
US House panel rejects immunity request by Maxwell
Ghislaine Maxwell, who was convicted in New York in 2021 of helping Epstein sexually abuse teenage girls and is serving a 20-year sentence in Florida, has been subpoenaed to testify privately to the House of Representatives Oversight and Government Reform Committee.
The committee has aimed to conduct a deposition of Maxwell, a British socialite who was the wealthy financier's longtime girlfriend, on August 11 at the prison where she is being held in Tallahassee.
"Ms Maxwell cannot risk further criminal exposure in a politically charged environment without formal immunity," Maxwell's lawyer David Markus told Representative James Comer, who chairs the House committee, in a letter.
In an emailed statement, a committee spokesperson said: "The Oversight Committee will respond to Ms Maxwell's attorney soon, but it will not consider granting congressional immunity for her testimony."
Markus also had laid down additional conditions for a deposition, including conducting it somewhere other than the prison and being provided with the committee's questions in advance.
Maxwell, Markus added, would testify to the committee in a public setting if she were to be granted clemency.
Maxwell is asking the US Supreme Court to overturn her conviction. Trump has said he was not considering a presidential pardon for Maxwell.
Questions over Trump's past relationship with Epstein, who died by suicide in a New York jail in 2019 while awaiting trial on charges of sex trafficking minors, and his administration's handling of records related to the case have dogged the president for weeks, including during a weekend visit to Scotland.
Trump knew Epstein socially in the 1990s and early 2000s. Trump has said he cut off ties with Epstein years before Epstein's death. Democrats in Congress and some of Trump's core supporters have demanded the release of documents involving Epstein and Maxwell.
Epstein served a 13-month jail sentence after pleading guilty in 2008 to a Florida state felony prostitution charge.
Democrats on Tuesday sought more information about the matter.
Dick Durbin, the No.2 Senate Democrat, and Senator Sheldon Whitehouse wrote to the Justice Department, asking for a copy of the transcript of a recent conversation a department official had with Maxwell.
In addition, Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer called on the FBI to conduct a "counterintelligence threat assessment" to determine the risk to US national security if a foreign entity were to gain access to the Epstein files.
"Could our adversaries use that information to blackmail someone like the president or other senior leaders in government?" Schumer asked.
1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732)
National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028
Lifeline 13 11 14
beyondblue 1300 22 4636
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


SBS Australia
33 minutes ago
- SBS Australia
Too many: 602 Indigenous deaths in custody since the royal commission
Warning: this article includes the names of Aboriginal people who have passed and distressing content. When Senator Lidia Thorpe first entered Parliament she carried a message stick with 441 notches on it - each marking the death in custody of a First Nations person since the 1991 Royal Commission into Aboriginal deaths in custody. Today, five years later, she carried that same message stick into the Senate. It has 602 notches. The Parliament today supported a motion from Senator Thorpe calling for urgent national action on the crisis of First Nations deaths in custody, following the passing of 24-year-old Kumanjayi White in Mparntwe/Alice Springs in May. 'Kumanjayi White should be alive today," the Gunnai, Gunditjmara and Djab Wurrung woman said. "He was a young, disabled man who needed care and support, not restraint and force. His death is a national shame. "We are in the middle of a crisis. First Peoples continue to die in custody at horrifying rates. "There have been at least 17 deaths this year alone and still no government has fully implemented the Royal Commission's recommendations after more than three decades." Senator Thorpe's motion followed the release of the latest Closing the Gap data overnight, which shows rates of incarceration and suicide of First Peoples continue to worsen. "This motion extends the Senate's deepest sympathies to his family, to the Yuendumu community, to the families of the 17 First Peoples who have died in custody this year, and to the families of all those who have died since the 1991 Royal Commission," she said. These are not just statistics; they are sons, daughters, mothers, fathers, cousins, siblings, grandchildren – lost to a system that continues to harm our people. Her motion received support from crossbench and Labor parliamentarians in both the Senate and House of Representatives and Shadow Minister for Indigenous Australians Senator Kerrynne Liddle. Labor Senator Murray Watt said it was unacceptable that 602 First Nations people had died in custody since the royal commission. "The royal commission was clear that the best way to reduce First Nations deaths in custody is to reduce the high incarceration rate of First Nations people, including through social and economic responses, which the evidence shows can reduce crime, change the course of lives, and avoid people coming into contact with the police or justice system in the first place," he said. "This is what the Commonwealth Government is focusing on, including through the national agreement on Closing the Gap." Senator Watt said the Albanese Government was investing in First Nations-led justice reinvestment initiatives (where money that would be spent on prisons is, instead, invested in early intervention and diversionary programs) and called on the states and territories to do more. Senator Liddle and Senator Watt both extended condolences to Kumanjayi White's family and Yuendumu community. "His grieving family deserve answers," Senator Liddle said. "Australians, too, deserve answers. "The recommendations of the Royal Commission into Aboriginal deaths in custody released in 1991 outlined what needed to be done. "Indigenous Australians were disproportionately incarcerated, and they were also over represented in deaths in custody. "The Royal Commission report was a blueprint for change. "Change then was necessary; 34 years later, the job is still not done." Greens Leader Larissa Waters and independent Senator David Pocock also both spoke in favour of Senator Thorpe's motion. "We stand in solidarity with the Yuendumu and Warlpiri communities," Senator Waters said. "We join their calls for justice, and we echo the family's demand for an independent investigation, for the officers involved to be stood down, for the release of CCTV and body camera footage, and for the Northern Territory police to apologise for and cease publicly criminalising Kumanjayi White in their statements." Senator Thorpe called for unity and said the issue of First Nations deaths in custody was not about politics but about compassion. "The families of those who've died at the hands of the system need justice, not excuses," she said. "They need truth, accountability, and support to navigate a legal system that continues to fail us. "Ending deaths in custody – which are this country's great shame – must be a priority for this Labor government, they have the power to act now." Senator Thorpe said, while the support for her motion across the Parliament was encouraging, it must be backed up with action. "First Peoples have waited 34 years since the royal commission for action," she said. "Together, we can get this done."

