logo
‘Ireland's first serial killer' will not face rape charges in Britain

‘Ireland's first serial killer' will not face rape charges in Britain

Irish Times07-07-2025
British police have carried out a cold case review into a series of rapes allegedly committed by murderer John Shaw, who is known as 'Ireland's first serial killer'.
The review said, however, unless new evidence came to light then Shaw (79) should not face any further charges relating to the attacks carried out in the 1970s.
This means Shaw, who is Ireland's longest-serving prisoner, will be a free man if he is successful in reapplying for parole early in 2026.
Shaw and accomplice Geoffrey Evans had come to Ireland from the UK with the claimed intention of murdering one woman a week.
READ MORE
In August 1976 Elizabeth Plunkett (23) was abducted and killed near Brittas Bay, Co Wicklow. A month later, Galway woman Mary Duffy was kidnapped and murdered by the men. Both women were subjected to extensive sexual violence.
The men were caught shortly afterwards and confessed to their crimes. They received a life sentence each for Ms Duffy's murder.
However, charges against Shaw relating to Ms Plunkett's murder were dropped by the
Director of Public Prosecutions
(DPP), something which the Plunkett family only became aware of recently.
Elizabeth Plunkett's sisters want the investigation into her death to be reopened
Before arriving in Ireland, Shaw and Evans were wanted by various British police forces for allegedly raping three victims over the course of five days in Cheshire and Leigh, northwest England.
The attacks bore similarities to what happened to Ms Duffy and Ms Plunkett. During one attack, a 15-year-old girl was kidnapped and raped over the course of eight hours.
[
Elizabeth Plunkett: How murdered woman's family discovered they were not 'relevant victims' in serial killer case
]
As the police manhunt intensified, Evans and Shaw fled to Ireland where they committed burglaries before being arrested and jailed for a year.
After their release, they were rearrested by gardaí for extradition to Britain to face the rape charges.
However, the men argued they were not the same suspects as those sought by British police and were released on bail. It was then they started their planned murder spree.
Evans (68) died in custody in 2012. Shaw remains in Arbour Hill Prison in Dublin.
Last August, on learning Shaw was applying for parole, a cold case team from Greater Manchester Police re-examined the rape offences as a priority. Their goal was to determine if Shaw could be finally extradited to Britain if he was successful in his parole bid.
The police force said the cold case unit had completed its review and that 'no new developments have been made' in relation to the case.
'Should any further evidence or information come to light, further reviews would take place and the appropriate actions taken where necessary,' a spokesman said.
He clarified that this meant that unless new evidence came to light then the rape cases were in effect closed.
The police force did not go into detail on why it was not pursing the rape charges.
There are many reasons historical prosecutions cannot go ahead, including the death of witnesses and the loss of vital evidence.
Ms Plunkett's sisters, Kathleen Nolan and Bernadette Barry, have called on the Irish authorities to reopen the investigation into her death, with a view to securing a conviction against Shaw and ensuring he is not released.
In response to queries,
An Garda Síochána
said it was up to the DPP to decide on reopening the case.
A DPP spokeswoman said it does not comment on individual cases, but said that in general cases cannot be reopened without 'a new Garda investigation file which identified sufficient evidence to provide a reasonable prospect of a successful prosecution of an identified suspect'.
The family hopes to gather enough new evidence to reopen the case.
Last month,
RTÉ
began airing a podcast on Ms Plunkett's case. Called Stolen Sister, it has led to multiple women coming forward saying they were targeted by men in the mid-1970s who may have been Shaw and Evans.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gardaí to use gait analysis and voice recognition to identify suspects
Gardaí to use gait analysis and voice recognition to identify suspects

Irish Times

time2 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Gardaí to use gait analysis and voice recognition to identify suspects

