‘Honest belief' of consent to sex may no longer be a defence in rape cases
victim
had consented to sex may no longer be a
legal defence
in rape cases if proposals being considered by the
Government
become law.
The
Department of Justice
and the Office of the
Attorney General
are currently considering the proposal to significantly modify the State's consent laws.
The planned reform is at advanced stage, has the backing of the Law Reform Commission and is a key part of the Government's plan to take action on consent laws.
Under the proposal, an accused person could not be acquitted of rape if a court found that their belief that the alleged victim had consented was not an objectively reasonable belief.
READ MORE
Case law in the State indicates that an accused person could defend themselves from a rape charge by testifying that they honestly believed their accuser had consented to sex, even if that belief is not reasonable or rational.
In 2016, the Supreme Court found, in the case of The People (DPP) v C O'R, that an 'honest, though unreasonable, mistake that the woman was consenting is a defence to rape'. It added that the belief must be 'genuinely held' by the accused.
In 2017, the attorney general asked the Law Reform Commission to examine the issue. The 'honest belief' defence came under scrutiny as the Oireachtas was passing a 2017 law that clarified the circumstances under which a person could not legally consent to sex. These included when they were asleep, unconscious, incapacitated by drugs or alcohol, or consenting under the threat or use of force.
The Law Reform Commission advised a change of the law to clarify that an accused person commits the crime of rape if he 'does not reasonably believe' the alleged victim was consenting.
The Department of Justice is now progressing the planned reform with the Office of the Attorney General.
It is one of a number of reforms of the way the criminal justice system handles rape and sexual assault allegations, which is a focus for Government officials in the wake of a scoping inquiry into historic abuse in schools.
Last week, the Government
announced a commission of inquiry
into the handling of historic sexual abuse allegations in schools. Officials from a number of Government departments, who were tasked with writing a report on the recommendations of the
scoping inquiry
published last year, noted that the majority of survivors who detailed their experiences with the scoping inquiry 'had a negative, and in some cases, retraumatising, experience with the legal system'.
[
Officials resist schools abuse redress scheme
Opens in new window
]
In a report published last week, the interdepartmental group added that a negative experience with the legal system 'may influence survivors' perspectives on participating in a future process such as a commission of investigation'.
Survivors had called on the State to 'make the legal system more accessible and appropriate for victims of sexual crimes'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Focus in Budget 2026 has to be on transforming infrastructure, Martin says
The Government's focus in the next budget has to be on transforming infrastructure, Taoiseach Micheál Martin has said as Sinn Féin insisted a cost-of-living package had to be included. Such a package has been ruled out in advance of Budget 2026 in October, including payments that have benefited the average worker by €1,000. In the Dáil Mr Martin said there would be supports in the budget but said the focus 'quite simply has to be on transforming our infrastructure'. Challenging the Government's budget stance, Sinn Féin leader Mary Lou McDonald said the Taoiseach was 'doubling down' on the removal of support payments 'for struggling households at a time when living costs are through the roof'. READ MORE Irish households are paying 30 per cent more than the EU average for electricity each year , almost €350 extra, recent Eurostat data shows. The ESRI said it was difficult to explain such a difference. The Government proposes to cancel the 'very help they desperately need' in energy credits as part of a cost-of-living package in the budget, Ms McDonald said. 'People are being fleeced now today, when they open their electricity or gas bill, when they get to the checkout with the weekly shop, when they go to fill the car, and when they go to buy basic toiletries like toothpaste or shampoo,' she said. Mr Martin acknowledged that prices are 'relatively elevated' following the peak of inflation and that Ireland has the third lowest rate of inflation in the EU. He said the Government had done a lot and 'more than any other European government' in terms of cushioning and trying to reduce the impact of cost-of-living increases on people. This included extending the VAT reduction to 9 per cent on electricity and gas, which will save households €70 for gas and €55 for electricity. Mr Martin said there will be a significant increase in the number of people eligible for the fuel allowance in September and that the carers support grant increased to €2,000 in January, benefiting 138,000 people. He said from June women can receive HRT free of charge. [ Why are food prices going up? Who is profiting and what can be done about it? Opens in new window ] He also pointed to the back-to-school clothing and footwear allowance, the free schoolbook scheme and the free hot meals scheme in primary schools. 'We have to be prudent,' he said. 'We have to be cautious and careful in terms of the resources that we have. And I know everybody wants us to spend billions, but that is not open to us.' He said 'we will be spending a lot. There won't be any austerity in itself but there has to be some degree of caution because the situation could change' he said, in reference to the threat of US president Donald Trump's 30 per cent tariff .
