Why AAP decided to dump INDIA bloc
The loss has prompted the party's leadership, particularly national convenor Arvind Kejriwal, to rethink their political approach.With Punjab remaining AAP's lone ruling state, the party now seems focused on consolidating its power there for the time being.Breaking away from the INDIA bloc allows AAP to pursue an independent agenda, distancing itself from the coalition's diverse and sometimes conflicting political interests. This move may encourage the party to forge issue-based alliances selectively, tailoring its strategy to regional political realities rather than adhering to a national opposition framework. However, the exit also diminishes the Opposition's collective bargaining power, possibly making it easier for the BJP to maintain dominance in key states and at the Centre.'Ekla Cholo Re' is the new revival strategy for AAPAAP was born out of the 2011 Anna Andolan, which was an anti-corruption movement against the then Congress government. It was once symbolised as a fresh and independent political alternative to the BJP and Congress. Under Arvind Kejriwal's leadership, AAP promised to disrupt the established political order by offering a new kind of governance with a focus on transparency, accountability, and grassroots empowerment. However, the party's recent political moves have stirred backlash and uncertainty about its future.During the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, AAP's decision to join the INDIA alliance led by Congress blurred its once-clear, equidistant position from both the BJP and Congress. This strategic compromise proved detrimental to the party's electoral fortunes. The 2024 general elections resulted in setbacks for AAP, but the real blow came in the 2025 Delhi Assembly elections, AAP's strongest bastion.From securing more than 90 per cent of the seats in both 2015 and 2020, the party managed to win only 22 out of 70 seats this time. More painfully, key leaders like Arvind Kejriwal and Manish Sisodia lost their own seats, a huge symbolic and morale hit to the party.Facing this crisis, AAP is now adopting the 'Ekla Cholo Re' strategy, inspired by Rabindranath Tagore's famous song that translates to 'walk alone if needed". By walking alone once again, AAP aims to regain voters' trust, reinforce its core values, and revive the energy that once made it a powerful force in Indian politics.advertisementPunjab is the key, and Congress is the main challenge in the stateThe Punjab Assembly elections scheduled for early 2027 will be significant for the Aam Aadmi Party, currently holding power under the leadership of Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann. As the party governing the state, AAP faces the challenge of managing anti-incumbency sentiments.The Congress party, as the main opposition, is gearing up to capitalise on this mood and is already vocal in its critique of the Mann government's policies and performance.Punjab's political landscape is poised for a multi-cornered contest, with other regional and national players also expected to participate, but the primary tussle remains between AAP and Congress. For AAP, the stakes are particularly high. Unlike Delhi, Punjab represents a crucial battleground that will determine the future trajectory of the party on the national stage.A loss in Punjab could leave AAP without any state-level governance, a scenario that would be detrimental to its broader ambitions of expanding influence across India. This reality also explains AAP's political strategy of distancing itself from Congress on the national front, despite calls for Opposition unity with the INDIA bloc.advertisementMaintaining a clear identity independent of Congress is essential for AAP to project itself as a viable alternative to established parties. Punjab, thus, is not just a state election but a litmus test for AAP's ability to sustain and grow its political footprint.Victory in two Assembly bypolls in Punjab and Gujarat showed the wayThe Aam Aadmi Party delivered a message by winning two crucial Assembly by-elections in Punjab and Gujarat last month, following its heavy defeat in the Delhi Assembly elections. In Punjab, AAP won the Ludhiana West seat defeating its main rival, the Congress party, while in Gujarat, it scored a remarkable win in the Visavadar constituency by defeating the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), which has been in power in the state for over two decades.These victories were particularly important as they reflected AAP's strategy of contesting elections independently, outside the INDIA bloc. The party believes that fighting solo has helped consolidate its base and project itself as a credible alternative to both Congress and the BJP in these key states.advertisementBoth Punjab and Gujarat are slated to go for Assembly elections in 2027, and AAP hopes to capitalise on these by-election successes to convert Congress's core vote bank in these regions.In the 2022 Gujarat Assembly elections, AAP managed to win five seats and significantly weakened Congress's hold, signaling the party's growing influence in the state.The party's leadership feels that an aggressive campaign against Congress is necessary to expand its footprint in Punjab and Gujarat. However, this approach comes with a strategic dilemma: remaining part of the INDIA bloc, dominated by Congress, would dilute AAP's distinct identity and limit its appeal. Therefore, AAP's posturing against Congress is ultimately a survival strategy aimed at crafting an independent political space. - EndsMust Watch
