News 8 Primetime 585 Elite Awards: Girls basketball
ROCHESTER, N.Y. (WROC) — Here are the News 8 Primetime 585 Elite Award winners for girls basketball.
Our first girls basketball winner led her team to a sectional title and was named Class B Sectional Finals MVP.
She followed that by being named Far West Regionals Player of the Game.
Her team went all the way to the New York State Championship game and earned a state runner up finish.
She was named the Livingston County Co-Player of the Year, an LCAA All-Star, The Way-Co Showcase MVP and the Roger Weiss Memorial Tournament 'Heart of a Champion' and character athlete award.
She set a school record for most points in a season with 484, and scored her 1,000th point this year.
She also tied a school record with 85 threes in a season, and tied a Girls Section V record with 10 threes in a game.
She is just as successful in the classroom as she is a High Honor Roll student and a member of the National Honor Society.
The News 8/ Primetime Elite Award winner for small schools girls basketball is from Hornell, Jordyn Dyring!
Our large school winner will be graduating with her name pretty much all over her school's record book.
This senior averaged just over 30 points a game last year. She also averaged 10 rebounds and four assists per game.
She shot 49% from the floor and a totally ridiculous 44% from 3 point range — for comparison, the most accurate NBA 3-point shooters are at 44 percent.
She finished her high school career with 2140 career points, the most in her school's history.
Also this year… she set the following school records: -Most points in a game 43-Most threes in a game: 9-Most threes in a season: 101-Most threes career: 226-Most points in a season: 702
She was named Monroe County Division 1 Player of the Year.
She is also a back-to-back Elite award winner, the large school girls basketball award goes to Mallory Heise of Hilton.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
29 minutes ago
- USA Today
Adaptability keeps Pacers coach on cutting edge of NBA change
Adaptability keeps Pacers coach on cutting edge of NBA change What makes Indiana coach Rick Carlisle unique is the way he has engaged with modern disruptions in the NBA, the way he has reimagined his philosophies to suit different teams in different eras. Show Caption Hide Caption Pacers and Thunder NBA Finals is better than it's 'small-market' billing USA TODAY Sports' Jeff Zillgitt breaks down the star-studded NBA Finals between the Indiana Pacers and Oklahoma City Thunder. Sports Pulse OKLAHOMA CITY — The reporter called out Rick Carlisle. His Indiana Pacers had staged yet another improbable come-from-behind victory in the playoffs, this one in an epic Game 1 of the NBA Finals — a series they entered as overwhelming underdogs. In the first few questions, Carlisle matter-of-factly had downplayed the frenetic pace of Indiana erasing a 15-point deficit in the fourth quarter against a Thunder team that rarely squanders leads, especially at home. 'I know you're being Cool Hand Luke and all that,' the reporter began, 'but at any point did you stop and say: 'Damn, that was a hell of a comeback?' ' The way Carlisle opened his answer, in essence a shrug, was quite revealing. 'No, no,' Carlisle began. 'Listen: I've been through too much of this, you know, over the years.' In what is a fascinating NBA Finals matchup of contrasts, Carlisle, 65, is a mainstay, a proven commodity and hoop lifer, a coach with a deep mental archive. But what makes Carlisle unique is the way he has engaged with modern disruptions in the NBA, the way he has reimagined his philosophies to suit different teams playing in different eras. OPINION: Pacers cannot keep relying on crazy comebacks. They must start quicker, finish stronger. And now, Carlisle's Pacers will try to pull off another improbable feat Wednesday, June 11, and go up 2-1 on Oklahoma City (8:30 p.m. ET, ABC). 'He's got unbelievable endurance in the league,' Thunder coach Mark Daigneault said Wednesday, June 4. 