PM Modi To Visit Gangaikonda Cholapuram Temple In Tamil Nadu: All About It
The once-imperial Chola capital has been transformed into a festive hub for the occasion, with garlands, flags, and heightened security arrangements in place. Over 2,000 police personnel have been deployed ahead of the high-profile visit.
PM Modi is on a two-day visit to Tamil Nadu, having arrived on July 26.
All About The Gangaikonda Cholapuram Temple
The Gangaikonda Cholapuram Temple is located in the Ariyalur district of Tamil Nadu, in the town of the same name.
The temple was built by the Chola emperor Rajendra I and completed in 1035 CE to commemorate his victorious northern expedition.
It is an example of Dravidian architecture, featuring intricate carvings and sculptures from the Chola period.
The principal deity of the temple is Lord Shiva, worshipped in the form of a 13-foot-tall Shiva Lingam.
The temple tower, or vimana, rises to a height of 55 metres, making it one of the tallest in India.
The temple stands on an elevated plinth and features a courtyard that measures 170 metres in length and 98 metres in width.
The main structure of the temple is 341 feet long and 100 feet wide.
The temple is part of the "Great Living Chola Temples", a group of UNESCO World Heritage Sites that also includes the Brihadeeswara Temple in Thanjavur and the Airavatesvara Temple in Darasuram.
The name "Gangaikonda Cholapuram" means "the city of the Chola who conquered the Ganga", referring to Rajendra I's military expedition to northern India, during which pots of Ganga water were brought back to the south.
Rajendra I shifted the Chola capital from Thanjavur to Gangaikonda Cholapuram, which remained the imperial capital for over 250 years.
The city was fortified with both inner and outer defensive walls, as revealed by archaeological excavations.
The outer fortification was made of burnt bricks, measuring six to eight feet in width and filled with sand between two layers of brick walls.
While the capital once housed many temples, most were destroyed in later centuries, and only the main Shiva temple survives today.
The temple was re-consecrated in 2017, with the installation of a new dwajasthambam (flagstaff) and the performance of maha kumbhabhishekam rituals.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
DMK leader downplays actor Vijay's political entry, says ‘he is not MGR'
DMK MP and party deputy general secretary A Raja took a swipe at actor Vijay, saying he may try to take the political path of MG Ramachandran (MGR) but insisted, 'he is not MGR'. In an exclusive interview with India Today, Raja acknowledged Vijay's cinema appeal but argued that without ideological grounding or leadership within the Dravidian movement, such a political entry may only have a limited asked whether the entry of actors into politics could impact DMK's vote share, Raja estimated a marginal effect of 'maybe a 5 to 7 per cent difference' but maintained that such momentum would not last. 'MGR was a DMK man and was treasurer of the party. Such an elevation is not a simple joke. His success was due to cinema fifty per cent and being a Dravidian and DMK leader fifty percent,' he said. Referring to other cinema figures who entered politics, he remarked, 'Now anyone can lay claim upon Dravidian ideology, but you are not a leader. Even Vijayakanth became Opposition leader while Karunanidhi was alive, but that momentum did not prolong.'On actor Vijay's political aspirations and his attempt to follow MGR's path, Raja said, 'Let him do so, but he is not MGR. He may take MGR's path, but he is not MGR.' He pointed out that MGR had been an MLA, MLC and later DMK treasurer, holding the third most senior position in the party. 'I do admit that with cinema fame he did split the party, but you (Vijay) are not MGR,' Raja added. Raja also lashed out at the AIADMK and its leader Edappadi K Palaniswami (EPS) for allying with the BJP, calling it an open invitation for the party to step into Tamil Nadu and weaken the state's Dravidian foundation. He said Chief Minister MK Stalin's call was not just to vote for the DMK alliance, but to form a unified opposition to the BJP's ideology, which he described as 'alien to Tamil Nadu for 2,000 years'.Responding to the AIADMK's continuous criticism of DMK during its campaign, Raja asserted that while Tamil Nadu may be politically divided, the core question of the election remains whether Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his ideology should be permitted a foothold in the state. 