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
8 minutes ago
- Mint
'I will not speak in English': BJP's Nishikant Dubey on Tamil Nadu MPs request in LS amid glitch in translating system
BJP MP Nishikant Dubey, on Tuesday, refused to speak in English, rejecting Tamil Nadu MPs request in Lok Sabha amid a glitch in translating system. He further claimed that the MPs 'only had a problem with Hindi.' The BJP MP made the comments in the Lok Sabha after after Tamil Nadu MPs requested Nishikant Dubey to speak in English following a a technical glitch in the translator (system) in the Lok Sabha. Responding to them, Dubey said "...It would have been better if you had asked me to speak in Tamil or Bengali. English is a foreign language, and your insistence on it reflects your mindset. Someone spoke in Bengali for half an hour, yet Tamil Nadu MPs didn't object. You only have a problem with Hindi. Congress and its allies don't like North Indians or Hindi. If you keep promoting English, we'll end up becoming England. 'Hum phir se gulaam ho jayenge' (We will become slaves again)..." During the Monsoon Session of the Parliament on Tuesday, several leaders launched scathing attacks on the government about India's Operation Sindoor in the aftermath of the brutal Pahalgam terror attack in April that killed 26 people. Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav said the launch of Operation Sindoor after the Pahalgam attack was a "symbol of the government's intelligence failure". Uttar Pradesh's former chief minister also said that India's foreign policy has 'completely collapsed,' while labelling China as a 'monster' that will "gobble up our (India's) land and market". "Who will take responsibility for the intelligence lapse in the Pahalgam attack?' Akhilesh Yadav said about the tragedy. Rahul Gandhi also took a swipe at the government, daring PM Modi to call 'Trump a liar,' referring to the POTUS's repeated claims of brokering a ceasefire between India and Pakistan. While India has consistently denied these assertions, the US President continues to highlight his alleged role in de-escalating tensions between the two nations following the Pahalgam terror attack. Following Rahul Gandhi's claims, PM Modi while addressing the Lok Sabha, refuted claims made by US President Donald Trump regarding his role in halting India's military action against Pakistan. He said said no world leader asked India to stop its military action against Pakistan during 'Operation Sindoor' after four days of conflict in May in the aftermath of the Pahalgam terror attack.
Scroll.in
10 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
Bihar voter roll revision is assault on foundations of democracy, say 93 ex-bureaucrats
A group of 93 retired civil servants and diplomats, on Tuesday, called the ongoing special intensive revision of electoral rolls in Bihar an 'assault on the very foundations of our democracy', referring to the right to vote. 'The assault is an insidious one where the purported attempt to clean up and sanitise the electoral rolls is likely to end up disenfranchising a very large segment of the voting population, particularly the poor and the marginalised,' the Constitutional Conduct Group said. The group of former bureaucrats highlighted that a vast majority of the economically weaker sections of the population have held their right to vote as the 'most fundamental stake in Indian democracy' because a liberal approach was followed to prepare electoral rolls, with the understanding that several Indians lack documentation to prove their citizenship. 