
UK interest rates kept on hold with Bank alert to ‘highly unpredictable' world
The Bank's Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) decided to keep rates unchanged at 4.25%.
In a split vote, with six members opting to hold and three preferring to cut, the MPC said a 'gradual and careful approach' to reducing borrowing costs continued to be the right course of action.
Bank governor Andrew Bailey said: 'Interest rates remain on a gradual downward path, although we've left them on hold today.
'The world is highly unpredictable.'
He added that there were 'signs of softening in the labour market' – referring to indicators including slower hiring and wage growth easing – which were being closely watched to see how far they feed into UK inflation.
The committee said it was alert to concerns about conflict in the Middle East, which has escalated in recent days with attacks between Israel and Iran.
In the minutes of the MPC's meeting, it noted that there had been 'rapid geopolitical developments', adding: 'Energy prices had risen owing to an escalation of the conflict in the Middle East.
'The committee would remain vigilant about these developments and their potential impact on the UK economy.'
It echoes similar remarks made by the US's central bank which also opted to keep interest rates on hold on Wednesday.
Global oil and natural gas prices have surged in recent weeks, which threatens to push up energy costs in the UK.
Furthermore, the MPC noted that Donald Trump's tariff policy was posing risks to global trade and continuing to create uncertainty.
But it said that deals struck between the US and other countries, including the UK, meant that the direct impact of the 'trade shock' on global growth could be smaller than it had forecast last month.
Meanwhile, the decision to keep rates on hold came as UK Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation remained above the Bank's 2% target level, coming in at 3.4% last month.
The jobs market was also starting to cool, with the rate of unemployment ticking up and pay growth starting to ease.
The Bank said its network of agents had found that cost pressures from the beginning of April – including national insurance contributions rising – had put pressure on firms to recover them by raising prices.
As well as price hikes, it noted that businesses had been leaning on other actions to mitigate costs, including reducing their workforce, staff hours, salaries, and absorbing into profits.
The Monetary Policy Committee voted by a majority of 6-3 to keep interest rates at 4.25%
Find out more: https://t.co/rcGJUYFkWZ pic.twitter.com/VkO9vZyjgS
— Bank of England (@bankofengland) June 19, 2025
It also pointed to waning business sentiment amid weak growth in the UK economy, with demand not expected to recover until 2026.
Signs of a weakening jobs market and economic growth indicates that a rate cut could be on the table when the committee next meets in August.
Matt Swannell, chief economic adviser to the EY Item Club, said three MPC members voting for a cut was 'probably a sign that the MPC has become slightly more concerned about the labour market than it was in May'.
'This only raises the bar for the MPC to break from its cut-hold tempo at its August meeting and opens the door slightly to rate cuts potentially speeding up in the latter half of this year,' he said.
Other experts pointed out that the Bank was having to weigh up a cooling labour market with growing pressures on inflation stemming from global developments.
James Smith, developed market economist for ING, said some policymakers had a 'beady eye' on oil prices and were 'wary of a repeat of 2022, where a rise in energy prices turned into a much wider and more persistent services-driven inflation episode'.
He is nonetheless forecasting a reduction in rates in August and again in November.
Rachel Reeves said the Government respected the Bank's decision as she spoke at The Times CEO Summit.
Speaking in central London, the Chancellor said: 'We respect independent economic institutions, and the Bank has got an incredibly important but difficult job to do.
'We want them to set the monetary policy that is appropriate for meeting the inflation target, because we also saw in the last parliament a double-digit inflation which was so challenging for businesses, but also family finances, which also has a knock on impact on business.'
