&w=3840&q=100)
Double whammy for Japan: Decline of Ishiba's LDP, and rise of far right
Japan's Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba attends a press conference at the headquarters of the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) in Tokyo on July 21, 2025, the day after the prime minister's coalition lost its upper house majority. File Image/Pool via Reuters
With the results of Japan's latest upper house (House of Councillors) election held on Sunday, July 20, trickling in, voters have dealt a double blow to the ruling coalition of Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba's Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) and its junior partner, the Buddhist Komeito party.
Held just nine months after Ishiba assumed the prime ministership, the election served as a strong rebuke to both the prime minister and the LDP—Japan's historically dominant party. Under Ishiba's leadership, the coalition has now suffered two consecutive defeats in national elections in under a year—in the lower house (October 2024), and in upper house now.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
First Time in Seven Decades
Of the 248 seats in the upper chamber, 125 were contested in Sunday's election. The LDP and Komeito needed to retain at least 50 of their combined 66 seats to maintain their majority. They fell short, winning only 47 seats—better than early projections, but not enough to hold control.
This marks the first time since World War II, and in the LDP's 70-year history, that an LDP-led coalition does not hold a majority in either house of Japan's national legislature—the House of Representatives and the House of Councillors.
Results Decoded
According to NHK's Monday, July 21 morning projections, the results break down as follows:
The LDP is likely to win 39 seats, and its partner Komeito 8 seats, for a total of 47.
The main opposition, the Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan (CDP), is projected to secure 21 seats.
The populist conservative Democratic Party for the People (DPP), with only four incumbents up for re-election, is expected to win 17 seats.
The surprise of the election is the far-right Sanseito party, which had just one seat going in but is projected to win 14. Sanseito ran a staunchly anti-immigration campaign under the slogan 'Japanese First'.
Nippon Ishin no Kai is projected to win seven seats.
The Japanese Communist Party and Reiwa Shinsengumi are expected to win three seats each.
And the Real Winner Is…
Mirroring a broader trend seen across Europe and beyond, Japan's latest election signals the rising clout of far-right and anti-establishment forces. Once relatively insulated from such movements, Japan has now joined this global wave.
The standout winners in Sunday's election are two far-right parties—Sanseito and the Democratic Party for the People—both of which didn't exist five years ago. These parties, with their populist messages, have made significant inroads, particularly among younger voters.
Most notable is Sanseito's dramatic leap from one seat to 14. The five-year-old party campaigned on the idea that Japan is under a 'silent invasion' from foreigners, claiming foreign investment and tourism have made the country an 'economic colony'. They described reliance on foreign labor as a 'national doping scheme'.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Sanseito has signaled its intent to join a coalition government after the next Lower House election—a possibility experts believe could gain traction amid mounting anti-LDP sentiment.
The Double Whammy
This comes on the heels of an earlier defeat in the more powerful Lower House election in October 2024, when Ishiba's coalition lost its majority in the 465-seat chamber. That loss was widely seen as voter punishment for numerous financial scandals.
The ruling bloc's seat count fell from 279 to just 215—their worst performance since briefly losing power in 2009. The Lower House, unlike the Upper House, selects the prime minister and can override the upper chamber on budgets and legislation.
To Stay On
Despite the double setback, Ishiba has resisted calls to step down. In interviews with NHK on July 20 and a press conference on July 21, he made it clear he intends to remain in office to fulfill his campaign pledges.
'We've received an extremely harsh judgment from the public,' Ishiba acknowledged at LDP headquarters. '(The result) was extremely deplorable. I apologise.' But he added, 'We will not allow stagnation in national politics.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
He cited ongoing tariff talks with the United States, rising prices, and the looming threat of a major earthquake in Tokyo as reasons to stay. 'Such things do not wait for the political situation to be settled,' he said.
Regarding US trade negotiations, he added, 'With the new date of August 1st in mind, I want to reach an agreement that benefits both Japan and the United States based on the idea of investments, rather than tariffs.'
Dismal Approval Rating
Public approval for Ishiba's cabinet has been low since he took office in October 2024. According to the latest Jiji Press survey, approval dropped 6.2 points in July to just 20.8 per cent—the lowest since his administration began.
