logo
James Carville doubles down for predicting Trump admin collapse — says it's happening ‘now'

James Carville doubles down for predicting Trump admin collapse — says it's happening ‘now'

New York Post6 hours ago
Democratic strategist James Carville insisted Thursday that he was right when he predicted the Trump administration would collapse 30 days into President Donald Trump's second term.
During an appearance on journalist Dan Abrams' podcast, Carville doubled down on his prediction when Abrams suggested that he got it wrong.
Advertisement
'I think it's collapsing now,' Carville told Abrams, who found it amusing. '30 days – 180 days, okay. It is collapsing right in front of you.'
Abrams brought up the subject by playing a clip of Carville on his show in February, where he declared that the Trump administration was 'collapsing' and would be falling apart within 30 days.
Abrams asked the strategist Thursday if he still stood by the prediction.
Carville replied, saying he was 'a pretty smart guy in February.'
Advertisement
He defended the months-old prediction, stating, 'You look at what's happening, and you look at the current stuff that's coming in – the public has revulsions against this.'
Democratic strategist James Carville claims he was right in predicting that the Trump administration would collapse within 30 days of President Donald Trump's second term.
Getty Images
He pointed to Democratic candidates leading in upcoming elections, like the governor's race in Virginia, saying that proves Trump's demise is underway.
'Do you know how much we're going to win by in Virginia?' he asked.
Advertisement
'Do you have any idea?'
'No, I don't,' Abrams responded.
'It's gonna be a lot,' Carville declared.
'It's not going to be close.'
Advertisement
A recent Virginia Commonwealth Poll from July has Virginia Republican gubernatorial candidate Winsome Earle-Sears at 37% and Democratic candidate Abigail Spanberger at 49%.
Still, Abrams wasn't convinced.
'But you said that you thought that this administration was in the midst of a collapse.'
'I think it is. Yes, I do,' Carville shot back.
Carville appeared on The Dan Abrams Podcast, as he acknowledged that the Trump administration 'is collapsing right in front of you.'
The Dan Abrams Podcast
'And you think you were right?' Abrams asked.
Carville didn't back down, stating, 'Yes. I think there are — they're somewhere about 37% or 40% approval. Their economic numbers are terrible, are just terrible. And I think we're running away with every election we've had. We're going to run away with Virginia. We're going to win New Jersey. We're starting to recruit every candidate that we want.'
Abrams continued pushing, mentioning polling showing that Trump isn't exactly in the midst of collapsing.
Advertisement
'I pulled up the recent approval polling from The New York Times and Real Clear Politics, and the aggregation puts Trump's approval between 44 and 45.8, with 53 and 51.4 disapproval, as of August the 6th. That's not a collapse. That's basically a little bit above where he was.'
Carville dismissed the numbers, saying the polling for upcoming elections 'in no way reflect that.'
'I don't want to get into saying this poll, that poll, this aggregate poll; but I look at like the UMass Amherst poll, I look at Gallup, I look at people like that. I see something completely different. I'm very, very, very confident that this administration is going to be widely rejected in the elections coming up; and they're gonna be particularly widely rejected in the elections in 2026,' he said.
Advertisement
One of Carville's more recent predictions didn't go so well.
In the weeks leading up to the 2024 presidential election, the political veteran was so convinced that Kamala Harris would win, he wrote a column for the New York Times titled, 'Three Reasons I'm Certain Kamala Harris Will Win.'
Carville's column slammed Trump as a 'repeat electoral loser' and claimed 'This time will be no different,' while heaping praise on the Democratic nominee.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

DOJ investigating N.Y. AG's office and Sen. Adam Schiff
DOJ investigating N.Y. AG's office and Sen. Adam Schiff

