Track 1.5 and 2.0 Dialogues way forward to South Asia's Prosperity: Experts
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
South Asia is a vibrant yet volatile region, where historical ties and modern rivalries collide—amplified by global power plays, said Pradeep S. Mehta, Secretary General, CUTS International in his opening remarks.Moderating a session titled Perpetual Conundrums in South Asia, Mehta emphasised the need for regional cooperation to tackle shared challenges, from climate change to trade disruption.Pointing to the recent India-Pakistan conflict, Lt Gen Subrata Saha (Retd.), former Member National Security Advisory Board of India, highlighted India's shifting military posture, noting its response to cross-border terrorism. 'From surgical strikes post-Uri to deeper incursions after Pulwama, India's suppression of Pakistani air defences and subsequent ceasefire requests marked a turning point in deterrence.'Former Foreign Secretary of Sri Lanka, Amb. Prasad Kariyawasam, underscored the geostrategic importance of Sri Lanka in the Indian Ocean. 'Ninety percent of global trade is seaborne. A stable Indian Ocean is vital for Sri Lanka's economic security, and there's strong bipartisan support for deeper ties with India,' he said.Amb. Tariq Ahmad Karim, Advisor, Centre for Bay of Bengal Studies, Independent University, Bangladesh and former Bangladesh envoy to India reflected on the region's challenges, stating, 'South Asia's inability to cooperate stems from a failure to learn from shared history. Geography ensures we can't escape each other, yet we remain stuck in the past'.Discussing the role of other countries and regions, especially the US in this region, Michael Kugelman, Senior Fellow, Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada remarked, 'Under a potential Trump 2.0 administration, trade and great-power competition will likely dominate U.S. engagement, though strategic ambiguity persists,''South Asia remains low on the EU's agenda. Moving beyond symbolic gestures to meaningful engagement is critical,' said Shada Islam, Founder, New Horizons Project, Belgium, as she critiqued the EU's approach.'The EU's engagement is ritualistic, overly influenced by the transatlantic partnership. There is an urgent need to move beyond symbolism to meaningful regional engagement.' she added.'India's resistance to Chinese projects curbs BRI's South Asian reach. Nepal's vision of trilateral connectivity remains aspirational without India's involvement', said Apekshya Shah, Senior Fellow, Nepal Economic Forum. She further added governance issues and limited political consensus remain major challenges in Nepal.While delivering the closing remarks, Bipul Chattopadhyay, Executive Director of CUTS International, called for a stronger focus on fostering not only physical connectivity but also energy and people-to-people linkages in the future. He emphasised that security remains supreme, noting that 'mutual respect for each nation's security and sovereignty is essential to forging a path towards incremental progress in regional cooperation.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
19 minutes ago
- News18
Several Pakistani Accounts Blocked During Op Sindoor Reinstated After Govt Review: Sources
Last Updated: Restrictions were imposed earlier this year during India's Operation Sindoor counter-terror campaign. Some Pakistani news websites and social media accounts of Pakistani celebrities which were banned during India's counter-terror operation Operation Sindoor have resurfaced on social media. It is unclear if those restrictions have been lifted or not as there is no official announcement lifting the ban by the government. However, government sources speaking to News18 said that 'following a periodic review, some social media accounts have been reinstated" but majority of the handles remain blocked. The government sources pointed out that some '14,000 accounts on some social still remain banned". They further added: 'Upon the review, it has been observed that some of these platforms which have been reinstated have not spoken anti India language for a while, which was the main reason for blocking them". The sources said: 'Accounts cannot be permanently banned and are subject to regular reviews as part of the standard process". The ban, part of India's Operation Sindoor counter-terror effort, targeted major Pakistani media outlets including Dawn News, Geo News, ARY News, Bol News, Samaa TV, GNN, Suno News HD and The Pakistan Reference, among others. Together, these channels accounted for an estimated 63 million subscribers. The crackdown also extended to sports and entertainment channels such as Samaa Sports, Uzair Cricket and Hum TV, as well as individual journalists and content creators. Pakistan public and sports-related personalities whose accounts faced ban included Umar Cheema, Asma Shirazi, Muneeb Farooq, Irshad Bhatti, Razi Naama, Wasay Habib, Arzoo Kazmi, Syed Muzammil Shah and former cricketer Shoaib Akhtar. Several of them also faced restrictions on platforms like Instagram and X (formerly Twitter), as the ban widened in early May 2025. The restrictions were imposed amid cross-border information warfare and attempts by these Pakistani social media cells to manipulate Indian public sentiment. A notable example of Pakistani cricketers and celebs spreading misinformation was that of Shahid Afridi, who criticised the people of India and the Indian Army. In early May 2025, Shahid Afridi's YouTube channel was one of the Pakistani platforms blocked in India. Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from geopolitics to diplomacy and global trends. Stay informed with the latest world news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! First Published: July 02, 2025, 20:15 IST
