
I ignored everyone's warnings and had a boob job in Turkey. The surgery nearly killed me and I've lost half my left nipple to necrosis. These are the mistakes I made and the signs I missed
It was a heartbreaking scene and all the more painful for Chloe to recall, given she was a trained nurse and the reason she was in this life-threatening state, fighting a deadly infection, was not an accident or an emergency, but 'pure vanity'.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
26 minutes ago
- BBC News
'My son's head size led to doctors spotting rare vein condition'
"The consultant was looking at his belly button, and then suddenly wanted to ask me questions about his head."A mother has described how a doctor noticed her son's "pronounced forehead" during an unrelated appointment which led to his rare now 3, was diagnosed with vein of galen malformation (VOGM) - where brain vessels connect abnormally - which affects only about 10 to 12 babies in the UK each year and can lead to serious complications if was treated with a new surgical technique at Alder Hey Children's Hospital in Liverpool in March, which involved open surgery. "Thank you just doesn't cut it," his mum, Lucy, from Bolton, said. "They not only saved his life, they saved ours too." She said she had initially felt "slightly confused" when the doctor started asking about Conor's head, after going in to check on a potential umbilical hernia. "He felt like he had quite a pronounced forehead; it was quite a large head," she said."And he had very visible veins on his forehead, and his temples, around his eyes."She said an MRI scan showed eight-month-old Conor had a "significant brain issue" that would require surgery."It was only after those scans that they said to us that they think that it's vein of galen malformation and then started to explain to us a little bit what that meant," Lucy said."But in reality, they'd never seen it before in Bolton."She said the experience was "terrifying" and the couple felt "helpless" and what followed felt like "a bit of an out of body experience". Conor went on to have three operations at Alder Hey. However, he was one of a rare group of patients where veins block off and doctors could no longer get to the malformation. It was causing swelling and damage to the brain stem and spinal cord, leading him to deteriorate, according to his surgeon Conor said: "It's a fight against time, and that happened quite early in Conor, which is why we had to come up with this alternative route."A new surgical technique was used involving access through Conor's skull to target the affected blood vessels. Alder Hey is one of only two centres in the UK equipped to carry out this procedure on hospital has a state-of-the-art theatre with advanced imaging machinery, giving specialists real-time X-ray pictures of blood vessels during operations and allowing them to combine endovascular and open technique has never been performed at another Mallucci said: "Exposing these veins that were blocked at the jugular level is high risk."You lose blood. It's a big operation, and to put a needle directly into one of those is a little bit hair raising, so we had to be very careful about that."Conor was expected to sleep for about a week after the operation and stay in hospital for six weeks, but he woke up soon after and asked his mum for chips. "I obviously went into mum mode and said 'can we get some chips in here please?," Lucy left the hospital 10 days later. Now aged three, Conor recovered well and is now considered "99% cured" by Mr has left nursery and will be attending pre-school in September. Lucy said: "As much as I feel like this is an incredibly unlucky diagnosis, I sometimes have to pull that back and think actually we were incredibly lucky in a lot of ways."She said she was "so proud" of her "resilient" son, adding: "At one point they were saying, 'we may want to hold him back' and 'maybe it might be a bit too much for him'."But they've said now that they think he's doing incredibly well." Listen to the best of BBC Radio Manchester on Sounds and follow BBC Manchester on Facebook, X, and Instagram. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.


BBC News
26 minutes ago
- BBC News
Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust recruits 167 doctors
More than 160 resident doctors have been recruited by Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust (SaTH), it has been 167 clinicians, from all stages of their career, have been inducted, and will now be training and working across disciplines including medicine, surgery and women and children's John Jones, medical director at SaTH,, said: "With them they bring experience and passion to help us to continue to provide excellent care to the communities we serve."The Royal Shrewsbury Hospital (RSH) is undergoing a transformation programme, and this week marked the first anniversary since work started on its four-storey building expansion. The induction programme was delivered by the trust's senior clinicians and other staff, to help the resident doctors, formerly known as junior doctors, become familiar with their new working will now move on to practical and ward-based Jones said: "I am delighted to have welcomed 167 new resident doctors to the trust." Follow BBC Shropshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.


