
Heavy-Duty Pickups Used to Tow 14,000 Pounds. Why Do They Need to Pull 35,000 Pounds Now?
If someone gave me the money, I could walk into a dealership and buy a new Chevrolet Silverado 3500 that maxes out at 36,000 pounds of towing capacity. Or if I wanted more than that, the most capable Ram 3500 can pull 36,610 pounds behind it. And if I really needed as much as I could get, I could buy a Ford Super Duty that'll drag 40,000 pounds when properly equipped.
The thing is, dually pickup trucks didn't always tow this much. Why do they need to now?
This is a question that's often overlooked in favor of more ogling, more bench racing among people with the cash to buy one but no real reason to. It's a valid curiosity, though. At the turn of the century, heavy-duty pickups from Detroit's Big Three couldn't tow half of what they do now, capping out just above 14,000 pounds. Technology has obviously come a long way since then, but is that alone the reason for the arms race we see in today's truck space? Or is it the target customer that's changed?
After talking with Chevrolet, Ford, and Ram, I learned that the answer is a little bit of both. More on that in a minute. These things didn't used to have porches, I swear. Caleb Jacobs
To understand the context of today's truck market in comparison to 25 years ago, you have to zoom out. The toys they're built to haul are a lot larger and heavier than they used to be. Look no further than fifth-wheel camper trailers, which used to be significantly shorter and lighter. A 30-foot Coachmen would've been a pretty sweet setup at the time, weighing a skosh under 9,000 pounds dry. Nowadays, 40-foot campers with king-size beds and two AC units on the roof are common, with some longer models even touting triple axles to support nearly 20,000 pounds. That's before you load your stuff in them.
This is where Ram spokesperson Nick Cappa chimed in:
'If you need to carry a gallon of gasoline across the garage, you will use a container larger than one gallon. The same goes for hauling. You buy a Ram truck that has a buffer in case you decide to pick up a rust-free SRT 10 you found on the side of the road on your way back from Arizona. Or maybe you packed a fifth-wheel trailer to the gills and forgot to drain the black tank after a two-week camping adventure, and you're approaching the Appalachians. Big travel trailers and boats may not weigh very much, but you certainly want the power, weight, and stability of a Ram 3500 dually when facing head- or crosswinds with that much sail in your rearview.' Ford
Then there's the fact that people use their pickups differently than they used to. Whereas it's always been typical for dually drivers to tow a skid steer or some similar piece of equipment with their rigs, now hot-shot truckers are loading up three and four cars on long ol' goosenecks. The trailers alone weigh more than 8,000 pounds, and then you have to figure 3,500-5,000 pounds per vehicle on top of that. All those dually pickups you see hauling multiple cars are often loaded to 25,000 pounds or more, and they rack up the miles unlike almost anyone else. It's not uncommon to see a hot-shot Super Duty or similar with 600,000+ miles on the odometer despite being less than five years old.
'Customers have asked for more capability out of their heavy-duty trucks,' explained Briath Rathsburg, Ford Super Duty product and brand marketing manager. 'The more capable the truck, the more it enables trailer manufacturers to develop bigger fifth-wheel and gooseneck campers, flatbeds, car haulers, horse trailers etc., allowing customers to do more without the need to stair-step upward to vehicle classes that may exceed their needs.'
He brings up a good point. You could argue that folks are better off buying a Class 8 truck that will pull the same weight like it's nothing, and you might be right. But a semi isn't a pickup. It doesn't have the same luxury, and more importantly, it doesn't offer the same maneuverability. Crowded car lots are not always easy to navigate with a trailer on, and that's doubly true if you're in a gigantic commercial vehicle. Meanwhile, a pickup can pull it off a lot easier with less stress. And you'll never make it past the height stopper at a McDonald's drive-thru in a Peterbilt, but unhitch the wagon from your Ram or Chevrolet, and you'll be just another happy camper grabbing a McDouble. Chevrolet
In all, it's arguably best summed up with one word: confidence. Truck buyers have proven they're willing to spend exorbitant amounts of money—up to and even above $100,000—on a pickup that has everything they want. And while it's easy to chide them for wanting massaging seats or TV-like touchscreens, the truth is that customers for these types of trucks want the capability to tow nearly anything under the sun without a worry.