Time of India
27 minutes ago
- Time of India
Why MAGA is losing its mind over Zohran Mamdani eating biryani with his hand
Image: It's 2025 and eating rice by hand is the new political weapon! It was just a man eating rice. With his hands. The way millions of people do every single day, across continents, cultures, and kitchens. But in 2025 America, that simple act turned into a political battlefield. Enter New York Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani, a progressive politician and proud South Asian who casually posted a video of himself eating rice and curry with his fingers. No flashy graphics. No soundbites. Just rice, lentils, and quiet dignity. But then came the backlash—loud, swift, and, frankly, ridiculous. Texas Republican Congressman Brandon Gill responded with what can only be described as textbook cultural xenophobia: 'Go back to the Third World.' Just like that, eating with your hands was no longer about dinner. It was about identity, dignity, and who gets to belong in America. So, let's talk about why eating rice—yes, rice—became a political weapon in 2025 in MAGA vs Zohran Mamdani. A plate full of prejudice First, let's get one thing straight: eating with your hands isn't dirty, weird, or backward. It's normal. In India, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Ethiopia, parts of the Middle East, and even in some parts of Europe, using your hands to eat is a sign of connection—to the food, to your senses, to tradition. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Trading CFD dengan Teknologi dan Kecepatan Lebih Baik IC Markets Mendaftar Undo But in the video of Mamdani eating with his fingers, Gill and his supporters saw something else. They didn't see heritage. They saw a threat. Because in their worldview, anything outside the 'white, Western' norm becomes fair game for mockery or suspicion. It wasn't about rice. It was about power. 'Go back' is never just a phrase The phrase 'go back to the Third World' isn't just a casual insult—it's a political dog whistle. It's the same energy as 'go back to where you came from,' just dressed up in geopolitical vocabulary. It's meant to delegitimize, to humiliate, and to draw a cultural boundary line: You're not one of us. Never mind that Mamdani is a New York-born elected official. Or that the "Third World" terminology is outdated, inaccurate, and soaked in Cold War-era snobbery. Or that Americans eat burgers, fried chicken, and ribs—with their hands—without being called uncivilized. In this case, eating with your fingers wasn't seen as personal—it was seen as political. The double standard is deliciously obvious Let's play a game: list five foods Americans love eating with their hands. Go ahead. We'll wait. Pizza. Burgers. Fried chicken. Fries. Tacos. All messy. All finger food. All accepted without question. No one tells someone chowing down on a dripping cheeseburger to 'go back to the Third World.' But when a brown man eats rice with his hands? Suddenly, it's a threat to civilization. The hypocrisy is wild—but not surprising. When authenticity makes people uneasy The fallout wasn't just political—it also caused some rumbles within the South Asian diaspora. Some folks felt secondhand embarrassment. Others applauded Mamdani for showing up as his full, unapologetic self. This tension isn't new. Many second- or third-generation immigrants grow up navigating two worlds: the world of their parents and the world of their peers. That often means editing how they eat, speak, or show up. Whitewashed lunch boxes. Switched-off accents. Curry smells hidden in sealed containers. Mamdani's hand-eating wasn't just a cultural moment—it was a reminder that authenticity still makes people uncomfortable. Even within our own communities. From curry to campaign trail To understand why Mamdani's rice moment landed so hard, you have to zoom out. He's not just some guy eating lunch—he's a progressive elected official in a country where identity politics and culture wars have taken center stage. Mamdani, who once ran on a campaign called Roti and Roses, has always tied his politics to food, culture, and justice. His support for food justice programs, housing rights, and labor protections connects with the everyday experiences of working-class communities—including immigrants. So when he posts a video eating with his hands, it's not just aesthetic. It's a deliberate choice to show solidarity, connection, and pride in his roots. But for