logo
Passenger Says Pregnant Woman's Partner Began 'Swearing' at Her for Asking the Expectant Mom to Get Out of Her Seat

Passenger Says Pregnant Woman's Partner Began 'Swearing' at Her for Asking the Expectant Mom to Get Out of Her Seat

Yahoo22-02-2025

A train passenger found herself struggling to calm down after a heated confrontation with a pregnant woman and her partner.
On Feb. 17, she penned a lengthy post on Reddit's popular "Am I The A------?" forum, writing under the username Quizzicalnonsense. She explained that despite having booked a seat in advance for her long train journey, a pregnant woman had chosen to sit there and simply 'put her head down' when asked to move.
'At this point her partner sitting opposite her starts speaking at me in what I perceive to be an aggressive tone,' the Redditor said. 'He suggests I find another seat (which there are none because it's busy) and I say but I booked that seat and there are no other available seats in the carriage.
'He then raises his voice and says, 'Well someone else is in our seats,' and that his missus is pregnant,' she continued. 'I say I understand and that I have a heart defect (which I do), and said everyone has their own medical issues and reasons standing for long periods of time might be difficult.'
Related: Mom Doesn't 'Ever Want to Travel' with Her 2-Year-Old Again After Fight with Fellow Flight Passenger: 'She Got Up and Flipped Us Off'
The passenger said she asked the pregnant woman's partner not to speak to her in an 'aggressive tone' and threatened to make a complaint.
However, he continued to berate her and began "swearing" until the pregnant woman he was with finally got up. The pair were offered a seat by another man onboard the train, which amused the pregnant woman's enraged partner so he began to point in the Redditor's face.
'Eventually when the ticket inspector comes around they are asked to move to their assigned seats and she asks if I'm ok as another passenger had made a complaint on my behalf,' the Redditor said. 'Even so was I the a------? Should I have just left them alone as she was pregnant? And did I in any way escalate the situation?'
Thousands of people replied to the post with the majority of commenters reassuring the train passenger that she was right to confront the couple about sitting in her booked seat.
'NTA [not the a------]. I'm pregnant,' one person wrote. 'You know what I'd do if I needed to travel and would require a seat? Book one myself. Also, in the event that we couldn't book one, there's no way my husband would sit there.
'He'd do the decent thing and forgo sitting for his pregnant wife,' the commenter continued. 'They were acting like entitled AHs, you were totally correct.'
Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories.
Related: Brawl Erupts on Flight After Couple 'Deliberately Bumped' into Other Passengers and Argued with Crew Members
Another person agreed, saying, 'You did absolutely nothing wrong. You had a reserved seat, and you were polite and assertive in asking for it back. Their aggressive behavior was completely unacceptable. You have every right to stand up for yourself and your rights.'
Several other commenters argued the couple should've been kicked off the train for 'stealing' her seat and said they would've reported it to the inspector when the situation began to escalate.
'I think it's a good lesson that I learned long ago,' a commenter said. 'I don't argue with strangers. I ask nicely and if I'm resisted, I report them to the person who can make it right.
"The fact that they chose to argue with you in the first place is a clue that they are entitled, ill-mannered and unreasonable,' the commenter added. 'Don't waste your time. Ask once, and then rat them out.'
Read the original article on People

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Woman refuses to let her friend borrow car again after it was trashed the first time
Woman refuses to let her friend borrow car again after it was trashed the first time

Fox News

time13 hours ago

  • Fox News

Woman refuses to let her friend borrow car again after it was trashed the first time

In a viral Reddit message, a woman reached out to others for advice and insight now that she's no longer allowing her friend to "borrow my car" given the way the friend "returned it [the] last time" — and yet she's taking heat for her stance from others. Over 3,000 people reacted to date to the post, with nearly 1,000 comments posted so far about the dilemma. "I have a decent used car that I worked hard to pay off," wrote the 27-year-old woman. "It's nothing fancy, but it runs well and I take really good care of it — regular maintenance, I keep it clean, no smoking, no trash left inside, etc.," the Reddit poster went on. "I've always been a little protective of it because I rely on it every day for work." She said that just a few months ago, a friend — "let's call her Sarah," she wrote — "asked to borrow it for a weekend trip because her car was in the shop. I hesitated but said yes because we've been friends for years and I wanted to help." The Reddit writer said her friend returned the car two days later with a host of problems. There were "fast-food wrappers in the back seat," plus "dirt all over the passenger floor." First of all, it had "less than a quarter tank of gas (I'd filled it before giving it to her)," wrote the woman. Then, there were "fast-food wrappers in the back seat," plus "dirt all over the passenger floor." Finally, as "the cherry on top," there was "a mystery scratch on the back bumper that she swore 'was already there' (it wasn't)," the woman wrote. She said that she "didn't say much at the time because I hate confrontation, but I was honestly [upset]. Especially because I expected more out of someone I'm friends with." The woman continued in her post, "Flash forward to this week. She texts me asking if she can borrow my car again for a different trip." So "I told her no, very politely," wrote the Reddit poster, "and said I just wasn't comfortable loaning it out anymore." The friend apparently became "upset" and began "saying things like, 'Are you sure you can't just help me out? That's what friends do for each other' — I feel like she's guilt-tripping me," the woman added. "I just wasn't comfortable loaning it out anymore." The woman wrote that she's now "getting messages from another mutual friend saying I'm being too uptight and that it wouldn't kill me to help her out 'just this once.'" Added the woman, "I feel like I'm being guilt-tripped for setting a boundary after already being taken advantage of once." She then asked others for their thoughts on whether she's wrong for refusing to loan out her car once again to the same person. "Don't back down," wrote one person. "She's not your friend, and she's obviously already talking s--- about you behind your back." Another person said, "Here's a novel thought. They have rental cars! I know, what a wacky idea." Another individual shared this thought, which many others agreed with: "It's just common courtesy to return someone's car clean, with a full tank, and in the same (if not better) condition as you got it." The person went on, "That's the bare minimum as a thank-you for trusting someone with your car. She didn't respect that the first time, so no, she shouldn't borrow your car again." And another person shared this bit of insight: "It's your car. It's expensive and somewhat essential. You don't need a reason not to lend it out."