NBC News

time43 minutes ago

  • NBC News

DOJ investigating N.Y. AG's office and Sen. Adam Schiff

U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi has appointed a "special attorney" to probe mortgage fraud allegations against Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., and New York Attorney General Letitia James, two administration officials told NBC News. The Justice Department is also in the initial stages of an investigation of James over her successful civil fraud case against President Donald Trump, according to three people familiar with the matter. Bondi tapped Ed Martin, a conservative activist and former interim U.S. attorney for Washington, D.C., as special attorney to investigate Schiff and James, both prominent Democratic opponents of the president, the two administration officials said. A senior law enforcement official said a grand jury seated in the Eastern District of Virginia will investigate the James mortgage fraud allegations and a grand jury in Maryland will investigate the allegations against Schiff. Martin met Friday morning with Federal Housing Finance Agency Director Bill Pulte, who sent a criminal referral on the California senator to the Justice Department in May, the administration officials said. Pulte sent a referral on James in April, prompting the Justice Department to open an investigation on allegations that she made false statements on mortgage loan applications. Trump had previously called for both Democratic officials to be prosecuted because of the mortgage fraud allegations. Schiff and James have denied wrongdoing. Preet Bharara, who is representing Schiff, said in a statement Friday that the allegations against the senator 'are transparently false, stale, and long debunked.' Schiff previously blasted Trump's claims, in a video statement in July. "This is the kind of stuff you see tinpot dictators do. It is designed to intimidate his political opponents and somehow try to silence them," he said then. The U.S. attorney probe of James is focused on whether her office used its authority to violate Trump's legal rights through its civil lawsuits against the president and his businesses, according to three people familiar with the matter. That investigation is also looking at whether the National Rifle Association's rights were violated by her civil suits, the three sources said. It is being run out of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of New York, two of those sources said. In response to an NBC News inquiry, a spokesperson for the attorney general's office said: 'Any weaponization of the justice system should disturb every American. We stand strongly behind our successful litigation against the Trump Organization and the National Rifle Association, and we will continue to stand up for New Yorkers' rights.' A spokesperson for the U.S. Attorney's Office did not return a request for comment. James, a Democrat, successfully sued Trump and his company over what her office said were fraudulent misrepresentations of his wealth and financial statements. A judge awarded James' office over $300 million in the case, an amount that's since swelled to over $500 million with interest. Trump is appealing the judgment. James' office also sued the NRA and its leadership with mixed results. The attorney general had sought the dissolution of the NRA in what is commonly referred to as the corporate 'death penalty,' but a judge struck down those claims. In 2024, James' office did win its civil fraud case against the longtime head of the NRA, Wayne LaPierre, with a jury convicting him of diverting millions of dollars from the gun group for his own personal lifestyle. The gun group said it was "gratified" to find out about the investigation. "She uses her powers as an elected official to try, in her words, to 'dissolve the organization in its entirety', thus silencing the voice of millions of our members,' NRA Executive Vice President and CEO Doug Hamlin said in a statement. "That she now expresses concerns over 'weaponization' is the height of hypocrisy--an utter lack of self-awareness at the very least.' It is not immediately clear how far along the DOJ investigation into James' office is and what evidence, if any, the Justice Department has gathered in the probe. An attorney for James, Abbe Lowell, said the probe of James' fraud case against Trump and his businesses 'has to be the most blatant and desperate example of this administration carrying out the president's political retribution campaign." "Weaponizing the Department of Justice to try to punish an elected official for doing her job is an attack on the rule of law and a dangerous escalation by this administration," he added. The FBI and Justice Department began its probe of the mortgage fraud allegations against James in the spring. It's unclear why Martin is now in charge of the review. Martin served as Trump's interim U.S. attorney for Washington, D.C., earlier this year, but his nomination was withdrawn after Republican senators expressed concerns over his association with Jan. 6 rioters. Trump then announced in May that Martin was moving to the Justice Department to serve as director of a 'weaponization working group." Martin did not comment on the Friday appointment. In his statement defending Schiff, Bharara criticized Martin, calling him 'the most brazenly partisan and politically compromised person possible for the task.' 'Any supposed investigation led by him would be the very definition of weaponization of the justice process,' said Bharara, who served as U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York before being fired by Trump during his first term in office. Lowell pushed back on the allegations against James in an April letter to Bondi, acknowledging there were some mistaken forms while noting contemporaneous letters and forms showing that James submitted the correct information. The letter called the "threadbare allegations" the "next salvo in President Trump's revenge tour against Attorney General James." In addition to her fraud case against Trump and his companies, James and her office have launched a number of successful legal challenges to his administration's agenda, dating back to his first term in office. Trump has maintained that James is biased against him. In 2021, he sued to stop her from proceeding with her fraud investigation, saying, 'Her mission is guided solely by political animus and a desire to harass, intimidate, and retaliate against a private citizen who she views as a political opponent." The lawsuit also alleged that Trump was the victim of "viewpoint discrimination." Trump later dropped the suit, but has continued to criticize James, including in an April Truth Social post that called her a "wacky" and "totally corrupt politician" who should immediately resign.

