Vanuatu Statement Ahead Of Landmark International Court Of Justice Advisory Opinion On Climate Change
Port Vila, Vanuatu (14 July 2025)
'We eagerly await the landmark opinion of the world's highest court on the greatest existential challenge facing our planet: the climate crisis. The Advisory Opinion from the International Court of Justice (ICJ), which will be issued on July 23 at 3:00 pm CEST, is not just a legal milestone, it is a defining moment in the global climate justice movement and a beacon of hope for present and future generations.
'Vanuatu and our fellow Small Island Developing States have long sounded the alarm as the seas rise around us, the storms grow stronger, and the cost of inaction deepens by the day. We have done so not out of fear, but from a place of courage, principle, and conviction that justice must prevail, and that the law must serve those most at risk.
'This case was born from a spark of hope from Pacific youth who dared to bring the world's biggest problem before the world's highest court, and their call was echoed by over 80 nations who stood together to demand climate justice.
'For the first time ever, the past decade includes the ten hottest years on record—and last year was the hottest ever. The United Nations tracked 152 unprecedented extreme weather events around the world in 2024, and this number will continue to grow as climate change continues to intensify.
Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
'We turned to the Court to clarify what international law already requires of States, because putting all our faith in mechanisms like the UNFCCC and Paris Agreement are not generating the actions the world urgently needs fast enough. We sought confirmation that States' legal obligations extend to their climate-related actions, especially when those actions have caused harm beyond borders.
'A favorable opinion from the Court could affirm that States have had long-standing legal obligations to act on climate change, including obligations rooted in human rights and environmental law. It could clarify the legal consequences for States that have failed to meet these obligations. It could provide a powerful tool for courts, communities, and negotiators around the world to seek remedies for the climate injustices that have occurred. It could support vulnerable nations in securing climate finance, technology, and loss and damage support. And it could help shift the global response from promises to accountability.
'I am hopeful for a powerful opinion from the ICJ. It could set the world on a meaningful path to accountability and action.
'But no matter the ICJ's ruling, this will be a turning point in the fight for climate justice. This process has elevated the voices of climate-vulnerable nations, driven global awareness, and set the stage for stronger climate action. This ruling will give us a foundation to build upon, and this moment will inspire continued efforts for stronger action and accountability, inspiring bold efforts to protect our planet.'
Vanuatu and allies have led the initiative to obtain this Advisory Opinion from the International Court of Justice (ICJ). Vanuatu government officials will be in the Hague for the readout of the Court's ruling on July 23.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
13 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Pacific Islands push hard as International Court of Justice set to deliver landmark climate ruling
'It will give new strength to climate litigation, inspire more ambitious national policies and guide states toward decisions that uphold their legal duties to protect both people and planet,' said Prasad. But some critics argue the ruling will be toothless, as ICJ advisory opinions are not binding and major polluters can choose simply to ignore it. 'Acts and omissions' The UN, pushed by tiny island state Vanuatu, asked the court to answer two questions. Firstly, what obligations do states have under international law to protect the Earth's climate from polluting greenhouse gas emissions? Secondly, what are the legal consequences for states which 'by their acts and omissions have caused significant harm to the climate system and other parts of the environment?' The second question was explicitly linked to the damage that climate change is causing to small, more vulnerable countries and their populations. This applies to countries facing increasingly damaging weather disasters and especially to island nations under threat from rising sea levels like those in the Pacific Ocean. 'David Vs Goliath' In what was termed a 'David versus Goliath' battle, advanced economies and developing nations clashed at the ICJ during December hearings on the case. The iconic Peace Palace in the Hague, the seat of the ICJ, played host to more than 100 oral submissions – the largest number ever, many from tiny states making their first appearance. Advanced economies and developing nations clashed at the ICJ during December hearings. Photo / Getty Images 'This may well be the most consequential case in the history of humanity,' said Vanuatu's representative Ralph Regenvanu, opening the two weeks of hearings. 'The outcome of these proceedings will reverberate across generations, determining the fate of nations like mine and the future of our planet,' he told the 15-judge panel. Major polluters argued the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) was sufficient and new guidelines on countries' obligations were not necessary. US representative Margaret Taylor said this framework was 'the most current expression of states' consent to be bound by international law in respect of climate change'. Taylor urged the court 'to ensure its opinion preserves and promotes the centrality of this regime'. Meanwhile, the speaker from India was even more explicit. 