How One Mom Is Restoring Joy to Kids Who Lost Their Favorite Toys
How One Mom Is Restoring Joy to Kids Who Lost Their Favorite Toys

Yahoo

time13 hours ago

  • Yahoo

How One Mom Is Restoring Joy to Kids Who Lost Their Favorite Toys

Randi Jaffe couldn't sleep—tossing and turning, worrying about all the Los Angeles families whose homes were burning. 'They're losing everything,' the New Jersey mother of two fretted, and then she began to wonder, If I was told I had to leave my home, what's the first thing I would grab? Randi sat bolt upright because she knew what she would take: her 3 1⁄2-year-old son Ryan's beloved baby cheetah. It had no tags—she couldn't remember where it came from. But Ryan couldn't sleep without it. It was absolutely irreplaceable. As a child life specialist at a local children's hospital, Randi helps kids through the trauma of scary places, needles and surgeries. 'Does your child have a favorite stuffy?' she asks parents when their little one undergoes an operation. She gives the bear, puppy or stuffed turtle a matching hospital bracelet and sometimes even a gown. In the OR, Randi stands by until the anesthesia has taken hold. 'Everything's going fine,' she'll tell the worried mom and dad, handing over the stuffy so they can hold it until their child wakes up in Recovery. 'It breaks my heart, thinking about all those children who weren't allowed back home even long enough to collect their favorite toy,' Randi told her sister-in-law, Amanda, the next afternoon. 'I'm hoping I can replace at least a few of them,' she said, and opened an Instagram account: @LostStuffyProject. Tell me about your child's lost stuffed animal and I'll try to replace it, she wrote on social media, and that very afternoon, Randi's phone began blowing up with new followers asking how they could help. Among the offers was a message from a mom whose little boy had lost his stuffed unicorn. When you open the zipper, lots of little unicorns fall out. They wouldn't let us back in our house to get it, she wrote, but luckily the stuffy was still available at a store online, and the very next day, an identical unicorn was on its way to the family's temporary address. Another mom wrote in about her son's lost stuffy, a zoo mascot from a family trip to Amsterdam. By now, thousands of people around the world were offering help, and five minutes after she posted the request, Randi received a miraculous message from someone in Amsterdam: I'm from LA, but we're currently living in Amsterdam. I know the zoo and its mascot. I'll take my kids there tomorrow and buy a replacement from the gift shop. One request nearly stumped Randi and her network of helpers: My little sister lost her pink bunny. It used to belong to our mom, the message said. It's over 30 years old. There's no way we'll ever be able to replace it. Randi and other helpers scoured the internet, thrift stores, attics and garages. No luck, but happily, someone had posted the photo to Reddit. I have that very pink bunny! a woman posted. He's been with me since I was little. I'd be happy to pass him along but he's in pretty rough shape. That's when another volunteer came forward. I've been looking for a way to help fire victims, wrote Danielle Allore, who restores stuffed animals for a living. Danielle took the bunny apart, laundered, restuffed and sewed him back. Then he was off to a ­second life with a thankful little girl. When Randi learned of a small Altadena preschool where the kids' classroom had lost their books, toys and 6-foot plush stuffed giraffe to smoke damage, she used donations to replace them—even the giraffe. 'Half of the class lost their homes—we couldn't lose their second home too,' Randi told a local reporter. Eventually, the fires were extinguished, but not Randi and the other group members' determination to help. 'There will always be more disasters,' says Randi, so she's transformed the Lost Stuffy Project into a nonprofit with a wider mission of replacing cherished fuzzy friends lost in floods, hurricanes and house fires across the country. 'When a family loses their home, they have so much else to think about,' she says. 'If we can help by taking this one thing off their plate and bringing a lot of comfort and joy to little boys and girls, we'll all sleep better at night.' A Little Boy's Big Heart: His Lemonade Stand Has Raised $35K to Help Shelter Pets in Need WWII Vet Turns His Garden Into a Lifeline, Feeding Hungry Kids in Florida for Over 30 Years At 90, He Ran Across America to Honor WWII Heroes—Then He Did It Again Before His 100th Birthday