Meanwhile, disapproval surged by 6.6 points to 55.0 per cent. The reasons cited include lack of hope (29.7 per cent), lack of leadership (21.9 per cent), and disapproval of policies (21.6 per cent).
Election Issues
Economy: The top issue for voters was the economy—particularly rising prices following decades of stagnation.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Wage Stagnation: While wages have increased somewhat, they haven't kept pace with the cost of living.
Spike in Rice Prices: A key frustration has been the sharp rise in rice prices, attributed to government failure in balancing supply and demand.
Trump Tariffs: Japan's export-reliant economy is grappling with the unpredictability of former US President Trump's on-again, off-again tariff threats.
In June, inflation rose by 3.3 per cent compared to a year earlier, while real wages fell 2.9 percent in May. While the ruling coalition proposed cash handouts to ease the burden, opposition parties favored cuts to the consumption tax.
Confusion Galore
Though Ishiba has only been in office since October 1, 2024, past prime ministers have struggled to retain power after similar losses. In fact, no LDP leader has survived after back-to-back electoral defeats. The defeats of Sosuke Uno in 1989 and Ryutaro Hashimoto in 1998 are poignant precedents.
Still, Ishiba has vowed to continue—for now. But the odds are stacked heavily against him.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
A Jiji Press exit poll found that 24.3 per cent of respondents want an opposition-centered government to replace the current regime. Only 18.4 per cent supported continuation of the LDP-Komeito coalition.
The poll also revealed widespread uncertainty:
9.6 per cent favored a DPP entry into the coalition.
7.0 per cent wanted the CDP to participate in government.
5.1 per cent hoped for a LDP-Komeito partnership with Nippon Ishin no Kai.
A significant 35.5 per cent supported none of the above or were undecided.
What Next?
No national election is due until 2028. The next LDP presidential election is set for September 2027—unless Ishiba resigns earlier.
The ruling coalition now finds itself in a legislative bind. Without a majority in either house, passing laws will be a challenge. Forming a third coalition partner may prove difficult; building consensus on critical issues could be even harder.
After back-to-back defeats in both houses—a historic first in 70 years for the LDP—the latest Upper House loss may well signal that time is running out for Prime Minister Ishiba. Public trust in the coalition's ability to tackle inflation, stabilise prices, and push through reforms has eroded.
Experts suggest the coalition's best bet may be to accept opposition policy proposals where possible and form 'diagonal' partnerships on a case-by-case basis to pass legislation.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Future Uncertain
As the dust settles, the questions loom: Is this the beginning of the end for the LDP's dominance? Do the new far-right parties represent a fleeting protest vote, or a long-term shift in Japan's political landscape? Is this the voice of the young and disillusioned?
It's too early to say with certainty—but what is clear is this: the ruling coalition has reached a checkmate moment. And if the fragmented opposition unites to bring a no confidence motion against the ruling LDP coalition, the unthinkable may possibly happen in Japan.
