Dispute with the Hohenzollerns ends after almost 100 years – DW – 06/17/2025
An almost century-long dispute in Germany is coming to an end.
The House of Hohenzollern — a German noble family to which the last German Emperor, Wilhelm II, also belonged — had long laid claim to various objects in German museums. They had also demanded millions in compensation for expropriated palaces and inventory.
The whole thing went to court — until Georg Friedrich Prince of Prussia, the great-great-grandson of the last German emperor, finally changed the aristocratic house's strategy in 2023. He withdrew the compensation claims and thus cleared the way for out-of-court negotiations. The talks began in late 2024, resulting in the newly-reached agreement.
Georg Friedrich Prince of Prussia, great-great-grandson of the last German emperor Image: picture-alliance/dpa/R. Hirschberger
Works of art to remain in museums
The new German Minister of State for Culture Wolfram Weimer (CDU) and Georg Friedrich Prince of Prussia had announced the breakthrough back in May 2025.
The federal government and the states of Berlin and Brandenburg had reached an agreement with the former ruling house of Hohenzollern to set up the non-profit "Hohenzollern Art Foundation" to manage the previously reclaimed art and cultural objects.
Now that the supervisory bodies of the Prussian Cultural Heritage Foundation and the German Historical Museum have also given their approval, the agreement has been signed and sealed.
According to Weimer, the public will be the biggest winner. The collections that include around 3,000 objects will now feature in the German Historical Museum, along with museums run by the Prussian Palaces and Gardens Foundation Berlin-Brandenburg, and the Prussian Cultural Heritage Foundation.
The new foundation will also manage the inventory — furniture, tableware and paintings — from around 70 palaces, villas and other properties in Berlin and Potsdam that were owned or used by the Hohenzollern family until 1945.
There are also objects belonging to the family that were confiscated as early as 1918, after the end of the monarchy.
#DailyDrone: Hohenzollern Castle
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
The expropriation of the 'Junkers'
At the end of World War II, Soviet troops conquered the former German territories east of the Elbe River and with them the bulk of the Hohenzollern territories.
The Soviet Union regarded the "Junkers" — the land-owning nobility — as the class enemy and a pillar of the Nazi system. So in 1945, all noble houses in the Soviet occupation zone were expropriated without compensation.
More than four decades later, the Berlin Wall fell and Germany was reunited. From one minute to the next, many former Hohenzollern castles and estates were once again on the Federal Republic's soil.
But the German Unification Treaty in 1990 stated that the land reform of 1945 would not be reversed, meaning the Hohenzollerns had to write off their old properties in the east.
Some 30 years later, the heirs of the last monarch demanded millions in compensation from the German state and the restitution of cultural assets — in vain. So the matter went to court.
A painting of the last German Emperor Wilhelm II, painted by Philip de László in 1911 Image: Ralf Hirschberger/dpa/picture alliance
Did the Hohenzollerns 'aid and abet' the Nazis?
This question played a central role in the compensation dispute: Had representatives of the House of Hohenzollern colluded with the National Socialists who ruled Germany between 1933 and 1945? Specifically, had the heirs of the last German Emperor, Wilhelm II, who abdicated in 1918, "significantly supported" National Socialism?
And what role did the son of the last monarch and former Crown Prince Wilhelm of Prussia play between the world wars? Did he help the Nazis come to power in order to re-establish the monarchy?
The so-called "Compensation Act" of 1994, which regulates the compensation of landowners whose property was expropriated in the East in 1945, states that anyone who "significantly aided" Hitler and the Nazis has no right to compensation.
In fact, historical documents prove Wilhelm's ties to Hitler, with photos and films showing the former crown prince with the dictator and other Nazi leaders. However, Wilhelm's hopes that the Nazis would crown him the new emperor were never realized and historians continue to debate Wilhelm's role in the Nazi state.
What relationship did the House of Hohenzollern have with the Nazi regime? Image: akg-images/picture-alliance
Seeking proximity with Hitler
In their biographies, two German historians Lothar Machtan ("The Crown Prince and the Nazis") and Stephan Malinowski ("The Hohenzollerns and the Nazis") describe the crown prince as a radical anti-democrat who admired Mussolini and sought proximity to Hitler. His mission was to restore the monarchy.
Malinowski and his colleague Peter Brandt concluded that Wilhelm of Prussia's behavior had "considerably aided and abetted" the establishment and consolidation of the National Socialist regime.
In fact, the ex-crown prince called for the election of Hitler in the 1932 German presidential election. He later boasted to Hitler that he had procured him two million votes.
