&w=3840&q=100)
Parliamentary standing committee on defence to meet today at 3 PM
The Parliamentary Standing Committee on Defence will meet on Monday afternoon at 3.
This development comes as Defence Minister Rajnath Singh met Prime Minister Narendra Modi at 7, Lok Kalyan Marg.
The meeting comes a day after Chief of Defence Staff Anil Chauhan briefed the Defence Minister on the key decisions taken to counter Pakistan following the deadly Pahalgam terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir. Today's meeting also comes three days after the all-party meet held in Parliament premises on the Pahalgam terror attack, which the Defence Minister chaired.
The attack, which occurred on April 22, 26 individuals, mostly tourists, including one Nepalese national, were brutally gunned down. The incident happened around 2 pm at Baisaran meadow. It was one of the deadliest attacks in the region since the 2019 Pulwama strike, which claimed the lives of 40 Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) jawans.
Following the incident, NIA teams have been stationed at the site since April 23 and have intensified the search for evidence. Additionally, the Indian Army is on high alert, launching several search operations to neutralise the terrorists following the attack in Pahalgam.
On April 23, the Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS) met to take steps regarding the attack, condemning it in the strongest terms and expressing their deepest condolences to the families of the victims and hoping for the speedy recovery of the injured.
In the briefing to the CCS, the cross-border linkages of the terrorist attack were brought out. It was noted that this attack came in the wake of the successful holding of elections in the Union Territory and its steady progress towards economic growth and development.
Meanwhile, India announced a ban on 16 Pakistani YouTube channels for spreading provocative and communally sensitive content and misinformation against India, its Army and security agencies in the backdrop of the tragic Pahalgam terror incident in Jammu and Kashmir. Collectively, these channels have a massive following of over 63 million subscribers.
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
24 minutes ago
- News18
Indian Diaspora Extends Warm Welcome To PM Modi In Cyprus
Last Updated: The key issues on PM Modi's agenda include IT and innovation, defence, shipping, renewable energy, and people-to-people ties. Prime Minister Narendra Modi received a warm welcome from the Indian diaspora in Limassol, after he arrived in Cyprus as part of his three-nation tour. Sharing pictures where the Prime Minister was seen greeting the Indian nationals, he wrote on X, 'I thank the Indian community for the affection. India will keep working to deepen ties with Cyprus in the times to come." Notably, this is the prime minister's first visit to Cyprus. His visit is seen as a historic moment by both Indian and Cypriot diplomatic sources. His visit comes following the invitation by President Nicos Christodoulides. PM Modi was accompanied by a large delegation of around 100 officials. After landing at Larnaca International Airport, the Prime Minister received a heartfelt welcome by the Cyprus President. 'Landed in Cyprus. My gratitude to the President of Cyprus, Mr. Nikos Christodoulides for the special gesture of welcoming me at the airport. This visit will add significant momentum to India-Cyprus relations, especially in areas like trade, investment and more," PM Modi said in a post on X. During his visit, PM Modi is scheduled to hold delegation-level talks with Christodoulides. Both leaders are also likely to share perspectives on global and regional matters, including maritime security and the situation in West Asia. Ahead of his arrival, the Indian diaspora in Cyprus was brimming with excitement at PM Modi's much-anticipated visit. India and Cyprus have shared close diplomatic ties since 1962, the year formal relations were established. Over the decades, Cyprus has 'consistently supported India's position on Kashmir and other key issues at international platforms, including the United Nations." Besides his official engagements, Prime Minister Modi is also likely to meet and address the Indian community in Cyprus. While relatively small in size, the diaspora has a significant presence across sectors such as healthcare, education, and business. Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from politics to crime and society. Stay informed with the latest India news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! First Published:
Hindustan Times
29 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Five years on, the lessons of Galwan
No one knew about the Galwan Valley in the Eastern Ladakh region of India until the fateful days of June 15-16, 2020. Something happened on the intervening night that impacted Sino-Indian relations in a big way and forced us to revisit our doctrines on strategic preparedness and border security. On the fifth anniversary of the Galwan clashes, it's necessary to remember the bloody skirmish that left our borders bleeding. Since 2013, a pattern of border tensions flaring up regularly between China and India has become obvious. In 2017, Chinese soldiers entered disputed areas. India showed alacrity in countering the incursions. Both parties held many rounds of discussions to defuse the tension and agreed to maintain the earlier status quo. Both countries withdrew their soldiers to the positions they held before the incursion. Meanwhile, China had constructed an