The author is a multi-disciplinary thought leader with Action Bias and an India based impact consultant. He is a keen watcher of changing national and international scenarios. He works as President Advisory Services of Consulting Company BARSYL. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
6 minutes ago
- Time of India
Who Is Sōhei Kamiya AKA Japan's Donald Trump? A YouTuber, teacher wins election in Japan
Sōhei Kamiya, a popular YouTuber-turned-politician, is currently making waves in Japanese politics. Also known as Japan's Donald Trump, Kamiya has emerged as a major figure after his far-right party, Sanseitō, shocked many by winning 14 seats in the recent Japan election. This surprising success has not only raised eyebrows domestically but also drawn comparisons to populist leaders like Donald Trump himself. From Fringe Candidate to Political Force The rise of Sōhei Kamiya marks a significant shift in Japanese politics. His party, Sanseitō, which started out on the fringes during the COVID-19 pandemic, has now become a strong force in the country's upper house. In 2022, Sanseitō held just one seat. But in the latest Japan election, the party secured 14–15 seats in the 248-member House of Councillors, dramatically increasing its influence. This unexpected gain has weakened Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba's coalition, placing Kamiya in a position to influence national legislation. Unlike mainstream parties, Kamiya prefers building alliances with other fringe groups instead of aligning with the ruling coalition. Who Is Sōhei Kamiya? Born on 12 October 1977 in Takahama, Fukui Prefecture, Sōhei Kamiya holds a law degree and has had a varied career. Before entering politics, he worked as an English teacher, supermarket manager, and later became popular on YouTube, where he posted political videos questioning government policies. His official political career began as a member of Suita City Council in Osaka. He was part of the Liberal Democratic Party from 2012 to 2015, later serving as an independent until he founded Sanseitō in 2020. Sōhei Kamiya's Career and the Birth of Sanseitō Sanseitō—also known as the 'Party of Do It Yourself'—was launched in April 2020 during the pandemic by a group of citizens frustrated with Japan's existing political choices. Since its foundation, Sōhei Kamiya's career has been closely tied to the growth of this party. As the Secretary General and key strategist, he has been its public face and driving force. The party's ideology includes Japanese nationalism, right-wing populism, and a firm anti-immigration stance. It also opposes LGBTQ+ rights, gender equality initiatives, and COVID-19 vaccines and masks—positions that have helped it gain popularity among right-leaning voters. In 2022, Sanseitō officially gained national party status by earning more than 2% of the national vote and winning one seat. Their success has now grown significantly, with 14 seats won in the 2025 Japan election. Why Is Kamiya Called 'Japan's Donald Trump'? Sōhei Kamiya has earned the nickname Japan's Donald Trump due to his populist rhetoric, controversial statements, and anti-establishment attitude. Like Trump, he positions himself as a voice for "ordinary people" and frequently criticises the government, media, and global institutions. His speeches often echo nationalist and xenophobic themes. During his campaign, Kamiya referred to Japan's reliance on foreign workers as 'national doping,' suggesting that immigration weakens national identity. He also drew criticism for saying, 'Only young women can have children,' a statement that many labelled as sexist and out of touch. Furthermore, he proposed that terminally ill patients should bear the full cost of life-prolonging treatments—another stance that stirred public outrage. Controversies and Criticism Like Trump, Sōhei Kamiya's career has been filled with controversies. He has made questionable historical claims, including suggesting that only American troops were responsible for Okinawan civilian deaths during the Battle of Okinawa—ignoring the role of Japan's own military. His party also came under fire when one of its candidates appeared on Russia's Sputnik News, leading to suspicions about pro-Russia leanings. However, Kamiya denied these allegations and called it a misunderstanding. What Lies Ahead for Sōhei Kamiya? With the momentum from the recent Japan election, Sōhei Kamiya and his party are expected to continue influencing Japan's political direction. As their online presence grows and their nationalist message resonates with certain voters, Kamiya is solidifying his place as a powerful new figure—one that many now call Japan's Donald Trump. Whether his rise will bring lasting change or fuel deeper divisions remains to be seen. But what's certain is that Sōhei Kamiya's career is just getting started, and the world is watching. To stay updated on the stories that are going viral, follow Indiatimes Trending.

