Indonesia's Prabowo pledges to strengthen ties with Russia
[MOSCOW] Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto pledged to strengthen relations with Russia at a meeting with his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin.
Ties between the two nations are developing 'extremely actively,' he said in St Petersburg at the start of their talks on Thursday (Jun 19).
Putin highlighted 'large and growing cooperation' in space, energy, agriculture and defence. 'We have an opportunity to talk in depth about the whole range of ties,' the Russian president said.
Prabowo's visit, coming as he passed up an invitation to attend the Group of Seven summit in Canada, is his first state trip to Russia since taking office last year. He will also speak on Friday at Putin's flagship St Petersburg International Economic Forum, where he's expected to court investment and signal the country's continued engagement with non-Western partners.
Prabowo has been seeking to deepen ties with Russia. As defence minister and president-elect last year, he met Putin in Moscow and called for stronger cooperation. Since his presidency began, the two countries held their first joint naval exercises, and the head of Russia's Security Council, Sergei Shoigu, visited Jakarta to discuss military cooperation, marking one of the most senior Russian visits to South-east Asia since Moscow began its war in Ukraine in 2022.
Prabowo's visit also follows Indonesia's entry into the Brics group of economies earlier this year, highlighting his push to diversify Indonesia's partnerships. BLOOMBERG
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
34 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Ukraine's Zelensky appoints new commander of land forces
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy looks on during the G7 Leaders' Summit in Kananaskis, in Alberta, Canada, June 17, 2025. REUTERS/Amber Bracken/File Photo KYIV - President Volodymyr Zelensky on Thursday appointed Hennadiy Shapovalov commander of Ukraine's land forces, replacing a commander who resigned over a Russian strike on a training area. Shapovalov, whose appointment was announced in a presidential decree, had previously acted as a liaison at a Nato coordination centre in Germany. Before that, he had served as commander of the forces of the Operational Command "south". Shapovalov takes over as head of land forces from Mykhailo Drapatyi, who tendered his resignation this month after a deadly Russian strike on a training camp in southeastern Ukraine. Zelensky reassigned Drapatyi to the post of commander of joint forces as part of a military shakeup. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
France softens restrictions for Telegram's Russian founder Pavel Durov
France has granted permission for Telegram founder Pavel Durov to live in Dubai for a maximum of two weeks at a time. PHOTO: AFP PARIS - Telegram founder Pavel Durov's judicial control has been relaxed, with the Russian-born entrepreneur now allowed to live in Dubai for a maximum of two weeks at a time. Durov, 40, was sensationally detained in Paris in 2024 and is under formal investigation by French authorities over illegal content on his popular messaging service. In March, Durov was allowed to leave France for the first time since his arrest and travel to Dubai, where his company is based and his family lives. According to a judicial source, on June 19 Durov was authorised 'to leave metropolitan France for a maximum of 14 consecutive days, subject to informing the investigating judge one week in advance.' The measure, which takes effect from July 10, allows him to travel only to Dubai. According to the judicial source, Durov's identity documents and passport will be returned to him on that date, while the other obligations of his judicial supervision, including a bail, will remain in place. Telegram welcomed the decision of the Paris Court of Appeal 'allowing Mr Durov to travel regularly to the United Arab Emirates without the need for judicial authorisation.' 'We are confident that the obligation to return to France every two weeks will also be lifted later this year, allowing Mr Durov to devote himself fully to Telegram and its users,' the company told AFP. Mr David-Olivier Kaminski, one of Durov's lawyers, added: 'The judicial supervision obligations imposed on Pavel Durov had become unfounded and totally disproportionate, as were the charges brought by the prosecutor.' Durov's recent requests to travel to the United States and Norway have been denied, however. In an interview with Le Point published on June 18, Durov said that the ban on leaving France affected him 'enormously' and denounced the charges against him as 'completely absurd'. Durov has been accused of 'complicity' in running an online platform that allowed illicit transactions, child sex abuse images and other illegal content – claims he denies. 'I have a newborn son and I am missing the first months of his life,' Durov said, adding that his parents had health problems. 'It seems that I am already being punished at this stage by being banned from leaving the country,' he said. Durov also told Le Point that he was 'very disappointed' with the policies of President Emmanuel Macron, who granted Durov French citizenship. 'I had high hopes for him,' Durov said. 'For a long time, he would send me messages on Telegram about all sorts of things,' Durov added. Durov has recently accused France's foreign intelligence service of seeking to meddle in Romania's election, claims the DGSE has denied. When he published his allegations, Mr Macron sent him a message, Durov said, adding: 'I didn't reply.' AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
