logo
Iran doesn't believe a nuclear deal is likely, sources say, as talks with US set to resume

Iran doesn't believe a nuclear deal is likely, sources say, as talks with US set to resume

CNN23-05-2025

Iran and the United States are set to begin a fifth round of high-stakes nuclear talks in Rome on Friday amid growing skepticism in Tehran about the chances of a deal as Washington hardens its position.
Two Iranian sources have told CNN the talks seem unlikely to lead to an agreement, with the US insisting that Tehran dismantles its uranium enrichment program – a demand Iranian officials say would cause the nuclear negotiations to collapse.
The sources said Iran's participation in the Rome talks is solely to gauge Washington's latest stance rather than pursue a potential breakthrough.
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi reiterated Tehran's red lines before he departed for Rome on Friday.
'Figuring out the path to a deal is not rocket science,' he posted on X before his flight. 'Zero nuclear weapons = we DO have a deal. Zero enrichment = we do NOT have a deal.'
The Trump administration has demanded Iran stop all uranium enrichment activity, which lead US negotiator Steve Witkoff says 'enables weaponization.' Uranium, a key nuclear fuel, can be used to build a bomb if enriched to high levels. Iran maintains that its nuclear program is peaceful and says it is willing to commit not to enrich uranium to weapons-grade as part of an agreement.
Speaking Thursday, Araghchi said Iran was open to enhanced monitoring by international inspectors but would not relinquish its right to pursue nuclear energy, including uranium enrichment. Washington is offering to wind back crippling economic sanctions on Iran in exchange for de-nuclearization.
The US had previously sent mixed signals about whether Iran would be allowed to enrich uranium, but in recent weeks it has hardened its stance, insisting that no enrichment will be permitted.
That shift has prompted officials in Tehran to question Washington's commitment to a deal, as Iran has repeatedly said enrichment is a red line in negotiations.
The two Iranian sources told CNN that Tehran harbors mounting doubts about US sincerity in talks.
'The media statements and negotiating behavior of the United States has widely disappointed policy-making circles in Tehran,' the sources said in a joint message. 'From the perspective of decision-makers in Tehran, when the US knows that accepting zero enrichment in Iran is impossible and yet insists on it, it is a sign that the US is fundamentally not seeking an agreement and is using the negotiations as a tool to intensify pressure.'
Initially, the sources noted, some Iranian officials believed Washington might seek a 'win-win' compromise. However, a consensus has now emerged that the Trump administration is steering discussions toward a deadlock.
The sources said that although neither the US nor Iran wants to leave the negotiating table, the position of the US is making the talks unproductive and formal meetings are unlikely to continue much longer.
They said that Tehran no longer takes seriously US efforts to distance itself from Israel's hardline stance on Iran, and it sees proposals made by the American side as following the agenda of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has insisted that no enrichment be allowed in Iran.
On Friday, Iranian delegates in Rome aim to probe whether the US has revised its approach. The sources suggested that Tehran will likely take a tougher stance unless the US offers tangible concessions.
Washington has kept up the pressure on Iran with fresh sanctions and threats of war even as diplomatic talks continue.
On Wednesday, the US State Department announced new measures, identifying Iran's construction sector as being 'controlled directly or indirectly' by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and 10 strategic materials that it said Iran is using in connection with its nuclear, military or ballistic missile programs.
'With these determinations, the United States has broader sanctions authorities to prevent Iran from acquiring strategic materials for its construction sector under IRGC control and its proliferation programs,' State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce said.
Iran's foreign ministry spokesperson criticized US Secretary of State Marco Rubio for the move, calling it 'as outrageous as it is unlawful and inhuman.'
'The US's consecutive rounds of sanctions only reinforce our people's deeply held belief that the American decision makers are set to make every malign effort to hinder Iran's development & progress. These sanctions, announced on the eve of the fifth round of Iran-US indirect talks, further put to question the American willingness & seriousness for diplomacy,' Baqaei wrote on X.
CNN's Angus Watson contributed to this report.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US Farm Sentiment at 4-Year High as Trump Pushes for Trade Deals
US Farm Sentiment at 4-Year High as Trump Pushes for Trade Deals

