Ex-finance chief at crisis-hit university says he ‘could have done a lot better'
Peter Fotheringham spoke out the day after the Scottish Government stepped in and used special powers to award £40 million directly to the university – whose interim principal quit last week after a report criticised him and others.
The university is currently seeking to cut up to 300 jobs as it seeks to deal with a £35 million deficit.
Professor Shane O'Neill, who up until last week was the interim principal and vice-chancellor there, has previously told MSPs on Holyrood's Education Committee that the scale of the financial problems only 'crystallised' in November last year.
He quit that post however after a report by former Glasgow Caledonian University principal Professor Pamela Gillies criticised senior figures at the university.
Members of the university executive group (UEG), which included the 'triumvirate' of Prof O'Neill, his predecessor former principal Professor Iain Gillespie and ex-chief operating officer Dr Jim McGeorge, were found to have 'failed' to 'properly respond to the worsening situation' and disclose the looming crisis to other university officials.
Dr McGeorge, appearing before the committee on Wednesday, said he was 'deeply and unreservedly sorry' for the situation at Dundee University.
He spent 16 years at the university, saying he had 'championed what it does through good times and through challenging times, including some previous financial difficulties'.
He added: 'Through the period covered by the report I tried to do my very best for the university, in good conscience, and on the basis of the information that was available to me.
'Where I have been found wanting or fallen short, either personally or collectively, I am deeply and unreservedly sorry for that.
'It would never have been my intention to do anything other than my very best for a university that I love and that I have served for over half my career.'
However he told the committee that leading figures at the university 'did not spot early enough the fact that the university as heading towards this crisis'.
He added: 'We should have done. I am hugely regretful and sorry that we did not.'
Committee convener Douglas Ross insisted that Dr McGeorge holds 'a significant amount of blame' for the university's situation.
The former chief operating officer however claimed he was 'equally as responsible as others' – although he said he wished decisions on cost-saving measures had been made earlier in March of last year.
'I think about that every single day at the moment and have done for some considerable period of time,' he told the committee.
But he insisted: 'I am not trying to shirk blame in any shape or form, I accept my share of responsibility for what happened to the university and the position it finds itself in.'
Mr Fotheringham meanwhile told the committee that the institution had 'not been in a strong financial position' for 'well over 10 years'.
But asked when the situation started to give him sleepless nights, he said that only happened 'as late' as September 2024.
Joe FitzPatrick, the SNP MSP for Dundee City West, told him: 'The fact that you didn't realise till September is the thing that folk who are watching – students, lecturers, staff – they will find that incredible that folk in your position have not realised how bad things were until that late. It is incredible.'
Mr Fotheringham responded: 'Absolutely and that has given me sleepless nights ever since September, if I'm honest with you.'
He left the university in October 2024, and is currently unemployed, telling the committee: 'I absolutely understand I could have done a lot better.'
And he said he took his 'share of responsibility in terms of the current position of the university'.
Mr Fotheringham added: 'The position that it now finds itself in is obviously deeply upsetting for all of us and I am very sorry for any part I played in that.'
But he also insisted: 'I thought it was very clear to everybody, the whole leadership team, that we did need to reduce costs. We had those discussions in late 2023 and early 2024.'
However SNP MSP George Adam accused the men of having 'tanked' the university.
He said there had been a 'systematic failure at every single point' at Dundee, including 'poor financial judgment, failure to act in real time on clear warning signs' as well as 'overly optimistic budget assumptions' and 'weak internal controls'.
Mr Adam described the problems as a 'perfect storm' as he told the witnesses: 'You nearly tanked the university. You nearly tanked one of the oldest universities in Scotland.'
The MSP added: 'I don't understand how people like yourselves can get yourselves into that position.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Western Telegraph
43 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Swinney apology to Gypsy Travellers ‘significant milestone', campaigner says
Roseanna McPhee welcomed the apology, which she said was the result of years of campaigning. John Swinney made the formal apology at Holyrood on Thursday over 'unfair and unjust policies' that caused 'trauma' in what was known as the 'tinker experiment'. Between 1940 and 1980, the so-called experiment – supported by councils and the UK Government – attempted to strip away the nomadic lifestyle of Gypsy Travellers, providing rudimentary and often cramped huts for people to live in. First Minister Scotland John Swinney issued a formal apology over 'unacceptable' policies against Gypsy Travellers (Jane Barlow/PA) A report published by the Scottish Government stated that 'the context within which the TE (tinker experiment) occurred is best understood as cultural genocide'. Ms McPhee, whose family was among those settled in Pitlochry on the former Bobbin Mill site, had grown up in a prefabricated Second World War-style Nissen hut which had no electricity and used candles for light. She welcomed the First Minister's apology, but said more needed to be done to stop the discrimination that her community continues to face. First Minister @JohnSwinney has apologised in @ScotParl for historical policies affecting Gypsy/Traveller communities, acknowledging they were unacceptable and caused enduring harm. More information here: — Scot Gov Fairer (@ScotGovFairer) June 25, 2025 She told the PA news agency: 'It's a milestone that we have reached in our long, long campaign, with no resources and just two or three generals and few food soldiers, really, because most people want to hide. 'I think the fact we managed to achieve that apology from the Government is a significant milestone. 'We're hopeful that discussions shall move forward, and perhaps something may be done about the general level of racism which we suffer, particularly in relation to public bodies.' Gypsy Traveller campaigner Roseanna McPhee welcomed the First Minister's apology (Craig Meighan/PA) Ms McPhee said the apology could have been 'more robust' and expressed disappointment that Mr Swinney did not label the Tinker Experiment as 'cultural genocide', the description used in the report published by the Government. 'Cultural genocide is a crime against humanity,' she said. 'They did not name the offence. They did not say they took full responsibility of the offence. 'However, it's a positive step on the road towards the discussion around restitution and just satisfaction.' Asked if she believed the Scottish Government should offer redress to affected families, she said: 'I absolutely believe it. 'If you'd been kept in degrading conditions as long as I have, with 16 health conditions and prevented from working with a joint-honours degrees and two post-graduates I think you might see some reason to have redress too.'