Sky News AU
3 hours ago
- Sky News AU
‘Toxic brand': Kamala Harris remains a ‘walking reminder' of the Biden cover-up
UnHerd Washington DC correspondent Emily Jashinsky has urged Kamala Harris to stay out of the limelight for 'as long as humanly possible'. Former US vice president Kamala Harris has confirmed she will not be running for California governor in 2026. 'She is such a toxic brand right now for Democrats; she is someone who just reminds them of the Biden cover-up, and average voters actually still really care about that,' Ms Jashinsky told Sky News Digital Presenter Gabriella Power. 'Kamala Harris is a big, walking reminder of that every single day.'

Sky News AU
3 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Labor blocks debate on Coalition Senators Alex Antic and Matt Canavan's bill to restore biological definitions in Sex Discrimination Act
The Albanese government has been accused of using its mammoth parliamentary majority to supress debate after Senators blocked debate on a bill which would restore biological definitions in the Sex Discrimination Act. Liberal Senator Alex Antic and Nationals Senator Matt Canavan tabled a private senator's bill to amend the Sex Discrimination Act by removing references to gender identity, and 'restoring the act to its original purpose" on Thursday. TheSex Discrimination Amendment (Restoring Biological Definitions) Bill would remove references to gender identity while returning clear definitions of a man and a woman as "members of the male and female sex respectively", Senator Antic said. The Australian Sex Discrimination states it is unlawful to discriminate on the basis of age, disability, race, sex, intersex status, gender identity and sexual orientation, with the term 'gender identity' controversially added in 2013 by the Gillard government. However, the Senate erupted on Thursday after Labor, the Greens and other members of the crossbench voted against the first reading being heard. First readings are typically considered a parliamentary formality. Deputy manager of Opposition business in the Senate Paul Scarr unleashed on Labor for vetoing debate and flatly rejecting the bill at the first reading stage. 'While the Senate has the opportunity to reject a bill at the first reading stage, in practise the first reading is almost always passed without opposition and is regarded as a purely formal stage,' Senator Scarr said in the Senate. The Queensland Liberal Senator outlined that the Coalition in the past had supported numerous bills tabled by the Greens, Labor and the crossbench which it had 'strongly opposed'. He said first readings were 'normal procedures' which should not be politicised. 'The normal process enables bills to be fairly considered and debated by the Senate before a substantive decision is taken. It should only be deviated from in the most extreme of circumstances, lest we deny the right of Senators to even have matters debated," he said. Finance Minister and Manager of Government Business in the Senate Katy Gallagher conceded that first readings were a 'normal custom and practice'. But she said the government would not allow the Senate to become a forum which could enable 'harm.' 'We do not agree with the Senate being a place where individual harm can be done to young people across this country. That is what would have happened had we allowed this bill to proceed in the normal course and we won't stand for it,' Senator Gallagher said. The decision to block the bill's first reading was upheld and split down party lines, with the Greens and progressive independents siding with the government to quash debate completely while LNP and One Nation Senators voted in favour of Senator Antic and Senator Cannavan's bill. The legislation was also scratched from the Parliament of Australia website, despite all other bills of the day being available for public viewing. Queensland One Nation Senator Malcolm Roberts railed against the government for using its super-majority to clamp down on parliamentary debate. 'What we're seeing here is an example of control,' Senator Roberts said. Senator Antic said that 'sex is not a social constrict' but rather a "core biological reality that underpins human nature" and that 2013 amendments "made discrimination based on appearance or mannerisms in relation to gender identity an offence.' In mid-April over 5,000 academics, doctors, mental health practitioners and teachers urged the government to come clean on answering 'what is a women?' and to further remove the phrase 'gender identity' from section 5B of the Sex Discrimination Act. In early April the UK's Supreme Court ruled that the term 'woman' is based on biological sex as opposed to gender identity.