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Former Seanad candidate wants full recount of agricultural panel vote, court hears
A former Seanad election candidate wants a full recount of the recent agricultural panel vote in the interest of fairness and transparency, the High Court has heard. Cllr Angela Feeney, a member of the Labour Party's central council and former head of Technological University Dublin's school of languages, law and social sciences, has brought a High Court petition challenging the conduct of vote counting for the agricultural panel. Cllr Feeney, a councillor in Kildare, wants January's election result overturned and a recount ordered. She was eliminated on the 23rd count by a margin of .116, or one-ninth, of a ballot, missing out on the final seat to Fine Gael's Maria Byrne. READ MORE Each valid Seanad ballot paper is deemed to have a value of 1,000 votes. The total valid poll for the 11-seat agricultural panel was 95,667 votes. Cllr Feeney's case claims there should have been a full recount of the ballots, rather than simply a repeat of the 23rd count. She says her request for a full recount was denied by the returning officer. On Tuesday, giving evidence at the hearing into her action, Cllr Feeney said she was asking the court to grant the recount in the interest of fairness and transparency. She added that the 'bigger issue' in the case is transparency and public faith in the electoral system. Cllr Feeney said she was 'surprised' when counting at the count centre began at such a distance that candidates and their teams had no proper sight of the process. Counting continued at a distance of about 7ft away and did not lend itself to 'proper oversight' of the process, as one might expect at local or Dáil election count centres, she said. Cross-examined by Catherine Donnelly, senior counsel for the returning officer, Cllr Feeney agreed other candidates vying for a seat on the agricultural panel were eliminated by similarly slim margins, less than the value of one ballot paper. Cllr Feeney said because she was last to be eliminated, she had the potential to be elected. None of the other candidates missed out by virtue of a margin as fine as hers, she said. Cllr Feeney agreed that her side had not identified any particular error in the count process. She said she believed the error was not allowing the full recount and the lack of transparency. Ms Donnelly put to Cllr Feeney that the count was visible to candidates. The councillor said the visibility was not adequate. Asked why she did not raise with the returning officer concerns around transparency when she first arrived at the count centre, Cllr Feeney said it did not seem she and her team had an opportunity to raise such concerns. Conor Power, senior barrister for Ms Feeney, said the returning officer had discretion in granting a full recount but a number of factors must be considered in exercising that discretion. In Cllr Feeney's case, those factors included the narrow margin of difference between her and the next candidate, the very small margin of difference on a number of previous counts and the possibility of human error during the count, Mr Power said. The case continues before Mr Justice Mícheál O'Higgins.
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on the local property tax: homeowners can pay a bit more
It is the time of year when local council decide whether to adjust the local property tax (LPT) bills of householders in their area. Under the rules they can choose to vary the amount of LPT to be paid upwards or downwards from a base figure. Cutting, while popular, leaves the council with less money to spend. The opposite calculus applies to increases. Looking at the decisions made so far, and the debates that have led to them, one thing is clear. There remains a huge reluctance in Ireland to tax residential property. Strangely, the strongest critics of the tax are those further to the left, including Sinn Féin and People before Profit/Solidarity. Housing is by the far the main source of wealth held by Irish people, but these parties object at every turn to raising tax on it. Too many councillors are still refusing to even collect the baseline level of the tax and are thus leaving less cash for their councils to spend. Councillors in Dun Laoghaire-Rathdown, which has the most expensive house prices in the State, voted to continue the maximum reduction of 15 per cent from the baseline level set for the tax. This costs the council €10 million in annual income. South Dublin County Council – where a reduction of 15 per cent from the baseline had been in place – voted to reduce this to 7.5 per cent, though the resulting increase in bills will be tiny in most cases. The decision in Fingal is to reduce the charge by 5 per cent, compared to 7.5 per cent previously. Outside Dublin, councils in Carlow and Wicklow both voted to maintain charges slightly above the baseline – arguing that this underpins important services for the public. READ MORE As well as opposition from many on the left to the tax, in some council – such as Dun Laoghaire-Rathdown – Fine Gael and Fianna Fáil councillors have supported cuts in bills. At a time when councils are scrambling for cash, this smacks of populism. True, bills may increase for some next year anyhow due to a reform of the tax announced by Minister for Finance, Paschal Donohoe. But the additional amounts to be paid will be small for most households. And surely those with properties of €1 million or more can be asked to pay a bit extra? In most cases council management clearly spell out to councillors the implications of their LPT decisions. That many still vote to undermine the funding of local services must be dispiriting for those who actually have to deliver them. At a national level, it is clear that there is no political appetite to increase LPT as a source of revenue, which would be a welcome widening of a very narrow tax base. The reform programme which will apply from next year was cautious and the tax will remain a small contributor to the exchequer. This means that when more tax is needed in the years ahead – as it will be – it will be income taxpayers who will again be hit.