'We are not opposing Modi or Amit Shah as individuals, but their ideology which has been alien to us for 2000 years,' he said. Raja added that the BJP's ideology 'will not be accepted' in Tamil Nadu and accused EPS of inviting Modi to the state under the guise of Chief Minister MK Stalin's call to voters, Raja said it was not a plea to support the DMK alone, but an appeal for a united front to oppose the BJP, which had been brought into the state's political arena by EPS. 'So the call made by Chief Minister MK Stalin is not for DMK or for our alliance, but to form a singular, unified alliance to oppose the BJP which has been invited by Edappadi,' he to EPS's recent invitation for parties in the DMK-led alliance to join AIADMK, Raja remarked, 'When you spread the red carpet for BJP itself, that carpet has been blocked for us.'On the DMK's prospects in the 2026 Assembly elections, Raja sounded confident, asserting that the party will return to power with more seats than in 2021. 'People are having faith in the DMK and more faith in Chief Minister MK Stalin as a leader. They believe that Tamil language, culture and identity will be protected only by our leader Stalin,' he said. Raja also dismissed the possibility of the AIADMK-BJP alliance succeeding. 'That chemistry will not work. In politics the rules of mathematical numbers do not apply. One plus one need not be two. It can become four or even minus one,' he said.- Ends IN THIS STORY#Tamil Nadu
India Today
2 hours ago
- India Today
Why India returned Haji Pir Pass to Pakistan after capturing it in 1965
"In the 1965 India-Pakistan War, our forces had recaptured the Haji Pir Pass from Pakistan, but the Congress later returned it," PM Narendra Modi said in the Lok Sabha this week. In his two-hour-long speech, Prime Minister Modi launched a scathing attack on the Congress leadership, which had been trying to corner the government over the alleged lack of political will and operational freedom to the armed forces during Operation Sindoor. Hitting back at the Congress, Modi reminded it of the return of the Haji Pir Pass to Pakistan, along with other alleged blunders, including the release of 90,000 Pakistani soldiers after the 1971 War, to target the Grand Old the 1965 India-Pakistan war, India captured the strategically important Haji Pir Pass and the entire Haji Pir bulge from Pakistan after a daring military just months later, it was returned to Pakistan under the Tashkent Agreement, which sparked long-standing criticism of the decision, including from some men in uniform involved in claiming the pass. "The [Haji Pir] Pass would have given India a definite strategic advantage. It was a mistake to hand it back. Our people don't read maps," Lieutenant General Ranjit Singh Dayal (retired), the hero of the Battle for Haji Pir (then a Major), said in a 2002 INDIA CAPTURED THE HAJI PIR PASS IN 1965The Haji Pir Pass, located at 2,637 metres in the Pir Panjal range, has been a key land route and was a major infiltration route even during the 1947 mujahideen 1965, Pakistan, under its Operation Gibraltar, aimed at inciting rebellion in Kashmir, pushed in infiltrators into the August 15, 1965, Indian forces crossed the Ceasefire Line to counter Pakistani shelling and infiltration. The operation, codenamed Bakshi, involved a pincer movement by the 19th Infantry Division, with 1 Para, led by Major Ranjit Singh Indian Army captured Sank by August 27 after a nightlong trek by soldiers in heavy 10.30 AM on August 28, Dayal's team outflanked the Pakistani defenders, and secured the Haji Pir pass. The victory shortened the Poonch-Uri route from 282 km to 56 km, and enhanced India's logistical pass, when under Indian control, also had the potential to seal the natural gap used by infiltrators for future incursions, but the control was short-lived.1965, - , ADG PI - INDIAN ARMY (@adgpi) September 22, 2017INDIA RELINQUISHED HAJI PIR PASS, RETURNED MORE TERRITORYThe Tashkent Declaration, signed on January 10, 1966, and mediated by the USSR, ended the 1965 mandated both India and Pakistan to withdraw from their pre-August 5, 1965, positions by February 25, under the terms of the Tashkent Agreement, relinquished the Haji Pir Pass and 1,920 square kilometres of captured territory, while Pakistan returned 550 sq km, including Chhamb, according to reports."The both sides will exert all efforts to create good neighbourly relations between India and Pakistan in accordance with the United Nations Charter. They reaffirm their obligation under the Charter not to have recourse to force and to settle their disputes through peaceful means. They considered that the interests of peace in their region and particularly in the Indo-Pakistan Sub-Continent and, indeed, the interests of the peoples of India and Pakistan were not served by the continuance of tension between the two countries. It was against this