Wilhelm also publicly demonstrated solidarity with the new elites. "The symbolic capital of the Hohenzollerns was very important for the Nazis in 1932/33, even if the crown prince had his own agenda in the process," said Jacco Pekelder, a historian from Münster, in a television interview."
This is where the last German emperor spent his exile — at Doorn House in the Netherlands Image: Daniela Posdnjakova/DW
Debate ongoing but settlement reached
The editors of the anthology "Die Hohenzollerndebatte" (The Hohenzollern Debate), published in 2021, casted their doubt on these fascist ties.
Historian Frank-Lothar Kroll attested to Wilhelm's "rather marginal commitment" to the Nazis. He may have pandered to Hitler, but he did not share his totalitarian ideology.
For decades, hordes of lawyers, politicians and historians dealt with the restitution and compensation claims of the descendants of Wilhelm of Prussia. Now a settlement finally seems to have been reached, and the public could benefit the most.
This is an updated version of an article originally written in German.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
a minute ago
- DW
US steel tariffs leave Indian foundries gasping – DW – 08/20/2025
Trump's 50% steel tariff has rattled India's small foundries. Facing mass layoffs and shutdowns, they urge urgent government action to survive the shockwaves. In Kolkata, a major hub for India's steel foundries that export sanitary castings, work has slowed or stopped. Owners discuss distress in private but don't share much in public, and workers are confused. But some owners, like Vijay Shankar Beriwal of Calcutta Iron Udyog, are not holding back. He blames the 50% tariff on steel and aluminum imposed by US President Donald Trump, which went into effect in June. Trump cited national security concerns under Section 232 of the US Trade Expansion Act of 1962 for the move. In addition to the steel tariffs, Trump has also imposed 25% "reciprocal tariffs" on most Indian goods. The US president has proposed an additional 25% tariff, set to go into effect later this month, in response to India's purchases of Russian oil. "The full impact has yet to hit the market, but the stressors have begun to show. Those with existing US orders are clearing them fast, but new orders are slow or absent. Many foundries have stopped work," he says. The 50% steel and aluminum tariff, part of Trump's protectionist trade policies, threatens to choke eastern India's export-driven foundries and medium and small enterprises (MSMEs), which rely heavily on the US market. India exported $4.56 billion in iron, steel, and aluminium products to the US last year, including $587.5 million in iron and steel, $3.1 billion worth of iron or steel products, and $860 million in aluminium products, based on data from the Ministry of Commerce and Industry. This accounts for roughly 5.3% of India's $86.51 billion total exports to the US. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Although a smaller portion, they represent a significant share of India's foundry sector, which employs over 200,000 workers in labor-intensive production across more than 5,000 units, of which over 95% are categorized as small-scale. Moreover, unlike in the state of Maharashtra or Tamil Nadu, where foundries cater to domestic automotive and construction markets, eastern India's foundries specialise in export-oriented castings, making them particularly vulnerable to tariff disruptions. Indian Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal has downplayed the impact of tariffs on steel and aluminium, arguing that steel and aluminium exports to the US are negligible. "How does it matter if out of 145 million tons, you are not able to export 95,000 tons?" he said at a Bengal Chamber of Commerce and Industry event. The domestic market is also under pressure. With export orders stalling, manufacturers are flooding the local market, intensifying competition. "Some clients are demanding 5% price cuts, others want credit payment. These are unprecedented moves," says RK Damani, owner of Industrial Casting Corporation in Kolkata. The Federation of Indian Export Organizations (FIEO) estimates an 85% drop in US-bound steel exports, leading to a surplus that could push down domestic steel prices by 6-8%, squeezing MSME margins further. "With the tariffs now, competitive pricing will be a deciding factor. But some countries, like China, have a great appetite for undercutting prices. Indian SMEs may not have the wherewithal to match that," said FIEO Director General Ajay Sahai. While his comment mainly focuses on sectors like textiles, the steel sector faces similar pressures, as China's ability to redirect low-cost steel to India threatens smaller producers. The Indian Stainless Steel Development Association (ISSDA) notes that India has become a net importer of finished steel since FY 2023-24, with imports rising significantly between 2021 and 2024, largely from China. "The problem with steel exports is that all developed countries are closing. Europe [European Union] has been charging duties since 2018, and from January 2026, it will impose the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM)," said Ajai Srivastava, founder of the Global Trade Research Initiative. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video India's steel and aluminium exports to the European Union have been under pressure due to the duties, and the CBAM, a carbon tax on high-emission imports, could make it worse by further eroding India's competitiveness. The foundry sector mostly comprises small players with narrow profit margins. The 50% tariff makes US orders cost-prohibitive, and redirecting to markets like the Middle East or Southeast Asia requires time and capital that many of these companies lack. The Indian government is responding to the situation with a multi-pronged strategy. The Ministry of Commerce is pursuing a bilateral trade agreement with the US, aiming to lower the tariffs. Measures like interest subsidies, loan guarantees, and reduced certification fees are being considered to support MSMEs. The Directorate General of Trade Remedies has also proposed a 12% safeguard duty on certain steel products to protect the domestic market from Chinese dumping. Beriwal of Calcutta Iron Udyog remains hopeful about government intervention to protect the foundries. "The industry urgently needs some support from the government to stay afloat. We will be approaching the government with a proposal, but as of now, we are holding on for how things roll with the US President," he said. However, industry insiders warn that without swift action, MSMEs could face layoffs and closures by early 2026.