'What I'd also say is, he's kind of out in front of some trends in the NBA right now. To be somebody that has the experiences that he has, that's very impressive that he's been able to evolve and be a trendsetter even as he's been one of the longest-tenured people in the NBA.' Carlisle has been a head coach 23 seasons. He was an assistant 11 seasons before that and a player the five years prior, though his first year as an assistant was unique. He began the 1989-90 campaign as a 30-year-old shooting guard for the Nets. However, he played just 4.2 minutes per game across five contests before he switched over to the coaching staff, becoming an assistant to the very players he had just called teammates. During his four decades in the NBA, Carlisle has played alongside legends like Larry Bird, only to later serve as an assistant under him in his first stint with the Pacers; coached Hall of Famers Jason Kidd and Dirk Nowitzki to a NBA title with the Dallas Mavericks; and is 11th all-time in coaching victories, with 993. Carlisle always has had a strong aptitude for offense. It helped that he played for the great Boston Celtics coach K.C. Jones and with Bird and Kevin McHale. Their offensive acumen shaped Carlisle's offensive philosophy. Still, despite that influence, Carlisle has seen offenses evolve. Not only has he adapted over the years, but his offensive vision has put him at the forefront of innovation, including the pace and effort in which his teams play. Throughout his coaching career, Carlisle was adamant about making offensive calls from the bench, instructing the point guard what play to run. Pacers center Myles Turner recalled a game in 2021-22, which was Carlisle's first season in his second stint with Indiana. "Rick was a coach that he used to like to call a play every single possession," Turner said. "Even Rick's first year here, we had a game where he did that. He stopped us and called a play every single possession. "In the dawn of this new NBA, especially in the playoffs, that stuff doesn't work. It's easy to scout. But when you have random movement on offense, guys that are someone like Tyrese (Haliburton) who wants to pass the ball, it makes the game a little bit easier, especially for a guy like myself who thrives with space." It was with Kidd that Carlisle's philosophy of player empowerment began to take root and he ceded some control. 'What I learned my first year in Dallas was to give J-Kidd the ball and get out of the way, let him run the show, let him run the team,' Carlisle said Thursday, June 5, before Game 1. With the Pacers, Carlisle has entrusted Haliburton, an All-Star point guard in 2023 and 2024, to dictate the pace and structure of Indiana's offense. Haliburton is able to operate with significant freedom, choosing when to push up the floor off of rebounds and how quickly. And while the Pacers do have plenty of set plays, they most often rely on flow and feel, allowing players to instinctively move without the ball and play off each other — almost always with Haliburton taking lead. 'It's pretty clear, when you have a player of that kind of magnitude, that kind of presence, that kind of knowledge and vision and depth, you got to let them do what they do,' Carlisle continued. Throughout the playoffs, regardless of score, the Pacers have played their game, which has allowed them to secure multiple comeback victories, including their thrilling 111-110 victory against the Thunder in Game 1. During a replay challenge with 22.5 seconds remaining in the fourth quarter, Carlisle made the decision not to call a timeout following Oklahoma City's possession. "If we get a stop and get the rebound, we're going to go," he explained to reporters. "Hopefully get the ball in Tyrese's hands and look to make a play." Carlisle let Haliburton create, which led to the winning shot with 0.3 seconds remaining. Carlisle's imprint, no matter what happens in the rest of the series, will undoubtedly be palpable. In the 2025 playoffs, the Pacers are No. 2 offensively (117.1 points per 100 possessions), No. 1 in 3-point shooting percentage (40.5%), No. 1 in field goal percentage (49.6%), No. 1 in assists per game (27.8) and No. 3 in pace, which is possessions per 48 minutes. "The skill aspect is the thing that's the most compelling part of the game, and we're getting to a point now where everybody on the floor, not a 100% of the five men, but all the guys, one through four, can make 3, drive it, make plays," Carlisle said. "And we're getting to a point now where more of the five men can do that than not. It's made the game a lot more difficult to defend, obviously. "But the skill aspect of it is, to me, always going to be the most compelling part about the beauty of watching the game and the challenge and the beauty of teaching the game." It's Carlisle's eye for beautiful offense — and his composed assurance to entrust his players — that now has the Pacers three victories from their first NBA title.