Charles' Funeral May Be the Only Time Harry & William Will Ever See Each Other Again Amid Claims There's ‘No Turning Back' in Their Feud
Charles' Funeral May Be the Only Time Harry & William Will Ever See Each Other Again Amid Claims There's ‘No Turning Back' in Their Feud

Yahoo

time14 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Charles' Funeral May Be the Only Time Harry & William Will Ever See Each Other Again Amid Claims There's ‘No Turning Back' in Their Feud

There's 'no turning back' for Prince Harry's relationship with Prince William and King Charles. Royals expert Hilary Fordwich told Fox News in June 2025 that, while Charles is still 'tender' toward reconciling with his son, William has 'shut the door' on Harry, and wants their father to follow suit. 'There is no turning back,' Fordwich said. 'King Charles remains tender towards his son but can't risk communication. Prince William now has absolutely no interest in mending fences. Those close to the king say he [shouldn't] make peace with Harry in a way that would burden Prince William's future reign. The animosity is so deep that William has shut the door on Harry. Charles is not willing to go against his heir's wishes.' More from StyleCaster Prince Harry Is 'Damaging' King Charles' Legacy Amid Reports the Monarch Is a 'Sick Man' Prince William Just Took Over a Role Meant for Harry Amid Reports He Wants Him 'Harshly' Dealt With For the 'Ultimate Windsor Crime' Fordwich explained that the real reason William and Charles don't plan on ever reconciling with Harry is due to their lack of trust in the former Duke of Sussex and his wife, Meghan Markle. 'Everything comes down to trust and the lack of it,' Fordwich said. Royal biographer Sally Bedell Smith also echoed the same sentiment to People after Harry's BBC interview in which Harry claimed that his father could die before they ever speak again. 'The underlying issue is trust,' Bedell said. 'The king and William don't trust Harry and Meghan with any kind of confidential conversation.' As for Harry's relationship with William, another source told Fox News that they don't expect the brothers to see each other again unless Charles dies. 'The funeral of Charles would be the first time that courtiers would imagine [them reuniting],' the source said. 'I can't imagine William would invite Harry to his coronation.' Harry hinted that only his father's funeral could bring him and William back together in his BBC interview, in which he told the outlet the 'only time I come back to the U.K. is, sadly, for funerals or court cases.' Royal author Valentine Low also confirmed to People that Charles' inner circle at Buckingham Palace are also advising him not to speak to Harry. 'There is not a good angel in [the king's] ear to say, 'Be a good dad and make the first move,'' Low said. While William has 'no interest' in reconciling with Harry for his own reasons, sources also told the magazine that Charles' issues with Harry stem from his comments about Charles' wife, Queen Camilla, in his book, Spare, in which he called his stepmother a 'villain.' 'It's Harry's criticisms of Queen Camilla [in his memoir, Spare], as well as his broader attacks on the family and institution, which have seriously crossed a line for the king and those closest to him,' Fordwich told Fox News. Fordwich continued, 'The king is now so puzzled by Harry's constant revelations. It's now beyond sensitive to discuss, so he avoids all interaction regarding the subject. He is so kind but overwhelmed and has quite enough on his plate to deal with, without all this from his son.' Another reason for Charles' rift with Harry has to deal with their court case over Harry's security detail, which he lost after he and Meghan stepped down as senior members of the British royal family and moved to the United States. 'Harry's ill-timed recent interview on the BBC highlighted the lack of trust between them publicly,' royal expert Richard Fitzwilliams told Fox News. 'He seemed to believe his father could and should solve the issue of security, which he insists he and his family should have.' Fitzwilliams continued, 'The rift, sadly, seems likely to remain toxic as there is no mutual trust between them. Hopefully, it will not worsen as the Sussexes could give further interviews or possibly write more about the feud, something that is invariably remunerative for them.' While Low explained that Harry's comment about not knowing 'how much longer' his father has to live wasn't 'meant to be an attack,' it still created a deeper wedge in his relationship with Charles. 'It wasn't meant to be an attack, but it would be seen as one,' Low said. 'It makes Charles reaching out even harder.' Best of StyleCaster The 26 Best Romantic Comedies to Watch if You Want to Know What Love Feels Like These 'Bachelor' Secrets & Rules Prove What Happens Behind the Scenes Is So Much Juicier BTS's 7 Members Were Discovered in the Most Unconventional Ways

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store