern if the platform increased efforts (aside from the most basic and easily evadable parental controls) in keeping the scarier stuff contained. Instead, viewers are in the thrall of the platform's problematic algorithm, which exists not to enhance the quality of the user experience but the quantity of it. In December, the company reported that people watched more than one billion hours of YouTube on TV daily. That time can often be spent not on the specific video that a user is seeking out but on the videos the platform's algorithm recommends and/or auto-plays at its conclusion. By now, there are well-known stories of how quickly the algorithm can steer viewers toward unrelated, or even worrisome, content. A much-shared 2019 New York Times story detailed the online radicalization of Caleb Cain, who 'fell down the alt-right rabbit hole' on YouTube. A year earlier, the company's then-product chief and now CEO said that the site's recommendations accounted for more than 70% of all time spent on YouTube. (Alphabet Inc.'s Google , YouTube's parent company, did not share updated metrics when asked by Bloomberg Opinion ahead of publication.) And while it may be uncommon for the platform to function as a full-stop radicalization machine — suggesting QAnon screeds to innocent cat video connoisseurs — it's hard to find a user (or a parent) who can't recall at least one head-scratching recommendation or ill-advised curiosity click. Busy parents or guardians, for example, might turn on an age-appropriate show for their kids to watch on YouTube (there's a reason 28% of the platform's viewers are aged 2-17). Maybe they need to occupy their children's attention while working from home, doing a household chore or two or perhaps just to get a mental break — only to hear or see a questionable video playing before it can be intercepted. Does that scenario sound familiar? For at least a segment of the population, this has led to an inherent distrust of YouTube's anything-goes, Wild West approach, which is absent from the sense of curation on conventional television networks or subscription streaming services. And it's hard to overstate the role that the platform's unruly and frequently unmoderated comments section can play in the dissemination of misinformation, to say nothing of the targeted harassment that runs rampant on both the site itself and various third-party tools. Unfortunately, the monopolistic nature of our current tech landscape means that the chances of an upstart video streaming platform replacing the ubiquitous YouTube are slim to none, even if other sites and apps (such as Vimeo , to name the most obvious example) offer a far superior user experience. But never forget, it was once hard to imagine any social media website overtaking MySpace, and user enthusiasm for Google's search engine, has cooled of late. The combination of copious ads and insipid, unwanted and frequently inaccurate AI-powered results have sullied the latter brand, at least among users who are paying attention. Some people have begun to seek out alternate web searches, just as many fled the Elon Musk iteration of Twitter. Is a similar migration for more ethical online video platforms in the realm of possibility? YouTube should make its algorithm safer for its youngest demographic to avoid finding out. (This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its Bailey is a film critic and historian whose work has appeared in the New York Times, Vulture, the Playlist, Slate and Rolling Stone. He is the author, most recently, of "Gandolfini: Jim, Tony, and the Life of a Legend.")
India Today
2 hours ago
- India Today
Jackie Chan was 40 when he learnt his father was a spy: My original name is Fong
Legendary actor Jackie Chan, celebrated for his remarkable martial arts prowess, recently shared a fascinating personal history. The actor revealed that his father was actually a 71-year-old Hong Kong actor recently reflected on the surreal moment when his late father, Charles, revealed that he had once worked as a spy for the Chinese government in the 1940s. In a retrospective with PEOPLE, Chan shared that he didn't discover this 'secret' until he was in his talking about the same, he said, 'One day, I was driving a car, my father suddenly said, 'Son, I'm old. I might sleep and never wake up. I have a secret to tell you'. His father then informed him of his true identity, revealing that their surname was Chan's rich family history was spotlighted in Mabel Cheung's 2003 documentary 'Traces of the Dragon: Jackie Chan and His Lost Family'. The film delves into the life of the actor's late father, who worked as a spy for Chiang Kai-shek's Nationalist Kuomintang (KMT) during the 1930s and 1940s. Following political turmoil, he escaped to Hong Kong in the 1950s to avoid persecution by the actor revealed that he was 'very shocked' at the revelation and initially felt unable to listen to his father Charles' explanation of his mother led an equally fascinating life. Before settling in Hong Kong, she was a stage performer in Shanghai and was involved in smuggling opium. In his retrospective with PEOPLE, Chan described her as a 'very traditional' woman who supported his film career but couldn't bring herself to watch him perform dangerous stunts on the actor returned to the Karate Kid franchise with 'Karate Kid: Legends'. The film is the sixth installment in the 'Karate Kid' franchise.'Karate Kid: Legends' is distributed by Sony Pictures Entertainment India in Indian theatres on May 30, in English, Hindi, Tamil, and Telugu.
