Roy Keane disagrees with Rio Ferdinand as Liverpool set for gesture from Chelsea and Arsenal
Following their rampant 5-1 win over Tottenham Hotspur last time out at Anfield, Liverpool wrapped up the Premier League title with four games to spare. Their first game since winning the title will see the Reds face off against Chelsea at Stamford Bridge, with Enzo Maresca's side set to give Liverpool a guard of honor prior to kick-off.
It is also presumed Arsenal, the team Liverpool play the following weekend at Anfield, will give the Reds a guard of honor in their first home game since winning the title, although it is not clear if this is a certainty.
READ MORE: Luis Suarez shows Liverpool love remains with response to Premier League title win
READ MORE: Roberto Firmino reaches out to Mohamed Salah with classy Liverpool title message
However, former Liverpool striker Peter Crouch, and ex-Man United defender Rio Ferdinand admitted they were not fans of the tradition.
"I don't like it," Peter Crouch said on TNT Sports during their coverage of Aston Villa and Fulham's Saturday clash.
The ex-Liverpool striker added: "I don't know... Maybe it shows respect, but I think it's a bit embarrassing for the team that comes out and it's highly embarrassing for the team that is clapping them on the field. It's not for me."
Ferdinand added: "I didn't like it.
"I've been fortunate enough to receive a guard of honor and be on the receiving end of it, and both are quite awkward. Crouchy is exactly right."
"In the game to get respect you have to show respect" Roy Keane discusses the guard of honour. pic.twitter.com/Zavc9WHQ46
— Sky Sports Premier League (@SkySportsPL) May 4, 2025
However, Keane, speaking on Sky Sports, disagreed with both Crouch and his former teammate. "Do you know what, I think in the game, to get respect, you have to show respect," said Keane, whilst the broadcaster showed footage of Man United giving Chelsea a guard of honor back in 2005.
"People might not like it, obviously it's nice when you get it, but you have to give it. It's part of the game. It'll be different if it were real rivals, just say maybe Man City against United or Everton versus Liverpool but I think you have to do it. It's part of the game.
"It's the respect and yeah, a nice touch. Chelsea obviously deserved it [in 2005]. And as I said, to get respect, you have to show it. It works both ways."
On Friday, Maresca confirmed Chelsea would honor the Reds. "It's tradition," the Italian said during his pre-match press conference on Friday. "We have to do that, and we are going to do that. They won the Premier League, so they deserve it."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Alexander Isak, Newcastle and Liverpool: What happens next?
The Alexander Isak saga took another twist on Tuesday, with the Newcastle United striker issuing an incendiary statement outlining his grievances at being denied a transfer by the club. Newcastle then responded in kind, insisting they had never promised he could leave and that they could not foresee circumstances in which he could depart this summer. So, with Newcastle determined not to sell and Liverpool still keen to buy, what happens now? The abridged version — a more exhaustive explanation can be found here — is that Isak feels Newcastle know he has long wished to leave and that he could do so this summer, something Newcastle have always refuted. The striker's camp claims that in the spring of 2024, it had been intimated by Amanda Staveley, Newcastle's former co-owner, that talks over an improved contract would take place the following summer. But financial pressures and the arrival of Paul Mitchell as sporting director meant giving increased terms to a high earner who had four years remaining on his deal was not a priority. Advertisement While those inside Newcastle maintain that Isak, while unsettled, had suggested he was receptive to contract talks this summer, those close to the striker insist that he repeatedly made clear his intention to leave after the 2024-25 campaign. Isak did not feature for Newcastle during pre-season and has chosen not to train with the senior group, missing the opening-day draw at Aston Villa. Liverpool indicated a willingness to pay around £120million ($162m) for Isak last month, before bidding £110m three weeks ago, which was instantly dismissed. They are yet to return with another offer, but they remain interested, and Isak is desperate to move to Merseyside. He decided to take his frustrations public for the first time on Tuesday. Having been named in the PFA Premier League Team of the Season for 2024-25 despite not attending (Newcastle and Liverpool officials were at the dinner in Manchester), Isak wrote on Instagram that Newcastle had broken 'promises' to him and that their 'relationship can't continue'. A blindsided