&w=3840&q=100)
India's Russian oil imports up slightly in January-June, shows data
India, the world's third-largest oil importer and consumer, received about 1.75 million barrels per day of Russian oil in January-June this year, up 1 per cent from a year ago, the data showed.
The two private refiners have term deals to buy Russian oil, while state companies rely on purchases from the spot market.
India's purchases of Russian oil sold at discounted rates surged after Western nations imposed sanctions and stopped buying oil from Moscow over its invasion of Ukraine in 2022.
Earlier this week, US President Donald Trump threatened sanctions on buyers of Russian exports unless Moscow agrees a peace deal within 50 days.
Indian refiners expect that any move by Trump is unlikely to disrupt oil supplies but could wipe out the thinning discount on Russian crude, as traditional and new suppliers ramp up output, refinery officials told Reuters.
In January-June, Russia continued to be the top supplier to India, accounting for about 35 per cent of India's overall supplies, followed by Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and United Arab Emirates.
The United States was the fifth-largest oil supplier to India, up from the sixth position it held a year earlier, the data showed.
India plans to raise energy imports from the U.S. as it prepares for a trade deal with Washington to avoid stiff U.S. import tariffs.
Overall, India's oil imports in January-June rose by 4.3 per cent to about 5.2 million bpd, the data showed.
In June, India's Russian oil imports rose 17.4 per cent to about 2 million bpd from the previous month, dragging down the share of Middle Eastern producers and the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
26 minutes ago
- Business Standard
JSW Steel Q1FY26 results: Consolidated net profit jumps 158% to ₹2,184 cr
JSW Steel on Friday reported a 158 per cent year-on-year (YoY) jump in consolidated net profit (attributable to owners of the company) to Rs 2,184 crore for the June quarter of 2025-26 (Q1FY26), driven by higher volumes and lower coking coal costs, a key raw material. In the year-ago period, the company's net profit had stood at Rs 845 crore. The net profit exceeded the Bloomberg consensus estimate of Rs 2,095 crore. JSW Steel's total revenues on a consolidated basis for Q1FY26 were Rs 43,147 crore, 0.5 per cent higher than Rs 42,943 crore a year ago. The Bloomberg estimate for revenue was Rs 43,004 crore. Sequentially, revenue was down 3.7 per cent due to planned maintenance shutdowns, while net profit was up 45.3 per cent. Capacity utilisation at the Indian operations was 87 per cent during the quarter, compared to 93 per cent in Q4FY25. Steel sales for the quarter stood at 6.69 mt, higher by 9 per cent YoY, driven by higher domestic sales. Domestic sales at 5.96 mt increased by 12 per cent YoY. However, exports continued to be muted, with a 20 per cent YoY drop. Exports constituted 7 per cent of sales from the Indian operations for Q1FY26. JSW Steel has outlined a capital expenditure (capex) plan of Rs 20,000 crore for FY26. The consolidated capex spend during Q1FY26 was Rs 3,400 crore. The company's net debt as of June 30, 2025, stood at Rs 79,850 crore, an increase of Rs 3,287 crore from March 31, 2025. The company said the increase was mainly due to investment in working capital. In its statement, the company said that the growth outlook for the Indian economy remained robust despite global uncertainties. "Domestic steel demand continues to be good, aided by healthy capex by the government in Q1," it said. However, it added that while finished steel imports have moderated, exports have fallen as well, and India continues to be a net importer. "Low-priced imports remain a concern, accentuated by changes in global trade flows due to rising tariff uncertainties," the company said. Among other board decisions was approval for entering into a share purchase option agreement to acquire an additional stake of up to 24.9 per cent in JSW Severfield Structures Limited from its existing joint venture partner, Severfield plc group. The cost of acquiring the additional stake of up to 24.9 per cent would be up to a maximum value of Rs 235.10 crore. The company also announced that the board had approved the incorporation of a joint venture company between JSW Steel and Andhra Pradesh Mineral Development Corporation to set up the Konijedu Marlapadu integrated iron ore project in Andhra Pradesh. The project will mine and beneficiate low-grade iron ore at a cost of Rs 1,075 crore.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
26 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Low value, high stakes: Why nations are racing to mine rare earth minerals