observation post in Galwan Valley. Despite Indian soldiers repeatedly protesting and asking the Chinese to vacate the makeshift observation post, the latter refused to oblige within the stipulated time. When, under the command of Colonel Santosh Babu, close to a hundred Indian soldiers went to remove the encroachment, a large contingent of Chinese soldiers attacked them. According to the treaties signed in 1996 and 2005, both armies don't use lethal weapons in case of a clash. So, what unfolded was shameful and instructive. Those aggressors had long sticks covered with barbed wire, steel rods and other such weapons that were enough to kill anyone. Outmanoeuvred and outnumbered, our soldiers fought bravely, but they didn't arrive at the location with an intent to fight. The unfortunate result was that 20 soldiers, along with Colonel Santosh Babu, laid down their lives in close-quarter hand-to-hand combat. The news hit the Indian masses like a tonne of bricks. Countrymen started asking if the 58 years that lapsed between 1962 and 2020 weren't enough to prepare for such a contingency. Everyone knew China annexed Tibet under a well-thought-out plan in 1959. Since then, Beijing has been involved in steadily changing the demographics of the land by increasing the number of Han settlers to outnumber the native Tibetans. Since 1980, it has been constructing military cantonments, airfields, and helipads along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) at a steady and fast pace. It's not that India was caught napping or that we weren't doing anything. We were preparing, but our speed was slow. In 2014, after coming to power in the Centre, Prime Minister Narendra Modi made it a priority and diverted his energies and focus to upgrading the military preparedness along the Chinese borders. Roads were extended to the borders and the existing ones were broadened. Border posts were upgraded. Special focus was given to the Indo-Tibetan border police during this period. It's true that despite our herculean efforts during the last decade, we will still need many more years to match the Chinese preparations. Still, powers that be in Beijing are now becoming jittery. This was the reason they raked up the Doklam issue before Galwan. Despite an agreement, probably, Galwan was carried out to stop us. But were they successful? The answer is no. New Delhi didn't lose its nerve. Within no time, 68,000 soldiers, 90 battle tanks, and a large cache of critical equipment were deployed in Eastern Ladakh. New Delhi knew it wasn't enough. China had more than 200,000 soldiers deployed in its Western Theatre Command, and its reserves weren't far behind. India's border with China is 3,488 kilometres long. However, China insists that it is only 2,000 kilometres. Our strategists were clear that we can't man the entire border, and neither can the Chinese. Exploiting this chink in the armour, our soldiers captured many steep and snow-clad heights including the Thakung Peak. The strategic importance of these heights was immense. Now, the Chinese soldiers deployed in the valley were in our line of fire. The Chinese should have known that we have enough experience to command heights since 1984, the year we captured the Siachen glacier. It broke China's morale and gave us a formidable bargaining chip at the negotiation table. After four years of intense negotiations, soldiers have returned to their bases, but the rancour in the relations remains. The clash also affected the way diplomacy and international negotiations are conducted. Earlier, dealing with such an impasse was the sole remit of the foreign office. However, after the Galwan clashes, military officers from both sides came to the negotiating table. The process was excruciatingly long, but no one can be more vigilant towards border security than military personnel. I am sure Indian generals must have made a well-considered decision. How Beijing's ruling elite views us was evident recently during the military conflict with Pakistan last month. China openly sided with Pakistan. After Galwan, not only has it provided deadly weapons to Pakistan, but it has also trained them. Some experts believe that Pakistani military officials have been seen in the People's Liberation Army's (PLA) training facilities in Ladakh and the North East areas. What is the key message from Galwan and the recent clash with Pakistan? We should be prepared to fight both China and Pakistan simultaneously. Age-old military principles insist we should remain alert to the enemy's every move. The world is rapidly changing in the wake of the Russia-Ukraine, Israel-Hamas, and Israel-Iran conflicts, and we must remain prepared for every eventuality. Chinese general Sun Tzu was right when he said, 'Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win'. Shashi Shekhar is editor-in-chief, Hindustan. The views expressed are personal
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
An arena for Islamabad to do grandstanding