New York Times
32 minutes ago
- New York Times
Celtics mailbag: Payton Pritchard's opportunity, Brad Stevens' trade options and more
Summer weather has arrived in Boston. And that means Brad Stevens and the Celtics front office are on the verge of a franchise-altering offseason. It's a good time to answer some questions from the readers. Here's part 2 of our Celtics mailbag. Part 1 can be found here. Questions have been lightly edited for style, grammar and clarity. Are the Celtics planning on giving Payton Pritchard the opportunity to establish himself as a primary offensive creator next season? All he's done since coming into the league is improve, and the Tatum injury would seem to provide him, more than anyone else on the roster, with an unexpected chance to level up into a much more prominent role. — Peter P. Pritchard could stand to gain the most touches and shot attempts during Tatum's absence. Considering the Celtics will also likely trade at least one starter, Pritchard should be set to take on the biggest role of his career. He should flourish with that opportunity. Throughout recent years, one of Pritchard's strengths has been an ability to step up when the Celtics are shorthanded. Over 10 games without Tatum last season, the guard averaged 19.0 points, 5.3 assists and 5.0 rebounds. And the Celtics went 8-2 in those games. Advertisement How much shooting accuracy will Pritchard sacrifice if he does become more of a go-to guy and a focal point for opposing game plans? One of the most impressive parts about his Sixth Man of the Year season was that he increased his efficiency even while taking more difficult shots. Among all players to attempt at least seven 3-pointers per game, only Zach LaVine finished with a higher true shooting percentage than Pritchard. On the diet of shots Pritchard took, only a premier shooter could have finished the season at 40.7 percent from downtown like he did. Can Pritchard push the boundaries of his game even further? 'We will put a good team together, a lot of competitors and people who will go out there and lay it on the line every night,' he said of next season. 'And I believe people will elevate their games and have bigger roles, especially with JT being out, until he comes back, and they should take full advantage of it and be ready for those opportunities. We will compete.' From what you've heard, what are the percentages that each of Kristaps Porziņģis/Jrue Holiday/Jaylen Brown/Derrick White are traded? — Joshua E. At this stage, I'm not sure even the Celtics front office could provide percentages on that. As far as I'm aware, none of those four players will be untouchable, but the price tag for Jaylen Brown and Derrick White will be extremely high. Jrue Holiday, who will turn 35 next week, might be the most likely to go because of how old he will be when Tatum returns to full strength. If other teams value Holiday now (and I suspect they will) it would make sense for the Celtics to move on, as much as they appreciate everything he brings to the team on and off the court. The futures of the other three starters likely all depend on the offers the Celtics receive as they explore avenues to shed salary this offseason. Is a team willing to blow away Brad Stevens with a huge offer for Brown or White? How much value does Porziņģis still have after yet another season marred by an inability to stay on the court? He will be on an expiring contract next season. There's going to be a whole lot for the Celtics front office to weigh over the coming weeks and months. How intact will the core four to seven players be in 2025-26 with JT out almost all year? Will this be a total rebuild, floor to ceiling? — Steve H. The Celtics could go several ways. If they want to get out of the luxury tax entirely, and not just below the second apron, they would need to shed about $40 million in salary. Such a path would likely require more of a full rebuild, but they don't necessarily need to take that path. Why, Jay? Why?? — Max S. But, for Boston fans, seriously. How did everything shift so suddenly for the Celtics? One moment they were one of the favorites to win a title, which would have given them the organization's first back-to-back championships since the Bill Russell days. The next moment, they were the authors of consecutive collapses against the Knicks and Tatum's loved ones were crying in the Celtics locker room because he had ruptured his Achilles. And now, poor Steve H. is pondering the possibility of a full rebuild. Advertisement Losing a second-round series to that New York team would have been awful anyway; the Tatum injury turned it into a catastrophe like the tsunami that wiped out much of Earth's population in the television show 'Paradise.' Unfortunately for Brad Stevens, I don't think anyone has built an underground city where he could move to hide from the daunting decisions ahead. What kind of quality big can the Celtics acquire if they move on from either Holiday or Porziņģis. Can they get a starter, a rim-protecting, screen-setting dunker that is a step up (from Neemias Queta)? I don't mind getting Al Horford back, but only as a rotation player with more limited minutes. — Jeff S. The Celtics' frontcourt is nothing but a question mark right now. Porziņģis could get traded. Luke Kornet and Al Horford are free agents. At his exit interview, Horford declined to say with any certainty whether he will even play basketball next season. I assume somebody will start at center for Joe Mazzulla's team next season, but your guess on who that will be is as good as mine. Tatum's injury could change Horford's decision on his future. The big man turned 39 earlier this week and the Celtics no longer appear ready to contend next season. This deep into his career, would he want to go chasing another ring elsewhere? If he does, he would be a good fit for several contending teams, including the Nuggets and Pacers. But Horford has really liked it in Boston and has five children to think about. The last time he left the Celtics as a free agent, he signed in Philadelphia, where he was utilized so poorly that people thought he was washed up. Would he risk ending his career in another situation that looks good on paper, but might not work