Int'l Business Times
2 minutes ago
- Int'l Business Times
German Minister Says China's 'Assertiveness' Threatens European Interests
China's assertiveness in the disputed South China Sea and tensions in the Taiwan Strait threaten international security and European interests, Germany's foreign minister said on Wednesday. "What happens here in the Indo-Pacific has a direct impact on European security and vice versa," Johann Wadephul said in a speech in Jakarta, using an alternative description for the Asia-Pacific region. "China's growing military assertiveness in the South China Sea not only threatens Asia's security but also undermines the international rules-based order," Wadephul said after talks with his Indonesian counterpart. "With essential trade routes running right through this area, it also constitutes an economic risk." He said the same applied to frictions in the Taiwan Strait, where China has deployed fighter jets, warships and coast guard ships near Taiwan and has held several major military exercises around the island in recent years. Communist China has never ruled Taiwan but Beijing insists it is part of its territory and has threatened to use force to bring it under its control. "Any escalation would have serious consequences for global security and prosperity, and directly affect German and European interests, too," he said. His comments are likely to cause more friction with Beijing after it lashed out at Berlin this week over his remarks in Japan, where he accused China of being "increasingly aggressive" and trying to "unilaterally change" regional borders. China warned Germany on Monday against "inciting confrontation and hyping up tensions" in the region. Wadephul said in a statement on Sunday before leaving for Asia that China was "increasingly asserting its regional supremacy" and questioning principles of international law. He also said on Wednesday Russia's war in Ukraine had an impact on regional security in Asia because of Chinese and North Korean support for Moscow. "Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine is not only an attack on the European peace order, it also affects Indo-Pacific security," he said. "The Russian war machine runs in part on North Korean troops and ammunition, as well as China's decisive economic support." China insists it is a neutral party in the conflict but many of Ukraine's allies believe that Beijing has provided support to Moscow. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz attended talks between US President Donald Trump, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and European leaders on Monday. He said Ukraine should not be forced to surrender its Donbas region to Russia in negotiations, likening it to the United States giving up Florida. Trump welcomed Russian President Vladimir Putin for a summit in Alaska days before those talks.
DW
an hour ago
- DW
A German town's bid to break China's grip on rare earths – DW – 08/20/2025
A small town in Germany wants to become one of the centers of the EU's push to cut reliance on Chinese rare earths vital for tech and defense. But can greener European solutions turn enough profit to make a difference? With its orchards of low-growing fruit trees and a harbor dotted with yachts, Bitterfeld has an air of pastoral charm. But this former East German town about 140 kilometers (86 miles) southwest of Berlin also has a less bucolic side. A shallow lake called the Silbersee is a reminder of a disused lignite mine that once provided fuel, while a tangle of pipes from what is one of Germany's oldest chemical facilities has long added an industrial twist to the skyline. Recently, this town of two tales has taken on a third persona, quietly emerging as a hub for the EU's drive to source rare earths on home turf. Vital to the manufacture of permanent magnets that show up in consumer electronics, renewables, and defense technologies, these chemical elements are largely sourced in China. As a result, Europe is dependent on exports — something it would like to change. Enter Bitterfeld. The idea is to recycle rare earth elements from end-of-life electronic devices. In May 2024, the family-run German tech group Heraeus opened its facility — a grey rectangular building shielded by a high barbed-wire fence — for that purpose. At its launch, the site was presented as "the largest rare earth magnet recycling plant in Europe." Initially, it aimed to produce around 600 tons of rare earth magnetic powder per year, with plans to double this figure to 1,200 tons in the near future. But that's not quite how things have panned out. A year after the launch, Heraeus says the facility is struggling to break even, despite the field's potential strategic importance. "I cannot disclose the exact number, but we are nowhere near full capacity," David Christian Bender, co-head of Heraeus Remloy, told DW, adding that European recycling "cannot compete" with rare earth metal deliveries from China. Four industrial sectors in Germany are particularly dependent on rare earth imports: