
Ex-Google exec: The idea that AI will create new jobs is '100% crap'—even CEOs are at risk of displacement
The idea that artificial intelligence will create jobs is "100% crap," Gawdat said Monday on the "Diary of a CEO" podcast, using his own AI startup, Emma.love, as an example. He and two other software experts built the app with the help of AI, a project that would have required "350 developers in the past," he said.
Gawdat has worked in tech for over 30 years. He was in the C-suite at Google X for almost five years tackling major problems facing humanity, like energy, climate change and internet access.
Even the jobs you may think require humans will be eliminated, including video editors, podcasters and executives, said Gawdat. Bill Gates has predicted that doctors and teachers will also be replaced in the coming years.
Those who have the most promising outlook are professionals who are the best at their jobs, said Gawdat, author of "Scary Smart: The Future of Artificial Intelligence and How You Can Save Our World." But even they won't be safe forever.
Artificial general intelligence is "going to be better than humans at everything, including being a CEO," said Gawdat. "There will be a time where most incompetent CEOs will be replaced."
Other leaders say AI isn't all doom and gloom. Billionaires Mark Cuban and Jensen Huang, for example, say learning AI skills — in addition to strengthening soft skills — will make you highly desirable in the workplace and give you a competitive edge. After all, somebody has to program, develop and train the chatbots, and teach others to do the same.
Both Cuban, who has a free AI boot camp for kids, and Huang, whose company develops the chips and software powering many of today's generative systems, use artificial intelligence on a daily basis for tasks like writing first drafts, sending emails and getting medical advice.
Though 41% of employers globally plan to downsize their workforce due to AI (48% in the U.S.), 77% of employers are planning to upskill their current workforce to better work alongside AI, according to The World Economic Forum's 2025 Future of Jobs report. Moreover, 47% are looking at transitioning employees from declining roles into other roles in the organization.
Put simply, companies aren't going on a firing spree to replace human workers with robots right now.
Though Gawdat says the job market will suffer greatly due to AI, this economic shift may help spark necessary change to our outlook on work, giving people more time to spend with family, cultivate new hobbies, pursue philanthropy and find an identity outside of a job title.
"We were never made to wake up every morning and just occupy 20 hours of our day with work. We're not made for that," he said. "We defined our purpose as work. That's a capitalist lie."
An AI-powered society would require some kind of universal basic income (UBI), said Gawdat, a social welfare policy that ensures all citizens of a community regularly receive a payment from the government without work requirements.
The other caveat to this "utopia" is the potentially dangerous consequences of the "hunger for power, greed and ego" as AI bots report to "stupid leaders," said Gawdat, calling for ethical use and regulations around artificial intelligence.
No matter the impact of artificial intelligence, or the approaches different leaders take, one thing remains undisputable: AI is no longer a curiosity, or a plot line in a sci-fi film. It's revolutionizing the way people live and work. And it's here to stay.
"This is real," Gawdat said. "This is not science fiction."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
7 hours ago
- Forbes
The AI Podcast Revolution And How Steven Barlett Is Tackling It
Diary Of A CEO founder and host Steven Bartlett is diving into AI. His company, FlightStory, currently releases an AI-made podcast using his voice. Bartlett says the users know the show is AI-generated and it still has a strong retention rate, with 60% of the audience staying through the end. The AI replication scares him—but not as much as the idea of someone else doing it first. 'There's always a bulldozer coming for you,' says Bartlett. 'You have a choice to either be hit by the bulldozer or to drive the bulldozer.'


