logo
A spectre in the east

A spectre in the east

Newsroom5 days ago
Opinion: The surge of the fringe far-right party Sanseito in Japan's upper house (House of Representatives) election on July 22 illustrated that Japan has joined the rising global xenophobic sentiment, and how powerful the populist-inclined catchphrase politics has become there.
The election ended with a historic defeat of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), which has almost exclusively governed Japan since its foundation in 1955. Still, the most controversial outcome was how Sanseito captured the growing anti-immigration sentiment with its catchy slogan 'Nihonjin Fāsuto', which means 'Japanese First' (Fāsuto is a loanword for First in Japan). The party held two seats in the upper house before the election, but won 14 of the contested seats last week.
The rise of catchphrase politics in Japan
The first salient example of this populist catchphrase politics came from the administration of Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi. One of his political slogans was 'structural reform without sanctuaries', which drove the country into the neoliberal agenda.
This culminated in a snap general election in 2005, which Koizumi decided to hold when the administration's bill to privatise the postal service was voted down in the upper house.
Koizumi, a long-time advocate for the privatisation of the postal service, situated this matter as a symbol of the neoliberal structural reforms, which New Zealand had taken the lead on in the 1980s. This policy evoked strong opposition even within the Liberal Democratic Party because it raised concerns regarding service degradation and challenged the strongly held political foundation of the party.
However, Koizumi led the party with the postal service privatisation as the sole subject of the election and labelled those opposed to the reform, including the major players in his own party, as 'forces of resistance'.
He succeeded in 'theaterising' the process by kicking out those opposed in the LDP. Those who were expelled went into the elections as independent candidates, but the LDP fielded new official candidates to their constituencies – referred to as assassins. The election resulted in a landslide victory for Koizumi.
The next instance was Shinzo Abe, who succeeded Koizumi as Prime Minister in 2006. He used populist catchphrase politics to push nationalistic ideologies with slogans such as 'Beautiful country Japan' and 'Take back Japan'.
Another was 'Breaking away from the postwar regime', which implied that the social system of postwar Japan, such as its pacifist constitution, was forced on Japan by the victorious countries.
Abe's administration amended the legislation for education, adding 'patriotic spirit' as an educational goal, and changed the constitutional interpretation to increase the possibilities of engaging in war. These policies gained support from far-right communities and helped him become the longest-reigning Prime Minister in his second administration in the 2010s.
Xenophobia and 'Trumpism'
Now, with the 'Nihonjin Fāsuto' (Japanese First) slogan, Japanese sloganeering combined with xenophobia. Although the nationalism during the Abe era arguably contributed to this phenomenon, the rise and establishment of the 'First' doctrine in Japan originated not in the ruling LDP but in a rather fringe political arena, and came to life as a ground-up phenomenon.
