Is China's ‘economic slave' sending troops to Ukraine to support Russia? Not Pakistan or Sri Lanka, it is....
According to the South China Morning Post(SCMP), Laos state media reported this week that the government rejected recent reports in international media that it would send troops to support Russian military operations in Ukraine. The reports claimed that Moscow was trying to recruit Laotian soldiers and civilians with the promise of financial incentives and Russian citizenship. Reports also claimed that Russia identified Laotian military engineering units to offer support, i.e., mine-clearing support in the Kursk region at the outset.
The reports, citing Ukraine's Main Directorate of Intelligence, stated that the Kremlin aims to involve allied states in the war under the 'under the pretext of carrying out humanitarian projects in Russian regions bordering Ukraine.' 'Laos is the latest country Russia is attempting to pull into the war,' the agency noted. Which major country provides economic and diplomatic support to Russia without condemning its actions?
With the country's strong ties with Moscow and demining expertise, concerns about the Southeast Asian nation playing a role in the conflict seemed reasonable. Laos said the allegations were baseless and were intended to confuse and damage the country's international reputation. Laos stressed there was no evidence to support the allegations, characterising them as a 'deliberate distortion of the truth' to create confusion in the world community.
The Thongloun Sisoulith government also announced that it has no policy or intention to dispatch military personnel or citizens to intervene in any other countries' internal conflicts, the report mentioned.
According to Ian Storey, a senior fellow at the Singapore-based ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute, these claims originated from Ukraine's military intelligence, which has 'a track record of false or exaggerated claims'.
'However, the story was somewhat plausible given the good relations between Laos and Russia,' Ian Storey, senior fellow at the ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute based in Singapore, was quoted as saying by the South China Morning Post.
The two nations' close historical ties began in the Cold War situation, with the Soviet Union supplying essential support to the Laotian Communist Party. Ian Storey, author of Putin's Russia and Southeast Asia: The Kremlin's Pivot to Asia and the Impact of the Russia-Ukraine War, notes that Vientiane is thankful to Moscow and has not condemned Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
India's climate challenge
As this year opened, the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists moved the Doomsday clock at 89 seconds to midnight. This is the closest ever to human extinction. This year's report cited climate change as one of the defining reasons for the clock ticking fast towards the end of our time as we know it. The 2025 clock time signals that the world is on a course of unprecedented risk, and that continuing on the current path is a form of madness. Indian view Currently, India stands at the precipice of a climatic crisis, and its response — or the lack thereof — will shape the nation's future in more ways than we can yet imagine. India's history is replete with climate-related upheavals that have tested its resilience — socially, economically, and ecologically. As per a report by the UN office for Disaster Risk Reduction, India suffered an economic loss of a whopping $79.5 billion due to climate-related disasters in the past 20 years from 1998 to 2017. As per scientists, the Indian monsoon, once predictable, has been destabilised by global warming. Increasing temperature causes increased evaporation, which results in heavier and more erratic rainfall. The shifting monsoon trough has become a scourge especially for the northeastern states of Assam, Manipur, and Arunachal Pradesh, where, in recent weeks, more than 46 people died and almost half a million were affected. These climate disasters should not be seen as seasonal misfortunes, but as climate warnings. With no cohesive policy in place and minimal integration of climate considerations into its national security strategy, India is underprepared for a crisis that affects its economy, its people, and its very future. The threat ahead India's coastline, stretching over 7,500 km, is a hub of economic activity, cultural vibrancy and biodiversity. Yet, this vast peninsular stretch and its inhabitants now face a severe threat: rising sea levels, driven by climate change. Compounding the long-term threat of sea level rise are short-term climate phenomena such as El Nino and La Nina, which have a significant impact on weather patterns across South Asia. El Nino reduced monsoon rainfall, leading to droughts, while paradoxically, La Nina events may increase rainfall and the frequency of extreme weather events such as cyclones and floods, many of which wreak havoc along India's coastal belt. Together, these factors create a dangerous cocktail of rising seas