Newcastle responded with an equally extraordinary statement three and a half hours later, saying 'no commitment has ever been made by a club official' that Isak could leave this summer. They conceded for the first time that 'players have their own wishes', but that they must protect the 'best interests of Newcastle United'. They added that 'conditions of a sale this summer have not transpired' and 'we do not foresee those conditions being met', before saying that a rapprochement with 'the Newcastle family' was still possible. Newcastle have been steadfast that Isak is not for sale and their stance has only been hardened by his outburst on Tuesday. Senior club figures were angered and insisted that they will not be 'bullied' into selling, particularly given the message it may send to other star players, such as Anthony Gordon, Sandro Tonali and Tino Livramento. Advertisement There is also the issue that PIF will not want to lose face. Those with connections to PIF believe this will only strengthen their resolve to keep Isak, even if he is unhappy. Eddie Howe has always trodden a delicate line. He has tried to keep Isak away from the squad so that he is not a distraction, but has not overtly criticised him, insisting he will be able to rejoin the squad once the window closes. Seemingly, that remains Howe's viewpoint, even if there is an acceptance that Isak's actions cannot go unpunished. Newcastle are yet to confirm whether Isak has been disciplined, but having missed the Villa match, the expectation was that he would be. As outlined in the Premier League's handbook, the club can fine Isak up to two weeks of his basic wage (around £150,000 a week) for a first disciplinary offence and 'up to four weeks for subsequent offences' inside a 12-month period. Anything beyond that would need to be approved by the Professional Footballers' Association (PFA), who have not yet been asked to intervene by either party. The PFA did not comment when approached by The Athletic. Newcastle have always intended to keep Isak, but that does not mean they have not considered the possibility of him departing. Once Isak absented himself from first team duties, it would have been negligent not to have at least looked into alternative options, and the club have scouted multiple top-level centre-forwards, just as they do for every position. Newcastle's stance is that the board may have sanctioned Isak's departure had they signed two strikers, one of whom they deemed to be of Champions League standard, and received an offer close to their valuation of around £150m. Advertisement Following Callum Wilson's departure, Newcastle needed a centre-forward regardless of the Isak situation. Joao Pedro was their top target, but he opted to join Chelsea, while an ambitious move for Hugo Ekitike was thwarted by Liverpool. Ironically, Ekitike's transfer to Merseyside made a departure for Isak less likely because, although he was targeted to play alongside the Sweden international, he was also seen as a potential long-term replacement. Once Ekitike joined Liverpool, Isak became more militant, which did not appear coincidental. Newcastle then aggressively pursued a deal for Benjamin Sesko, despite their feeling all along that the Slovenian preferred Manchester United. Sesko is the only striker Newcastle have bid for who was genuinely considered a direct Isak replacement. Subsequently, Porto's Samu Aghehowa, Chelsea's Nicolas Jackson and Paris Saint-Germain's Goncalo Ramos have been discussed internally, but none look likely to be pursued as things stand. Yoane Wissa, meanwhile, was always deemed to be a Wilson successor, but that deal has not progressed decisively over the past three weeks, with Newcastle having had a bid worth up to £40m rejected today. In the interim, Wolverhampton Wanderers' Jorgen Strand Larsen has emerged as a potential alternative. Wissa or Strand Larsen signing would not meet the 'conditions' Newcastle mention. They would still require an elite striker, or one with elite potential, to join, plus a massively increased offer from Liverpool. The club do not feel both will happen. The response has not been homogeneous, although Dan Burn and Gordon pinpointing the 'team spirit' and 'togetherness' during post-match interviews after the Villa draw seemed to be part of a coordinated message. Newcastle fans were quick to pounce on Bruno Guimaraes, the captain, posting a captionless photo of himself in a black-and-white club shirt on social media a few minutes after Isak's statement dropped, although his intentions are unclear. Advertisement Some players are said to feel disappointed by Isak's actions, but others are more sympathetic, echoing similar sentiments to Howe, who, earlier in the summer, said he understood that players' careers are short and they have their own ambitions. Clubs can