The Wire
36 minutes ago
- The Wire
Amid Mass Starvation in Gaza, 109 NGOs Issue Urgent Plea to Allow in Aid
'The Government of Israel's restrictions, delays, and fragmentation under its total siege have created chaos, starvation, and death.' Palestinians hold onto an aid truck returning to Gaza City from the northern Gaza Strip on Tuesday, July 22, 2025. Photo: AP/PTI. Two months since Israel took the reins of reaching aid to Gaza – a territory that the same government has been relentlessly attacking – more than 100 aid agencies, including Save the Children and Médecins Sans Frontières, have released a joint statement urging for aid to be allowed into the territory under siege. "The starvation of civilians as a method of warfare is a war crime," the letter says. The full text and the signatories are below. § As the Israeli government's siege starves the people of Gaza, aid workers are now joining the same food lines, risking being shot just to feed their families. With supplies now totally depleted, humanitarian organisations are witnessing their own colleagues and partners waste away before their eyes. Exactly two months since the Israeli government-controlled scheme, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, began operating, 109 organisations are sounding the alarm, urging governments to act: open all land crossings; restore the full flow of food, clean water, medical supplies, shelter items, and fuel through a principled, UN-led mechanism; end the siege, and agree to a ceasefire now. 'Each morning, the same question echoes across Gaza: will I eat today?' said one agency representative. Massacres at food distribution sites in Gaza are occurring near-daily. As of July 13, the UN confirmed 875 Palestinians were killed while seeking food, 201 on aid routes and the rest at distribution points. Thousands more have been injured. Meanwhile, Israeli forces have forcibly displaced nearly two million exhausted Palestinians with the most recent mass displacement order issued on July 20, confining Palestinians to less than 12 per cent of Gaza. WFP warns that current conditions make operations untenable. The starvation of civilians as a method of warfare is a war crime. Just outside Gaza, in warehouses - and even within Gaza itself - tons of food, clean water, medical supplies, shelter items and fuel sit untouched with humanitarian organisations blocked from accessing or delivering them. The Government of Israel's restrictions, delays, and fragmentation under its total siege have created chaos, starvation, and death. An aid worker providing psychosocial support spoke of the devastating impact on children: 'Children tell their parents they want to go to heaven, because at least heaven has food.' Doctors report record rates of acute malnutrition, especially among children and older people. Illnesses like acute watery diarrhoea are spreading, markets are empty, waste is piling up, and adults are collapsing on the streets from hunger and dehydration. Distributions in Gaza average just 28 trucks a day, far from enough for over two million people, many of whom have gone weeks without assistance. The UN-led humanitarian system has not failed, it has been prevented from agencies have the capacity and supplies to respond at scale. But, with access denied, we are blocked from reaching those in need, including our own exhausted and starved teams. On July 10, the EU and Israel announced steps to scale up aid. But these promises of 'progress' ring hollow when there is no real change on the ground. Every day without a sustained flow means more people dying of preventable illnesses. Children starve while waiting for promises that never arrive. Palestinians are trapped in a cycle of hope and heartbreak, waiting for assistance and ceasefires, only to wake up to worsening conditions. It is not just physical torment, but psychological. Survival is dangled like a mirage. The humanitarian system cannot run on false promises. Humanitarians cannot operate on shifting timelines or wait for political commitments that fail to deliver access. Governments must stop waiting for permission to act. We cannot continue to hope that current arrangements will work. It is time to take decisive action: demand an immediate and permanent ceasefire; lift