Ms Reeves, a former economist at the Bank, insisted the four interest rates cuts made under Labour were 'a world away from the previous parliament, when interest rates went up so sharply because of the poor economic mismanagement of prime ministers and chancellors'.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


South Wales Guardian
an hour ago
- South Wales Guardian
UK interest rates kept on hold with Bank alert to ‘highly unpredictable' world
The Bank's Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) decided to keep rates unchanged at 4.25%. In a split vote, with six members opting to hold and three preferring to cut, the MPC said a 'gradual and careful approach' to reducing borrowing costs continued to be the right course of action. Bank governor Andrew Bailey said: 'Interest rates remain on a gradual downward path, although we've left them on hold today. 'The world is highly unpredictable.' He added that there were 'signs of softening in the labour market' – referring to indicators including slower hiring and wage growth easing – which were being closely watched to see how far they feed into UK inflation. The committee said it was alert to concerns about conflict in the Middle East, which has escalated in recent days with attacks between Israel and Iran. In the minutes of the MPC's meeting, it noted that there had been 'rapid geopolitical developments', adding: 'Energy prices had risen owing to an escalation of the conflict in the Middle East. 'The committee would remain vigilant about these developments and their potential impact on the UK economy.' It echoes similar remarks made by the US's central bank which also opted to keep interest rates on hold on Wednesday. Global oil and natural gas prices have surged in recent weeks, which threatens to push up energy costs in the UK. Furthermore, the MPC noted that Donald Trump's tariff policy was posing risks to global trade and continuing to create uncertainty. But it said that deals struck between the US and other countries, including the UK, meant that the direct impact of the 'trade shock' on global growth could be smaller than it had forecast last month. Meanwhile, the decision to keep rates on hold came as UK Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation remained above the Bank's 2% target level, coming in at 3.4% last month. The jobs market was also starting to cool, with the rate of unemployment ticking up and pay growth starting to ease. The Bank said its network of agents had found that cost pressures from the beginning of April – including national insurance contributions rising – had put pressure on firms to recover them by raising prices. As well as price hikes, it noted that businesses had been leaning on other actions to mitigate costs, including reducing their workforce, staff hours, salaries, and absorbing into profits. The Monetary Policy Committee voted by a majority of 6-3 to keep interest rates at 4.25% Find out more: — Bank of England (@bankofengland) June 19, 2025 It also pointed to waning business sentiment amid weak growth in the UK economy, with demand not expected to recover until 2026. Signs of a weakening jobs market and economic growth indicates that a rate cut could be on the table when the committee next meets in August. Matt Swannell, chief economic adviser to the EY Item Club, said three MPC members voting for a cut was 'probably a sign that the MPC has become slightly more concerned about the labour market than it was in May'. 'This only raises the bar for the MPC to break from its cut-hold tempo at its August meeting and opens the door slightly to rate cuts potentially speeding up in the latter half of this year,' he said. Other experts pointed out that the Bank was having to weigh up a cooling labour market with growing pressures on inflation stemming from global developments. James Smith, developed market economist for ING, said some policymakers had a 'beady eye' on oil prices and were 'wary of a repeat of 2022, where a rise in energy prices turned into a much wider and more persistent services-driven inflation episode'. He is nonetheless forecasting a reduction in rates in August and again in November. Rachel Reeves said the Government respected the Bank's decision as she spoke at The Times CEO Summit. Speaking in central London, the Chancellor said: 'We respect independent economic institutions, and the Bank has got an incredibly important but difficult job to do. 'We want them to set the monetary policy that is appropriate for meeting the inflation target, because we also saw in the last parliament a double-digit inflation which was so challenging for businesses, but also family finances, which also has a knock on impact on business.' Ms Reeves, a former economist at the Bank, insisted the four interest rates cuts made under Labour were 'a world away from the previous parliament, when interest rates went up so sharply because of the poor economic mismanagement of prime ministers and chancellors'.


