Markets' 90-day tariff pause rollercoaster nears an uncertain end
GDANSK/LONDON — The deadline U.S. President Donald Trump set for major trading partners to strike deals with Washington or face hefty tariffs expires next week, bringing to a close 90 days of volatility but leaving global investors in the dark over what will happen next.
Trump's propensity to issue a threat, or impose a new tariff, only to reverse course shortly afterwards has led to turmoil over the past three months.
Investors, however, have now become somewhat inured to this sort of policymaking on the fly. And, as a result, there is little evidence at this point that many are preparing for fireworks on July 9. Instead, most expect some kind of delay, pause or compromise.
What that will look like, however, is anyone's guess.
Here is a snapshot of where major markets are now, relative to where they were when Trump dropped his initial tariffs bombshell on April 2:
Taking stock of stocks
Global stock markets have staged a strong recovery following the intense volatility triggered by Trump's tariff announcement.
The MSCI World index .MIWD00000PUS, which fell 10 per cent between April 2 and April 9, the day Trump paused the tariffs, has hit successive record highs and gained over 11 per cent since the original 'Liberation Day' announcement.
Global equities got another boost in May, when the U.S. and China reached a temporary truce, pausing many tariffs for another 90 days. Geopolitical tensions, including Israel's recent strikes on Iran and Washington's subsequent bombing of Iranian nuclear sites, briefly reined in sentiment but have not derailed the broader rally.
The S&P 500 .SPX, which had lagged other major equity markets earlier in the year, has closed those gaps, gaining over 10 per cent since April 2, and is neck and neck with the MSCI all-country index, which excludes the United States .MIWU00000PUS.
There's an important caveat, however. The S&P has only hit record highs in dollar terms. The weakness in the U.S. currency has eroded the returns for overseas investors. In euro or Swiss franc terms, for example, the index is still about 10 per cent below February's record high, while in pounds, it's seven per cent below the sterling-denominated peak.
Dollar decline
The U.S. dollar, widely regarded as the world's most powerful and stable currency, has suffered a knock to its reputation from Trump's tariffs and the subsequent 90-day pause.
The dollar index, which reflects the U.S. currency's performance against a basket of six others including the euro and the Japanese yen, suffered its worst first half of the year since 1973, declining by approximately 11 per cent. It has fallen by 6.6 per cent since April 2 alone.
Against the currencies of some of the United States' biggest trading partners, the decline has been even more marked. It has lost some eight per cent against the euro and the Mexican peso since then and five per cent against the Canadian dollar.
Vincent Mortier, the CIO of Europe's largest asset manager Amundi, said the euro has plenty more room to run, especially as U.S. debt worries are also driving the dollar down.
'I won't be surprised if by the end of next year we start to revisit the US$1.30 level,' he said, highlighting that at its 2008 peak, the euro got as high as $1.60.
For exporters, certainty is the prize
European shares have more than recovered losses suffered since Trump's 'Liberation Day.' But strength in the euro and anxiety over tariffs have kept them below March's record highs.
Large exporting sectors such as pharma and autos, which make up around one-third of EU exports to the United States, have rebounded too, but have been more volatile.
Brussels is reportedly open to a U.S. deal that would apply a universal 10% tariff on many of its exports, something several investors would view favorably should it be confirmed. Citi said markets risk being caught offside if tariffs are reimposed at 20 per cent or reach 50 per cent.
'Trump is truly unpredictable, but if it's really around 10 per cent, I think the markets will react very well,' said Carlo Franchini, head of institutional clients at Banca Ifigest.
The impact of the trade talks extends beyond Europe, however, with automakers in Japan also being watched. Citi's base case is for a sustained 25 per cent tariff, while a surprise cut to 10 per cent could unlock a 50 per cent upside for Japanese auto stocks.
All that glitters
Gold has featured as the hedge of choice against an array of risks, from tariff-induced inflation, to geopolitical risk and a shift away from the U.S. dollar.
The price has hit record after record, rising 26 per cent so far this year to around $3,330 an ounce. Gold has eclipsed bitcoin, which has gained about 14 per cent year to date, and even Nvidia, the maker of chips that power AI capabilities, whose shares went parabolic last year and have risen about 18 per cent this year.
Since April 2, gold's ascent has gathered pace, fueled by purchases from central banks, fund managers and even individuals.
A survey by UBS Asset Management this week showed 39 per cent of respondents said they planned to increase their gold holdings, compared with 15 per cent last year. The independence of the Federal Reserve - whose chair, Jerome Powell, Trump has berated repeatedly for not cutting interest rates fast enough - is one of the key concerns cited in the survey.