'Current HD Chevy trucks can tow and haul more than ever,' Chevrolet spokesperson Shad Balch wrote to me. 'This not only meets the needs of truck customers who increasingly tow larger and heavier trailers, but more importantly, higher ratings give higher confidence to drivers while towing–regardless of how much they're pulling. An HD Silverado with the max tow package makes hauling just about anything a breeze.'
Just because someone may never touch their truck's max tow capacity doesn't mean that massive, unfathomable number won't affect how they experience it. And in reality, some of the most popular pickups—crew cab 4x4s with lots of options—are rated to pull several thousand pounds less than the advertised max. It's better to learn that before you buy, instead of learning the hard way like some others do.
'The most important message: Always buy a truck with room to grow your toy and equipment fiefdom,' Cappa from Ram concluded.
I think that says it all, don't you?
Got a tip or question for the author? Contact them directly: caleb@thedrive.com

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
TRAFFIC ALERT: Semi truck on fire in St. Augustine stops traffic on I-95
UPDATE 10:08 a.m.: The left lane is the only one being blocked at the moment. END UPDATE A vehicle fire has shut down all northbound lanes of I-95 in St. Johns County, according to the Florida Highway Patrol. The fire was reported at 9:10 a.m. Tuesday. The incident is just south of the St. Augustine area. >>> STREAM ACTION NEWS JAX LIVE <<< Action News Jax spoke to St. Johns County Fire Rescue and they say it was a mechanical issue that made the truck catch on fire. Drivers are being urged to avoid the area and seek alternate routes as crews work to clear the scene. No injuries were reported. We'll update as more information becomes available. [DOWNLOAD: Free Action News Jax app for alerts as news breaks] [SIGN UP: Action News Jax Daily Headlines Newsletter] Click here to download the free Action News Jax news and weather apps, click here to download the Action News Jax Now app for your smart TV and click here to stream Action News Jax live. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
GM breaks EV range record with elaborate 2026 Silverado EV drive test
Range anxiety is one of the leading reasons consumers cite for avoiding electric vehicles, and a big purchase reason for customers of the Silverado EV, which advertises a range of 400-plus miles over its various trims. To address that concern and to amuse its engineers, General Motors put its electric truck to the test last week and smashed a distance record in the process. Under meticulous parameters — including restricting the use of air conditioning in the July heat — the 2026 Chevrolet Silverado EV Work Truck set a new world record for electric vehicle range, traveling 1,059.2 miles on a single charge, more than double the truck's EPA-estimated range of 493 miles. Lucid Motors held the previous record for electric vehicle range, with 749 miles earlier this summer. GM and other automakers are limited to what they can advertise about their vehicles' ranges outside of the EPA test cycle conducted at the National Vehicle and Fuel Emissions Laboratory in Ann Arbor. Stephanie Brinley, associate director of Auto Intelligence at S&P Global Mobility, said those tests are meant to create a level playing field among automakers to compare how vehicle ranges perform under the same set of conditions. 'It's very rarely precise on what you get in the real world, but automakers are only able to advertise what number comes out of that test cycle,' Brinley said. The Silverado EV test allowed GM to demonstrate in a one-off case that there's more potential in the battery pack than a consumer may expect. The Silverado EV reached the record after months of preparation and planning. First, the vehicle was optimized, but only in a way that customers could replicate at home, according to GM spokeswoman Catherine Scales. According to the company those optimizations included: Maintaining an average speed of 20-25 mph when safe to do so and avoiding hard braking or quick acceleration. Conducting most of the test with the driver alone in the vehicle. The windshield wiper blades were set to the 'lowest acceptable' position to reduce drag. The Silverado's tires were inflated to their highest acceptable pressure for lower rolling resistance except for the spare, which was removed to lighten the load. The wheel alignment 'was optimized.' An accessory tonneau cover was added to streamline airflow around the truck bed. Climate control was off. Another factor that helped the vehicle's battery life was performing the test in summer, which GM said provided the 'optimum ambient temperature for battery efficiency.' The test was conducted over the course of one week on public roads near GM's Milford Proving Ground and on Belle Isle. Forty GM engineers volunteered to drive the vehicle. GM sold 5,439 Silverado EVs in the first six months of 2025, up 67% over last year but still falling drastically short of its gasoline-powered predecessor. GM sold 289,251 across all Silverado types, including medium and light-duty versions. Jackie Charniga covers General Motors for the Free Press. Reach her at jcharniga@ This article originally appeared on Detroit Free Press: GM breaks EV range record with elaborate 2026 Silverado EV drive test