The use of 'Fāsuto' in the Japanese political scene can be traced back to the regional party Tomin Fāsuto no Kai (Tokyoites First Party) in 2016. This was founded by the Tokyo Metropolitan Governor Yuriko Koike, a former member of the LDP and minister of the Koizumi administration. She never admitted it, but this Fāsuto was likely influenced by 'America First', the slogan Donald Trump used in his first presidential campaign.
This 'Tomin Fāsuto' (Tokyo First) advocated for prioritising citizens rather than political elites and vested interest groups. This was a stark contrast with the long-ruling LDP in the 2017 Tokyo metropolitan assembly election, and led to the overwhelming victory of Koike's party in 2017.
But her true colours were displayed when she upgraded the party to a national party and declared she would exclude people who did not align with the core values of the party – the liberals or the leftists. This caused an immense backlash from the public and led her party to a disastrous defeat in the general election that same year.
Immigration restriction
However, after only eight years, the rapid transformation of Japanese society – and with the help of Trump's agenda – led to 'Fāsuto' politics entering the national arena.
Japan has been perceived as a homogeneous country, but this has changed dramatically in recent years because of an ageing and declining population.
The Japanese government invited more immigrant workers to fill the workforce shortages and, with declining economic power, started to rely on inbound tourism.
By the end of 2024, the number of foreign nationals residing in Japan was more than 3.7 million, a record high for three years in a row. The number of foreign visitors hit a record high of 36 million in the same year.
As increasing numbers of gaijin (foreigners) became visible in Japanese society, this led to social anxiety similar to the anti-immigration campaign now raging in the US. This gave the minor conservative parties momentum and also forced the administration to tighten its stance against immigration, for example with 'rigorous screening' and planning for 'zero illegal immigrants'.
Japan is still very restrictive with immigration. Given it is an island, border-crossing undocumented migrants are very rare. It has also maintained extremely strict procedures for granting refugee status. According to the Japan Association for Refugees report, in 2023, Japan recognised 303 people as refugees, which was a record for Japan, but the lowest number of refugees recognised in the G7 countries. Japan also had one of the smallest immigrant populations in the OECD, which was only 2.2 percent of the country's population compared with 10.4 percent of the immigrant proportion of the total OECD population in 2021.
Japan has been using the participants of its Technical Intern Training Programme as de facto low-skilled migrant workers, which has faced international criticism, including from the United Nations Human Rights Committee, concerning forced labour.
The rise of the anti-immigration party Sanseito in the recent election was not based on actual threats but the phantom of catchphrase politics.
A spectre of America First, Nihonjin Fāsuto, is haunting Japan, whether or not it will help Make America Great Again. The English term 'great' has also been incorporated into the Japanese lexicon as a loanword – gurēto. I hope this will not become the next spectre in the catchphrase politics in my home country.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Letters to the Editor: voting, parking and mining
Letters to the Editor: voting, parking and mining