How Trump, a self-proclaimed ‘peacemaker', embraced Israel's campaign against Iran
US President Donald Trump (right) and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu answering questions during a February 2025 press conference. PHOTO: REUTERS WASHINGTON - Roughly one month ago, from the stage at an investment forum in Saudi Arabia, US President Donald Trump issued a warning to Iran that would prove prophetic. 'We'll never allow America and its allies to be threatened with terrorism or nuclear attack,' Mr Trump told the crowd, sending a message to the leadership in Tehran. 'The time is right now for them to choose. Right now. We don't have a lot of time to wait. Things are happening at a very fast pace.' That May 13 ultimatum received little attention at the time. But behind the scenes, the president already knew an attack on Iran could be imminent - and that there might be little he could do to stop it, according to two US officials. By mid-May, the Pentagon had begun drawing up detailed contingency plans to aid Israel if it followed through on its long-held ambition to strike Iran's nuclear programme, the officials said. And the US had already diverted thousands of defensive weapons away from war-torn Ukraine towards the Middle East in preparation for potential conflict, according to a Western source familiar with the matter and a Ukrainian source. The Pentagon declined to comment for this story. This account of the weeks and days leading up to Mr Trump's decision to throw his support behind Israel's bombing campaign is based on interviews with over a dozen administration officials, foreign diplomats and Trump confidantes, most of whom spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss private deliberations. The picture that emerges is that of a long, secretive preparation process and a president who for weeks found himself torn between diplomacy and supporting military action - and was ultimately persuaded in part by an ally whose actions he did not fully control. While Mr Trump has long described himself as a peacemaker - dispatching Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff to the region several times to try to seal a diplomatic accord - he had several trusted political allies pushing him to back an Israeli attack on Iran's nuclear facilities. And US intelligence had indicated a unilateral Israeli strike was possible, even likely, even if Mr Trump wanted to wait, according to two US officials. While it is unclear if Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu or Mr Trump's more hawkish allies ever got him to a 'yes' to Israel's plans, by the days leading up the strike he was at least not a 'no,' according to two senior US officials and a senior Israeli source. That stance, people familiar with the dynamics said, helped tip Israel into action. Seven days into the Israel-Iran conflict, Mr Trump is left with a dilemma, said Mr Aaron David Miller, a veteran diplomat who has advised six secretaries of state on Middle East policy. He can try again to pursue a diplomatic resolution with Iran, allow Iran and Israel 'to fight it out,' or he can enter the war with US airstrikes on the deeply buried Fordow enrichment plant, a step that would have unknown consequences for the region. Mr Trump 'let it (the Israeli attack) happen,' said Mr Miller. 'He got on the tiger and he's riding it.' The White House, the Israeli prime minister's office and Iran's delegation to the United Nations did not respond to a request for comment. Tehran has consistently said its nuclear programme is designed for peaceful purposes only, a conclusion Washington has rejected. Coming storm One of the first hints that Mr Trump might sign off on an Israeli bombing campaign came in April. During a closed door meeting on April 17, Saudi Arabia's defence minister delivered a blunt message to Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian: Take Mr Trump's offer to negotiate an agreement seriously because it presents a way to avoid the risk of war with Israel. Reuters could not determine whether the message was sent at Washington's behest, nor whether Iran's leaders took that message seriously. With hindsight, they should have. The Israel Defence Forces and the head of US Central Command, General Michael 'Erik' Kurilla, were discussing detailed intelligence about Iran's missile buildup and nuclear programme and steps that could be required to defend US troops and Israel itself in any conflict with Iran, according to a US official and senior Israeli official. Meanwhile, the US was funnelling weapons to Israel that would be useful for an air war with Iran. In one instance in early May, a large shipment of defensive missiles originally meant for