and erratic climatic behaviour, threatening livelihoods, infrastructure, and long-term sustainability in the region. According to a report by the Center for Study of Science, Technology and Policy (CSTEP), a Bengaluru-based think tank, there are multiple Indian States at the threat of getting submerged. Those such as Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, West Bengal, and Kerala are already prone to flooding, have an uncertain future lying ahead. The study further highlights that more than 10% of the land in Mumbai, Yanam, and Thoothukudi; 5%-10% in Panaji and Chennai; and 1%-5% in Kochi, Mangaluru, Visakhapatnam, Haldia, Udupi, Paradip, and Puri would be submerged due to rise in sea levels by 2040. Damage to livelihood The impact of severe weather goes beyond the metropolitan infrastructure and has a devastating impact on the rural and coastal communities. In a country where 47% of the population is dependent on agriculture, it poses a severe threat. Soil salinisation, caused by seawater intrusion, renders once-fertile land unfit for cultivation. This decline in agricultural output can fuel price inflation and deepen reliance on non-local food sources, thereby undermining national food security. The Indian coastal ecosystems are equally vulnerable — the mangrove forests, coral reefs, estuaries and wetlands which serve both as rich habitats for marine biodiversity and as natural buffers against cyclones and tidal surges. A survey warns that the Sunderbans, the world's largest contiguous mangrove forest could lose up to 80% of its area by 2100. The destruction of these habitats by warming waters and rising sea level could trigger species extinction and disrupt food chains, with consequences that ripple far beyond borders. National security concern With a ranking of sixth on the Climate Risk Index, India must acknowledge the danger of surging seas. Experts warn that India is most vulnerable to compounding impacts of sea level rise. The Indian Ocean is the fastest-warming ocean in terms of surface temperature, and cyclones are intensifying due to excess heat and moisture. Therefore, it is imperative that the government begin to treat environmental degradation concerns as an issue of national security, because nature itself can just be as dangerous, if not worse, than any armed adversary. Across the world, climate change is already being framed as a security threat. In the U.S., the Pentagon labels it a 'threat multiplier' — one that exacerbates tensions and compromises national defence readiness. The U.K., too, has integrated climate resilience into its foreign policy. While the Indian government has taken commendable steps — participating in the Paris Agreement and committing to a net-zero emissions target by 2070 — its internal budgeting tells a different story. As per the Union Budget 2025-26, the Ministry of Defence was allocated ₹6,81,210 crore, or 13.45% of the total Union Budget, highest among all the Ministries. While the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change received just ₹3,412.82 crore, a meagre 0.067%. It is high time India stopped operating as if in a cowboy economy, a reckless, fossil-fuel-hungry model that assumes infinite resources and minimal consequences. Incidents suh as the northeastern floods, the Wayanad landslides, and the slow but steady sea level rise are all climate alarms. They call for a shift towards the values of ecologism, sustainability, and resilience. As the World Economic Forum notes, ignorance in the face of environmental collapse is now a threat to over one billion people worldwide. In this era of de-territorialisation, no nation can insulate itself from the effects of climate related catastrophe. The environment has become the archetypal example of a global issue, affecting all nations alike. Therefore, the key takeaway from the incident climatic crisis is simple yet urgent: we must treat environmental risk as central to national and human security, and adhere to sustainable development. rohanststephens1@
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Dmitry Medvedev: Defender of the Kremlin
On August 1, U.S. President Donald Trump wrote on the social media that he had ordered two 'nuclear submarines' to be positioned in 'the appropriate regions', in a direct threat to Russia. Pete Hegseth, the Secretary of Defence, reposted Mr. Trump's post. The reason for Mr. Trump's escalatory move: back-to-back social media posts by Dmitry Medvedev, a former Russian President and Prime Minister. Mr. Trump also slammed the 'foolish, inflammatory and provocative' statements by Mr. Medvedev. Mr. Medvedev had evoked the fabled Dead Hand mechanism (also known as 'Perimeter'), a secretive semi-automated Russian command system that could launch a nuclear strike if its leaders were killed in enemy attacks. Born on September 14, 1965 in Leningrad (now St. Petersburg), Dmitry Medvedev is the son of professors Yulia and Anatoly Medvedev. He earned a degree in law and then completed post-graduate studies at Leningrad State University, graduating in 1990. In 1989, he