Otago Daily Times

time3 days ago

  • Otago Daily Times

Letters to the Editor: voting, parking and mining

Today's Letters to the Editor from readers cover topics including the new electoral law proposals, replacing car parks with cycle lanes, and the Santana gold mine develoment. Former MP condemns electoral law proposals From 1990 until 1999 I was a member of Parliament's electoral law select committee. During those nine years a wide range of changes and reforms to electoral law were proposed. At no time did anyone propose changes remotely as retrograde as those that the current government is progressing. Had they done, they would have been opposed by all political parties, left wing or right wing. Western democracies usually seek to make voting as easy as possible, or alternatively compulsory, to ensure governments are elected validly and have the moral authority to govern. This government's changes are voter suppression, pure and simple. Those affected are likely to be a mix of young, poor, brown and transient. Furthermore, with one exception, all elections since MMP began in 1996 have been surprisingly close. The 110,000 people who may now be disenfranchised are enough to affect the result, and therefore the will of the nation. We should all be deeply concerned. A wrong move I am alarmed to see the coalition government following the American example of making voter enrolment more inconvenient. Justice officials say closing enrolments ahead of advance voting could result in lower turnout and reduce confidence in the electoral system. Those voters who are either working long hours or irregular hours will be most affected by the cancelling of same-day election enrolment. In America over the last 20 years the conservative Republican Party in various states has consistently made it more difficult for working people and minorities to vote. The need to prove your permanent address has been used to disqualify minority voters as America has moved toward becoming a more authoritarian society. Cancelling same-day enrolment is a move in the wrong direction. Trumpism is not a good look in our electoral system. Our electoral system is too important for democracy to be changed casually. Any changes to the electoral systems, even minor ones, should be agreed across parties. Just winning an election should not give political parties the right to alter the electoral system. A great risk I write in profound concern upon realising the extent of voter restrictions this government is considering. Total disenfranchisement for prisoners was sadistic in my opinion, certainly not aiding return to normal life, but to read of universal restrictions for enrolment beggars belief. Or, rather, it confirms that the really needy of New Zealand are also of the same great risk, even should they understand that asking for special votes is possible, though these will be well scrutinised. In particular, the proposed "ability to check enrolment details with data from other government agencies" surely jeopardises privacy, while "greater use of digital communication" has obvious drawbacks, to those without required means (probably mostly elderly) or are not familiar or comfortable with voting process, until now having face-to-face communication with poll clerk or returning officer. Universal emancipation is a vital necessity of an enlightened society, a fact of which this government seems unwilling to ensure. Heavy machinery and losing your car park How would anyone like to have large machinery working about 4m from where he/she was studying for examinations or resting? That happened when the Dunedin City Council worked underground on the Albany St pipes. Now a few DCC personnel have decided to rob about 60 much needed Albany St car parks from right outside the numerous student flats and businesses. This cycle lane is being forced on to those who don't want it. How many cyclists will use it? Cyclists appear to ride anywhere at all, and few appear to keep to the cycle lanes. I have spoken to several present tenants who are surprised and angry to hear their parks will be taken. Where will students' families or shuttle buses park when they need to move students in and out of their student flats? Where will the students, who own cars, park their cars? Most flats and hostels do not provide sufficient parks for all cars and some have no parking areas at all. These people have agreed to waste local money ruining Albany St businesses and living areas. How would each feel if their livelihoods (or streets in which they live) were to be treated in this offhand way? The RMA is there to allay mine concerns The development of the Santana gold mine in the Bendigo area, the site of significant gold mining over 100 years ago, has generated a lot of media coverage, most of which appears to be opposed. Our current principle planning document clearly allows consenting authorities to provide consents for the activities with conditions which should allay the concerns of opposition groups and individuals. These conditions could require the applicant to avoid, remedy or mitigate real or perceived adverse effects on a whole host of values. These could include amenity, visual, natural beauty, landscape, protection of flora and fauna etc. The applicant has the choice of accepting such conditions, appealing them, or choosing not to proceed. This process has the significant advantage of providing environmental and amenity value protection and allowing the activity to proceed . This is entirely consistent with the purpose of this current principle planning document (the Resource Management Act). Manic Monday I guess Monday is a day to stir the pot and get people to react with hopefully more good letters to the editor. Two letters got me thinking, so here goes. Lynne Newell (28.7.25): discussing a world event may not be top of the list of council duties but I think it's relevant. Councillors are our chosen representatives just as parliamentarians are. No-one lives in a bubble. Tony Vink (28.7.25): you are looking through rose-tinted glasses when it comes to Israel. They remind me of the wolf dressed in sheep skin. Address Letters to the Editor to: Otago Daily Times, PO Box 517, 52-56 Lower Stuart St, Dunedin. Email: editor@