'The court should avoid the creation of any new or additional obligations beyond those already existing under the climate change regime,' said Luther Rangreji. The United States, under President Donald Trump, has since pulled funding for the UNFCCC and withdrawn from its landmark pact, the Paris climate agreement. 'Watery graves' But smaller states said this framework was inadequate to mitigate climate change's devastating effects. 'As seas rise faster than predicted, these states must stop. 'This court must not permit them to condemn our lands and our people to watery graves,' said John Silk from the Marshall Islands. After bitterly fought UN climate talks in Azerbaijan in November, wealthy countries agreed to provide at least US$300 billion ($504 billion) a year by 2035 to help developing nations transition to clean energy and prepare for an increase in extreme weather. The vulnerable nations argued this is simply not enough and urged the ICJ to push for more. 'This is a crisis of survival. It is also a crisis of equity,' said Fiji's representative Luke Daunivalu. 'Our people ... are unfairly and unjustly footing the bill for a crisis they did not create. 'They look to this court for clarity, for decisiveness and justice.' -Agence France-Presse
NZ Herald
6 days ago
- NZ Herald
Listen to The Country online: Christopher Luxon on coalition friction
Listening to articles is free for open-access content—explore other articles or learn more about text-to-speech. Access to Herald Premium articles require a Premium subscription. Subscribe now to listen. Listen to The Country online: Christopher Luxon on coalition friction Prime Minister Christopher Luxon spoke to The Country's Jamie Mackay today. Photo / Mark Mitchell Today on The Country radio show, host Jamie Mackay catches up with Prime Minister Christopher Luxon, who reckons there aren't any cracks in his coalition government. On with the show: Christopher Luxon: The Prime Minister says he won't hang the Tasman/Nelson region out to dry after the devastating flooding. He also denies that cracks are appearing in the coalition and is adamant we should not be pulling out of the Paris Agreement.
Scoop
7 days ago
- Scoop
Vanuatu Statement Ahead Of Landmark International Court Of Justice Advisory Opinion On Climate Change
Statement by Hon. Jotham Napat, Prime Minister of the Republic of Vanuatu Port Vila, Vanuatu (14 July 2025) 'We eagerly await the landmark opinion of the world's highest court on the greatest existential challenge facing our planet: the climate crisis. The Advisory Opinion from the International Court of Justice (ICJ), which will be issued on July 23 at 3:00 pm CEST, is not just a legal milestone, it is a defining moment in the global climate justice movement and a beacon of hope for present and future generations. 'Vanuatu and our fellow Small Island Developing States have long sounded the alarm as the seas rise around us, the storms grow stronger, and the cost of inaction deepens by the day. We have done so not out of fear, but from a place of courage, principle, and conviction that justice must prevail, and that the law must serve those most at risk. 'This case was born from a spark of hope from Pacific youth who dared to bring the world's biggest problem before the world's highest court, and their call was echoed by over 80 nations who stood together to demand climate justice. 'For the first time ever, the past decade includes the ten hottest years on record—and last year was the hottest ever. The United Nations tracked 152 unprecedented extreme weather events around the world in 2024, and this number will continue to grow as climate change continues to intensify. Advertisement - scroll to continue reading 'We turned to the Court to clarify what international law already requires of States, because putting all our faith in mechanisms like the UNFCCC and Paris Agreement are not generating the actions the world urgently needs fast enough. We sought confirmation that States' legal obligations extend to their climate-related actions, especially when those actions have caused harm beyond borders. 'A favorable opinion from the Court could affirm that States have had long-standing legal obligations to act on climate change, including obligations rooted in human rights and environmental law. It could clarify the legal consequences for States that have failed to meet these obligations. It could provide a powerful tool for courts, communities, and negotiators around the world to seek remedies for the climate injustices that have occurred. It could support vulnerable nations in securing climate finance, technology, and loss and damage support. And it could help shift the global response from promises to accountability. 'I am hopeful for a powerful opinion from the ICJ. It could set the world on a meaningful path to accountability and action. 'But no matter the ICJ's ruling, this will be a turning point in the fight for climate justice. This process has elevated the voices of climate-vulnerable nations, driven global awareness, and set the stage for stronger climate action. This ruling will give us a foundation to build upon, and this moment will inspire continued efforts for stronger action and accountability, inspiring bold efforts to protect our planet.' Vanuatu and allies have led the initiative to obtain this Advisory Opinion from the International Court of Justice (ICJ). Vanuatu government officials will be in the Hague for the readout of the Court's ruling on July 23.