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ultimate off-road toy? Defender Octa vs Nomad and Mach-E Rally
The emergence of the dual-purpose, loose-surface-specialist, off-road performance car is one of the better reasons for enthusiastic drivers like us to be cheerful. From the Porsche 911 Dakar and Lamborghini Huracán Sterrato right the way through to the Ford Ranger Raptor and Bowler Bulldog, we've had quite a constant and varied supply of these lovably rogue and madcap mud-pluggers over the past 10 years of car industry history. And now, if you want to go fast and have fun on gravel and mud as well as on the road in 2025, you can do so in all kinds of different ways. Take, for example, the three fast off-roaders we have gathered at the Sweet Lamb Motorsport Complex in Wales for what should be a fantastic day of testing. They are, respectively, appealingly little, usably mid-sized and unapologetically large. Hobbyist, daily driver and indomitable do-it-all. We've got rear-engined rear-wheel drive, all-electric four-wheel drive and V8-engined, proper mechanical four-wheel drive on offer, to suit whatever your requirement. These cars are about as different from each other as anything you're likely to see sharing space in an Autocar comparison test. But all should be great fun on what is ostensibly a gravel rally stage that's ours for the day. At just 715kg, the Ariel Nomad 2 is the kind of flyweight thrill-seeker most would stick on a trailer to transport and use. One towed by something like the 2510kg Land Rover Defender Octa, quite possibly. Could the tow car actually be as much fun as what's towed? Could it get close? Let's see. At 2343kg, meanwhile, the Ford Mustang Mach-E Rally isn't far behind the range-topping Defender on kerb weight, although it comfortably beats it for torque-to-weight ratio and claimed on-asphalt 0-62mph sprinting – not least because it's electric. On wheel travel, any-surface traction and towing capacity? Not so much. Sweet Lamb's dark side So, we have spaceframe construction and motorsport-grade long-travel passive suspension here, up against just about the cleverest and most versatile interlinked active air suspension that a global car manufacturer can come up with. The niche-industry Nomad probably cost less to develop, from clean sheet to finished product, than JLR spent on the Octa's 6D Dynamics interlinked hydraulic damper system alone. Meanwhile, the Mach-E Rally is, on the face of it, just a £2250 option on an existing performance EV. Some retuned dampers, longer coil springs, white-faced alloy wheels, underbody protection panels and Michelin CrossClimate 2 all-season tyres. How serious could that be? Answers to all those questions and more will follow shortly after the nice man in the pick-up truck opens the gate on the steep, rutted and, in places, adversely cambered gravel playground. The bad news for the Defender, and to an extent the Mach-E, is that it's fairly narrow, perhaps twice the width of a Nomad as an average but at points an even tighter squeeze. The surface is sun-baked gravel and dirt, with plumes of drifting dust eddying up from it behind you as you drive, which the spring sunshine hits and beams through like rising flame. It's a 'loose' surface in quite unforgiving terms. The stones across it range in size from smaller than marbles to larger than cigarette packets – and, as stones do, they pile up on the outside of corners, making the grip ebb away just where you need it to come to your aid. There are, in places, channels, holes and gullies to drop wheels into on the inside of those same corners – and not all of them will help you. There's a tight hairpin bend with ruts deep enough to throw you offline and a roughly sheep-sized rock to stop you taking a wide line on entry. There are a couple of faster downhill, off-camber bends that will be unforgiving if you're too quick going in (and, sooner or later in cars like these, you're sure to be). There are sheer drops looming just beyond the margins of the 'road' in places. And there's a jump. Of course there is. It's going to be something of a leveller, this place. Commitment will be needed to get very far into fourth gear even on the quickest stretches, so I'm not sure how much use 626bhp will be to the Land Rover, or even 480bhp to the Ford. Accessible torque should go a long way, though, but only if it's matched by proper gravel traction and stopping power. Cars of many parts The Defender Octa is the kind of big, heavy car that can take some serious punishment. You arrive in it at a place like Sweet Lamb, with its tracks, fields, streams and climbs in every direction, with not a flicker of unease. That's partly because your journey has already been so