Ukraine were diverted to Israel instead, according to the Western source and the Ukrainian source. The diverted shipment caused consternation in Kyiv and sparked continued fears that additional weapons needed to defend against Moscow will instead be used to defend US interests elsewhere, the Ukrainian source said. In the opening months of Mr Trump's term, Israel had already proposed to Washington a series of options to attack Iran's facilities, according to sources. While Mr Trump had rebuffed those ideas, saying he preferred diplomacy for the time being, several people close to him said he was never dead-set against using military force against Iran. He had done so before. In 2020, despite a foreign policy during his first term that was otherwise marked by restraint, Mr Trump ordered a drone strike that killed major-general Qassem Soleimani, the head of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards' division responsible for its international operations. The Iranian government has since sought to murder Mr Trump in revenge, US prosecutors have said, an allegation Tehran denies. Behind the scenes, Mr Trump had been pulled in multiple directions on the Iran issue since before he even took office. On one side, many supporters - including conservative media personality Tucker Carlson - and administration officials saw Mr Trump's Make America Great Again movement as an antidote to decades of foreign wars that cost thousands of American lives without significantly advancing American interests. On the other, several close Trump allies - from conservative commentator Mark Levin to Republican Senator Lindsey Graham - were portraying a nuclear Iran as an existential threat that must be removed at any cost. Mr Trump himself took pride in being a broker of peace. 'My proudest legacy,' he said during his inauguration address, 'will be that of a peacemaker and unifier.' 'It's a tango' Ultimately, no US official, Trump confidante or diplomat Reuters talked to identified an epiphany that tipped the scales for the president. One senior administration official said that after months of sitting on the fence a lack of diplomatic progress, a push from the Israelis and appeals by hawkish allies likely wore him down. Trump aides and allies have noted that Israel's attack unfolded just after the expiry of a 60-day deadline the Trump administration had set for a diplomatic breakthrough with Iran. The senior US official said another dynamic was at play: As US intelligence consistently showed Israel might go ahead with an attack with or without US support, the administration could look caught off guard if they did not get behind it. Worse, it could appear that the US was opposing a longtime ally. Although Mr Trump had appeared to some to snub Mr Netanyahu as he pushed for a peaceful solution to the crisis, privately, Israel understood that Washington would stand by it, said a separate official. By the time Mr Trump talked to Mr Netanyahu on June 9 - one of many phone calls in recent days - his stance was one of tacit, if not explicit approval, according to one US and one Israeli official. The Wall Street Journal reported that Mr Trump had said he would like more time to see diplomacy play out. But the US official said that he did not explicitly veto Israel's plans. By June 11, it was clear to Washington that Israel's plans were a go. That day, Reuters reported that the US was preparing a partial evacuation of its Iraqi embassy amid fears of reprisals from Iran following an imminent attack. The next day, June 12, Washington sent a formal diplomatic note to several regional allies, warning them that an attack was imminent. That evening, Israel launched its overnight barrage, an attack that almost immediately escalated into an air war. Mr Trump and some key Cabinet members watched the events live from the wood-panelled 'JFK room,' part of the White House Situation Room. Other officials watched the events nearby. On the menu, per one official: stone crabs from a local restaurant. The initial attack appeared to be a success, with several close advisers to Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei killed and key nuclear sites seriously damaged. Over the weekend, the Israelis considered killing Khamenei himself, but were waved off by Mr Trump, according to two US officials. Almost immediately, a political civil war erupted in Mr Trump's Republican Party, with several high-profile conservatives, including members of Congress, accusing his administration of fanning the flames of war. Seven days on, the US intelligence community believes the strikes have set Iran's nuclear ambitions back by only months, according to a source familiar with US intelligence reports, confirming a CNN report. A significant blow to Iran's nuclear ambitions, most analysts say, will require dropping bunker-busting bombs on the Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant, the crown jewel of Iran's nuclear programme. Only the US has that capability. Mr Trump has said he is considering such a strike, which would represent a major escalation for the United States. As of June 19, his intentions were still unclear. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