out? The Celtics' luxury tax situation (not great!) will also limit their frontcourt options, including potentially their ability to re-sign their own free agents. What I'm trying to say is that they should sign Vitor Faverani again and see what happens. For real, maybe they should call the Mavericks and see if they can pry away Daniel Gafford in a Jrue Holiday trade, though it would be fascinating to see how frustrated Mazzulla would get if he needed to play Queta 25 minutes per game. Mazzulla's sideline reactions to Queta's mistakes often provide great entertainment. Here's the headline question I think you could answer in a fun way, because while the new owner and front office could stand pat and run up bills, they also could pull a swashbuckling Auerbach move or two: 'The Celtics are at a crossroads: What would Red do?' — Tad W. He would have found a loophole to draft Cooper Flagg last year before his one and only season at Duke. Boom. Advertisement Jaylen Brown's name keeps coming up in trade rumors both by national media and by fans who think he's a turnover machine, which isn't true — a simple check of stats would tell them that, but no one uses facts in debates these days. While yes, they could get a lot in return for Brown which could reset the roster and get them out of luxury tax hell, do you think trading a young superstar who is also a pillar of the community and has great plans for the future of the area would destroy the image of the Boston Celtics and send a horrible message to other free agents? — Adam B. Trading Brown would be a bold move. It could go extremely poorly. Generally, teams try to keep All-Stars who improve every year, serve as locker room leaders and own an NBA Finals MVP award. Even if a Brown move would fix Boston's apron dilemma, there would be no promise the Celtics would ever find Tatum such a capable running mate again. That said, such player movement will become the new norm. The collective bargaining agreement includes severe enough penalties that teams will only have short windows before they need to break up a contending core. So I don't think such a trade would hurt Boston's chances of landing any free agents in the future. It would likely be more of a blow to the team's image among fans, many of whom love Brown and would hate to see him go. Would a new owner in Bill Chisholm have the stomach to oversee a teardown right away and potentially tick off his entire fan base during his first offseason? Chisholm could just listen to the optimistic Chris W. instead. So, I figured it out. Even without Tatum, the Celtics will win it all next year, and it'll be because Jaylen Brown leveled up. Hear me out: JB is best used as a play finisher. With Horford, KP, and Kornet all potentially gone, by necessity, the C's will need to play small, putting Brown at the 4. With 2-3 other ball handlers around him at all times, he'll no longer need to initiate. He'll also be matched up against 4s, mitigating the problems he has dribbling through traffic. With small-ball thrust upon them, the C's will embrace a new level of Mazzulla Ball, hoisting an absurd amount of 3s and powering the league's highest-scoring offense. It's a foolproof plan, right? Guys? — Chris W. I don't see any weaknesses in that plan. (Photo of Payton Pritchard: Al Bello / Getty Images)
USA Today
33 minutes ago
- USA Today
On this day: Robert Parish, pick used for Kevin McHale traded for; Bird, Ainge drafted
On this day: Robert Parish, pick used for Kevin McHale traded for; Bird, Ainge drafted On this day in Boston Celtics history, President of Basketball Operations Red Auerbach pulled off one of the most lopsided trades in NBA history in 1980. Auerbach dealt a pair of first-round picks used to select big man Joe Barry Carroll and center Rickey Brown to the Golden State Warriors in exchange for big man Robert Parish and the draft pick used to select Kevin McHale. In one fell swoop, Boston's head honcho scooped up two-thirds of one of the greatest frontcourts ever assembled. Forward Larry Bird, who had already been drafted, completed the trio that win titles together in 1981, 1984, and 1986. It is also the anniversary of the 1978 NBA draft, in which the Celtics took three players of note. They selected small forward Jeff Judkins out of Utah with the 30th pick of the draft. Judkins played two seasons for Boston, averaging 7.3 points, 1.8 rebounds, and 1.3 assists per game before being drafted by the Dallas Mavericks in the 1980 NBA expansion draft. The Celtics also took shooting guard Freeman Williams out of Portland State with the eighth overall pick of the draft. Williams was immediately dealt with Kevin Kunnert, Kermit Washington, and Sidney Wicks to the (then) San Diego (now, Los Angeles) Clippers for Tiny Archibald, Marvin Barnes, Billy Knight, and draft assets. They also drafted a player you may have heard of -- forward Larry Bird. Bird was taken with the sixth pick of the draft despite still being enrolled in Indiana State University, exploiting a since-closed loophole in the Collective Bargaining Agreement to do it. He finished his final season at Indiana State before joining Boston for his Hall-of-Fame career that included three titles, 12 All-Star nods, 10 All-NBA teams, three Most Valuable Player Awards, and many other honors. The 1981 NBA draft also fell on this date, with the Celtics again taking three noteworthy players. The first was shooting guard Charles Bradley, a Wyoming standout, taken with the 23rd pick. Bradley played two seasons with Boston, averaging 3.3 points, 1.1 rebounds, and 0.5 assists per contest before being waived in October 1983. The Celtics took shooting guard Tracy Jackson out of Notre Dame with the 25th pick. Jackson played 11 games with Boston before having his contract sold to the Chicago Bulls. In those 11 games, he averaged 2.4 points, 1.1 boards, and 0.5 assists. The Celtics drafted shooting guard Danny Ainge -- formerly of BYU -- with the 31st pick. The move was a gamble since Ainge had already signed with Major League Baseball's Toronto Blue Jays. However, the move paid off big for Boston. Ainge won two titles with the team as a player which laid the groundwork for him to return later in life as an executive and win another in 2008.