remarkably pleasant. The Octa takes to on-road motorway and A-road miles with very little compromise whatsoever to its rolling refinement associated with its beefed-up running gear – and big-hitting overtaking pace when you need it. But it's also because this car's sheer rough-stuff capability is exceptional. We've had a dry winter, so it happens that the ford you have to cross to gain access to The Mile Loop is at a low level on the day of our test, and all three cars can cross it easily. But if it had been 18in deeper? The Defender – with its 1000mm wading depth – would simply have had the fun all to itself, and the Nomad might have ended up somewhere a lot farther downstream in the Wye Valley. Getting to where you want to be in order to enjoy yourself in fairly remote places like this, and carrying with you what you will need when you get there, is a significant part of the equation when assessing how much fun these cars can provide in the broadest of senses. And on all of that stuff, the Defender has a mighty head start when you stop to think about it. Are usability and capability – or, rather, the want of them – significant hurdles for the electric Ford? In some ways, I'd say so – but not all. The Mach-E GT wasn't the most efficient EV you could spend £70,000 on before Ford jacked up the ride height by 20mm and fitted those all-season tyres to it. As the Rally, it will do a little over 210 miles as a touring electric range, which meant it arrived at our Welsh rallying idyll with about 75% battery capacity showing, with the nearest rapid charger a good 25 miles away. Focuses the mind, that. I won't be ruining the verdict, however, to tell you that the Mach-E survives a fairly long day's off-road use, with a couple of leadfoots taking plenty of entertainment from it, and leaves at the end with more than enough range remaining to guarantee its onward progression. As a very basic test of the primary usability of an EV made with this sort of driving in mind, I reckon that's valid: and the Mach-E Rally passes it. But, at all points, we keep a wary eye on that range meter, in a way we simply don't need to with the fossil-fuelled alternatives, and perhaps have just a little less outright fun as a result. On a more normal day, of course, the Mach-E Rally is still a car you could get all manner of profitable, zero-emissions use out of. It's practical but not huge; fast, alternative and interesting to drive but not a six-figure buying prospect. Suited to the school run, supermarket shop, office commute and football practice. It has five doors, five usable seats and Ford-typical real-world appeal baked right in. Need we point out that the Nomad, er, doesn't? I doubt it, because it's the kind of car you take giant helpings of enjoyment from on the more limited occasions you have to drive it, not the other way around. The one with the green frame that Ariel brought to Sweet Lamb for us has Perspex side protection to stop the breeze billowing up your trouser legs so much, as well as a canvas roof as rain protection. You expect to finish driving it by removing so much dust from your various facial orifices, but it actually shelters you from all that fairly well. Hit a water splash in it at pace, though, and… you get wet. But generally, it doesn't throw enough dirt into the cockpit to make you wish you had packed ski goggles or to make it a mission to clean up afterwards. The Nomad may be the kind of car you would only really ever seek to have fun in, but what fun it is. You can have one with a rally-style hydraulic handbrake fitted if you want (as our test car has), in addition to the optional winch, roof-mounted headlights and gorgeous Öhlins TTX suspension – and, trust me, you should. Crunch time Onto the gravel we go, then. In descending order, 534lb ft of torque per tonne in the Ariel plays 271lb ft in the Ford and only 235lb ft in the Octa. Even there, you can start to see the enormous difference that the Nomad's lightness makes. But the proper all-terrain tyres of the Nomad and Octa will have an impact, too, versus the more road-intended rubber of the Mach-E, while peak torque at revs isn't the same thing as accessible torque right under your big toe, right at the wheel where you need it most. Is your idea of a fun gravel driving experience something pointy, drifty and responsive, which rotates freely as you turn it in and 'gas it up'? Whose cornering attitude can be adjusted with power as quickly and easily as a flick of your ankle and roll of your wrists? S omething that powers away from 50mph corners with a real surge of urgency and a carefree wiggle of its hips? Well, you might be surprised just how well the Mach-E Rally fits the bill. Being electric might actually make it more fun than it would otherwise be here. It's lively and responsive to the controls at speeds that don't make you fear for what's waiting on the other side of the grass verge. The bigger, more stable, more under-control-feeling Octa isn't quite so lively. That's partly a function of grip and partly of size. It has loads of