90-day pause on Trump tariffs set to expire soon. Can renewed trade barriers complicate US Fed's rate cut path?
Now, ahead of the expiry of the 90-day pause on tariffs this week on July 9, Trump said on Sunday that the US is close to finalising several trade agreements in the coming days and will notify other countries of higher tariff rates by July 9.
Trump in April announced a 10% base tariff on most countries and higher "reciprocal" rates of up to 50%.
Trump also threatened an extra 10% tariff on countries aligning themselves with what he called the anti-American policies of the BRICS group of developing nations.
While no substantial trade deals are in place yet, the concerns for the economy continue to linger, further impacting the US Fed's rate cut decision.
The US Fed Chief Jerome Powell has already communicated that the central bank will 'wait and learn more' about how these tariffs are filtering into higher inflation before they start to focus on interest rates. Other Fed officials also say that the unclear trade policy and the chance that adding or bringing back higher fees could push prices up again means they will be careful and rely on data before cutting rates.
Pranay Aggarwal, Director and CEO of Stoxkart said the approaching expiry of the 90-day pause on Trump-era tariffs could reignite trade tensions, especially between major economies like the US and China.
"If renewed trade barriers are introduced, we may see a ripple effect on global inflation, supply chains, and investor sentiment. For the US Federal Reserve, this adds another layer of complexity; rising trade-related inflationary pressures could delay or limit the scope of planned rate cuts, as the Fed continues to balance between cooling inflation and supporting growth," Aggarwal added.
Palka Arora Chopra, Director, Master Capital Services believes the reimposition of trade barriers by the US, and may further postpone any rate cuts. Delayed rate cuts also don't bode well for emerging markets (EMs) like India, as higher US interest rates curb FII inflows into EMs.
In the last policy meeting, the US Fed along expected lines kept the rates unchanged at 4.25-4.5%, while the Fed's dot plot continued to signal two rate cuts for 2025.
The dot plot is a chart published by the US Fed that shows the FOMC's future path on interest rates. Last week, data showed US job growth was unexpectedly solid in June, further easing pressure for the Fed to cut rates.
Minutes from the US Fed's last meeting due later this week could shed more light on the US central bank's rate cut path.
Indian stock market has traded on a backfoot ahead of the tariff pause deadline. On Monday, July 4, both BSE Sensex and NSE Nifty ended with small cuts as investors continued to stay on the sidelines.
Analysts believe From an Indian market perspective, such developments often translate into increased volatility.
"Additionally, any global uncertainty tends to impact foreign institutional investor (FII) flows, which are a key driver of Indian equity markets. While India remains structurally strong, short-term knee-jerk reactions cannot be ruled out if global trade disruptions escalate," Aggarwal said.
Meanwhile, commenting on the impact of a possible US-India trade deal, Chopra said that the larger impact on Indian stock markets hinges upon the outcome of the trade negotiations: a deal would sell well, while failure would certainly have a spillover effect on exporters and general market sentiment.
Disclaimer: This story is for educational purposes only. The views and recommendations made above are those of individual analysts or broking companies, and not of Mint. We advise investors to check with certified experts before making any investment decisions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
10 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Zohran Mamdani — a threat to Wall Street and the US financial empire
Amidst the million hot takes about Zohran Mamdani's victory in the Democratic Party primary for New York City's mayoral race, two stood out. The first involved the undisputed don of the Democratic Party's macroeconomic policymaking and former president Bill Clinton's treasury secretary, Larry Summers, taking to X to berate Mamdani. Summers accused him of advocating 'Trotskyite economic policies… following the most problematic aspects of Britain's Labour Party' and hoped that Mamdani would learn and eventually reassure Americans who are committed to a 'market economy as an American ideal'. The second: A friend from Delhi posted a half-sarcastic story on Instagram that read, 'Congratulations to all the residents of NYC' — ribbing her fellow South Delhi folks for going gaga over Mamdani. These disparate reactions highlight two fascinating trends evident in the aftermath of Mamdani's primary win. First, the sudden burst of enthusiasm and hatred (in equal parts) around the world about Mamdani — a name that most, perhaps, didn't know until a month ago. Second, how rattled some sections of Wall Street and the larger mainstream American economic establishment and commentariat seem to be when thinking about the prospects of a Mamdani victory in November. On the face of it, the reasons for both are straightforward. New York no longer boasts the world's fanciest skyline; kids watching stray reels of Chongqing's infrastructure in interior Uttar Pradesh and Bihar might testify to this fact. Yet New York, with its filthy subway and rat-dominated streets, remains enthroned as the world's cultural capital. When a staunchly left-leaning politician rises in the city, it animates the global left and right in equal parts. This, at least on paper, explains the global fascination with Mamdani. For Wall Street and the larger US economic mainstream, the idea of rent freezes and a wealth tax might be ones they are used to hearing in the American political discourse, but these need to be kept away from New York City, the heart of the global financial system. New York boasts the broadest, deepest, and most sophisticated financial markets in the world and accounts for a chunk of the US's systemic global power. Yet, these are just symptoms of a far more structural factor behind New York's disproportionate role in the global imagination. The late Italian economist and sociologist Giovanni Arrighi presents a masterful analysis in his book The Long Twentieth Century: Money, Power and the Origins of Our Times, of how global financial centres like New York City have risen and fallen for centuries. More substantively, he contends that over the past six centuries, Genoa (the Italian city-state), Holland, Great Britain, and now the US have built capitalist global empires, which he refers to as 'regimes of accumulation'. These have had a few common features. First, each regime rests on a state-capitalist consensus, where