(Reporting by Canan Sevgili and Alberto Chiumento in Gdansk, Danilo Masoni in Milan and Alun John, Marc Jones and Amanda Cooper in London; Editing by Joe Bavier)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
How Trump could make Canada better
As obnoxious as he is, Donald Trump may actually be doing Canada some good. His demands are forcing this country to rethink bad ideas, question sacred cows and brace itself for the challenges of the future. Just this week, the U.S. President gave Prime Minister Mark Carney an excuse to jettison a wrong-headed tax on foreign tech giants. Because just about all of those giants are American, Washington has opposed it from the start, under Joe Biden's administration as well as Mr. Trump's. The heaps of money that were to flow to Ottawa from the tax would have come from the pockets of the millions of Canadians who use Amazon, Apple, Google or other digital providers. Higher taxes inevitably mean higher rates for consumers. Mr. Trump refused to continue trade talks with Canada until Ottawa got rid of the tax, which was about to take effect. Mr. Carney duly killed it. A capitulation? No, a sensible concession. Good policy, to boot. I can think of at least three other ways that Mr. Trump's Blame Canada campaign is forcing us to reconsider the way we do things. Start with national defence. Mr. Trump has said for years that Canada and other countries in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization are freeloading off the United States, relying on Washington to keep the Western alliance well armed while scrimping on armaments themselves. To up defence spending, Canada must cut deeper, tax harder and borrow more – all at once It's not your grandfather's war any more, and defence procurement must evolve Canada was one of the worst of the laggards, its rate of spending near the bottom of the pack. By outsourcing our defence to our mighty next-door neighbour, we saved countless billions – money that was freed up for other needs such as hospitals, roads, parks and schools. The generous health care and other social programs that Canadians cherish were in effect underwritten by the U.S. That had to change some time. Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine showed how vital it is to keep NATO strong, united and well armed. Now the alliance itself is calling for all members to increase their defence spending dramatically over the next decade. 'For too long, one ally, the United States, carried too much of the burden,' NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte said at last month's summit. That is changing, he said, and Mr. Trump 'made this change possible.' That may have been an attempt to feed the ego of the egomaniac in the White House, but it was not wrong. Or consider interprovincial trade. The absurd barriers to the flow of goods, services and labour across Canada have been an issue for decades. Everyone agreed they were absurd. Editorial writers turned blue in the face pointing out their absurdity. Premiers and prime ministers huddled every few years to talk about doing something. Next to nothing actually happened. Try getting one of Quebec's many excellent craft beers in Ontario. Now, at last, we are seeing some progress. The punishing, nonsensical tariffs imposed by Mr. Trump have put a fire under the provinces and the feds. If we cannot have free trade with the United States, we should at least be able to trade freely with each other. Internal free trade by Canada Day? It'll take longer than that Even Canada's system of supply management is getting a second look. Under this Soviet-style scheme, marketing boards, rather than the free market, govern the output of eggs, milk, cheese and poultry. Authorities set minimum prices and impose production quotas. High tariffs on imports of these basic commodities ensure that the cozy little set-up survives. The result for ordinary consumers is far higher prices than they might otherwise pay for simple things such as a brick of cheddar or a carton of yogurt. Mr. Trump attacked the system in his first term and is at it again. He is not alone. Canada's other trading partners complain bitterly about it, too. But the agriculture lobby is so strong, especially in Quebec, that no government has dared to dismantle it. Whether Mr. Carney's will remains to be seen. The recent Throne Speech reaffirmed support for supply management and new legislation attempts to prevent Ottawa from sacrificing it in trade talks. But the system is probably the biggest remaining irritant for Mr. Trump, and Mr. Carney might be forced to make concessions to strike a tariff deal with him. Good. Should we all be giving Mr. Trump a great big cheer, then? Of course not. He is bad for his country, for us and for the world in ways too many to count. He is a bully and blowhard. He has insulted our leaders and threatened our sovereignty. On many issues, pushing back against his demands is the way to go. But some of what he says about the way we do things is right. We do hide under American skirts for our defence. We do coddle our farm producers and hobble foreign competitors. If Canada is to survive the Trumpian onslaught, it must do more than simply put its elbows up and stand strong. It must become more efficient, more productive, more innovative. It must change.
