Australian competitors in controversial 1980 Moscow Olympics to be recognised
The athletes were among over 5,000 competitors from 80 countries who participated in the Games.
According to the International Olympic Committee between 45 and 50 nations boycotted the Games in protest of the Soviet Union's invasion of Afghanistan in 1979.
The Australians who chose to go faced a financial and public backlash amid then-prime minister Malcolm Fraser's call to join the boycott.
They returned with nine medals — two gold, two silver and five bronze — but there were no parades, no fanfare and no official recognition.
The prime minister and opposition leader will today recognise the 1980 Australian Olympic Team and acknowledge other athletes pressured into not going.
Michelle Ford was 18 when she competed in Moscow, winning gold in the 800-metre freestyle and bronze in the 200-metre butterfly.
She said the government put on a negative media campaign to stop the athletes from going.
"All the athletes that decided not to go were given a pat on the back, a thank you letter from the government, and a financial reward for not going," Ms Ford said.
"We were being treated as traitors. We were given death threats. We were nearly banished from this country.
"At the 800-metre freestyle, at lunch time, I open my fan mail … and I get a letter saying that if I stand on those blocks to represent I would be un-Australian and I'd be a traitor. That really touched me."
Rob de Castella AO MBE, then a 23-year-old marathon runner who finished 10th in Moscow, said the athletes were met with more attacks upon their return.
"I remember one prominent radio journalist down in Melbourne calling us traitors and saying how we were competing while the Russians were killing Afghan babies," said the four-time Olympian and former director of the Australian Institute of Sport.
"Horrible, disgraceful, despicable comments targeting young, talented Australians."
Around 50 Moscow Olympians and their families are in Canberra today for this recognition which Mr de Castella called "an important statement".
"It is an important acknowledgement that the prime minister and the government, and Australia, is making to acknowledge the mistakes of the past," he said.
Pam Westendorf, who represented Australia in rowing, said the gesture may come too late for some, with many traumatised by the vilification for competing.
"Part of the reason I'm going up to is to see some of those people that I haven't seen for such a long time, and I suppose to talk about those times," Ms Westendorf said.
Australian Olympic Committee president Ian Chesterman said the athletes who could not join the Australian contingent are also part of the team.
"My thoughts also go to those athletes who qualified and were selected but did not attend the Games, many due to decisions made by national sporting organisations under the pressure of the day," he said.
"The devastation those athletes experienced is real, and for many it remains so today.
"So we acknowledge them as selected team members and victims of the political environment of that time."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
7NEWS
an hour ago
- 7NEWS
Basketball
Aussie legend opens up on Olympics heartbreak: 'Still affects me' 'I couldn't do the closing ceremony, I just felt so much shame on myself personally.' 2 min read
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Former Australian cricket captain and coach Bob Simpson dies aged 89
Former Australian men's Test cricket captain Bob Simpson has died aged 89. The cricketer, who was born in Sydney in 1936, played 62 Tests for Australia, scoring 4,689 runs — with 10 centuries and 27 50s — and taking 71 wickets. He made his Test debut against South Africa in Johannesburg in 1957, and his first century came in an Ashes Test at Old Trafford in 1964 — Simpson went on to score 311. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese was among the first to pay tribute to Simpson. He is one of only seven Australians to make a triple-century. Simpson captained Australia in 39 Tests in three stints between 1963 and 1978. After nearly a decade away from Test cricket, he was called out of retirement after the arrival of World Series Cricket in 1977. He played a home series against India, and a tour against the West Indies in the Caribbean. He went on to coach the national team for more than a decade — under his mentorship, Australia rebounded to win the 1986 Cricket World Cup, several Ashes series, including the regaining of the urn in England in 1989, and winning the Frank Worrell Trophy for the first time in 1995, beating the West Indies in the Caribbean. After stepping down from the role in 1996, Simpson was a consultant to the Indian national team in the late 90s, and coached the Netherlands national team for a period. He received numerous honours, including his induction into the Australian Sporting Hall of Fame in 1985, to the Australian Cricket Hall of Fame in 2006, and the ICC Cricket Hall of Fame in 2013. He was made a Member of the Order of Australia in 1978, and an Officer of the order in 2007.