married Svetlana; their son Ilya, now 29, joined the United Russia Party of Vladimir Putin in 2022. A PhD in law, Mr. Medvedev taught for nine years at the St. Petersburg State University. During this time, he also worked as an adviser to the city council, and in 1991, he joined the legal team working for the then Mayor of St. Petersburg, Anatoly Sobchak. It was here that he met Mr. Putin. Mr. Putin became the acting President of Russia in December 1999, and Mr. Medvedev was tapped to become a member of his team. In 2000, he led Mr. Putin's presidential campaign, and was appointed the Deputy Chief of Staff to the Presidential Executive Office. In November 2005, he became the first Deputy Prime Minister, and was named by Mr. Putin as his successor in 2007. On May 7, 2008, Mr. Medvedev became the President of Russia, for a one-term stint since Mr. Putin was barred under the then Constitution from occupying the post for a third consecutive term. Soon after his inauguration, he nominated Mr. Putin as his Prime Minister. Mr. Medvedev had campaigned with the slogan 'Freedom is better than no freedom,' and during his stint as President, he undertook several reforms, such as the decriminalisation of defamation. He negotiated with the then U.S. President, Barack Obama, to reduce the number of nuclear warheads in the two nations, and presided over Russia's accession to the WTO. He also announced an end to counterinsurgency operations in Chechnya. He was at the helm when war broke out in Georgia in 2008. New role Mr. Putin returned as President in March 2012, and Mr. Medvedev became the head of the United Russia party and the Prime Minister of Russia, occupying this position from May 8, 2012 to 2020. He slowly faded into the background and eventually resigned as Prime Minister in 2020. Post this, Mr. Medvedev was appointed as the deputy of the newly created National Security Council, an advisory body with Mr. Putin at its head. Since the beginning of the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, Mr. Medvedev has been a strong supporter of Mr. Putin's actions. He started a Telegram channel soon after the invasion, becoming Russia's most popular blogger by the end of 2022. This also turned around his image in the eyes of the public: from a public trust rating of 23% in 2021 from pollster VTsIOM, he notched a rating of 45.7% in June 2025. While Mr. Trump and Mr. Medvedev have sparred before, the current exchange was sparked by Mr. Trump's post on July 29, warning that the U.S. would sanction Russia in 10 days if it did not take measures to end the war with Ukraine. Mr. Medvedev called this a 'theatrical ultimatum', and said 'each new ultimatum is a threat and a step towards war'. He also warned that Russia was not 'Israel or even Iran', and warned Mr. Trump to not 'go down the Sleepy Joe road.' In response, Mr. Trump called him 'the failed former President of Russia, who thinks he's still President'. Mr. Medvedev responded via a message on Telegram, 'If some words from the former president of Russia trigger such a nervous reaction from the high-and-mighty president of the U.S., then Russia is doing everything right and will continue to proceed along its own path.'
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
India indicates it will keep buying Russian oil despite Trumps threats
NEW DELHI (AP) — India has indicated that it would continue buying oil from Russia despite threats by U.S. President Donald Trump. The Indian foreign ministry said its relationship with Russia was 'steady and time-tested,' and should not be seen through the prism of a third country. Addressing a weekly presser on Friday, spokesman Randhir Jaiswal said India's broader stance on securing its energy needs was guided by the availability of oil in the markets and prevailing global circumstances. The comments follow an announcement by President Donald Trump that he intends to impose a 25% tariff on goods from India plus an additional import tax because of New Delhi's purchases of Russian oil. The threat came as the U.S. president has increasingly soured on Russia for failing to agree to a ceasefire in Ukraine and has threatened new economic sanctions if progress is not made. India bought 68,000 barrels per day of crude oil from Russia in January 2022, but by June of same year oil imports rose to 1.12 million barrels per day. The daily imports peaked at 2.15 million in May 2023 and have varied since. Supplies rose as high as nearly 40% of India's imports at one point, making Moscow the largest supplier of crude to New Delhi, the Press Trust of India reported, citing data from Kpler, a data analytics company. India's daily oil consumption is pegged around 5.5 million barrels, of which nearly 88% is met through imports. The country has historically bought most of its crude from the Middle East, but this has changed since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. India, the world's third-largest crude importer after China and the U.S., began buying Russian oil available at discounted rates after the West shunned it to punish Moscow.