background that Jammu and Kashmir was discussed, and each of the sides set forth its respective position," said the Tashkent, without naming the Haji Pir agreement aimed to restore peace but lacked a no-war pact or measures against guerrilla warfare, which is fueling criticism in India to this RETURN OF HAJI PIR ROOTED IN STRATEGIC CALCULATIONSIndia's decision to return to Haji Pir was driven by the need to secure Pakistani withdrawal from Chhamb, near the Akhnoor bridge, a critical supply negotiations commenced in January 1966 between India and Pakistan under the aegis of the Soviet Union, India had to view the threat posed by Pakistani dagger into the Indian heart in the Chhamb Sector. Since Pakistani forces had already reached Fatwal ridge only four kilometres from Akhnoor, they could always resume operations for capture of Akhnoor," Major General Sheru Thapliyal (retired) noted in his 2015 piece in the Strategic Study India Chhamb sector, a flat, open terrain west of the Munnawar Tawi River, is also a critical defensive outpost for India. Its proximity to the Akhnoor bridge, roughly 20 km away, makes it vital for securing the only all-weather road linking Jammu to Poonch and the Kashmir Kuldip Nayar, part of PM Shastri's entourage, claimed Soviet pressure and threats to withhold UN veto support on Kashmir influenced the decision of the prime minister, who died the next day in suspicious including Lieutenant General Dayal (retired), argued that retaining Haji Pir would have curtailed infiltration, which continues through the pass today."If we had retained the post, things could have been different," Lieutenant General DB Shekatkar (retired) told Rediff India News in return, seen as a strategic blunder, has been criticised by experts and stakeholders who noted it enabled ongoing Pakistani infiltration and undermined India's long-term security in exactly what PM Modi pointed out, reminding the Congress of the realpolitik and strategic give-and-take that played out back then, and possibly continues to do so even today.- Ends
The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
A.P. gets Railway Zone in Vizag, Telangana gains Railway Coach Factory under Reorganization Act
The Ministry of Railways is establishing the Railway Zone in Visakhapatnam, connecting Amaravati, by constructing a railway station, with the rest of the country and has planned to develop a rail coach factory at Kazipet in Telangana, as part of implementing the Andhra Pradesh Reorganization Act, 2014. In response to a Right to Information (RTI) query raised by this The Hindu Correspondent, the Ministry of Railways has explained that as part of executing the A.P. Reorganization Act, the department has undertaken these infrastructure development works. Sunil Prabhat, Joint Director/Efficiency and Research, Railway Board, while providing the details explained that the item No. 8, 10 and 11 of Schedule 13, related to infrastructure, of the Act are pertaining to the Ministry and execution of these projects are in different stages. As per the item number 8, the foundation stone of new SCoR Zone has been laid by the Prime Minister Narendra Modi on January 8, 2025. Tender for SCoR Head Quarters Office building has also been awarded. Additionally, the General Manager has also been posted at South Coast Railway on June 5, 2025. With respect to the item number 10 in the thirteenth schedule of the Act, Indian Railway has planned to develop a Rail Manufacturing Unit at Kazipet, Telangana which will be capable of manufacturing and maintaining a variety of modern railway stocks. The project has been sanctioned and entrusted to Rail Vikas Nigam Ltd. When it comes to the execution of the item number 11 in the same schedule, the Railway Ministry has explained that, 'The new capital of Andhra Pradesh i.e. Amaravati is near to Vijayawada, which is situated on important rail route and is very well connected with Secunderabad. Moreover, to provide direct rail connectivity to Amaravati, a separate project, that is Errupalem-Namburu via Amaravati new line with 56.53 Kms has been sanctioned. Regarding better connectivity from Amaravati to Hyderabad and other important cities, a number of projects are in progress'. Though, the RTI reply did not say anything about the Metro projects for Andhra Pradesh, the central government has also initiated Vizag and Vijayawada metro projects. Item number 12 of the same schedule in the Act mandates that, 'The Government of India shall examine the feasibility of Metro Rail facility in Vishakhapatnam and Vijayawada-Guntur-Tenali Metropolitan Urban Development Authority within a period of one year from the appointed day and take an expeditious decision thereon.'