Bloomberg

timean hour ago

  • Bloomberg

US Farm Sentiment at 4-Year High as Trump Pushes for Trade Deals

American farmer sentiment jumped to a four-year high, with growers betting on rising crop exports as the Trump administration pushes for more trade deals from Vietnam to Italy. Agriculture Secretary Brook Rollins said during a visit to Rome on Tuesday that she is working to get Europe to buy more US products including wheat and soybeans. That comes after Vietnam announced deals to buy American grain and the US reached a trade truce with China.

FBI wants to investigate doctors who provide gender-affirming care to minors. Experts question its legal basis
FBI wants to investigate doctors who provide gender-affirming care to minors. Experts question its legal basis

CNN

timean hour ago

  • CNN

FBI wants to investigate doctors who provide gender-affirming care to minors. Experts question its legal basis

The Federal Bureau of Investigation began Pride month by asking Americans to report doctors, hospitals and clinics who offer gender-affirming surgeries to minors, claiming that those procedures amount to child mutilation. In social media posts Monday, the FBI and its chief spokesperson asked for tips on 'any hospitals or clinics who break the law and mutilate children under the guise of 'gender affirming care.'' But experts say the FBI's new push isn't backed up by federal law and may only be intended to scare medical practitioners away from offering those services. 'The only purpose of a tweet like this is to create fear and confusion for transgender youth, their families and their medical providers,' Josh Block, a senior attorney with the ACLU's LGBTQ & HIV Projects, told CNN. 'It simply has no legal basis.' The reporting initiative is among the most dramatic moves in a multipronged effort by President Donald Trump's administration to challenge gender-affirming care across the country, spawned by a January executive order that initiated a crackdown on what the president called 'chemical and surgical mutilation' of individuals under 19 years old. It also comes as the Trump administration broadly continues an anti-transgender agenda. The Justice Department on Monday, for instance, issued warnings to California school districts that have allowed transgender student athletes to play on sports teams that align with their gender identity. 'Today at work… put 1600+ California schools on blast for violating equal protection in girls' sports,' Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon said on X. There is no federal law that outlaws gender-affirming surgeries on minors – a rare practice that is not recommended by major medical organizations. The Trump executive order instructed that the Justice Department prioritize enforcement actions under a criminal statute that protects against female genital mutilation. The FBI did not immediately respond to an inquiry about the legal backing for any future investigation. Federal prosecutors, however, have conceded in court that the female genital mutilation law 'differs markedly' from Trump's executive order, according to a ruling earlier this year from a federal judge who said that parts of the order targeting federal funding should be paused indefinitely. The judge, Lauren King, who was nominated by Joe Biden, said that gender-affirming surgery is considered medically necessary – a key legal hurdle when prosecuting someone for mutilation. She also noted that prosecutors 'acknowledge that non-surgical options 'are generally the only treatments minors can receive.'' Referencing that law in the executive order, King concluded, 'seems misplaced, and could be construed as a bad-faith attempt to make parents and providers fear prosecution.' Gender-affirming care for trans youth is largely focused on social aspects like names, pronouns and clothing. If a minor does move forward with any sort of medical intervention – treatment that is typically focused on medications whose effects are reversable instead of surgeries – a team of doctors and the child's family will consider what is appropriate for that child's needs and stage of development. 'A strong body of medical evidence supports the safety and efficacy of this care,' said Jennifer Levy, the senior director of transgender and queer rights at GLAD Law. 'These efforts make it more difficult for parents to secure the health care their children need to thrive.' Still, nearly 30 states have passed legislation banning gender-affirming medical care for people under 18 years old. Several of those states, including Alabama, Florida and North Carolina, are defending those bans in court. One of the challenges, which was brought over a Tennessee law that bans puberty blockers and other hormonal treatments for minors, is currently under consideration by the US Supreme Court. A decision is expected this month.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store