Congress always betrayed, suppressed OBCs: BJP on fresh caste census in Karnataka
New Delhi, June 16 (UNI) The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) on Monday criticised the Congress party for suppressing the rights of Other Backward Classes (OBCs) following Karnataka government's decision to scrap an earlier caste survey and conduct a fresh one, which involved a public expenditure of over Rs 165 crore.
Addressing a press conference here, Union Minister Bhupender Yadav alleged Congress has historically betrayed the OBC community by ignoring recommendations of commissions like the Kaka Kalelkar and Mandal Commissions aimed to empower the OBCs community.
"The OBC community has always been betrayed by the Congress. If the Congress had genuine intent, it would have formed a new commission after scrapping the Kaka Kalelkar Commission on empowering the OBCs ... Instead, they dismissed the commission's report and continued to rule...
'Later, when the Mandal Commission was constituted and the Supreme Court upheld its legality, the Congress worked to weaken the OBC Commission,' Yadav said at a press conference here.
He also pointed out internal contradictions in the Congress, noting that Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah said the survey decision was directed by Congress leadership, not the state government, likening this to previous interventions by Sonia Gandhi-led bodies during the UPA regime.
'Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah said the decision for a new caste survey was not his government's but the Congress leadership's. Such an intervention of the party in the government's decision-making? Is there interference from Sonia Gandhi-headed National Advisory Council which played a key role in the UPA government. There should be an accountability about the public expenditure...,' he said.
The BJP's criticism of the Congress over the OBC caste survey in Karnataka also comes on the same day that the central government issued a notification for the 16th Caste Census, scheduled for 2027.
Yadav credited the BJP government for initiatives benefiting OBCs, including granting constitutional status to the OBC Commission and introducing reservations for Economically Weaker Sections (EWS).
He praised PM Modi's welfare schemes for lifting millions out of poverty.
He said, "It was the BJP government that granted reservation to the Economically Weaker Sections (EWS). Congress has never stood with the poor, OBCs, or SC/ST communities. Congress MP & LoP Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi, calls Karnataka an ideal state — but the timing and internal contradictions of their stance show that social justice is merely a showpiece for Congress, not a genuine commitment. Misleading the OBC community has been Congress' policy; delivering justice to them has never been their intent..."
"We thank our PM for addressing the long-standing issue of reservations in admissions to central schools... Through his economic welfare schemes, crores of people have been lifted out of poverty," said the senior BJP leader.
Responding to Congress' demand to adopt the Telangana census model for caste data, Yadav took a jab at the Opposition, remarking, 'If that's the case, then why haven't they are not implementing the Telangana model in Karnataka, where they are in power?'
UNI AJ SS
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
Togadia: Extending Op Sindoor would have hit Pak harder
Hubballi: Even as debate still rages on whether India should have persisted with , instead of agreeing to a ceasefire, International Hindu Parishad founder president Dr Pravin Togadia feels India's reprisal ought to have lasted longer. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Addressing a press conference here on Monday, he said prolonging Operation Sindoor could have inflicted a greater damage on Pakistan, though he acknowledged that govt decisions on such sensitive national security issues should not be commented on. Regarding the 'One Nation, One Election' policy, Dr Togadia emphasised the need for a comprehensive dialogue among political parties before the rollout of something as significant as this. He further clarified that Antarashtriya Hindu Parishad, established in 2018, has no political aspirations. Its focus remains on Hindu advocacy and influencing Indian politics through public support for Hindu welfare. Interestingly, he ruled out splitting post-Independence India's timeline around 2014 – the year Narendra Modi became Prime Minister for the first time. He suggested that 1947 should be the watershed moment. Addressing concerns about a perceived threat to Hindus in many states across the country, he expressed confidence in the measures adopted by the govt. He admitted receiving adequate security from various state govts, including those run by non-BJP parties such as Congress and TMC. The press conference was also attended by former MP Vijay Sankeshwar, International Hindu Parishad Karnataka working president Ramesh Kulkarni and others. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now BOX Batting for Hanuman Chalisa For the protection of a strong India and to safeguard Hindu interests, a resolution was adopted at the Hindu Chitana Sabha organised by Antarashtriya Hindu Parishad in Hubballi on Monday to chant Hanuman Chalisa in every corner of the country. Highlighting the need to unite crores of Hindu families across India, Dr Pravin Togadia said at the gathering that although Hindus are the majority in India, they are not organised as a religious entity. "That is why we came forward with a new campaign with the resolution of a healthy Hindu, a safe Hindu, and a prosperous Hindu, and Hanuman Chalisa should be chanted every Saturday from 8 pm to 9 pm," Dr Togadia said.