be ruthless when it comes to discarding players and there is a recognition of that, although others in the squad have flirted with leaving and have not behaved in this manner. Isak — who is especially close to Sven Botman and Joe Willock — did thank his colleagues and 'everyone at Newcastle' in his statement. He is regularly described as 'complex' by those who know him, but he has a dry sense of humour and led the celebrations following Newcastle's Carabao Cup victory. Isak is on Tyneside and, despite reports to the contrary, has not moved out of the area. The long-term lease on his house in Northumberland has not been renewed, but this is due to multiple break-ins at that property, rather than being directly connected to his desire to leave Newcastle. Last month, Isak temporarily trained at Zubieta, the training ground of his former club, Real Sociedad, although Howe only discovered this through the media. Isak has now been in north-east England for almost three weeks, attending individual sessions at Newcastle's Benton facility. But he was not invited to a squad-and-family BBQ earlier this month and his training programmes are orchestrated so they do not overlap with the first-team squad. Some supposition is required here, given Isak did not specify and Newcastle have subsequently denied that any 'commitment has ever been made by a club official' that he can leave this summer. However, it is believed Isak is referring to the suggestion in 2024 that talks over a new-and-improved deal may have been forthcoming. The perception of those close to Isak is that an assurance was made, only for that to be reneged upon once the hierarchy at the club changed and a vow was made internally to ensure the club never again got into a mess with profit and sustainability rules. Advertisement Some viewed Isak's comments on Tuesday as an attack on Howe, given he is the only person to have spoken on the record this summer, and Isak referred to his own silence with the 'allowing people to push their own version of events' comment. Equally, it may be a reference to media coverage in general, which has been sourced by other figures with connections to Newcastle. 'He can't just walk away, he's under contract,' says Jibreel Tramboo, sports law barrister at 33 Bedford Row. 'If he says he won't play, then he's technically in breach of contract, and that's enforceable if Newcastle wanted to. 'The reality is that Newcastle hold the cards. They can block him from leaving. There are no grounds for termination of contract.' There is a framework in which players are able to terminate their own contracts, but that would require the club to not fulfil its contractual obligations. That scenario typically arises when clubs fail to pay players on time. Isak is yet to submit an official transfer request, although there is little to suggest it would have much effect, given he has already made clear his intentions of not playing for Newcastle again. There would, though, be potentially significant financial ramifications for Isak should he take that step. 'If a player hands in a transfer request, then it can affect some of their loyalty bonuses in the contract and some of those can become void,' adds Tramboo. 'I don't think handing in a transfer request does much for a player in terms of negotiation. It has no real legal power. In practice, it's a political tool, which is why you rarely see them anymore.' Similarly, the idea that Newcastle have not fulfilled a gentleman's agreement is legally flimsy. 'He's arguing he's been given assurances by the club that he can move on, but that's not going to trump the provisions of the contract,' says Jamie Singer, partner at Onside Law. 'But because his registration is so valuable, he does have that player power. He will know his value can come down if he's an unhappy player, not playing to the best of his ability.' Advertisement Isak's camp is insistent that he will still refuse to play. With the Champions League beginning next month and a World Cup next summer, that seems remarkable, but even if he does eventually relent, Newcastle's pathway to reconciliation may be a slow one. There is an international break immediately after the transfer window closes, so theoretically mediation could occur then, though Isak may be called up by Sweden to face Slovenia and Kosovo. The grey area is whether Newcastle consider Isak to be in breach of his contract. The Premier League's standard contract stipulates that Isak must attend matches and training sessions when instructed to by a club official and 'play to the best of his skill and ability at all times'. But Isak was seemingly given permission not to join the club's pre-season tour and has since reported to training, albeit in a pattern that avoids him being part of the first-team's schedule, so proving he is in breach may not be straightforward. Isak's statement on social media is another move that risks him breaching his contract. 