'This process has now been reversed to ensure that those with poor access to documents will be deprived of their rights as voters,' the group contended. The former bureaucrats argued that the exercise by the Election Commission allows it to effectively become a deciding authority on citizenship rights' without possessing the constitutional mandate to do so. The exercise, under the guise of cleaning up voter lists, attempts to 'introduce the contested idea of the NRC [National Register of Citizens] through the backdoor', the group further alleged. The group also raised alarm at the 'breakneck speed' at which the process of revising the electoral roll has been implemented. It highlighted that booth-level officers have been tasked with completing the process with 'grossly inadequate infrastructure' and under 'impossible timelines'. The group also cited journalist Ajit Anjum's reportage as evidence that there has been a massive scale of 'fraud and forgery' during the entire process. In a video posted on his YouTube channel on July 12, Anjum had claimed that he had found irregularities in the revision of the electoral rolls in the state, with several enumeration forms at the booth not having photos of the applicants and others that had been partially filled or did not have signatures. Anjum was, however, booked by the police for allegedly interfering in the Bihar voter roll revision process and for allegedly provoking communal discord. Several press bodies questioned the filing of a case against him, saying that the authorities should not 'criminalise journalism'. The signatories to the statement by the Constitutional Conduct Group include Punjab's former director general of police Julio Ribeiro, Delhi's former Lieutenant Governor Najeeb Jung and former Indian Administrative Service officer Harsh Mander. The revision of the electoral rolls in Bihar was announced by the Election Commission on June 24. As part of the exercise, persons whose names were not on the 2003 voter list will need to submit proof of eligibility to vote. This means that 2.9 crore out of the state's 7.8 crore voters – or about 37% of the electors – will have to submit documentary evidence. Voters born before July 1, 1987, must show proof of their date and place of birth, while those born between July 1, 1987, and December 2, 2004, must also submit documents establishing the date and place of birth of one of their parents. Those born after December 2, 2004, will need proof of date of birth for themselves and both parents. A draft roll will be published on August 1 and the final roll will be out on September 30. On July 2, eleven INDIA bloc parties told the Election Commission that the special intensive revision of Bihar's electoral rolls risked disenfranchising more than 2.5 crore voters, as they may not be able to produce the necessary documents. Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar on July 6 defended the exercise, claiming that the exercise had to be carried out as no one was satisfied with the current voter rolls.
Mint
10 minutes ago
- Mint
'India destroyed 1,000 Pakistani missiles mid-air, Congress waited for slip up': PM Modi
Prime Minister Narendra Modi took multiple swipes at the Opposition, accusing them of being obsessed with finding even a single instance of his failure during Operation Sindoor. Addressing the Lok Sabha, the prime minister said while the whole country was proud when India destroyed all Pakistani missiles in the sky, Congress was waiting to find one instance to attack him. 'Pakistan launched 1,000 missiles and drones towards India, but they were destroyed mid-air by our armed forces. If they had fallen on any part, it would have led to huge destruction, but india destroyed them in the sky. Whole India was proud of it, but Congress was waiting,' PM Modi said. 'Modi kahin toh fasega [Modi will slip up somewhere]' the prime minister said. Attacking Congress more, the prime minister said the party 'operates through the remote control' of Pakistan. 'The country is surprised that Congress has given a clean chit to Pakistan. They are saying that the terrorists of Pahalgam were from Pakistan. Give us proof of this. Pakistan is also demanding the same thing that Congress is making,' he said. 'It has been an old habit with Congress to have a negative approach to the armed forces; Congress yet to embrace Kargil win,' PM Modi said. Also Read | 'Say Donald Trump is a liar': Rahul Gandhi dares PM Narendra Modi during Operation Sindoor debate PM Narendra Modi said, "On one hand, India is moving ahead at a fast pace towards self-reliance, but Congress is becoming dependent on Pakistan for issues. Unfortunately, Congress is importing issues from Pakistan..." "Just 3-4 days after the 22nd April terrorist attack, they [Congress] started jumping up and down. They started saying, "kahan gayi 56 inch ki chhati?" "Kahan kho gaya Modi?" "Modi has failed"...They were shaping their politics even in the murder of innocent people in Pahalgam," he said. PM Modi said the Congress needs excuses to keep attacking the government. "Some people are crying here too. They tried to play a game during surgical strike, it didn't work. During airstrike, they tried playing another game. That didn't work either. When #OperationSindoor took place, they adopted a new tactic - "Why did you stop?"...Waah re bayan bahaduron! You need one or the other excuse to oppose."