The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
Senators seek UnitedHealth records on push to curb nursing home hospitalizations
US lawmakers are asking UnitedHealth Group, the nation's largest healthcare conglomerate, to disclose internal documents about its efforts to reduce hospital transfers for nursing home residents and the bonuses it has given to nursing homes which help it to do so. In a 6 August letter, the Democratic senators Ron Wyden and Elizabeth Warren asked UnitedHealth's CEO, Stephen Hemsley, to hand over a trove of company records about a partnership program it has with nursing homes across the country, which aims to decrease hospitalizations and thereby coverage expenses for the conglomerate. The document demand letter follows a Guardian investigation into the initiative. 'Put simply, these allegations suggest that UHG [UnitedHealth Group] appears to be prioritizing its bottom line at the expense of the health and safety of nursing home residents enrolled in UHG I-SNPs,' Wyden and Warren wrote, referring to a type of UnitedHealth plan for long-term nursing home residents. 'Nursing home residents and their families should not live in fear of a for-profit health care company withholding care when it is most critical.' UnitedHealth argues the program is designed to curb 'unnecessary' hospitalizations. The company has vigorously denied the allegations in the Guardian's 21 May investigation, which was based on thousands of confidential corporate and patient records, public records requests and court files, interviews with more than 20 current and former UnitedHealth and nursing home employees, and two whistleblower declarations submitted to Congress in May through the non-profit legal group Whistleblower Aid. 'We stand firmly behind the integrity of our I-SNP program, which consistently receives high satisfaction ratings,' said a UnitedHealth Group company spokesperson. 'The allegations stem from an article that misrepresents a program that provides high-quality care, personalized on-site clinical care and enhanced coordination among caregivers. The US Department of Justice extensively reviewed these allegations and found no evidence of wrongdoing.' Wyden's and Warren's offices received a briefing from UnitedHealth on 29 July about the program. Both lawmakers, who sit on the powerful Senate finance committee, said they 'remained concerned' about several aspects of the UnitedHealth nursing home initiative, according to the 6 August letter. The senators pointed out, for example, that UnitedHealth pays some nursing homes bonuses based on their residents' rate of hospital transfers, as the Guardian previously reported. But that bonus metric 'does not take into account avoidable versus unavoidable hospitalizations, but rather sets a cap on hospitalizations for any reason, potentially making it a poor measure of quality of care', the letter notes. The company has previously said that its bonus payments to nursing homes help prevent unnecessary hospitalizations, which can be costly and dangerous, to patients and that its partnerships with nursing homes improve health outcomes. Wyden and Warren are also seeking information about how the company markets its plans under Medicare Advantage, a privatized alternative to traditional Medicare, to nursing home residents, and about how its employees talk to residents about advanced care directives which can affect their ability to access hospital care. The senators are requesting information, too, on whether federal regulators have sanctioned certain UnitedHealth Medicare Advantage plans geared toward long-term nursing home residents within the last five years. The healthcare conglomerate has faced lawsuits alleging its employees have improperly attempted to enroll nursing home residents into its Medicare Advantage plans and have risked or harmed residents' health by helping to delay or avoid critical hospital transfers. Under Medicare Advantage, the federal government pays insurers fixed sums to cover the care of seniors, a model which critics contend can encourage inappropriate tactics to slash coverage expenses. UnitedHealth has previously alleged that the Guardian's reporting was 'blatantly false and misleading' and said that the suggestion that its employees have prevented hospital transfers 'is verifiably false'. UnitedHealth sued the Guardian for libel shortly after the outlet informed the company it was publishing a follow-up investigation into the nursing home program. Sign up to Headlines US Get the most important US headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning after newsletter promotion The document demand letter from Wyden and Warren comes just a few months after lawmakers from both parties expressed rare bipartisan concern about UnitedHealth's activities inside nursing homes. In June, two congressional Democrats – representatives Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York and Lloyd Doggett of Texas – sent a letter to the Department of Justice asking it to 'thoroughly review new revelations from investigative reporting and whistleblower complaints, which suggest that UnitedHealth may have engaged in illegal activities'. Likewise, Josh Hawley, a Missouri Republican on the Senate investigations subcommittee, vowed to secure 'justice for patients, policyholders and whistleblowers alike who've been harmed by insurance companies'. In their letter on Thursday, Wyden and Warren asked UnitedHealth to provide 'a provide a full, written response' to their inquiry by 8 September. In its statement, UnitedHealth said it would 'continue to educate their staff and share information on the I-SNP model and its proven benefit for seniors'.