West Australian
2 hours ago
- West Australian
MICHELLE GRATTAN: Consensus goal may elude
One observer describes next week's economic roundtable this way: 'Chalmers has opened a can of worms — and everybody has got a worm'. Even those close to the roundtable are feeling overwhelmed by the extent of the worm farm. There are many hundreds of submissions, five Productivity Commission reports, Treasury background papers, and stakeholders in the media spruiking their opinions ahead of the event. Business, unions and the welfare sector have largely settled into their predictable wish lists. In areas such as the housing crisis, it's actually not difficult to say what should be done — you hardly need this meeting to tell you. It just seems near impossible to get the relevant players (whether they be States, local councils, the construction industry) to do it, or be able to do it. On issues of deregulation generally, when it comes to specifics, a lot is contested. As the ACTU's Sally McManus says, 'one person's regulations are another person's rights'. As much as Treasurer Jim Chalmers might like to project the sunny side of Australia's situation, independent economist Chris Richardson (who will be at the summit's day three tax session) puts it more bluntly. 'We have a problem: the average Australian saw their living standards rise by just 1.5 per cent over the past decade,' he posted on X. 'That's embarrassingly shy of the 22 per cent lift in living standards enjoyed across the rich world as a whole, and way below what Australians achieved in times past. 'You'd have hoped that both sides would have talked about tackling that challenge at the last election, but they didn't.' Richardson is hoping the roundtable can achieve 'enough consensus to change some things', which the Government can use as a springboard. But he's worried the meeting could underperform, given its 'lead-up hasn't seen much consensus', Economist Richard Holden from UNSW says to be successful, the roundtable needs to get 'broad agreement on some version of the ' Abundance agenda' (a reference to a currently fashionable book focusing on loosening regulatory blocks) – especially as it applies to housing. 'In addition, to be successful would require that big issues like federation and tax reform are referred to Treasury for serious consideration and to present the Government with options by year's end.' There are two approaches for a government that wants to promote economic reform. It can, as then treasurer Paul Keating did at the 1985 tax summit, put up a model and see how much it can make fly. Or it can, as Chalmers is doing, ask a wide range of participants for their ideas, and then decide how much of what emerges to pursue — in terms of what has wide support and what fits the Government's agenda. The closer we get to the meeting, the harder it becomes to anticipate its likely import (or lack of). Signposts are there, but they could be false signals, or ignored later. Despite all the talk about tax, the Government — specifically the Prime Minister — has flagged it doesn't have the stomach for radical reform. Certainly not this term. Anthony Albanese said last week, 'The only tax policy that we're implementing is the one that we took to the election'. This doesn't rule out new initiatives this term — the phrasing is carefully in the present tense — but from what we know of the PM's approach they would likely be limited rather than sweeping. Independent economist Saul Eslake said that a few weeks ago he was optimistic the summit would give Chalmers the licence to spend some of the vast political capital the election yielded. 'But the Prime Minister has made it clear he is not getting that licence. The Government is not prepared to venture much beyond its limited mandate from the election. 'The best that can be hoped for is a willingness to have an adult conversation with the electorate between now and the next election with a view to seeking a bold mandate in 2028,' Eslake says. Predictably, the roundtable is putting the spotlight on the Albanese-Chalmers relationship. This can be summed up in a couple of ways. The PM is more cautious when it comes to economic reform, the Treasurer is more ambitious. In political terms, it's that 'old bull, young bull' syndrome. The different styles are clear. The 'old bull' is blunt, sounding a touch impatient, for example, when he's asked about tax. The 'young bull' is publicly deferential to his leader. One of the most potentially significant discussions at the roundtable will be around AI. Unlike many well-worn issues, this is a relatively new, and quickly changing, area of policy debate. There are varying views within Government about whether firm or light guardrails are needed and whether they should be in a separate new act or just via changes to existing laws. Chalmers is in favour of light-touch regulation. The unions are not on the same page as Chalmers' regulatory preference, and they want a say for workers. The unions were the winners from the 2022 jobs and skills summit — the Government delivered to them in spades at the meeting, and later. It's not clear they are in as strong a position this time. Their big claim for the roundtable — a four-day working week — has already been dismissed by the Government. Regardless of the diversity of views among those rubbing shoulders in the cabinet room next week, one man will stand out as something of an oddity. Ted O'Brien, shadow treasurer, invited as a participant, will be as much an observer. O'Brien might say he wants to be constructive, but his role means he will want to be critical. But he has to tread carefully. Others in the room, and outside observers, will be making judgments about him. For O'Brien, the gathering should be a networking opportunity more than an occasion for performative display.