Rep. Jasmine Crockett laughs off troubling accusations she's a no-show ‘diva' boss, quotes Beyoncé in bizarre response
Rep. Jasmine Crockett laughs off troubling accusations she's a no-show ‘diva' boss, quotes Beyoncé in bizarre response

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

Rep. Jasmine Crockett laughs off troubling accusations she's a no-show ‘diva' boss, quotes Beyoncé in bizarre response

Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas) invoked Beyonce and laughed off troubling accusations about her workplace behavior on Thursday when asked about The Post's exclusive report on her 'diva' antics on Capitol Hill. Crockett's response to allegations that she's a boss from hell came after she repeatedly refused requests for comment from The Post. Former congressional aides told The Post that Crockett terrorizes her staff and rarely shows up at the office for work. Getty Images The congresswoman erupted in laughter when asked about the report during an interview on 'The Takeout with Major Garrett' on CBS News. 'Oh my goodness, listen, I know that I have arrived, honey,' Crockett said, after composing herself. 'That is the way that I see this.' 'Because as Beyoncé says, if they're not talking about you, then obviously you must not be doing anything,' she added. Multiple former staffers and congressional aides that have worked with Crockett described the Dallas-area rep as 'rude,' rarely present in the office and a terror to work with when she does show up. 'She is focused almost exclusively on being an influencer, not a member of Congress,' one source said, describing Crockett as 'all diva, no wow.' 'She is laying around her apartment, won't come into the office, and is really just indifferent to staff and will scream at them,' a former aide said, claiming that the foul-mouthed congresswoman 'freaks out over the most random things.' Another source indicated that Crockett demands staffers rent high-end vehicles– 'has to be an Escalade' – to chauffeur her to and from the Capitol every week. 'She expects her staff to drive her around while she's in the back seat,' the source added, calling it a 'power play' akin to 'treating the staffer like an Uber driver.' Crockett slammed allegations made by former congressional aides as 'slander.' CBS News/YouTube In her interview with CBS News, Crockett did not address the specific allegations from congressional staffers but called the report 'more slander, more nonsense, more lies.' 'And honestly, I don't think that the New York Post would probably be the first ones to be able to figure out if I was a boss from hell,' she said dismissively, touting her 'five and a half years' of public service. The congresswoman has only served about four and half years in public office. 'I have happily served on the state level for – I did two years there, and now I am at year two and a half on the federal level,' she said before flubbing the 4th-grade math problem. 'All of a sudden I'm this terrible person and terrible boss? Yeah, I don't think so,' Crockett continued. The congresswoman went on to bemoan 'all of the scrutiny that comes with being not only a woman, but being young and being a black woman.' 'Your hate is my motivation,' she added. 'So keep hating. All it does is motivate me to continue to do what I do.'

Trump seeks $1-billion fine against UCLA. Newsom says ‘we'll sue,' calling it extortion
Trump seeks $1-billion fine against UCLA. Newsom says ‘we'll sue,' calling it extortion

Los Angeles Times

time2 hours ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Trump seeks $1-billion fine against UCLA. Newsom says ‘we'll sue,' calling it extortion

Hours after the Trump administration demanded that the University of California pay a $1-billion fine to settle federal accusations of antisemitism in exchange for restoring frozen grant funding to UCLA, Gov. Gavin Newsom called the proposal 'extortion' and said the state will go to court to protect the nation's premier university system.'We'll sue,' Newsom said during a news conference with Texas legislators over California's effort to counter a contentious Republican redistricting plan in that state. President Trump is 'trying to silence academic freedom' by 'attacking one of the most important public institutions in the United States of America,' Newsom said, adding that he would 'stand tall and push back against that, and I believe every member of California Legislature feels the same way.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store