'There are provisions about acting in the best interests of the club and there are non-disparagement provisions in the contracts as well,' explains Singer, partner at Onside Law. 'Isak is getting closer to being in breach, but the question then becomes what are the consequences of that? It's pretty limited.' A legal action against Isak is an option for Newcastle, but there is no precedent for this, and for good reason. The forward remains the club's greatest asset and reconciliation would appear the only means of protecting that if Isak fails to get his move. This, for now, is a domestic dispute between player and club. FIFA can become involved in such cases if an International Transfer Certificate (ITC) is being disputed, but attempting to join Liverpool would ultimately need a challenge to the Premier League's rules. Advertisement There could be long-term implications for this kind of stand-off in light of the recent Lassana Diarra legal case, but a landmark ruling (explained at length here) that brought changes to Article 17 of FIFA's regulations does nothing to alter Isak's position this summer. 'The problem for Isak is that he can't tear up his own contract, so you can't force Newcastle to pass on your registration,' says Singer. 'Premier League rules are very strong and, at the moment, there's no other club involved. It's just the player who is employed under a Premier League contract at a Premier League club, who both submit to the authority of the Premier League and its rules.' Newcastle's swift rejection of Liverpool's £110m offer meant Liverpool felt that submitting an improved second bid would be futile. However, the Premier League champions haven't pursued an alternative target and remain keen to secure Isak's services if Newcastle's stance changes. Liverpool have the funds to break the British transfer record for Isak. They have embarked on the biggest spending spree in their history this summer, with around £320m, including add-ons, committed to new signings, but have also generated up to £220m from sales. Arne Slot has made it clear that he feels Liverpool need to sign another attacker in this window, but will be only too aware that Isak agitating for a move won't necessarily improve their chances of getting him. Luis Suarez and Philippe Coutinho behaved similarly when they were pursued by Arsenal and Barcelona respectively. However, on both occasions, Liverpool refused to sanction a sale in those summer windows. Isak's statement only inflames tensions further from a Newcastle perspective. Advertisement Newcastle supporters have been critical of what many perceive to be Liverpool's covert backing of Isak's stance. The feeling is that this is a deliberate attempt to force through a transfer at a fee substantially lower than Newcastle's valuation, a view shared by some figures at the club. From Liverpool's perspective, Isak's statement and talk about 'broken promises' is an issue between the player and Newcastle. Earlier in the summer, Liverpool were baffled by reports that they had hijacked Newcastle's pursuit of Ekitike. Club officials had been in contact with the player's camp since January and Slot held talks with the player in May. They believed Newcastle were simply late to the party. The two clubs were also in competition for defender Giovanni Leoni, who arrived at Anfield from Parma last week. Fenway Sports Group CEO of football Michael Edwards, Liverpool sporting director Richard Hughes, and Newcastle manager Eddie Howe have been friends since their time together at Portsmouth more than two decades ago, but business is business. On the field, meanwhile, a 'mini' rivalry was already emerging, at least from the Newcastle side, following March's Carabao Cup final victory over Liverpool. Howe has also yet to beat Liverpool in the Premier League and is desperate to change that. Wor Flags, the Newcastle supporters' group that orchestrates displays at St James' Park, is planning a pre-match reveal. Security-wise, Newcastle insist they always put on adequate provisions and there is no suggestion of special measures being laid on. Whether Edwards and Hughes will attend as part of the visiting delegation is unclear. Edwards and FSG technical director Julian Ward were both present at the corresponding fixture last season, as they tied it in with a visit to see Ben Doak, then on loan at Middlesbrough. The Liverpool executives who attend away matches vary between the likes of CEO Billy Hogan, club ambassadors Sir Kenny Dalglish and Ian Rush (both former Newcastle employees), club secretary Danny Stanway, and chief legal and external affairs officer Jonathan Bamber. Extremely unlikely. Harry Kane at Tottenham and Wayne Rooney at Manchester