economic sophistication arises from building world-class production and trade capabilities, supported by stable policies and institutions. This phase of development hinges on fixed capital investment driving productivity and mass consumption, seen clearly in early British and American dominance. Second, when further investments in fixed capital begin to turn less productive and cause rigidities, the state-capitalist consensus facilitates the financialisation of the economy, which leads to a rapid financial expansion across the capitalist global empire. The Genoese made the switch in the 15th century. Around 1740, the Dutch withdrew from commerce and emerged as the bankers of Europe. The British also followed suit and, after accumulating heaps of capital during the Industrial Revolution, shifted to comprehensive financialisation centred around London. Similarly, the Americans, following the industrial success during the pre- and post-war period, shifted to rapid financialisation of their domestic and global economy by the mid-1960s. Third, while each cycle of capitalist accumulation shares core traits, they differ in institutional complexity and regime sophistication. Genoa monopolised commerce but relied on external security; the Dutch internalised defence costs. Britain industrialised and absorbed both production and security. The US went further, internalising global transaction costs through its unique financial markets. This marks a clear evolutionary arc from Genoa to Holland to Britain to the US. Lastly, every phase of financialisation has carried with it seeds of the new regime of accumulation. A financial expansion has historically resulted in the flow of capital to another country, allowing it to develop production capacities more sophisticated than the incumbent, resulting in an increase in overall interstate competition and an eventual regime change. According to Arrighi, the shift from trade and production to financial expansion marks the beginning of the end of that regime of accumulation. As a side note, these four factors would have been quite instructive in predicting the emergence of the US-China rivalry. After all, it was the rise of the US financial system and the flow of its capital and technology to China that eventually allowed Beijing to become a competitor. Albeit significant, it's beyond the focus of our discussion. By virtue of evolution, the US capitalist global era has produced the starkly financialised form of globalisation, where the losers and winners have never been as apparent. While the current US regime has internalised the greatest number of costs, it is also the one regime that has overlapped the most with actual democratisation. Therefore, over the past six centuries, no other empire has faced such high domestic political costs and discontents. This is precisely what has resulted in the American political system being swept away by politicians like Donald Trump and Mamdani. How do these recurring patterns of global capitalist regimes explain the international obsession with Mamdani and Wall Street's angst with him? This is because New York isn't just the cultural capital of the world; it is effectively the capital of the US-led global financial empire. If the US created the widest and most comprehensive form of globalisation ever seen, then New York has been at the heart of it. In that sense, a small but significant upwardly mobile population across the world seems to be a part of New York's fabric and its politics. On its part, the city obliges by ensuring even its local election campaign is flooded with foreign policy debates and developments across the world. For folks on Wall Street and the like, Mamdani isn't some run-of-the-mill social democrat. He at the very least poses a challenge to the capitalist class at the heart of the US economy. He isn't just a threat to New York City but seemingly to the whole US global financial empire. Never mind that he might need some hard bargaining with Albany to fulfil his promises. The writer is associate fellow, Observer Research Foundation
Hans India
12 minutes ago
- Hans India
Market drifts lower amid tariff jitters, Q1 earnings season key to lift sentiment
Markets drifted lower during the week and lost over a per cent, primarily pressured by the lingering uncertainty surrounding global tariffs and a disappointing start to the earnings season, analysts said on Saturday. While the tone remained largely stable in the first three sessions, profit booking in the final sessions dragged the indices lower. Eventually, both the Nifty and Sensex settled near their weekly lows at 25,149.85 and 82,500.47, respectively. According to Ajit Mishra–SVP, Research, Religare Broking Ltd., sentiment weakened amid heightened global trade tensions following US President Donald Trump's renewed tariff threats on Canada and other key partners. 'Although there were expectations of an interim trade deal between the US and India, the lack of clarity kept risk appetite in check. Additionally, a weak start to the Q1 earnings season — especially after IT major TCS reported below-par results — added pressure to the markets in the final session,' he mentioned. Consumption-oriented sectors such as FMCG and discretionary stocks experienced selective buying, supported by signs of urban demand revival and improving margins. A backdrop of easing inflation, declining interest rates, and a favourable monsoon contributed to the overall positive undertone. 'Broader indices slipped into negative territory due to a lack of triggers to sustain current premium valuations and uninspiring results from a key IT bellwether, which raised concerns over FY26 earnings estimates,' said Vinod Nair, Head of Research, Geojit Investments Limited. As Q1 FY26 earnings unfold, investors are closely monitoring guidance on margins and sector dynamics. Looking ahead, the earnings season will be in full focus. A packed calendar includes results from HCL Tech, Tech Mahindra, Axis Bank, ICICI Bank, Wipro, JSW Steel, L&T Finance, and HDFC Bank, among others. On the macroeconomic front, participants will closely track the WPI and CPI inflation data scheduled for July 14 for further cues on the economy. Apart from these, the trend in FII flows and movement in crude oil prices will also remain on traders' radar, said market watchers. Globally, markets will watch for any updates related to trade negotiations and tariffs, along with key economic data releases such as U.S. inflation and 'We anticipate a consolidation phase in the Nifty index with a negative bias in the near term, following the recent fall. Volatility is expected to persist amid global uncertainties and the unfolding earnings season. Traders are advised to maintain a stock-specific approach, focusing on companies with strong earnings and relative strength,' said Mishra.
