logo
Tesla design chief who accidentally shattered 2 Cybertruck windows says the viral moment was a 'great meme'

Tesla design chief who accidentally shattered 2 Cybertruck windows says the viral moment was a 'great meme'

Business Insider17 hours ago
It was an awkward blooper that may have been a blessing in disguise.
When Tesla unveiled the Cybertruck in 2019, the company's chief designer, Franz von Holzhausen, stood next to CEO Elon Musk and threw a metal ball at the car's windows to prove their durability.
The only problem? The Cybertruck's windows shattered.
In a recent interview, von Holzhausen spoke about the story behind the viral incident.
He'd done a test run on the armored glass windows "multiple times right before we went live on the stage," he said in an interview with Tesla Club Austria published Saturday.
"I think it was just one of those Murphy's law kind of things where something bad happens. But it turned out to be a great meme," he said.
The incident also "turned into a great marketing moment" for the company, which famously doesn't advertise.
Shortly after the debacle, Tesla started selling a $45 T-shirt with a shattered design poking fun at the accident.
"The ball didn't go through the window, so you know, you're still safe," von Holzhausen said. "It was not an expected moment, but in that moment, you have to roll with it."
Shortly after the mishap, Musk offered an explanation on X, then known as Twitter. A few moments before throwing the ball at the two windows, von Holzhausen had taken a sledgehammer to the door of the Cybertruck to prove it was sturdy. Unlike the windows, the door held up against the impact.
"Sledgehammer impact on door cracked base of glass, which is why steel ball didn't bounce off. Should have done steel ball on window, then sledgehammer the door," Musk said in his explanation.
Musk laughed off the incident during the live event, saying there was "room for improvement."
Musk released a slow-motion video shortly after the fail, showing the Cybertruck's windows remain unscathed after von Holzhausen threw a steel ball at them off-stage.
Tesla did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rivian expects tariffs to increase car production costs by 'a couple thousand dollars per unit'
Rivian expects tariffs to increase car production costs by 'a couple thousand dollars per unit'

Business Insider

time7 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

Rivian expects tariffs to increase car production costs by 'a couple thousand dollars per unit'

Rivian is expected to experience some headwinds in the near future due to the rapidly evolving policies that impact EV production in the US. Rivian's CEO, RJ Scaringe, said during the company's second-quarter earnings call on Tuesday that the "changes to EV tax credits, regulatory credits, trade regulation, and tariffs are expected to have an impact on the results and the cash flow of our business." The company increased its anticipated EBITDA losses — or earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization — to a range of $2 billion to $2.5 billion for the 2025 fiscal year. That's up from the previous guidance of $1.7 billion to $1.9 billion reported last quarter. Claire McDonough, Rivian's chief financial officer, provided a sobering picture of how the policy environment will have an impact on Rivian's business. The CFO said the company expects to "roughly break even" for total gross profit by the end of 2025. Total sales in regulatory credits — or credits that automakers receive in the US to incentivize EV production — are expected to be around $160 million, nearly half of its prior outlook of $300 million in regulatory credit sales, according to McDonough. Production costs will also increase for the remainder of the year, McDonough said. Recent policy changes will impact Rivian's cash flow, she said, and "this includes increased tariffs, which had a minimal impact during the second quarter but are expected to have a net impact of a couple thousand dollars per unit for the remainder of 2025." Guidance and results for Rivian's second quarter provide a snapshot of how the Trump Administration's move to eliminate federal incentives for EVs, such as a $7,500 clean vehicle credit, will impact automakers. Tesla, the leading EV company in the US, and other automakers have been urging consumers to buy their electric cars before the tax credits expire later this year. Scaringe previously told BI that the end of the EV credits will have minimal impact on his company, but it will ultimately slow down US automakers' momentum to transition from gas-powered cars to electric vehicles. "I think that the move away from some of the tailwinds that were previously in place for electric vehicles is actually good for Rivian, it's good for Tesla, it's bad for the US auto industry, and it's bad for my kids," he said at the time. Despite the near-term challenges, Rivian appears to be on track to deliver its much-anticipated R2 model, a $45,000 to $50,000 midsize SUV expected to come next year. Scaringe said during the call that Rivian has secured contracts with suppliers that ensure the cost of making R2 will be about "half that of R1." "We've spent the last two years in development and time negotiating with suppliers — to put in place contracts that we both selected —suppliers that can scale with us and ramp appropriately, but also can deliver a much lower cost structure," he said. The company reported a mixed second-quarter earnings result, slightly beating Wall Street estimates on revenue — $1.3 billion vs. $1.28 billion estimate — while reporting higher operating losses than anticipated. Total operating expenses were $908 million, Rivian reported, slightly missing the Street's estimate of $876.2 million. Rivian's stock fell about 5% after trading hours.