United both pushed to leave their clubs and ended up fully reintegrated, but in the social-media-dominated landscape of 2025, it is difficult to envisage the resentment and hurt many Newcastle fans feel dissipating entirely. Advertisement That does not mean it is unthinkable that Isak will play for Newcastle again. He is a world-class centre-forward and Newcastle desperately need goals. If he plays, shows commitment and scores, then the strength of feeling may begin to wane, if never entirely dissipate. Isak, too, may get frustrated at not playing, but as an olive branch to fans, a public apology would feel a minimum requirement. Either way, Isak's reputation among Newcastle fans has been irretrievably damaged. Additional reporting: James Pearce Spot the pattern. Connect the terms Find the hidden link between sports terms Play today's puzzle
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Villarreal set to sign Chelsea's Renato Veiga in permanent transfer
Villarreal are set to complete the signing of Chelsea's Renato Veiga on a permanent transfer. Chelsea are confident that a deal, when finalised, will be processed for a total fee of around €30million (£26m) which includes achievable add-ons and a significant sell-on clause for the Premier League side. Advertisement Chelsea signed the versatile defender, who primarily plays at centre-back, from Basel for €14m last summer on a contract until June 2031, with the option of a further 12 months. After scoring two goals across 18 Chelsea appearances, the Portugal international spent the second half of last season on loan at Juventus, where he made 15 appearances and helped the club qualify for the Champions League after the club paid a €5m loan fee. Veiga became a Portugal international following his move to west London, and has since played five times for Roberto Martinez's side. The Athletic reported on July 22 that Atletico Madrid and Bayern Munich were among the clubs who had registered their interest in the 21-year-old. Veiga was primarily a squad player in the first half of the season for Chelsea, making only one Premier League start and playing 90 minutes in all six of their Conference League league-phase matches. Sources close to Veiga, who spoke anonymously to protect relationships, told The Athletic in January that he wanted to establish himself in the Portugal team after breaking into Martinez's senior side in the opening months of 2024-25. He then joined Serie A side Juventus on loan, where he made 12 league starts in the second half of the campaign as they qualified for the Champions League with a fourth-place finish. Veiga was then not included in Chelsea's traveling squad for the Club World Cup after his spell in Italy ended, instead returning to their Cobham training base outside London alongside other returning loanees such as Ben Chilwell and Joao Felix, the latter of whom has joined Al Ittihad in a permanent move. Veiga was used primarily as an inverting left-back at Chelsea, occasionally playing as a defensive midfielder or centre-back. But all his Juventus appearances came in the heart of defence, where he has featured for Portugal. Spot the pattern. Connect the terms Find the hidden link between sports terms Play today's puzzle
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
From Chelsea Reject to Premier League Legend: Salah's Record Breaking PFA Hat Trick
Liverpool star becomes the most decorated player in award's history with three wins From Chelsea Reject to Premier League Legend: Salah's Record Breaking PFA Hat Trick The Egyptian forward Mohamed Salah added another historic milestone on Tuesday after being crowned PFA Player of the Year for the 2024 /25 season. Record Breaking Achievement Salah's latest triumph makes him the most decorated player in the history of the award surpassing legends like Cristiano Ronaldo, Thierry Henry and Alan Shearer. The Liverpool icon's now won the prize 3 time since joining the club in 2017. Consistency Since Day One The Egyptian first claimed the award in 2017 /18, his debut season with Liverpool when he scored 32 league goal. He won it again in 2021 /22 finishing as Premier League joint top scorer alongside Son Heung min despite Liverpool falling short in both the league & Champions league. Surpassing Football Greats Before Salah's third win, he was level with several icons who each collected the trophy twice including Mark Hughes, Alan Shearer, Thierry Henry, Cristiano Ronaldo, Gareth Bale and Kevin De Bruyne. With his latest success, Salah stands alone at the top. From Chelsea Struggles to Liverpool Glory Salah's journey makes his achievement even more remarkable. After difficult spell at Chelsea in 2014 he revived his career in Italy with Fiorentina & Roma. His move to Liverpool marked the start of legendary chapter that continues to inspire.