Time of India
30 minutes ago
- Time of India
SP to contest UP polls as part of INDIA bloc: Akhilesh
1 2 Lucknow: Former CM and SP chief Akhilesh Yadav on Monday said his party would contest the 2027 assembly polls in UP as a part of the INDIA bloc, the party's combination with the Congress and other regional parties that had given the SP its highest-ever tally of seats in the 2024 Lok Sabha polls. "SP chief has reiterated that our party will contest the UP assembly polls as a part of the INDIA bloc and this has been the stance of the party chief since the Lok Sabha polls," party's national secretary Rajendra Chaudhary told TOI on Monday. Akhilesh's statement, made while presiding over a meeting of the office-bearers and cadres of party's minority cell held at the party headquarters, was being seen as an attempt to reaffirm that the assembly elections would see SP joining hands with the Cong. SP insiders said the party leadership was open to joining hands with other some regional parties as well and the list included some "who were presently close to the BJP as well". In April, while responding to media queries in Prayagraj, Akhilesh had said that SP would contest the assembly polls in UP under the INDIA bloc dropping clear hints that party's alliance with Congs was very much alive for the assembly polls in UP as well. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Поза во сне может многое рассказать о вашем характере! Удивительные Новости Undo In the 2024 Lok Sabha polls the SP-Cong alliance bagged 43 out of the total of 80 seats in the state, confining the BJP-led NDA to 36 seats. The SP won 37 seats while the Congress bagged 6 seats. While addressing the office-bearers of the party's minority wing, Akhilesh called upon the cadres to keep a close watch on voters list and caste census stating that the BJP was capable of hatching conspiracies to tamper both. "We will have to be extra cautious at the booth level and keep an eye on the caste census process as well. The BJP is capable of manipulating anything," Akhilesh said. The national president of SP minority wing Maulana Iqbal Qadri and regional head Shakeel Nadvi also addressed the gathering. Party's national secretary Rajendra Chaudhary, state president Shyam Lal Pal and a host of party MPs and MLAs also attended the meeting.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Census 2027: Assessing pros and cons of self-enumeration exercise
It's a much delayed Census, and changes are afoot. On Monday, the government notified the 2027 Indian Census, which will be the first census exercise in India in 16 years. India has seen significant economic, political, and technological transformation in this time period. There is also a lot riding politically on the Census. Also Read: Centre issues notification for caste census, says 2-phase exercise to begin in 2027 It will likely be the basis for the controversial National Register of Citizens (NRC), which can be used to determine citizenship in India, should the government decided to extend the National Population Registry to a NRC; the next round of delimitation (drawing constituency boundaries); and caste reservations. This iteration of the Census will also include a 'caste census' — enumerating Indians by caste for the first time since 1931, which will certainly impact the allotment of reservations for other backward classes (OBCs). With so much riding on the Census, a curious little addition to the census procedure, with no details, was included in the notification. For the first time ever, India will allow 'self-enumeration' which will allow citizens to fill out Census data without a visit from a census enumerator. Also Read: BJP will have to give people their due 'bhagidari': UP Cong in charge Let us take a closer look at the challenges and implications of self-enumeration. Many developed countries, such as the US, essentially use self-enumeration in the Census — as door-to-door canvassing is not operationally or fiscally feasible. Given India's advancement in biometric identification, greater mobile phone connectivity, and the difficulty of interviewing populations on the move such as commuters and migrants, it makes sense for the government to experiment with this idea. Also Read: UP Congress pushes caste census, begins statewide outreach Beyond operational ease, self-enumeration can offer many advantages for procuring high quality data. It is no secret that demographics in many parts of India are highly sensitive matters. To take one example, speaking Bengali as a first language in the state of Assam has become politicized. Imagine how a Bengali speaker may respond to the language questions in the census if directly speaking to an Assamese-speaking enumerator. The interaction may cause the speaker to lie about their first language, or the enumerator may intimidate the respondent to generate incorrect data. Similar claims can be made about declaring oneself as Muslim where there is a threat of religious intimidation or being a Hindi-speaker in Karnataka. In principle, if privacy protocols are sufficiently strong, respondents may more honestly report their demographics and this could yield some surprising (but more correct) results. In this manner, the push to self-enumeration may help reduce 'surveyor bias.' At the same time, there can be genuine concerns about data quality with self-enumeration, from a greater likelihood of data entry error to purposeful misrepresentation. The Census data is complicated, and enumerators are given strict guidelines about how to code various definition (the definition of the household). How will these guidelines genuinely be communicated to the citizen, and will people be able to apply them systematically? Are we certain that each person that desires to enter data through self-enumeration will have the functional literacy to do so? But beyond entry error, there are genuine concerns of wilful misrepresentation. If we are concerned that the Census can only be filled by persons with a certain level of functional literacy, then it is equally true that those that do not reach that level will be obliged to look to others, such as 'agents,' to fill out the information. Given that this data will now be tied to a caste census and to a national register, will there be a secondary market that develops to fill out the information in the 'right way'? For instance, will better organized caste groups get 'better enumeration' through self-enumeration? Data fidelity is a major concern, even in the US. After the information is collected, the US runs a Post-Enumeration Survey to characterize the bias and error in self-enumeration. Is this something to which the government is committed? Will there be sufficient coordination in the system to know who has engaged self-enumeration and who needs a visit from a Census enumerator? In other words, when there are multiple ways of entering in the system, there are genuine concerns of redundancy but also miscoordination that misses out on Indians. Perhaps this initial run a self-enumeration will see a low adoption rate. But if the government is committed to moving to a system of self-enumeration for a significant share of the population, these are all issues that will have to be addressed. We all expect some growing pains. The biggest challenges will occur if self-enumeration throws up some surprising results, like higher than expected number of Bengali speakers in Assam. Will the data be seen as more accurate or the subject of manipulation? How will the validity of such surprising data be adjudicated? Given the operational costs of the Census, it was only a matter of time before the government looked to self-enumeration. As the government builds out the guidelines on self-enumeration in future notifications, it will need to think through these concerns to guarantee that the data remain high quality. Neelanjan Sircar is Associate Professor, Division of Social Sciences, Ahmedabad University