Global News
an hour ago
- Global News
How Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill' impacts Canada and the clean energy push
Spread across the more than 800 pages of U.S. President Donald Trump's massive tax cut and spending package signed into law on Friday are measures that could have impacts on Canada, particularly on environmental and energy policies. The 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' cuts billions of dollars in spending meant to boost clean energy infrastructure across the U.S., which building trades unions warn could result in over a million lost construction jobs. The legislation also scraps tax credits for electric vehicles, which may push the North American auto industry further away from EVs. Taken together, the measures effectively end a brief era where the U.S. and Canada were moving in the same direction in combatting the climate crisis, says George Hoberg, a professor at the University of British Columbia who focuses on climate and energy policy. Story continues below advertisement 'It really interrupts whatever delicate momentum we had towards stronger climate policy and towards a clean energy transition,' he told Global News. Clean energy tax credits scrapped Tax credits passed under the Inflation Reduction Act during former president Joe Biden's term for individual home solar systems, heat pumps and battery storage will end this year under the Republican bill. So will tax credits for upgrades such as windows, insulation, heating and cooling systems. But growing concern is being raised for the impact to large-scale wind and solar projects, which qualified for tax credits even if they were to begin construction nearly a decade from now under Biden's law. Under Trump's bill, the timeline shrinks. While projects that begin construction within a year of the law coming into force will still be eligible for a full credit, those that start beyond that must be fully operational by the end of 2027, or they lose out on the incentives. Story continues below advertisement 1:46 Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' set to become law after it passes in US House Atlas Public Policy, a policy consultancy, said roughly 28 gigawatts of wind and solar projects are planned to be operational after the start of 2028 but haven't begun construction yet. Under the bill, they're unlikely to qualify for a credit, raising fears they could be cancelled altogether. North America's Building Trades Unions, which represents over three million trades workers in the U.S. and Canada, said late last month that the legislation 'stands to be the biggest job-killing bill in the history of this country.' 'Simply put, it is the equivalent of terminating more than 1,000 Keystone XL pipeline projects,' president Sean McGarvey said in a statement, adding an estimated 1.75 million construction jobs were under threat. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy The Laborers' International Union of North America, home to half a million American and Canadian workers, echoed those fears after the U.S. Senate passed what ended up being the final version of the bill on Tuesday. Story continues below advertisement 'This bill eradicates thousands of good-paying LIUNA jobs — jobs that were promised, planned, and already underway,' general president Brent Booker said. 'These solar and wind projects weren't abstract policy ideas — they were real job opportunities for real people across every part of our country for the next seven years. Now, all projects that have not started construction within one year — a year marked by economic fragility and supply chain insecurity — will never break ground and our members will never work on them.' Republicans argue the bill will 'unleash American energy' through its multiple supports for oil, coal and gas production and mining. The legislation expands oil leases off U.S. coasts and includes tax incentives for corporate oil and gas producers. 'This historic legislation is a win for American-made energy, consumers and the workers who power our economy,' Mike Sommers, president and CEO of the American Petroleum Institute, said in a statement after the bill's final passage Thursday. Bill stalls EV incentives The bill eliminates credits of up to US$7,500 for buyers of new electric vehicles and up to US$4,000 for buyers of used EVs, which industry analysts have said contributed to steadily rising EV sales in the U.S. Story continues below advertisement The credits will disappear after Sept. 30. The Inflation Reduction Act ensured those credits were applied to vehicles made with North American auto parts. Canada later secured inclusion in that policy, spurring cross-border EV production. 1:57 Carmakers tell Carney to ditch Canada's target for EV sales But sales have stalled in both Canada and the U.S. and have fallen short of government goals. Biden had set a target for half of all new vehicles sold in the U.S. to be electric by 2030, while Canada's EV sales mandate requires that 20 per cent of all new light-duty vehicles sold next year be zero-emission. The target rises annually to 100 per cent by 2035. Canadian automakers who met with Prime Minister Mark Carney this week to urge him to repeal the mandate said they were 'cautiously optimistic' that their lobbying would pay off. Story continues below advertisement Meanwhile, automakers this year have steadily paused or reduced EV production and and the building of new battery plants in Ontario, threatening billions of dollars in investments. 'Getting rid of the (U.S.) tax credits really isn't going to bode very well for the EV industry, and that has big implications for Canada on the idea of an integrated EV supply chain,' said Joseph Calnan, vice-president of the Canadian Global Affairs Institute who focuses on energy policy. What does this mean for Canada? Like Trump, Carney has also been pursuing policies to make his country an 'energy superpower.' Unlike Trump, however, the Liberal government is taking an 'all of the above' approach to energy infrastructure, rather than only focusing on fossil fuels. 