A spectre in the east
A spectre in the east

Newsroom

time5 days ago

  • Newsroom

A spectre in the east

Opinion: The surge of the fringe far-right party Sanseito in Japan's upper house (House of Representatives) election on July 22 illustrated that Japan has joined the rising global xenophobic sentiment, and how powerful the populist-inclined catchphrase politics has become there. The election ended with a historic defeat of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), which has almost exclusively governed Japan since its foundation in 1955. Still, the most controversial outcome was how Sanseito captured the growing anti-immigration sentiment with its catchy slogan 'Nihonjin Fāsuto', which means 'Japanese First' (Fāsuto is a loanword for First in Japan). The party held two seats in the upper house before the election, but won 14 of the contested seats last week. The rise of catchphrase politics in Japan The first salient example of this populist catchphrase politics came from the administration of Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi. One of his political slogans was 'structural reform without sanctuaries', which drove the country into the neoliberal agenda. This culminated in a snap general election in 2005, which Koizumi decided to hold when the administration's bill to privatise the postal service was voted down in the upper house. Koizumi, a long-time advocate for the privatisation of the postal service, situated this matter as a symbol of the neoliberal structural reforms, which New Zealand had taken the lead on in the 1980s. This policy evoked strong opposition even within the Liberal Democratic Party because it raised concerns regarding service degradation and challenged the strongly held political foundation of the party. However, Koizumi led the party with the postal service privatisation as the sole subject of the election and labelled those opposed to the reform, including the major players in his own party, as 'forces of resistance'. He succeeded in 'theaterising' the process by kicking out those opposed in the LDP. Those who were expelled went into the elections as independent candidates, but the LDP fielded new official candidates to their constituencies – referred to as assassins. The election resulted in a landslide victory for Koizumi. The next instance was Shinzo Abe, who succeeded Koizumi as Prime Minister in 2006. He used populist catchphrase politics to push nationalistic ideologies with slogans such as 'Beautiful country Japan' and 'Take back Japan'. Another was 'Breaking away from the postwar regime', which implied that the social system of postwar Japan, such as its pacifist constitution, was forced on Japan by the victorious countries. Abe's administration amended the legislation for education, adding 'patriotic spirit' as an educational goal, and changed the constitutional interpretation to increase the possibilities of engaging in war. These policies gained support from far-right communities and helped him become the longest-reigning Prime Minister in his second administration in the 2010s. Xenophobia and 'Trumpism' Now, with the 'Nihonjin Fāsuto' (Japanese First) slogan, Japanese sloganeering combined with xenophobia. Although the nationalism during the Abe era arguably contributed to this phenomenon, the rise and establishment of the 'First' doctrine in Japan originated not in the ruling LDP but in a rather fringe political arena, and came to life as a ground-up phenomenon. The use of 'Fāsuto' in the Japanese political scene can be traced back to the regional party Tomin Fāsuto no Kai (Tokyoites First Party) in 2016. This was founded by the Tokyo Metropolitan Governor Yuriko Koike, a former member of the LDP and minister of the Koizumi administration. She never admitted it, but this Fāsuto was likely influenced by 'America First', the slogan Donald Trump used in his first presidential campaign. This 'Tomin Fāsuto' (Tokyo First) advocated for prioritising citizens rather than political elites and vested interest groups. This was a stark contrast with the long-ruling LDP in the 2017 Tokyo metropolitan assembly election, and led to the overwhelming victory of Koike's party in 2017. But her true colours were displayed when she upgraded the party to a national party and declared she would exclude people who did not align with the core values of the party – the liberals or the leftists. This caused an immense backlash from the public and led her party to a disastrous defeat in the general election that same year. Immigration restriction However, after only eight years, the rapid transformation of Japanese society – and with the help of Trump's agenda – led to 'Fāsuto' politics entering the national arena. Japan has been perceived as a homogeneous country, but this has changed dramatically in recent years because of an ageing and declining population. The Japanese government invited more immigrant workers to fill the workforce shortages and, with declining economic power, started to rely on inbound tourism. By the end of 2024, the number of foreign nationals residing in Japan was more than 3.7 million, a record high for three years in a row. The number of foreign visitors hit a record high of 36 million in the same year. As increasing numbers of gaijin (foreigners) became visible in Japanese society, this led to social anxiety similar to the anti-immigration campaign now raging in the US. This gave the minor conservative parties momentum and also forced the administration to tighten its stance against immigration, for example with 'rigorous screening' and planning for 'zero illegal immigrants'. Japan is still very restrictive with immigration. Given it is an island, border-crossing undocumented migrants are very rare. It has also maintained extremely strict procedures for granting refugee status. According to the Japan Association for Refugees report, in 2023, Japan recognised 303 people as refugees, which was a record for Japan, but the lowest number of refugees recognised in the G7 countries. Japan also had one of the smallest immigrant populations in the OECD, which was only 2.2 percent of the country's population compared with 10.4 percent of the immigrant proportion of the total OECD population in 2021. Japan has been using the participants of its Technical Intern Training Programme as de facto low-skilled migrant workers, which has faced international criticism, including from the United Nations Human Rights Committee, concerning forced labour. The rise of the anti-immigration party Sanseito in the recent election was not based on actual threats but the phantom of catchphrase politics. A spectre of America First, Nihonjin Fāsuto, is haunting Japan, whether or not it will help Make America Great Again. The English term 'great' has also been incorporated into the Japanese lexicon as a loanword – gurēto. I hope this will not become the next spectre in the catchphrase politics in my home country.