Tom's Guide
15 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
Sam Altman's bold prediction: Gen Alpha grads could skip the cubicle and head right for high-paying jobs in space
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman believes the next generation of college graduates won't just be working in offices, their careers could take them to space. In an interview first reported by Fortune, Altman predicted that by 2035, Gen Alpha graduates may step into 'completely new, exciting, super well-paid' jobs that blend space exploration and AI technology. Speaking with host Cleo Abram on the Huge Conversations podcast, Altman framed today's college grads as the 'luckiest kids in all of history.' According to him, AI will do more than disrupt the workforce, it will rewire it, creating opportunities unimaginable just a few years ago. By 2035, Altman envisions young professionals leaving university and heading off on missions to explore the solar system, engaged in highly lucrative and fulfilling careers that blend space and AI technology In Altman's vision, a 2035 graduate might just as easily be boarding a spacecraft to work on an asteroid mining project as joining a tech startup in San Francisco. But Altman's prediction isn't universally shared. Former Google X executive Mo Gawdat has warned that AI could wipe out nearly half of entry-level white-collar jobs in the next five years, potentially leaving younger generations scrambling for footing in a volatile Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei claims AI will cause mass unemployment but also help us live longer. On the other hand, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang offered a more hopeful perspective at the 28th annual Milken Institute Global Conference, encouraging workers to see AI as a tutor and collaborator, not a rival, to unlock new skills and career opportunities. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. Altman's forecast is a provocation to rethink how we define work in the coming decades. His comments open up questions about where careers could exist, who will benefit from these changes, and how society should adapt. Altman's vision may read like sci-fi, but it underscores a real shift. AI is advancing so fast that tomorrow's careers could be unlike anything we've known, with some measured in light-years. As a mom of three gen alpha kids, I just hope those high-paying space jobs come with powerful Wi-Fi and a way to do their own Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Former Google exec says AI's going to lead to a 'short-term dystopia' because the idea it will create new jobs for the ones it's replacing is '100% crap'
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Something funny happened as I was watching Google X's former chief business officer Mo Gawdat, on the Google-owned platform YouTube, outline his exact take on the AI dystopia he thinks is coming. The host began to ask Gawdat about the idea AI will create new jobs, then the video halted while Google ads served me a 15-second clip showing someone using Microsoft CoPilot to do their job. When Gawdat returns, he begins his answer by talking about the idea of the West transitioning into service or knowledge economies: people, as he puts it, who "type on a keyboard and use a mouse." Oh dear. Gawdat's economics lesson concludes that "all we produce in the West is words [...] and designs. All of these things can be produced by AI." One thing is impossible to deny: the business world is very interested in the idea of replacing humans with AI and, where it can be done, will not hesitate to do so. There's also the fact that every big tech company is pushing AI into their products and our lives. The AI industry has something of a stock line about its technology replacing existing careers: AI will simultaneously create new jobs we can't even imagine, and people will start working in those fields. But Gawdat doesn't buy that line, and in straightforward language calls the whole idea "100% crap" (thanks, Windows Central). Gawdat left Google to form an AI startup, and cites this company as an example of what he's talking about: the app was apparently built with only two other developers, a job that Gawdat reckons would have taken "over 350 developers" without AI assistance. "Artificial general intelligence is going to be better than humans at everything, including being a CEO," says Gawdat, referring to the idea that the industry will eventually produce an AI model capable of reasoning and more intelligent than humans. "There will be a time where most incompetent CEOs will be replaced.' Gawdat's spin on this, however, is that society has to undergo a paradigm shift in how we think about our lives: "We were never made to wake up every morning and just occupy 20 hours of our day with work. We're not made for that. We defined our purpose as work. That's a capitalist lie." Tell me more, comrade! Gawdat generally seems to hold a rather low view of executives and their priorities, pointing out that the AI future is subject to human "hunger for power, greed, and ego' because the tools themselves will be controlled by "stupid leaders." I'm not sure I'd characterise Elon Musk as stupid, but I doubt I'm alone in thinking I'd rather not have him in charge of re-arranging society. "There is no doubt that lots of jobs will be lost," says Gawdat. "Are we prepared to tell our governments, this is an ideological shift similar to socialism, similar to Communism, and are we ready from a budget point of view? Instead of spending a trillion dollars a year on arms and explosives and autonomous weapons to suppress people because we can't feed them." Gawdat runs through some beermat maths, offering an estimate that $2.4-2.7 dollars is spent on military hardware every year, a fraction of which could solve a problem like world hunger, or lift the global population out of extreme poverty. Then we get into the truly starry-eyed stuff like universal healthcare worldwide and the end of war, with Gawdat saying for AI these things would be "simple decisions." Hmm. I'll have some of what he's smoking. Gawdat's take on AI starts out more persuasive than many others I've seen, but when it gets onto the more fantastical ramifications the caveat is simply enormous. If the singularity happens and AI just takes over running the planet then, sure, all bets are off: who knows whether we'll end up with dystopia or utopia. But that day may never come and, until then, there will still be human beings somewhere pulling all the levers. And as history shows, time and again, humans can be horrendous at making simple decisions: and that's rarely good for the rest of us. Solve the daily Crossword