'They're moving in the same direction, but the Carney government has moved more toward the centre, and the Trump government has moved more toward the kind of further end of discussions of of energy policy,' Calnan said. Story continues below advertisement In discussions among premiers and stakeholders on 'nation-building projects' set to be fast-tracked under newly passed federal legislation, government leaders have discussed pursuing both new oil and gas projects as well as renewable energy, critical minerals and carbon capture simultaneously. Alberta Premier Danielle Smith has pitched a 'grand bargain' where a proposed $16.5-billion carbon capture project would go ahead in tandem with a new crude oil pipeline to the West Coast under the major projects bill. Ottawa is currently drafting a final list of major projects to undertake. 3:02 Carney calls for energy partnerships to make Canada a global superpower Experts say there are opportunities for Canada to attract investments from the United States now that its tax credits have been scrapped. Artificial intelligence companies looking to reduce their environmental impact could be lured by Canada's hydropower resources to power their data centres, Hoburg said. It may be harder for Canada to present itself as a viable alternative for wind and solar projects, however, Calnan said, given parts of the U.S. are some of the sunniest and windiest places in the world. Story continues below advertisement Yet uncertainty in the U.S. could still lead companies to look elsewhere. Tariffs will also play a role in how Canada is either impacted or can potentially benefit by the shifts in policy. Canada could consider waiving its counter-tariffs on U.S. goods and companies to spur investment, according to Calnan. The high tariffs on Chinese goods — as well as Beijing's ongoing threats to national security — should also fuel Canada's ongoing push to create domestic supply chains not just for critical minerals, but also for solar panels and wind turbines. Ultimately, Hoberg says Trump's bill will have major implications on North America's shared climate goals, including efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. 'It makes it harder for the Canadian government to pursue ambitious policies,' he said. 'It doesn't make it impossible, but it makes it more costly, and as a result it increases domestic political resistance.' He said the Carney government's efforts to reorient Canada's trade and economic relationships toward Europe and Asia could present opportunities to pursue shared climate goals with those allies. —with files from the Associated Press
Canada News.Net
2 hours ago
- Canada News.Net
Nvidia approaches $4T valuation, closes in on historic record
SANTA CLARA, California: Nvidia came within a whisker of making financial history on July 3, briefly surpassing Apple's all-time market value record and edging toward becoming the most valuable company ever. The AI chipmaker's market capitalization hit US$3.92 trillion in early trading, fuelled by soaring investor confidence in artificial intelligence. Its share price rose as much as 2.4 percent to $160.98, nudging past Apple's record close of $3.915 trillion set on December 26, 2024. Shares later settled at $159.60, leaving Nvidia's market value just shy of the all-time high at $3.89 trillion. Nvidia's cutting-edge chips have become essential to training large AI models, making its products highly sought after amid an AI arms race among tech giants. Microsoft followed closely behind with a valuation of $3.7 trillion, while Apple trailed in third at $3.19 trillion, despite its own gains on the day. The high-stakes race to build AI data centres has driven up demand for Nvidia's processors, with companies like Microsoft, Amazon, Meta, Alphabet, and Tesla fuelling its rise. "When the first company crossed a trillion dollars, it was amazing. And now you're talking four trillion, which is just incredible," said Joe Saluzzi, co-manager of trading at Themis Trading. "It tells you that there's this huge rush with AI spending and everybody's chasing it right now." According to LSEG, Nvidia's valuation has exploded nearly eightfold in four years, from $500 billion in 2021, surpassing the combined value of the Canadian and Mexican stock markets and even exceeding all UK-listed companies. Despite the surge, Nvidia's stock trades at about 32 times expected earnings—lower than its five-year average of 41—as earnings forecasts continue to climb faster than share prices. The rebound in Nvidia stock—up 68 percent since its April 4 low—coincides with recovering U.S. markets after global jitters tied to President Donald Trump's tariff announcements. Optimism around potential trade agreements has helped soothe investor nerves. The company now makes up 7 percent of the S&P 500, with Nvidia, Microsoft, Apple, Amazon, and Alphabet collectively accounting for 28 percent of the index. That means everyday savers in S&P 500 index funds are increasingly tied to AI's fate. "I strongly believe that AI is a greatly productive tool, but I am fairly sure that the current delivery of AI via large language models and large reasoning models is unlikely to live up to the hype," warned Kim Forrest, chief investment officer at Bokeh Capital Partners. Founded in 1993 by Jensen Huang, Nvidia has transformed from a gaming-focused chipmaker into the bellwether of the AI revolution. Its rise has reshaped the semiconductor landscape, especially after replacing Intel on the Dow Jones Industrial Average last November. Nvidia's stock has rallied after a slow start to the year. Investor excitement over AI was briefly overshadowed by trade tensions and a cut-price AI model from China's DeepSeek, which prompted fears of reduced spending on high-end processors. But if the numbers are any indication, Wall Street's AI enthusiasm is far from cooling.