critics on the far right, that pride is interpreted as defiance. And defiance must be punished. Food isn't just food. It's identity Here's the thing: food is never just food. It's memory, heritage, comfort, protest, and politics—all rolled into one. What we eat, how we eat, and who we eat with sends signals about who we are and where we belong. Mamdani's video did all of that. It was subtle but powerful. A quiet act of defiance that said, This is who I am—and I'm not hiding it for anyone. And that's what truly scared his critics. What this moment really says about 2025 America and MAGA This entire episode—one man, one plate of rice, one racist response—says a lot more about the country than about Mamdani. It says that cultural insecurity still runs deep. That people will use something as universal as eating to divide and exclude. That even in a so-called melting pot, some flavors are still considered 'too foreign.' But it also shows something else: people are tired of hiding. Tired of apologizing. Tired of editing themselves to fit into someone else's idea of 'American.' Because if America is truly a place where everyone belongs, then eating rice with your hands shouldn't be controversial—it should be celebrated. So, the next time someone mocks a cultural practice as 'uncivilized,' hand them a mirror—and maybe a biryani. Because food is power. And in 2025, eating rice with your hands isn't just a meal. It's a message. Hands, not hate. Always.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
28 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Foxconn's Chinese engineers called back, disrupting Apple's India expansion
Over 300 Chinese engineers and technicians have been sent back from Foxconn's iPhone factories in India, raising concerns about a potential slowdown in Apple's local manufacturing push. According to a Bloomberg report citing sources, the recall began nearly two months ago, with the majority of Chinese staff at Foxconn's southern India facilities asked to return home. Most of those who remain are Taiwanese support personnel. While Foxconn has not issued any statement on the move, it aligns with recent informal efforts by Chinese authorities to discourage the transfer of skilled labour, technology, and equipment to countries like India and Vietnam. Apple's dependence on Chinese expertise Apple CEO Tim Cook has often praised the proficiency of China's assembly workforce, attributing the company's reliance on the country to their expertise rather than just cost advantages. While the withdrawal of these staff from India is not expected to affect product quality, it could impact assembly line efficiency, a source told Bloomberg. The development comes at a crucial moment for Apple, which is working with manufacturing partners in India to scale up production of the upcoming iPhone 17. So far, Apple has not issued any comment on the development. China tightens grip on tech exports Foxconn's decision appears to align with recent efforts by Beijing to limit the movement of technology, skilled professionals, and specialised equipment out of China. These measures are seen as a response to growing interest from countries like India and Vietnam, which are working to attract global tech manufacturers amid ongoing tensions between the United States and China. Recently, China even halted the export of key rare earth metals. This shift in supply chains began during Donald Trump's first term as US president, when Apple started shifting some of its device production to India and Vietnam. The trend has continued, especially as Trump pushes forward with new tariff plans. In response, China has tightened its grip on exports of rare earth materials, technology, and labour. Foxconn's presence in India Although Foxconn still produces most iPhones in China, it has steadily expanded its operations in India, as earlier reported by Business Standard. To support this growth, the company had deployed many experienced Chinese engineers to help speed up production and train Indian workers. Chinese supervisors have played a key role in guiding Foxconn's Indian workforce. Large-scale iPhone production in India began just four years ago and now contributes around 20 per cent of global output. Apple aims to manufacture most iPhones destined for the US market in India by the end of 2026. However, Trump has criticised this move, saying Apple should make phones for American users within the US. High labour costs in the US make this idea difficult to implement. And if China restricts the movement of its skilled engineers, setting up advanced manufacturing in the US would become even less viable. India-China relations Meanwhile, India and China continue to share a strained relationship. While tensions have eased slightly over the past year, and high-level meetings have resumed, direct flights between the two countries remain suspended. India still enforces strict visa rules for Chinese nationals and maintains bans on Chinese apps like TikTok. On the other hand, China continues to block exports of fertilisers to India, even though such restrictions have been lifted for other nations.