all bureaucratic and administrative restrictions; open all land crossings; ensure access to everyone in all of Gaza; reject military-controlled distribution models; restore a principled, UN-led humanitarian response and continue to fund principled and impartial humanitarian organisations. States must pursue concrete measures to end the siege, such as halting the transfer of weapons and ammunition. Piecemeal arrangements and symbolic gestures, like airdrops or flawed aid deals, serve as a smokescreen for inaction. They cannot replace states' legal and moral obligations to protect Palestinian civilians and ensure meaningful access at scale. States can and must save lives before there are none left to save. Signatories: 1. American Friends Service Committee (AFSC) 2. A.M. Qattan Foundation 3. A New Policy 4. ACT Alliance 5. Action Against Hunger (ACF) 6. Action for Humanity 7. ActionAid International 8. American Baptist Churches Palestine Justice Network 9. Amnesty International 10. Asamblea de Cooperación por la Paz 11. Associazione Cooperazione e Solidarietà (ACS) 12. Bystanders No More 13. Campain 14. CARE 15. Caritas Germany 16. Caritas Internationalis 17. Caritas Jerusalem 18. Catholic Agency for Overseas Development (CAFOD) 19. Center for Mind-Body Medicine (CMBM) 20. CESVI Fondazione 21. Children Not Numbers 22. Christian Aid 23. Churches for Middle East Peace (CMEP) 24. CIDSE- International Family of Catholic Social Justice Organisations 25. Cooperazione Internazionale Sud Sud (CISS) 26. Council for Arab‐British Understanding (CAABU) 27. DanChurchAid (DCA) 28. Danish Refugee Council (DRC) 29. Doctors against Genocide 30. Episcopal Peace Fellowship 31. EuroMed Rights 32. Friends Committee on National Legislation (FCNL) 33. Forum Ziviler Friedensdienst e.V. 34. Gender Action for Peace and Security 35. Global Legal Action Network (GLAN) 36. Global Witness 37. Health Workers 4 Palestine 38. HelpAge International 39. Humanity & Inclusion (HI) 40. Humanity First UK 41. Indiana Center for Middle East Peace 42. Insight Insecurity 43. International Media Support 44. International NGO Safety Organisation 45. Islamic Relief 46. Jahalin Solidarity 47. Japan International Volunteer Center (JVC) 48. Kenya Association of Muslim Medical Professionals (KAMMP) 49. Kvinna till Kvinna Foundation 50. MedGlobal 51. Medico International 52. Medico International Switzerland (medico international schweiz) 53. Medical Aid for Palestinians (MAP) 54. Mennonite Central Committee (MCC) 55. Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) 56. Médecins du Monde France 57. Médecins du Monde Spain 58. Médecins du Monde Switzerland 59. Mercy Corps 60. Middle East Children's Alliance (MECA) 61. Movement for Peace (MPDL) 62. Muslim Aid 63. National Justice and Peace Network in England and Wales 64. Nonviolence International 65. Norwegian Aid Committee (NORWAC) 66. Norwegian Church Aid (NCA) 67. Norwegian People's Aid (NPA) 68. Norwegian Refugee Council (NRC) 69. Oxfam International 70. Pax Christi England and Wales 71. Pax Christi International 72. Pax Christi Merseyside 73. Pax Christi USA 74. Pal Law Commission 75. Palestinian American Medical Association 76. Palestinian Children's Relief Fund (PCRF) 77. Palestinian Medical Relief Society (PMRS) 78. Peace Direct 79. Peace Winds 80. Pediatricians for Palestine 81. People in Need 82. Plan International 83. Première Urgence Internationale (PUI) 84. Progettomondo 85. Project HOPE 86. Quaker Palestine Israel Network 87. Rebuilding Alliance 88. Saferworld 89. Sabeel‐Kairos UK 90. Save the Children (SCI) 91. Scottish Catholic International Aid Fund 92. Solidarités International 93. Støtteforeningen Det Danske Hus i Palæstina 94. Swiss Church Aid (HEKS/EPER) 95. Terre des Hommes Italia 96. Terre des Hommes Lausanne 97. Terre des Hommes Nederland 98. The Borgen Project 99. The Center for Mind-Body Medicine (CMBM) 100. The Glia Project 101. The Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect (GCR2P) 102. The Institute for the Understanding of Anti‐Palestinian Racism 103. Un Ponte Per (UPP) 104. United Against Inhumanity (UAI) 105. War Child Alliance 106. War Child UK 107. War on Want 108. Weltfriedensdienst e.V. 109. Welthungerhilfe (WHH) The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.


