Who is Mark Carney, Canada's newly elected Prime Minister?
Carney was sworn in last month following the resignation of Justin Trudeau, but quickly called a snap election in hopes of securing his own mandate. Canadians responded at the ballot box on Monday, delivering a victory to a candidate with an unusually technocratic résumé and no prior political office.
The 60-year-old economist, known internationally for steering Canada through the 2008 financial crash and later modernizing the Bank of England, leaned heavily on his crisis management experience throughout the campaign. 'I know how to manage crises,' he said during a leadership debate. 'In a situation like this, you need experience in terms of crisis management, you need negotiating skills.'
Carney's rapid ascent to political leadership was capped in March when he won the Liberal Party's leadership race, defeating fellow contender and former finance minister Chrystia Freeland in a landslide.
- Background -
Born in the remote town of Fort Smith in the Northwest Territories, Carney's early life is far from typical for a global financial heavyweight. He is the son of a high school principal, attended Harvard on a scholarship, and went on to complete a PhD in economics at Oxford University.
His doctoral supervisor, Meg Meyer, described him as 'an extraordinarily versatile student, rapidly mastering new approaches, perspectives and challenges,' adding that these strengths would be crucial 'as he leads Canada during these turbulent times.'
Carney holds Irish and Canadian citizenships, and previously acquired British citizenship in 2018. However, he has said he will relinquish both Irish and British nationalities, emphasizing that Canada's leader 'should only hold Canadian citizenship.'
- Career -
Carney's transition from global finance to national politics comes with both praise and scrutiny. During his time at the Bank of Canada, he gained wide respect for stabilizing the economy during the 2008 crisis by slashing interest rates and maintaining transparency on future policy—a move credited with keeping Canadian investment afloat.
In 2013, Carney became the first non-Brit to head the Bank of England, where he introduced policies such as 'forward guidance' and led the Bank through the Brexit turmoil. His clear communication during market panic earned him accolades, though not without controversy—an MP once likened him to an 'unreliable boyfriend' over mixed messages on interest rate policy.
Though central bankers are usually tight-lipped, Carney has grown more candid, especially in relation to US President Donald Trump. Responding to Trump's repeated jabs at Canada and suggestions that it could become 'the 51st state,' Carney remarked, 'I view this as the sort of Voldemort of comments… I will not even repeat it, but you know what I'm talking about.'
He has pledged to maintain counter-tariffs in response to US trade aggression 'until the Americans show us respect … and [make] credible and reliable commitments to free and fair trade.'
- Campaign focus: economy, climate, and immigration -
On the domestic front, Carney has already made bold moves. One of his first actions as prime minister was scrapping Trudeau's controversial carbon tax, effective April 1. 'This will make a difference to hard-pressed Canadians,' he said, though he has historically supported similar environmental initiatives.
In 2019, Carney became a UN special envoy on climate change, and in 2021 he helped launch the Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero, an initiative linking financial institutions in the fight against climate change. He now proposes turning Canada into a 'clean and conventional' energy powerhouse, calling himself a 'pragmatist' when challenged on the balance between energy development and environmental sustainability.
On immigration, Carney supports scaling back intake targets to reduce pressure on the country's housing and healthcare systems, echoing debates that surged during Trudeau's final year in office.