Economic Times
17 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Gold rally cools but jewellery stocks sparkle with up to 45% return in FY26
Let's take a closer look at what's fueling this rally: Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel India's top jewellery stocks have put on a dazzling show in FY26, with share prices of PC Jeweller , Kalyan Jewellers, Senco Gold , and Titan Company surging between 10% and 45% so far this fiscal. Although gold prices have eased slightly following a sharp run-up, and macroeconomic uncertainties persist, these stocks have remained unaffected — a testament to the strong investor confidence in the sector's resilience, sustained demand, and promising growth rally isn't just sentiment-driven—it's backed by solid fundamentals. All four players delivered strong Q1 business updates, each benefiting from a combination of factors — including robust revenue growth driven by Akshaya Tritiya sales, regional festivities, and aggressive showroom expansion. Consumer preferences are also evolving, with a clear shift toward lightweight jewellery and gold coins, while brands are bolstering performance through strategic marketing efforts and prudent debt management. Together, these trends highlight the sector's ability to shine even amid challenging macroeconomic performance in FY26 so far shows PC Jeweller leading the pack with a sharp gain of 44%, followed by Kalyan Jewellers India and Senco Gold, both rising about 25%. Meanwhile, Titan—the largest company by market capitalization in the segment—has registered a gain of 12%.PC Jeweller made a powerful comeback in FY26, emerging as the top performer among gold stocks. A massive 80% year-on-year revenue spike in Q1 — thanks to strong wedding and festive demand — set the tone. But what truly caught investor attention was the company's sharp focus on debt reduction, trimming bank borrowings by 7.5% in Q1, following a 50% cut in FY25. With plans to go debt-free by FY26-end, and operational momentum backing that target, investor confidence surged. The market rewarded PC Jeweller's discipline and ambition — with stock prices gleaming early in the fiscal Jewellers is proving the power of multi-channel growth, clocking 31% revenue growth across Indian and international markets in Q1. India operations thrived with an 18% jump in same-store sales, while its digital-first brand Candere soared with 67% growth, fuelled by a fresh marketing campaign and strong online traction. Overseas markets — particularly the Middle East — also held up well, contributing 15% to consolidated revenue. With a massive showroom rollout planned (170 in FY26) and momentum across physical and digital fronts, Kalyan is all set for a golden expansion Gold sparkled this year with a perfect blend of strong festive traction, rapid retail expansion, and creative marketing. Q1 revenue jumped 28%, including 24% YoY retail growth and 19% same-store sales growth (SSSG) — driven by high footfall during Akshaya Tritiya, Poila Baishakh, and Baisakhi. Despite a 32% YoY rise in gold prices, the brand sustained demand with clever tactics like promoting old gold exchange, which made up 40% of total sales. With 9 new stores added in Q1 and fresh campaigns like Bangle Utsav and The Golden Curve drawing crowds, Senco is shaping up as a major contender in the modern jewellery the most diversified and stable player in the pack, continues to play the long game — and win. Tanishq's domestic jewellery business grew 18% YoY in Q1, while high gold prices nudged consumers toward lighter jewellery and gold coins. Though the studded jewellery segment saw slightly muted volume growth, overall ticket sizes increased, helping drive early double-digit Titan's US jewellery business nearly doubled YoY, boosting the company's international revenue by 49%. The company also added 19 jewellery stores in India and launched outlets in Dubai and Sharjah, showcasing its global push. Add in strong growth in watches (+23%) and eyewear (+12%), and Titan proves once again why it remains a solid gold pick in uncertain times.