Gardaí will soon receive powers to use artificial intelligence to analyse the gait, voice and other physiological features of suspects during criminal investigation. These biometric investigative tools will be used alongside facial recognition to identify suspects in serious offences and to locate missing people. At first, investigators will only be able to use these powers retroactively, to process evidence already available to them such as CCTV and phone footage. However, further legislation is planned to allow these tools to be used in a live setting, alongside live facial recognition, in situations where there is an imminent threat to life. Under the plans, gardaí will be empowered to use artificial intelligence to identify the physiological characteristics of suspects on recorded footage. READ MORE This includes computer programmes that can analyse the gait of a person - the unique way they walk - to identify them. Other programmes will be able to identify people based on their voices patterns. There has been significant debate regarding the Government's plans to introduce facial recognition technology in recent years, with criticism coming from civil liberties and privacy groups. However, this is the first time the Government has confirmed it will also legislate for other forms of biometric data in criminal investigations. The upcoming legislation 'will provide the power to utilise biometric technologies generally', a Department of Justice spokesman said. 'This could include the use of physical, physiological or behavioural characteristics of an individual, such as face, gait or voice', he said, but will not include DNA analysis and fingerprints, which are provided for in separate legislation. As technology develops, other potential forms of analysis will become available overtime. These include tools allowing suspects to be identified by other unique markers, such as the shape of their ears or the pattern of veins in their hands. Technology is even being developed to identify people based on the movement of their eyes and the unique odours they give off. All of these types of biometric data are provided for in the EU's Artificial Intelligence Act which, according to the Department of Justice, which will form the basis for Irish legislation in this arena. Artificial technology will be used to compare biometric characteristics and provide a percentage based assessment of whether they match. Garda management has long been calling for facial recognition powers to analyse digital evidence, which is becoming more prevalent in criminal investigations. Manually going through hours of CCTV to identify suspects 'is becoming unfeasible and ineffective', Commissioner Drew Harris said last year. He was speaking in the aftermath of the Dublin riots, when gardaí had to manually process 22,000 hours of CCTV footage to identify offenders. In response to queries, the department stressed the new powers will be based on a 'bedrock' of human rights and that trained gardaí will review all results produced by biometric technologies. 'At the moment Garda investigations can involve teams of gardaí spending months and months trawling through footage from CCTV, footage captured on a phone or from passersby. 'Biometric technologies will help An Garda Síochána carry out investigations quickly and efficiently and will save valuable Garda time. It will prove to be of particular assistance where time is of the essence in order to preserve a person from a threat of serious harm or a threat to their life or the lives of others.' [ Abeba Birhane: We're headed for big problems if gardaí get facial recognition technology Opens in new window ] The department said the technology will also save gardaí 'from the harrowing work of poring over thousands or even millions of images and footage of child sexual abuse material'.

‘Honest belief' of consent to sex may no longer be a defence in rape cases
‘Honest belief' of consent to sex may no longer be a defence in rape cases

Irish Times

time2 hours ago

  • Irish Times

‘Honest belief' of consent to sex may no longer be a defence in rape cases

An 'honest' belief that an alleged victim had consented to sex may no longer be a legal defence in rape cases if proposals being considered by the Government become law. The Department of Justice and the Office of the Attorney General are currently considering the proposal to significantly modify the State's consent laws. The planned reform is at advanced stage, has the backing of the Law Reform Commission and is a key part of the Government's plan to take action on consent laws. Under the proposal, an accused person could not be acquitted of rape if a court found that their belief that the alleged victim had consented was not an objectively reasonable belief. READ MORE Case law in the State indicates that an accused person could defend themselves from a rape charge by testifying that they honestly believed their accuser had consented to sex, even if that belief is not reasonable or rational. In 2016, the Supreme Court found, in the case of The People (DPP) v C O'R, that an 'honest, though unreasonable, mistake that the woman was consenting is a defence to rape'. It added that the belief must be 'genuinely held' by the accused. In 2017, the attorney general asked the Law Reform Commission to examine the issue. The 'honest belief' defence came under scrutiny as the Oireachtas was passing a 2017 law that clarified the circumstances under which a person could not legally consent to sex. These included when they were asleep, unconscious, incapacitated by drugs or alcohol, or consenting under the threat or use of force. The Law Reform Commission advised a change of the law to clarify that an accused person commits the crime of rape if he 'does not reasonably believe' the alleged victim was consenting. The Department of Justice is now progressing the planned reform with the Office of the Attorney General. It is one of a number of reforms of the way the criminal justice system handles rape and sexual assault allegations, which is a focus for Government officials in the wake of a scoping inquiry into historic abuse in schools. Last week, the Government announced a commission of inquiry into the handling of historic sexual abuse allegations in schools. Officials from a number of Government departments, who were tasked with writing a report on the recommendations of the scoping inquiry published last year, noted that the majority of survivors who detailed their experiences with the scoping inquiry 'had a negative, and in some cases, retraumatising, experience with the legal system'. [ Officials resist schools abuse redress scheme Opens in new window ] In a report published last week, the interdepartmental group added that a negative experience with the legal system 'may influence survivors' perspectives on participating in a future process such as a commission of investigation'. Survivors had called on the State to 'make the legal system more accessible and appropriate for victims of sexual crimes'.