Despite his polished credentials, Carney has faced criticism from political opponents. Conservatives accuse him of downplaying his involvement in Brookfield Asset Management's relocation from Toronto to New York—a decision he claims occurred after his departure from the firm's board. They have also pressed him on financial transparency, though Carney insists he is in full compliance with ethics rules and has placed his assets in a blind trust.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Ammon
10 hours ago
- Ammon
Keeping the Transatlantic Relationship Alive
Ammon News - WASHINGTON, DC – By Jim O'Brien- The confusion sewn by the Alaska summit between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin, and the follow-up summit between Trump and European leaders, including Ukraine, has more than justified the decision taken by NATO's non-US members to increase defense spending and intensify security cooperation. This commitment made it possible for European and Ukrainian leaders to propose that they buy tens of billions of US military equipment as part of a sustainable plan for peace in Europe, and Ukraine. This is the right approach, perhaps the only one, not only for promoting European and Ukrainian defense, but also for rebuilding transatlantic cooperation in a variety of sectors, from AI to tariffs. Defense may be the simplest sector for the US and Europe to align, for multiple reasons. For starters, all the joint (transatlantic) work done since NATO's Wales Summit in 2014 has already established a solid foundation. Second, there is broad agreement on the need for Europe to do more. Europe and non-US NATO members now plan to spend 5% of GDP on defense by 2032, and European officials have said that Europe will spend 3%, on average, by 2028. Following the launch of a €150 billion ($175 billion) EU fund that has already solicited bids, EU defense investment is scheduled to be ten times what it was. Nor is this just a headline created to appease the Trump administration in the short term. NATO leaders had already committed (at the NATO Summit in July 2024) to fund regional defense plans, and the estimated cost for those was approximately 3.5% of GDP. The Trump administration has highlighted the European commitments and agreed to treat spending on crucial military infrastructure as counting toward the 5% target. Although some countries will have difficulty meeting the higher targets, at least in the near term, the continent's military capabilities will be much stronger than would have been the case. Third, the money will be spent on meeting the most crucial military needs. Under the 2024 plan, NATO will determine how to prioritize military capabilities, implying that the US still has a say in the matter. This approach should address the long-held US concern that European defense initiatives result in redundancies or divert funds from more pressing needs. Fourth, this approach also allows US companies to participate in and benefit from European defense procurement, giving the US a stake in Europe's re-arming effort. Donald Trump touted European spending on US arms following his July meeting with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, and one senior European official estimates that 40% of early EU defense spending will go to US firms. Much of this is already directed toward capabilities that only the US can provide, such as advanced air defense. To be sure, difficult decisions lie ahead. Above all, European leaders will have to determine how far they should go in creating alternatives to US equipment. These decisions will not be made all at once, and continued tensions with the Trump administration will increase the likelihood of Europe moving away from US-made weapons systems where it can. Another challenge for European leaders will be to allocate the new money pouring into the sector. Every European leader will lobby for domestic companies. But here, too, Europeans' initial moves have been promising. The EU is focused on creating effective capabilities, and key member states have called attention to what Ukraine most needs and can produce on its own. This emphasis on Ukraine sets a clear, urgent objective and allows spending to proceed without ensuring that every state gets some funding. Still, it will be important to understand how much investment can be directed to Ukraine without duplication or bidding up scarce resources. Looking ahead, a small, informal group of European leaders should identify urgent investment projects and participants. Any such group will be a hot ticket for European leaders, so its work should be discreet. It will need to include the countries with the largest industrial capacities, while also being sufficiently representative. Focusing on the largest defense and industrial capabilities and frontline states may be the best way to start. Europe's decision to keep the US involved in its defense industrial strategy did not come easily. In the first months of the second Trump administration, some in Europe questioned whether cooperation with the US was even possible. But by recognizing that America and Europe each have something to contribute to shared transatlantic security interests, European leaders are setting an example of how transatlantic cooperation can recover even during a destructive period. These structural considerations matter, because successful cooperation on defense can provide a model for other areas. Economic growth over the next generation is likely to come from industries such as AI, life sciences, and new energy technologies. China has a leading position in many of these sectors, and it will seek to shape global habits and standards for its own benefit. Europe, the US, Canada, and the Indo-Pacific will respond more effectively together than they would separately. As a group, their size is comparable to China, and they can draw on shared habits of cooperation in aligning supply chains, investment, and standards. A focus on aligning Europe and the US may seem premature, given the extent to which disagreements on trade and investment are impeding cooperation. These tensions will continue unless Trump stops treating Europe as only a competitor. We cannot know when or if tensions will ease, but I believe they can and must – even if only after this administration ends. In any case, we should be ready for any opportunities that arise. The early steps on defense cooperation show that recognition of shared interests, open communication about the best path forward, and a willingness to let one another's companies compete on fair terms can be a basis for a renewed relationship, at least in discrete areas. To prepare for that possibility, European leaders should identify strategically important sectors and make clear what conditions would allow them to keep the US as a long-term, reliable partner, and then to hold the US to its own commitments. Step by step, the partnership that underpinned peace and prosperity for previous generations can do the same for the next one. Jim O'Brien was US Assistant Secretary of State for Europe and Eurasian Affairs during the Biden administration.