the automotive industry, mechanical and plant engineering, energy, and defense. One of the key minerals they need is neodymium. Found in countless smart devices, from electric motors and wind turbines to MRI scanners and smartphone speakers, this silvery-white metal is the holy grail of the high-tech economy. The element, primarily in the form of neodymium-iron-boron magnets, is also crucial for military applications. "These magnets are used in precision-guided weapons, radar and sonar systems, satellite communications, and the acoustic signature reduction on military vehicles," Stefan Steinicke from the Federation of German Industries (BDI) told DW. Although Europe possesses some reserves, it does not currently mine neodymium. In fact, the continent imports 100% of its heavy rare earth elements (REEs), such as terbium, and 85% of its light rare earth elements, including neodymium, from China. The country also produces 90% of the world's magnets. "When it comes to electric motors, robotics and drones, import dependency is not only high, but system-critical," Steinicke said. Short-term import stoppages lead to production delays, supply bottlenecks, and price hikes. Longer-term disruptions could result in project cancellations in key tech sectors and cause strategic uncertainty among investors. In April this year, China severely restrictedits exports of several heavy rare earth metals and rare earth magnets, leading to a drastic shortfall in Europe. In some parts of Germany, production lines came to a standstill. In 2024, the EU introduced its Critical Raw Materials Act. By 2030, Europe aims to mine at least 10% of the raw materials it requires, process 40%, and recycle 25%. Dependence on any single non-EU country is to be reduced to a maximum of 65%. Experts welcome the targets but regard them as ambitious, saying the EU needs to move faster, make greater investments and be more creative with its policy tools. The mining-to-magnet production chain is long and costly. "A green mine is an oxymoron. It always involves environmental degradation and pollution," said Pascal Leroy, Director General of the WEEE Forum, a Brussels-based non-profit focused on electronic waste. Short-loop recycling, in turn, uses vacuum melting, skipping the dirtiest, most energy-hungry steps found in the longer recycling loop. It is, therefore, held up as a cleaner alternative to mining. Aside from Heraeus Remloy, several other European companies are racing to lead in REE-recycling. But finding customers willing to pay extra to support European producers remains difficult. Jan Giese, a senior manager at TRADIUM, a German metal products distributor says the challenges are due to "relatively high prices for interesting scrap material," higher European production costs, "lower recycling capacities and resulting poorer economies of scale." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video According to TRADIUM, the price of neodymium oxide has been gradually declining — albeit with certain volatility — since March 2022, reaching one of its low points around mid-2024. This further adds to recyclers' profitability struggles. So far, less than 1% of the rare earths consumed in the EU are recycled, Rüya Perincek, press officer at the EU Commission, told DW. And though Brussels has approved several projects to help tap private funding, it is not likely to tip the scales in any big way. Early next year, the EU is planning to launch a special platform connecting buyers and suppliers of strategic raw materials to diversify sourcing. "Recycling quotas could be part of a solution," Jürgen Hardt, foreign policy spokesman for Germany's conservative CDU/CSU parliamentary bloc, told DW. Highlighting the need for "a coherent political effort that combines a mosaic of measures," he did not rule out a tax credit for magnets manufactured domestically or made from reclaimed components. Such steps, however, should be taken "in close coordination within the EU," he added. Nearly 50% of all e-waste in the European Union remains uncollected, and less than 40% is recycled. The Commission plans to revise the WEEE Directive — an EU regulation on electronic waste management — to better align collection, treatment, and market incentives. According to Leroy, Brussels needs to introduce dedicated waste codes for permanent magnets so they can be traced and recycled before going missing or being exported. Together with its partners, the WEEE Forum has also created an online Urban Mine Platform highlighting the volume of precious materials in EU waste — equivalent to roughly the weight of three million African elephants. Bender, co-head of Heraeus Remloy, hopes to see a swift introduction of measures to boost the recycling of rare earth elements. He is calling for mandatory quotas and financial or tax incentives for using recycled European magnets, especially in the car industry. "The situation is very challenging... If nothing is done right now, I can't see any change happening by 2030," he added — despite the goals set in Brussels.