Even though the global rare earth elements (REE) market is relatively small, estimated at $3.5 billion in 2024, nations are racing to secure reserves and develop domestic supply chains. Prices for key elements like neodymium-praseodymium (NdPr) have been volatile and low, making purely commercial ventures unattractive without state support. Still, governments view rare earths as critical to national security and high-tech industries like defense systems, wind turbines, EV motors, and consumer electronics rely on them. This explains why the Pentagon pledged $400 million investment in MP Materials and a 10-year price-floor guarantee of $110 per kg for NdPr, nearly double current rates, as reported by the Financial Times. China's rise to rare earth processing dominance China's position evolved through geological advantages and decades of strategy. With massive ion-adsorption clay deposits, easier and affordable to extract and process, the country targeted both mining and midstream refining from the 1980s onwards. Deng Xiaoping declared in 1992: 'While there is oil in the Middle East, China has rare earths.' That vision guided state-backed subsidies, lax environmental regulations, and vertical integration, from mining to finished magnets. Today, China controls 90–95 per cent of global REE refining and processing capacity. The 2010 export restrictions to Japan highlighted the leverage China holds: prices spiked five- to seven-fold, even though rare earths are not geologically scarce, but economically rare. Why were other countries slow to compete? Mining and refining REEs involves high costs, environmental risks, and technical complexity. Western firms exited in the early 2000s; notably, the US's Mountain Pass mine shut in 2002 due to stricter environmental rules. Processing facilities also generate 2,000 tonnes of toxic and radioactive waste per tonne of rare earths. Mining and processing rare earths face three major constraints namely: Low market value: Annual US import value stands at only $200 million. High pollution: Processing leads to extreme pollution — generating toxic and radioactive waste. Low return on investment: Investments in mining hard rock and ionic clay are significant but yield thin margins due to low prices. With tight margins and low prices, only China was willing to absorb these costs. In contrast, Western miners focused on extraction but lacked downstream separation infrastructure. Are rare earths worth more strategically? In 2023, the United States imported approximately 400 tonnes of rare-earth metals, valued at $22.1 million. In addition, it imported around 10,530 tonnes of rare earth compounds, worth $186 million, according to Statista and the World Integrated Trade Solution database. In 2024, US imports of rare earth compounds remained around 10,530 tonnes, with their value estimated between $151.08 million and $170 million. Of this, approximately 74.5 per cent of the imports by value came from China. In the European Union, 2023 imports of rare earth minerals stood at 18,300 tonnes, worth €123.6 million, with 39 per cent of the total volume supplied by China. In 2024, imports into the EU declined sharply to 12,900 tonnes, a 29 per cent decrease, with China's share rising to 46.3 per cent. Russia and Malaysia also contributed significantly to Europe's rare earth supply. India eyes security in REE imports India's rare earth imports in 2023 were between 1,085 tonnes (narrower product category) and 2,270 tonnes (broader category), with the total value ranging between $4.9 million and $5.84 million. The majority of these imports originated from China. In 2024, India's imports were around 2,270 tonnes, though the financial value for the year has not been specifically disclosed. Though trade values are modest, the geo-political stakes are high. A single F-35 jet, for instance, contains hundreds of kilograms of rare earths. Export controls, such as China's 2023–24 restrictions on seven heavy REEs, show how supply can be weaponised. China has previously leveraged these restrictions as well: During 2010, global prices rose dramatically and Japan scrambled for alternatives. Similar patterns repeated in recent US-China tensions. Why are govts backing projects like MP Materials? State support is essential to offset the non-commercial nature of rare earth refining. In the US, the Pentagon's $400 million stake in US rare-earth materials company MP Materials and guarantee of 7,000 tonnes of magnet purchases annually give the company financial viability, according to the Financial Times. Apple has committed up to $500 million for future magnet orders. Additionally, the Pentagon will take 15 per cent equity in MP and underwrite a minimum $110 per kg floor price for NdPr (neodymium-praseodymium). These policies aim to spark magnet-grade rare earths