The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Spain rejects Nato plan for member states to spend 5% of GDP on defence
Spain's prime minister, Pedro Sánchez, has rejected Nato's proposal for member states to increase their defence spending to 5% of their GDP, saying the idea would 'not only be unreasonable but also counterproductive'. Sánchez said that he was not seeking to complicate next week's Nato summit in The Hague, but he wanted there to be a 'more flexible formula' that would either make the target optional or allow Spain to opt out. The proposal – advanced by the Nato secretary general, Mark Rutte, in response to Donald Trump's demands for a 5% target – suggests member states agree to raise defence spending to 3.5% of their GDP and commit a further 1.5% to wider security spending. In a letter to Rutte that emerged on Thursday, Sánchez questioned the possible consequences of such a rise, saying it would be incompatible with Spain's welfare state and its vision of the world. 'Committing to a 5% target would not only be unreasonable but also counterproductive because it would move Spain further away from optimal spending and would hinder the EU's ongoing efforts to strengthen its security and defence ecosystem,' he said. 'It is the legitimate right of every government to decide whether or not they are willing to make those sacrifices. As a sovereign ally, we choose not to.' Spain currently lags well behind other western nations by dedicating only about 1.3% of its GDP to defence spending, well short of the current Nato target of 2%. It has suggested a target of 2.1%. Two months ago, Sánchez announced a €10.5bn (£9bn) 'industrial and technological plan for security and defence' to help Spain hit the 2% target by the end of the year, saying it had become obvious 'only Europe will know how to protect Europe' from now on. Asked for comment about Spain's request, a Nato official told Reuters: 'Discussions among allies on a new defence investment plan are ongoing.' Trump increased pressure on the alliance in January, saying the US had shouldered the global defence burden for too long and that he would ask all members to increase defence spending to 5% of GDP. Sign up to This is Europe The most pressing stories and debates for Europeans – from identity to economics to the environment after newsletter promotion Rutte has urged member states to use the threats from Washington as an incentive to take unilateral action on raising defence contributions. He said last month that the pressure was already paying off in countries such as Spain, Portugal, Belgium and Italy. 'I tell them that, well, now I am calling you to ask you to deliver the 2% by the summer, so that collectively we can move considerably north of the 2% because we have to spend much, much more,' he said in March.


The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
As Trump threatens to join the Israel-Iran conflict, what are Keir Starmer's options?
The choice Keir Starmer makes in the next 48 hours could define his premiership. Tony Blair never escaped the accusation he had been George Bush 's 'poodle' over the invasion of Iraq. And how far the current Labour PM goes in backing another US president in another foreign conflict could help or haunt him for years to come. Sir Keir has urged Donald Trump to step back from the brink of a direct strike on Iran, warning against any action that would 'ramp up the situation'. The PM's official spokesman said ' de-escalation is the priority ' after the US president threatened to wade into the conflict. But, if that did happen, how could the UK respond? One option – albeit the most diplomatically tricky – is to withhold support entirely. Sir Keir has spent months trying to build a special relationship with President Trump. Anything less than support for their actions is likely to go down badly with the current White House regime. However, the Attorney General Lord Hermer, a close political ally of Sir Keir, is reported to have raised legal concerns about any potential British involvement in the conflict beyond defending its allies. Lord Hermer is reportedly reluctant to sign off any offensive operations, with a source telling The Spectator: 'The AG has concerns about the UK playing any role in this except for defending our allies.' The weight the Labour leader places on his old friend's legal judgement could limit the extent of any support for the US, if Mr Trump does decide to act militarily. The PM's own background will also play a role in the decision. The energy minister Miatta Fahnbulleh said on Thursday that he 'who is a lawyer and a human rights lawyer, he will obviously do everything that is in accord with international law.' But will he really risk infuriating President Trump at a time when the Republican's tariffs on goods entering the US have already led economists to downgrade their forecasts for the UK economy? Another option, considered the most likely, is to allow the use of the UK-US airbase at Diego Garcia in the Chagos Islands. The type of B-2 stealth bombers which are often based there are the ones that are capable of carrying specialised 'bunker buster' bombs, which could be used against Iran 's underground nuclear facility at Fordo. This is a middle ground seen as the most likely option for the UK government to back. It would not require action from the UK, but could protect the relationship with the US by seeming to offer support. He is already under pressure over the issue at home. Shadow foreign secretary Dame Priti Patel has said the UK should give permission for the US to use Diego Garcia to launch bunker-buster bombs. One step beyond the Diego Garcia option is to provide logistical support to the US, and what that would look like in practice is being wargamed in Whitehall. The benefit of this option is that it would allow the UK to appear to be more supportive of Present Trump than just simply allowing him to use a US airbase, and at the same time risking only a limited response from Iran. The UK is keen not to allow Tehran a pretext to strike British bases or interests and has sent extra assets to the region, with another six Typhoon jets sent to RAF Akrotiri in Cyprus, joining the eight already there. The final option, considered the least likely, is full UK military intervention. Britain is still pushing hard behind the scenes for a de-escalation in the Middle East. The UK's most favoured outcome is a diplomatic solution, in which both sides dial down the aggression. Keir Starmer is also, as a politician, a gradualist and as such is considered less likely than some of his predecessors as prime minister to commit the UK military to support this kind of intervention, even if it is in the aid of one of our key allies, the United States.