Coastal Commission vs. SpaceX: Round 2
Coastal Commission vs. SpaceX: Round 2

Politico

time37 minutes ago

  • Politico

Coastal Commission vs. SpaceX: Round 2

With help from Camille von Kaenel ROCKET REMATCH: The California Coastal Commission is going for another round with Elon Musk's space company. U.S. Space Force officials will be back in front of the commission next Thursday with a proposal to double SpaceX's rocket launches from Vandenberg Space Force Base from 50 to 95 per year — and agency staff is recommending commissioners reject it. 'The simple fact remains that it is a privately owned company engaged in activities primarily for its own commercial business,' staff said in a report Friday. 'It is not a public federal agency or conducting its launches on behalf of the federal government.' The vote promises to reopen a rift between Musk and the agency after the commission rejected Space Force's previous proposal to increase SpaceX launches from 36 to 50, but cited Musk's politics and support for President Donald Trump in doing so. The commission drew a lawsuit from Musk — and a rebuke from Gov. Gavin Newsom at the time. 'I'm with Elon,' Newsom said in October after Musk sued the commission for political bias. 'You can't bring up that explicit level of politics.' The fight is flying further under the radar this time around, though. Where a bipartisan group of pro-space state and federal lawmakers spoke up for SpaceX ahead of October's vote — and environmentalists chimed in on behalf of nearby residents and wildlife they argued would be disturbed by the launches' sonic booms — that type of lobbying hasn't materialized. Neither Newsom's office nor SpaceX responded to a request for comment. Space Launch Delta 30 Commander Col. James T. Horne III, who oversees Vandenberg and Western operations, said in a statement that the commission staff recommendation doesn't change the military's 'unwavering commitment to preserving the California coastline' and that its partnership with SpaceX helps maintain 'its technological edge and strategic advantage over competitors.' The relative quiet comes amid a shifted political landscape, after Trump returned to power and Republicans swept Congress on a message of affordability and economic strength. Newsom and Democratic state lawmakers, faced with looming refinery closures and perpetually high building costs, are trying to boost in-state oil drilling and have already weakened environmental permitting for everything from wildfire fuel breaks to high-speed rail, putting environmentalists on the back foot. Jennifer Savage, California policy associate director for the Surfrider Foundation, said environmental groups are in rapid response mode, which has 'taken energy away from other things that we normally would have perhaps had more capacity to deal with.' 'I do think there's a lot of political overwhelm happening on all fronts, and that has divided people's attention perhaps more than when this first came up,' Savage said. Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas and Senate President Pro Tempore Mike McGuire have also shaken up the commission since last year, replacing members like former Chair Justin Cummings, former Vice Chair Paloma Aguirre and alternate Gretchen Newsom (no relation to Gavin Newsom), all of whom had bemoaned Musk's behavior. And Newsom himself spent the early part of this year clipping the commission's wings, issuing several executive orders in the wake of the Los Angeles fires to suspend the Coastal Act — the 1976 law that established the commission — in an effort to fast-track rebuilding. But there's also the reality that Space Force officials moved forward with the increase from 36 to 50 last year, even after the no vote, citing federal preemption and national security considerations. Rep. Kevin Kiley (R-Calif.), one of the lawmakers who signed a bipartisan letter last year backing the launch increase, said the reality that the commission can't stop the military's plan means the issue has taken on less urgency. 'Now that the commission has proved its own irrelevance, maybe that same imperative doesn't exist,' said Kiley, who is pushing a bill that would limit state authority to review certain activities related to national security and post-disaster recovery and rebuilding. — AN Did someone forward you this newsletter? Sign up here! MERCURY RISING: Los Angeles landlords and tenants, get your fans ready. The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors passed an ordinance Tuesday to require landlords in its unincorporated areas to keep indoor temperatures in all the rooms of rental units below 82 degrees, either by using passive cooling methods like blackout curtains or by installing air conditioners. Chair Pro Tem and Supervisor Hilda L. Solis, who introduced the measure after three years of efforts to establish an indoor heat standard, called it a 'life-saving policy that prioritizes the health and dignity of renters' amid growing evidence that rising temperatures are triggering more heat illnesses and death. She said she hoped other cities in the region would follow suit. She and her co-author, Supervisor Lindsey Horvath, agreed to partly carve out small landlords from the requirement amid pushback from the California Apartment Association and Supervisor Janice Hahn. Landlords who only own a few units will have until January 2032 to bring temperatures into check in every room of the unit; in the interim, they will have to keep only one room below 82 degrees. The compromise partly responded to a RAND report that recommended that Los Angeles policymakers should focus first on cooling one room instead of the whole unit so as not to stress the grid with new air conditioners. The ordinance takes effect in 30 days but won't be enforced until Jan. 1, 2027. — CvK AI YI YI: Artificial intelligence could be the power sector's savior — if the industry plays its cards right, California policy editor Debra Kahn writes in her latest column. Trump is canceling loan guarantees for wind-connected transmission lines and trying to block federal land from being used for wind power — but he's telling agencies to figure out how to build data centers on that same land. And those data centers need power. AI and its attendant data centers are projected to unleash the U.S. electricity industry's first net growth in 20 years. They could solve the industry's longstanding problem of spreading its growing costs across a shrinking pool of customers, if it can build fast enough to meet the demand. 'The size and the scale of what we're seeing now is unlike anything we've ever seen,' Pacific Gas & Electric Co. executive Mike Medeiros said, after PG&E got approval for a new rate structure to speed up connecting data centers to the grid. 'People will tell you — they probably haven't seen load growth like this since World War II.' — DK WHAT CANCELED PROGRAM?: The Trump administration is claiming it didn't really cancel a FEMA grant that funds disaster preparation and mitigation, four months after it shuttered the program. FEMA acting Administrator David Richardson wrote in a July 25 court declaration that 'despite FEMA's public announcements,' the agency actually didn't end the Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities program, of which California is one of the largest beneficiaries. The document startled state and local officials and created new uncertainty about the administration's plans for helping communities with hurricanes, floods and other disasters, Thomas Frank reports for POLITICO's E&E News. Attorney General Rob Bonta joined 19 other AGs in a lawsuit last month challenging the program cancellation, arguing that the Trump administration violated congressional guidance to prioritize mitigation efforts and defied government spending authority by refusing to reallocate funds dedicated for BRIC to other programs. — AN CASTING SHADE: The Trump administration is making plans to cancel a $7 billion program funding solar projects in low-income communities across the country, people familiar with the agency's plan told POLITICO's Zack Colman, Alex Guillén and Kelsey Tamborrino on Tuesday. The termination letters are being drafted this week and could go out within days, according to a former EPA official familiar with the agency's plan granted anonymity to speak ahead of the release of the letters. The Solar for All program awarded money to state agencies, localities or nonprofit groups in almost every state to be used for residential rooftop panels, community solar developments or storage technologies — including $250 million to California state energy agencies that has yet to be distributed. Kym Meyer, litigation director at the Southern Environmental Law Center, signaled the group would pursue legal action if the administration terminates the grants. — The shipping company that delivers most of Hawaii's cars has stopped sending electric vehicles to the state because of the risk of battery fires. — Purple states are piling onto the lawsuit challenging Trump's freezing of federal electric vehicle funding. — A heat wave is coming to California this week, intensifying the wildfires already burning and raising the risk of more blazes.