Roya News
2 days ago
- Roya News
Zelenskyy gifts Trump golf club belonging to wounded Ukrainian soldier
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy sought to underscore solidarity with Washington this week by presenting US President Donald Trump with a golf club once owned by a wounded Ukrainian serviceman, his office confirmed Tuesday. Trump, a longtime golf enthusiast with several courses in his business portfolio, accepted the gift and in turn handed Zelenskyy symbolic keys to the White House. The exchange, according to Kyiv, reflected a markedly warmer tone compared to the leaders' strained meeting earlier this year. Back in February, Zelenskyy cut short a visit to Washington after a heated argument with Trump and Vice President JD Vance was broadcast live. Since then, the Ukrainian leader has worked to mend relations, often praising Trump's role in promoting peace efforts. 'The president of Ukraine presented the president of the United States with a golf club,' Zelenskyy's office said in its Tuesday statement. The club once belonged to Kostiantyn Kartavtsev, a Ukrainian soldier who 'had lost a leg in the first months of Russia's full-scale invasion while saving his brothers-in-arms,' according to the statement. Zelenskyy also showed Trump a video message from Kartavtsev. Later that day, the veterans' group United by Golf shared footage of Trump holding the club and addressing Kartavtsev directly. 'I just watched your swing. I know a lot about golf and your swing is great,' Trump said. 'You're an amazing person, and you just keep playing golf and doing all of the other things. Your country is a great country. We're trying to bring it back to health.' Zelenskyy also delivered a personal note to Melania Trump from Ukraine's First Lady, Olena Zelenska, who thanked her American counterpart for appealing to Russian President Vladimir Putin to safeguard children's lives. The gesture follows a series of symbolic gifts foreign leaders have offered Trump during White House visits. In February, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer presented him with an invitation to the UK, accompanied by a letter from King Charles III.
Jordan Times
2 days ago
- Jordan Times
Canadian Conservative leader seals parliamentary comeback
TORONTO — Canada's Conservative Party leader Pierre Poilievre looked set Tuesday to return to parliament, four months after losing his seat in a humiliating general election defeat. Poilievre had been on track to become prime minister in April's elections until US President Donald Trump's return to power upended Canadian politics with talk of annexing his northern neighbor. Poilievre's Conservatives blew a massive polling lead as voters backed the new Liberal leader, Mark Carney, now prime minister, to confront Trump. In an added blow, Poilievre lost to a Liberal in his own constituency, an Ottawa-area district he had represented for two decades. He vowed to stay on as the Conservative party head, but needed a seat in parliament before he could return as leader of the opposition. The MP for Battle River-Crowfoot , a rural district in the western province of Alberta where Conservatives dominate , offered to step down so Poilievre could run for his seat. National media projected a handsome victory for Poilievre , the favorite, soon after polls closed Monday in the district, seen as one of Canada's most right-wing. With 265 of 286 polls reporting, he led with 80 percent of the vote, far ahead of his two main rivals, public broadcaster CBC reported. In his victory speech, Poilievre vowed to oppose the policies of Carney's government, which he said had sent crime, immigration and inflation "spiralling out of control." "I am grateful that I will have the chance to be [your] humble servant, to fight every day and in every way for the people in this region," he said in a video of the address posted on X. "We'll put Canada first," he said to cheers and applause in front of a giant national flag. Elections Canada was forced to use a special ballot after a protest group seeking electoral reform successfully nominated a dizzying 214 candidates for the vote. Voters had to write the name of their preferred candidate on their ballot, not tick a box, to help people find the correct name in the enormous list. Experts say Poilievre, 46, may struggle to rebuild momentum in a political arena heavily shaped by Trump. Some voters still view Poilievre as a Trump-aligned figure, a major liability in Canada, where attitudes towards Washington are at historic lows since the US president's return to power.