Round three - United States and China hold economic talks as trade truce nears end
Round three - United States and China hold economic talks as trade truce nears end

NZ Herald

time5 days ago

  • NZ Herald

Round three - United States and China hold economic talks as trade truce nears end

The Trump Administration has been trying to win concessions from many countries before an August 1 deadline for reimposing tariffs announced in April. Those levies were suspended in order to reach trade deals. Over the last week, the Trump Administration has announced deals with some of America's biggest trading partners in quick succession. Last week the US and Japan finally agreed to a deal that included a 15% tariff on Japanese imports and a pledge from Japan to invest US$550 billion in the US. Today, Trump announced that he had also reached a deal with the European Union, whose economies rely on exports to the US. The deal would put a 15% tariff on many European exports, including cars. One of the biggest unknowns is what will happen with China, which remains one of America's largest source of imports. After a tit-for-tat period of tariffs and retaliation, the two nations have come to something of an uneasy truce after talks in Geneva in May, and in London in June. Today, before he met with European officials, Trump implied that some kind of trade arrangement with China might be close at hand. 'We just struck a deal with Japan as you know, and we're very close to a deal with China,' he said. This will be the first meeting between the countries without an imminent crisis, like the tariff standoff or China's economically crippling ban on rare earth exports this year. Trade experts said the list of potential topics for discussion was long, ranging from Trump's push to get China to stop the flow of fentanyl to the US, to America's concerns about its purchases of Russian and Iranian oil, and recent exit bans that have prevented US citizens from leaving China. US officials appear to be looking forward to more ambitious trade talks in the months to come. Those could include Chinese purchases of American products, steps to open the Chinese market and, potentially, Chinese investment in the US. They are also likely seeking to lay the groundwork for a potential meeting between Trump and Xi Jinping, the Chinese leader, this year. Administration officials are considering a trip to Beijing before a meeting of Asian and Pacific countries in South Korea in October or potentially connecting Trump and Xi on the sidelines of an international meeting. Michael Pillsbury, a former government official who has advised the Trump Administration on China, said this would be Trump's sixth summit meeting with Xi. Each of those summits had a minimum of two hours of dialogue, and Trump went prepared with specific dealmaking requests, he said. 'The President feels it's better to deal face to face,' he said. Trade experts are also wondering whether US technology controls or an agreement to transfer ownership of TikTok may be on the negotiating table. On CNBC last week, Howard Lutnick, the Secretary of Commerce, said that the US had submitted a proposal to China for transferring ownership of TikTok to American companies, and that the Administration was waiting for the Chinese response. The topic was 'not officially' part of the trade talks, he said, 'but unofficially, of course'. Tensions between the US and China started to spiral after Trump announced his 'Liberation Day' tariffs in early April. China was the only country to immediately retaliate, matching Trump's tariffs of 34% with 34% tariffs on American products. Beijing also set up a licensing system to restrict exports of seven rare earth elements that are processed almost exclusively in China and used in electric cars, smart bombs and other high-tech devices. Trump then responded by ratcheting up tariffs on Chinese products to a minimum of 145%, which brought much of the trade between the countries to a halt. The previous rounds of negotiations secured a temporary truce that included China's relaxing its restrictions on shipments of valuable rare earth minerals and magnets needed by US manufacturers. In return, US officials agreed to roll back limits on exports of US products and technology, including ethane and airplane parts, as well as the proposed visa restrictions. US tariffs on Chinese imports were scaled back to 30%, while China has 10% tariffs on American products. The truce is scheduled to expire on August 12, after which tariffs would rise by 10%. However, Bessent has been optimistic that the truce could be extended. In an interview on the Fox Business Network last week, Bessent said that 'trade is in a good place' with China. He added that he hoped to begin having broader discussions with his counterparts about rebalancing the Chinese economy and encouraging China to curb purchases of Russian and Iranian oil. Bessent said China was in a manufacturing slump and faced a residential real estate market crisis. He argued Beijing must focus on building a consumer economy. 'They can't export their economic problems to the rest of the world; they need to solve them,' Bessent said. US companies continue to have a rash of criticisms about doing business in China, including the country's newly established rare earth licensing system. The processing time for licences is long, American firms say, and China requests proprietary and sensitive business information as part of the applications. In a survey released this month, members of the US-China Business Council said strained relations and tariffs between the two countries remained their biggest concerns. But they also said Chinese policies favouring domestic companies were eroding confidence in doing business in the country. This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Written by: Alan Rappeport and Ana Swanson ©2025 THE NEW YORK TIMES

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store