Dáil committee to scrutinise how Tusla has spent millions on ‘complex litigation'
Dáil committee to scrutinise how Tusla has spent millions on ‘complex litigation'

Irish Times

time2 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Dáil committee to scrutinise how Tusla has spent millions on ‘complex litigation'

The Child and Family Agency, Tusla , is facing an investigation by the Dáil Public Accounts Committee (PAC) over how millions of euro have been run up in legal costs over number of years arising from 'complex litigation' and a protected disclosure. The costs include about €416,000 spent on a report on issues raised in a whistleblower disclosure made to the Minister for Children. The report was later quashed by the courts. Tusla's accounts signal that the State Claims Agency will this year record significant additional costs arising from the same circumstances. The chairman of the PAC, John Brady of Sinn Féin , said the amounts involved represented 'extraordinary levels of expenditure'. READ MORE Tusla told The Irish Times it cannot comment on legal cases. However, some details were provided by the State's financial watchdog, the Comptroller and Auditor General Seamus McCarthy, and in a governance statement in Tusla's annual accounts for 2024, which have just been published. Mr McCarthy told the PAC on Thursday that he wanted to draw attention to some matters including compensation and legal costs incurred by Tusla and the State Claims Agency in respect of four cases taken against Tusla. He said the compensation payments to the four individuals totalled €799,000, while plaintiff legal costs of €949,000 were paid in two cases and Tusla's own legal costs incurred to date are €1.6 million. Mr McCarthy said the legal costs of the State Claims Agency for these matters are not yet known. The Tusla annual accounts show€848,000 was paid out in legal costs last year as well as €296,000 in legal compensation. The accounts refer to legal settlements and costs relating to 'complex litigation cases' arising from circumstances before 2018. In a governance statement and board members' report, it says a protected disclosure to the Government resulted in Tusla's board engaging an external investigator to look into the matter. The investigator's report was nullified by the courts following litigation. 'Tusla's own costs in relation to this action have amounted to just under €1.6 million to date,' the accounts note. This figure includes €416,000 for the third-party investigation and report. The case was settled after mediation, with Tusla paying €200,000 damages and the State Claims Agency paying an additional €100,000 award to the individual. Legal costs have not yet been finalised, the accounts report notes. A second case, involving 'complex' constitutional and administrative law issues, was settled via mediation with €49,500 damages paid. The other party's legal costs were €870,000, the report says. Separately, the accounts say, two additional separate awards were made through the State Claims Agency to individuals 'arising from the same circumstances'. An award of €309,000 was made in 2025 (legal costs relating to this have not been finalised), while €140,000 was made in 2023, carrying with it a €79,000 legal costs bill. Tusla said it 'does not comment on individual legal cases or specific settlements due to legal confidentiality, the integrity of the process and the rights of the individuals involved'. The agency said a detailed note was provided in its annual report and financial statements. Mr McCarthy said it was for Tusla to provide explanations to the committee regarding the issues involved. The committee said it would seek for Tusla to appear before it in the autumn.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store