Indian Express
36 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Tariff Tracker, July 23: Trump's 3 trade deals with Japan, Philippines, Indonesia
The Trump administration has kept itself busy in the weeks leading up to the August 1 deadline for countries facing 'reciprocal' tariffs to complete trade deals with the US. Tuesday (July 22) in particular was eventful, with President Donald Trump announcing that the US had concluded trade deals with two countries – Japan and the Philippines. Thus far, the US has announced trade deals with the UK and Indonesia, and committed to a tariff de-escalation with China. Further details are awaited on the announced trade deal with Vietnam. Donald Trump on Tuesday announced that he had reached a 'massive trade deal' with Japan, which will impose 15% tariffs on Japanese imports into the US and see Japan invest $550 billion in the US. Trump had announced 24% 'reciprocal' tariffs on Japan, in addition to the 10% baseline for all countries, on April 2, which he had called Liberation Day. 'I just signed the largest trade deal in history – I think maybe the largest deal in history – with Japan,' Trump said at an event at the White House on Tuesday after announcing the deal on social media. 'And that was done with Japan. They had their top people here and we worked on it long and hard and it's a great deal for everybody.' Trump also said that Japan would 'open' its markets to American cars and rice, which had been a point of contention during the negotiations. According to a Bloomberg report, US trade negotiators had pressed upon trading partners, including Japan, to accept cars complying with US federal motor vehicle safety standards, instead of subjecting them to different requirements. The Japanese delegation had long sought a reduction in tariffs from the 24% duty declared by Trump among his country-specific 'reciprocal' tariffs on Liberation Day, but the talks were derailed by the separate 25% duty on automobiles. According to Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, Japan's auto tariffs – part of a separate tariff schedule – would also be reduced to 15% from 25%, without any import quota, the Financial Times reported. US goods trade with Japan was valued at $227.9 billion in 2024, according to US Trade Representative data. Notably, the Japanese automotive sector has been a vital part of its $63 billion trade surplus with the US. Trump also announced a US-Japan joint venture in Alaska on liquefied natural gas, which The New York Times has identified as a $44 billion plan called Alaska LNG, aiming to ship natural gas from Alaska to buyers in Asia. Notably, the trade deal announcement came a day after Ishiba's Liberal Democratic Party lost its majority in the upper house of the parliament. However, the Prime Minister told reporters on Wednesday (July 23) that he would remain in the post to prevent 'political instability' ahead of the August 1 tariff deadline. Earlier in the day, Trump announced a trade deal with the Philippines after meeting its president, Ferdinand Marcos Jr. 'The Philippines is going OPEN MARKET with the United States, and ZERO Tariffs. The Philippines will pay a 19% Tariff. In addition, we will work together Militarily,' Trump wrote in a social media post. Marcos reportedly confirmed the suspension of tariffs on American automobiles, as well as increased imports of soybeans, wheat and pharma products from the US, according to Filipino newspaper The Inquirer. However, it is presently unclear if the latter three are exempt from Filipino tariffs. Earlier, the Philippines had said that it would not be able to offer the US a zero tariff because it would hurt domestic businesses. The 19% duty is higher than the 17% reciprocal tariffs Trump originally imposed on the country in April. Earlier this month, however, Trump threatened to raise this duty to 20% from August 1. Marcos sought to portray the 1% reduction in the tariff rate as a win for the country. 'When we arrived in Washington, tariff rates were 20%. So why they came up from 17% to 20% is an internal matter with the United States government,' he said. 'We tried very hard to see what we can do and we managed a 1 [percentage point] decrease in tariff rates.' In 2024, the two countries had a total goods trade of $23.5 billion, according to USTR data, with the US trade deficit valued at $4.9 billion in 2024, a 21.8% increase ($873.3 million) over the previous year. Data from the Philippines Statistics Authority indicated that the US accounted for 16.6% of its exports in 2024. While the US entered into a trade deal with Indonesia last week, the details of the agreement were revealed in a joint statement between the two nations published Tuesday. 'Indonesia will be Open Market to American Industrial and Tech Products, and Agricultural Goods, by eliminating 99% of their Tariff Barriers,' Trump wrote in a social media post. Indonesia will remove 99% of its current tariffs on a range of industrial and agrifood products from the US, and eliminate all non-tariff barriers to US goods. Under the agreement, Indonesia would also stop taxing data flows that American tech companies rely on and eliminating taxes on digital service revenue, such as advertising on streaming and social media sites, and 'pre-shipment inspection or verification requirements' on American goods, CNN reported. Indonesia has also agreed to accept US Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards and remove export restrictions on critical minerals. The US, on the other hand, will charge 19% tariffs on Indonesian imports, a decline from the 32% duty Trump had originally threatened. The agreement thus mirrors the deal with the Philippines, with the Trump administration anticipating that the lack of trade barriers would result in $50 billion in additional market access to US goods. In 2024, the US-Indonesia goods trade was valued at $38.3 billion, with the US incurring a trade deficit of $17.9 billion, a 5.4% increase over the previous year. The US will also identify those products which are not naturally available or cannot be domestically produced in the US for a further tariff rate cut.