Pakistan will assume the presidency of the UN Security Council (UNSC) in July, for one month. However, in the run-up to the presidency, there has been much consternation in the Indian media about Pakistan becoming one of the three vice-chairs of UNSC's Committee on Counter-Terrorism (CTC). Algeria will remain the CTC chair till the end of 2025, and Pakistan wants to become the chair in 2026. Even though Pakistan unwisely held up the work of other UNSC Committees for a full five months just to get this express commitment for 2026 — similar to the dispensation India got in 2021 — the P-5 (permanent five members of UNSC) still would not agree to give Pakistan any such commitment. When India wanted to be the CTC chair during its term at UNSC between 2021-2022, there was no vacancy in 2021 since the chair, Tunisia, still had one year to go. Normally, the chair would then have gone to those members elected for 2022-2023, and India would have missed the chance. However, the UNSC, and more importantly, the P-5 (which included China), gave an express commitment to India in 2021 that it would be the CTC chair for 2022. Needless to add, India made an impact by bringing the entire CTC Committee in 2022 to visit the venue of the 2008 Mumbai attacks and chairing a special CTC session in New Delhi. Pakistan wanted a similar express commitment for the CTC chair in 2026, which was refused by the Council. This is not to say that it won't get the chair in 2026, but it will have five other newly elected member-States competing for the post. The P-5 also rightly, and outrightly, rejected Pakistan's demand to chair the 1267 sanctions committee dealing with al-Qaeda and ISIL (Da'esh), since the 1267 sanctions list is peppered with the names of Pakistani terrorists and terror groups, including Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed and the masterminds of the Pahalgam terror attack. Pakistan had to settle for the 1988 Taliban sanctions committee which has now become a mere shell of its former self after the Taliban takeover in Afghanistan in August 2021. Though some Taliban ministers are still on the sanctions list, they have been continuously given waivers from sanctions to perform their functions. If Pakistan thinks that it can arm-twist the Taliban as the chair, it is sadly mistaken. That said, the focus is on Pakistan's UNSC presidency in July. Its presidency comes in the aftermath of Operation Sindoor, with a civilian government fattened by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and other loans and a military establishment receiving arms from China and Turkey. Since it is Islamabad's only presidency, during its term, it will go for the 'jugular vein' — borrowing a phrase from its much-decorated army chief. During its presidency, Pakistan can be expected to do all it can to have an open debate on Jammu and Kashmir to do some grandstanding on the world stage. It would ideally prefer this under an anachronistically titled agenda item, 'The India-Pakistan question'. However, the P-5 nations have allowed only closed consultations under this agenda item in the recent past. Since Pakistan is adamant about an open discussion, it may settle for another agenda item 'peaceful resolution of conflicts' which would, however, dilute the focus given there are enough conflicts around the world. Of course, technically any decision for an open or closed session can be challenged and voted on, for which nine affirmative votes out of 15 members are required (since vetoes do not apply to procedural votes). But Pakistan is mindful of the fact that contrary to what it is trying to project, there is really no appetite in the international community to internationalise the Kashmir issue. Moreover, while Indians like to portray any call for de-escalation as a hyphenation of India and Pakistan, this hyphenation is more in our minds and not in those who call for de-escalation. The world knows better. On the Indus Water Treaty, even before India held it in abeyance after the Pahalgam attacks, Pakistan had declared its intention to make it an issue during its presidency. After consistently thwarting India's attempt to renegotiate this lopsided treaty, it will take the matter to the UNSC citing breach of security. There is a precedence of UNSC presidential statements being adopted earlier, on the construction of the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam that was contested by Egypt fearing decreased flow of Nile waters from Ethiopia. Any UNSC statement will require the concurrence of all 15 member-States. Further, a Pakistani focus on combatting terrorism and Islamophobia is inevitable, in the country's attempt to wipe away the stains of being a State sponsor of terrorism. A session on the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation is on the cards to burnish Pakistan's Islamic credentials. The Gaza war and Israeli-Iran conflict will receive attention. So will UN peacekeeping, since Pakistan is a major troop-contributing country. While our multiparty delegations have visited UNSC countries, multilateral issues have dynamics of their own. Close bilateral friendship with a country does not necessarily translate into greater multilateral cooperation at the UN. India will no doubt keep a close eye on what the US and the UK do in July, given recent American flip-flops on Pakistan and the UK's ambivalent postures in UNSC. Further, given India's geopolitical distancing from recent conflicts around the world — in its national interest — we should be prepared for similar reactions towards India when we need them. Given our standing, the world now expects us to get geopolitically involved in their problems as well. As I have argued before, it is time for India to take its right geopolitical place — regionally and globally. Pakistan's presidency also comes during the monsoon session of our Parliament. One hopes that we in India treat Pakistan's grandstanding with a sense of perspective and equanimity. No UNSC document can threaten the national interests of India. TS Tirumurti is a former ambassador and Permanent Representative of India to the United Nations, New York. The views expressed are personal