grip on gravel, its Goodyear Wrangler Duratrac all-terrain tyres chewing through the surface scree and making it ready to pull bigger speeds than the confines of this circuit really allow something of its sheer size. It feels a bit like a monster truck on a Race of Champions stadium circuit. The Mach-E's all-season Michelins get to about 50mph, by contrast, and then start to skate around on the top layer of stones, their tread blocks failing to clear the rubble they're bombarded with, and allowing the chassis' naturally more expressive tendencies to start to become a liability. So driving the Ford on gravel is a kind of quick-quick-slow progression; you will have a blast, provided you don't go too fast. In the tighter bends, there's nothing the Defender's posh active suspension can really do, by comparison, about the more languid chassis responses of a bigger, taller, heavier car, but the Mach-E feels much lower, keener and more willing to be teased into a positive cornering attitude than the Land Rover, which only really wants to tuck its nose in under trail-braking (although it will certainly do it). Both cars are fun. The Defender is leagues tougher and more capable and would come into its own on a quicker, wider gravel track, I'd wager. But here and now and in a corner of the Powys countryside that seems to suit it peculiarly well, the Ford is actually the more addictive driver's car. And then you get into the Nomad and it's like you're in another place altogether and engaged in an interactive physical act of a different order of magnitude. The Octa ultimately goes perhaps 10-15% further than a regular Defender for entertainment factor but still trades squarely on its assured feel. It can only make so much room to really entertain you without the risk of bursting that safe, silver-lined bubble. The Mach-E goes further still, but its ultimate lack of grip, ground clearance and damping authority would make you fear for it if tougher, quicker surfaces and tests presented. But the Nomad simply yums it all up, lets you feel every little deflection and work for every correction, and puts itself on a different plane of motoring existence in the process. It is enormous, monumental fun. It's a test of nerve to begin with, though, and a huge change of tone. Because suddenly every channel, bump, ridge, rock and camber gets right through to your fingertips and backside. The Defender was filtering them out, mostly, although you didn't know it; the Ford only hinting at them. But the Nomad broadcasts them right into your forearms and shoulders. Lots of physical effort is involved in getting on its level and armfuls of corrective lock require plenty of fast dexterity. But it gives back what you put in and more, with its incredible, oh-so-faithful handling. On 16in wheels and chunkily sidewalled Yokohama all-terrain tyres, it finds plenty of grip and traction on the gravel but still demands a much closer watching brief before you can let all 382lb ft loose through the rear wheels without a bodily reaction. The steering communicates tirelessly, so you know without doubt when you're on a good line and, very clearly, when you're not. Get wide, get lazy, turn in in the wrong gear or fluff your lines with the pedals and you will have plenty to sort out. But drive well and you can take pretty much whatever line and angle through a third-gear, 50mph corner you want to and feel every move the chassis makes. And the most awe-inspiring move is when it takes to the air. The jump on the Mile Loop isn't a desperately quick one, but it is quite steep and severe. You wouldn't risk what damage the Defender's bulk could do to itself by jumping it there; even less the not-as-well-damped, shorter-travel Mach-E. But the Nomad takes it like some magic flying La-Z-Boy armchair. It vaults like a gazelle but, thanks to that Öhlins suspension and its modest weight, comes back down to earth in a more comfortable, matter-of-fact way than you would ever believe possible. And so you line it up again, just to check it wasn't a fluke. The same way you do once you've found the perfect line through that tricky off-camber corner. And you don't stop until you're blowing and grinning in gloriously equal measure. Cars this compelling may not play by the rules, but they're absolutely worth making room, time, occasion and effort for. The Nomad vividly proves that if you really want to have fun off road, committing fully and putting the effort in truly pays off – and it does it in singularly superb fashion. The Result 1st. Ariel Nomad 2 Has neither usability nor capability to worry about and feels superbly, vividly liberated as a result. Fun on the loose like just about nothing else. 2nd. Ford Mustang Mach-E Rally A simple, direct and surprisingly effective way to enjoy yourself on gravel, although it lacks some toughness, stamina and true capability. 3rd. Land Rover Defender Octa Would get you to almost anywhere there is fun to be had and with plenty of entertaining flourish. Needs a big canvas to really impress as a driver's car, though. ]]>