production capacity and Vietnam, Australia, and Canada are following suit. How are other countries responding to China's monopoly? The US is ramping up domestic projects (MP Materials, Fort Worth magnet plant, second facility for 10,000 tonnes per year capacity) according to The Wall Street Journal. Meanwhile, the EU, Japan, France, and South Korea are funding new separation plants. India, which is home to 6.9 million tonnes of REE reserves (third globally), has produced only 2,900 tonnes per year from 2012-2024, but is now aggressively investing in mining and refining partnerships through its National Critical Mineral Mission. Australia, Vietnam, Brazil, and emerging players like Greenland are also positioned to diversify the supply chain, though most need 5-10 years and billions of dollars to establish full processing capabilities. Challenges ahead in rare earth supply diversification Building end-to-end rare earth supply chains remains time-consuming, capital-intensive, and environmentally fraught. Western nations face stricter environmental rules and higher energy costs. Even with state support, it may take years, estimated to be from five to 10 years, to reach China-level processing. Furthermore, China's ability to dump excess capacity, driving down prices and squeezing new entrants, remains a powerful barrier. Without coordinated policies, such as guaranteed offtake, subsidies, and strategic reserves, Western producers will struggle to compete. Is the rare earth race driven by strategy, or profit? While REE trading generates modest revenue, their strategic value far outweighs market price. Governments are investing not to chase profits, but to mitigate geopolitical risk, secure defence-relevant supply, and support green-tech independence. As demand for high-performance magnets and critical defence components grows, countries will continue the strategic pursuit even when unit values remain low as it is not about immediate profits but about geo-political insurance in a world increasingly defined by high-tech competition and resource security.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
26 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Inside India's plan to locally make 600,000 AK-203 rifles in Amethi by 2030
The AK-203 assault rifles being manufactured in Amethi's Korwa by Indo-Russian Rifles Private Limited (IRRPL) are set to be completely indigenous by the end of 2025. As of now, 50 per cent of the components and processes are already locally sourced, and full indigenisation is on track, according to IRRPL CEO and MD Major General SK Sharma. "If you ask a soldier, then his most reliable friend is an assault rifle... AK-203 will be the most reliable thing in the future," Sharma told news agency ANI. He added that the Indian armed forces will receive 70,000 rifles by the end of this year, of which 48,000 have already been delivered. Delivery timeline to beat deadline by nearly two years Under a ₹5,200 crore contract, IRRPL is to supply 601,427 AK-203 rifles to the Indian armed forces by October 2032. However, the company now aims to complete deliveries by December 2030 — almost two years ahead of schedule. Currently, production is scaling up. An additional 7,000 rifles will be delivered in the next few weeks, with 15,000 more expected by December 2025. From 2026 onwards, monthly production will reach 12,000 rifles, helping meet the early completion target. 'Sher' replaces INSAS in border forces The AK-203, named "Sher" in India, is a modernised version of the classic Kalashnikov. Lighter than the INSAS (3.8 kg vs 4.15 kg), it is set to become the standard-issue weapon for troops posted along the Line of Control and Line of Actual Control. The rifle is built for reliability in counterinsurgency and counterterrorism operations. Indo-Russian venture backed by army expertise Formed in 2019 under an intergovernmental agreement, IRRPL is a joint venture between Russian firms Rosoboronexport and Concern Kalashnikov, and Indian public-sector companies AWEIL and MIL. The company is led by a team of Indian Army officers and operates from an 8.5-acre site in Amethi. Major Gen Sharma described the venture as the 'younger brother of BrahMos', highlighting its strategic value. High precision manufacturing and future scale Each AK-203 rifle goes through 120 manufacturing processes and comprises about 50 components and 180 sub-parts. The rifle has a service life of 15,000 rounds. Already, 60 critical parts have been indigenised, with components sourced from Indian vendors and assembled at the Amethi facility. IRRPL aims to manufacture 150,000 rifles annually post full indigenisation, eventually reaching a production rate of 600 rifles per day — approximately one rifle every 100 seconds. (With agency inputs)