North Wales Chronicle
an hour ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Swinney apology to Gypsy Travellers ‘significant milestone', campaigner says
Roseanna McPhee welcomed the apology, which she said was the result of years of campaigning. John Swinney made the formal apology at Holyrood on Thursday over 'unfair and unjust policies' that caused 'trauma' in what was known as the 'tinker experiment'. Between 1940 and 1980, the so-called experiment – supported by councils and the UK Government – attempted to strip away the nomadic lifestyle of Gypsy Travellers, providing rudimentary and often cramped huts for people to live in. A report published by the Scottish Government stated that 'the context within which the TE (tinker experiment) occurred is best understood as cultural genocide'. Ms McPhee, whose family was among those settled in Pitlochry on the former Bobbin Mill site, had grown up in a prefabricated Second World War-style Nissen hut which had no electricity and used candles for light. She welcomed the First Minister's apology, but said more needed to be done to stop the discrimination that her community continues to face. First Minister @JohnSwinney has apologised in @ScotParl for historical policies affecting Gypsy/Traveller communities, acknowledging they were unacceptable and caused enduring harm. More information here: — Scot Gov Fairer (@ScotGovFairer) June 25, 2025 She told the PA news agency: 'It's a milestone that we have reached in our long, long campaign, with no resources and just two or three generals and few food soldiers, really, because most people want to hide. 'I think the fact we managed to achieve that apology from the Government is a significant milestone. 'We're hopeful that discussions shall move forward, and perhaps something may be done about the general level of racism which we suffer, particularly in relation to public bodies.' Ms McPhee said the apology could have been 'more robust' and expressed disappointment that Mr Swinney did not label the Tinker Experiment as 'cultural genocide', the description used in the report published by the Government. 'Cultural genocide is a crime against humanity,' she said. 'They did not name the offence. They did not say they took full responsibility of the offence. 'However, it's a positive step on the road towards the discussion around restitution and just satisfaction.' Asked if she believed the Scottish Government should offer redress to affected families, she said: 'I absolutely believe it. 'If you'd been kept in degrading conditions as long as I have, with 16 health conditions and prevented from working with a joint-honours degrees and two post-graduates I think you might see some reason to have redress too.'
The National
an hour ago
- The National
SNP need two distinct arms in order to achieve their twin objectives
Yes, we have explored the currently available constitutional options and now realise that Westminster is highly unlikely to consent to a fully lawful referendum on the basis they are afraid of losing. What the activists have lost sight of is that in 2014 we had a parliamentary majority for the agreed democratic mandate for holding a referendum. Since then we have not. That majority didn't exist before 2014 and Westminster has not consented to one since on the basis that in Holyrood we didn't gain another single-party majority. READ MORE: Scottish Government responds to claims of 'Iranian pro-independence accounts' Holding a constitutionally unlawful referendum is not as easy as it appears. The practicalities of doing so are immense. Who would pay for it, who would validate the result, who would accept the result? Who would actually participate? If nothing else, how can it claim any authority, as the arch-Unionists will almost certainly not take part, and being 'unlawful' it cannot be implemented? The only real way of demonstrating our demands is to keep returning a majority of MPs to Westminster and regain a single-party majority at Holyrood. The voted-on mandate must have a commitment to hold a single-question referendum, not just a statement of intent about independence. The other problem would be if a Section 35 order is issued preventing us from running that. The question is of course how would that be enforced, and the most likely way is for the Scotland Act to be suspended, thereby removing all powers from Holyrood and probably preventing it from sitting. READ MORE: Seamus Logan: Using an election as plebiscite referendum is just not going to fly That leaves a huge conundrum, as clearly Westminster would have to appoint commissioners to run our affairs, back to the old days of the Scottish Office! In effect, trying to hold an unconstitutional referendum would be the cessation of devolution, forcing us back to square one. So, we have to demonstrate and continue to demonstrate a majority, preferably rising, in favour of independence. No arguing amongst ourselves, or undermining each other. The grassroots have already started the process at the UN, and we have friends in other countries. The grassroots can do the door-knocking and one-to-one persuasion and dissemination in the absence of a friendly media, but they are currently more or less on their own. This does introduce another difficulty as the SNP do need to meet two different challenges, – on a day-to-day basis running the country within the confines of the UK constitution, important as it is, but at the same time taking a lead in the strategic goal. Our current political leaders, while impassioned and competent, do not have the spare time to take on another important role. So for political credibility we need two arms within the SNP: the first is ongoing political administration, and the second is that of galvanising indy supporters, but not using elected politicians to front it. The principal role of this arm will be to give the non-aligned majority of voters something for them to understand, and achieve buy-in. Not just the ideal and fuzzy concept of independence, but the pragmatic understanding of how that would work and how our economy would be placed To this end we need to offer those voters a (draft) constitution that spells out limits and powers of whoever forms our government along with a draft budget using all of our GDP, to sit in comparison with the one limited by our current constitutional arrangement. Produce something that ordinary voters get their teeth into and forms a prospectus for a new and independent Scotland. Nick Cole Meigle, Perthshire