The California Coastal Commission's fight with Elon Musk's SpaceX is back on
The California Coastal Commission's fight with Elon Musk's SpaceX is back on

Politico

time37 minutes ago

  • Politico

The California Coastal Commission's fight with Elon Musk's SpaceX is back on

The vote promises to reopen a rift between Musk and the agency after the commission rejected Space Force's previous proposal to increase SpaceX launches from 36 to 50, but cited Musk's politics and support for President Donald Trump in doing so. The commission drew a lawsuit from Musk — and a rebuke from Gov. Gavin Newsom at the time. 'I'm with Elon,' Newsom said in October after Musk sued the commission for political bias. 'You can't bring up that explicit level of politics.' The fight is flying further under the radar this time around, though. Where a bipartisan group of pro-space state and federal lawmakers spoke up for SpaceX ahead of October's vote — and environmentalists chimed in on behalf of nearby residents and wildlife they argued would be disturbed by the launches' sonic booms — that type of lobbying hasn't materialized. Neither Newsom's office nor SpaceX responded to a request for comment. Space Launch Delta 30 commander Col. James T. Horne III, who oversees Vandenberg and Western operations, said in a statement that the commission staff recommendation doesn't change the military's 'unwavering commitment to preserving the California coastline,' and that its partnership with SpaceX helps maintain 'its technological edge and strategic advantage over competitors.' The relative quiet comes amid a shifted political landscape, after Trump returned to power and Republicans swept Congress on a message of affordability and economic strength. Newsom and Democratic state lawmakers, faced with looming refinery closures and perpetually high building costs, are trying to boost in-state oil drilling and have already weakened environmental permitting for everything from wildfire fuel breaks to high-speed rail, putting environmentalists on the back foot. Jennifer Savage, California policy associate director for the Surfrider Foundation, said environmental groups are in rapid response mode, which has 'taken energy away from other things that we normally would have perhaps had more capacity to deal with.' 'I do think there's a lot of political overwhelm happening on all fronts, and that has divided people's attention perhaps more than when this first came up,' Savage said. Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas and Senate President Pro Tempore Mike McGuire have also shaken up the commission since last year, replacing members like former chair Justin Cummings, former vice chair Paloma Aguirre and alternate Gretchen Newsom (no relation to Gavin Newsom), all of whom had bemoaned Musk's behavior.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store