
BRICS nations ‘condemn and reject' Europe's carbon-based import duties
CBAM is an import duty imposed by the European Union (EU) on goods produced by processes that lead to more carbon emissions than domestic European manufacturers are allowed to emit. The ostensible reason is to check 'carbon leakage', but this has the effect of making items like steel or cement, from a country like India for example, more expensive, and thus less competitive, in the European markets.
Developing countries including India and China have been strongly critical of CBAM, calling it a unilateral and unfair trade barrier. They maintain this violates international agreements on both trade and climate, and have raised this issue at multiple international forums, including the annual climate conferences. But EU has been unrelenting. The statement by the BRICS nations, a group of nine large developing economies whose annual two-day summit concluded in Brazil on Monday, is another reiteration of the stand of the developing countries, though in a much stronger language.
'We condemn and reject unilateral, punitive and discriminatory, protectionist measures that are not in line with international law, under the pretext of environmental concerns, such has unilateral and discriminatory carbon border adjustment mechanisms (CBAMs), due diligence requirements with detrimental impacts on global efforts to halt and reverse deforestation, taxes and other measures …', the BRICS nations said in a statement on climate finance that is a new addition to the outcomes from this annual meeting.
The Leaders' Framework Declaration on Climate Finance is the result of the discussions held by a new contact group of ministers on climate change and sustainable development that was formed last year under Russia's chairmanship of BRICS.
The declaration said CBAMs, and other measures like restrictions on trade of forest goods, violated the provisions of the 1994 UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and agreements reached at other climate meetings. For example, Article 3(5) of UNFCCC calls upon countries to 'promote a supportive and open international economic system' that would lead to sustainable economic growth and development in all countries, particularly those in the developing world. Importantly, it also says that 'measures taken to combat climate change, including unilateral ones, should not constitute a means of arbitrary or unjustifiable discrimination or a disguised restriction on international trade'.
The BRICS countries, in their latest statement said they want a full implementation of this provision in UNFCCC.
'We also oppose unilateral protectionist measures which deliberately disrupt the global supply and production chains and distort competition,' it said.
'We express concern that such measures, as well as unilateral economic and financial sanctions, may undermine BRICS countries' capacities to invest in their own just transitions and development priorities and risk diverting away critical resources at a time when developing countries face a financial gap to pursue climate action and sustainable development. We emphasise the importance of non-discriminatory access to trade and to climate finance for all countries and the need to address existing barriers,' it said.
The BRICS nations also asked the rich and developed world to fully deliver on their commitments under the UNFCCC and the 2015 Agreement, particularly those related to providing financial resources to the developing countries to take climate action. Developed countries are obligated to raise at least US$ 100 billion a year in climate finance meant for developing countries. They have promised to raise this to at least US$ 300 billion a year from 2035. But developing countries say this is too less and too late, considering that they already need at least US$ 1.3 trillion a year.
'We emphasize that although developing countries have contributed to a lesser extent to climate change, populations in these countries are the most vulnerable to its adverse impacts and the lesser equipped, including in terms of relevant infrastructure, to withstand its effects. Therefore, we highlight the need to increase the share of financing for adaptation, particularly public finance…,' the BRICS statement said.
The BRICS nations called on the developed world to urgently increase their financial contribution to adaptation projects, at least doubling the amount in 2019 by 2025, as has been agreed in climate conferences.
'We emphasise that adaptation finance must be primarily concessional, grant-based and accessible to local communities and should not substantially increase debt burdens on developing economies, while ensuring predictability, adequacy and direct access modalities that facilitate implementation of context-appropriate solutions aligned with national adaptation plans and priorities,' their statement said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
17 minutes ago
- Mint
For India's oil refiners, the Gulf is calling again
India's state-run oil refiners are looking to crank up oil purchases from the UAE, Saudi Arabia and Iraq amid a standoff with the US over buying Russian oil, two people aware of the matter said. India has traditionally relied on oil from West Asia, until Russia began offering steep discounts three years ago. Saudi Aramco and Abu Dhabi National Oil Co., the oil champions of Saudi Arabia and the UAE, are among West Asia's top crude oil producers and suppliers. "Import of Russian oil will continue, but India is also looking at diversifying its imports, and higher supplies from West Asia are being looked at," one of the two people cited above said. Queries sent to the Union petroleum ministry, Indian Oil Corp. Ltd, Bharat Petroleum Corp. Ltd and Hindustan Petroleum Corp. Ltd remained unanswered. Moscow calling As European countries shunned Russian oil in the wake of the Ukraine war, India stepped into the breach, scooping it up at a steep discount. The discount has sharply narrowed now, and India's Russian oil imports have fallen as well. Currently, Russia caters to 36% of India's total oil imports, compared to 2.5% before Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022. In FY25, Russia was India's top supplier with oil worth $50.28 billion exported to India, followed by Iraq ($27.35 billion), Saudi Arabia ($20 billion) and the UAE ($13.86 billion). In the first two months of FY26, Russia supplied oil worth $9.16 billion, followed by Iraq ($5.36 billion), Saudi Arabia ($3.26 billion), UAE ($2.8 billion) and US ($2.7 billion. "Inquiries for West Asian oil have already increased of late," an industry executive said on condition of anonymity. 'Suited for W. Asia' Indian refiners are better equipped to handle Russian Urals and West Asian crude, the executive said, adding there is higher scope for more West Asian oil to flowing into India, compared to lighter variants such as West Texas Intermediate of the US. Apart from state-run refiners, Reliance Industries Ltd and Nayara Energy are also among India's leading crude oil importers. The person cited earlier said price may still be a concern for India. That is because West Asian suppliers do not generally offer discounts, and the final cost—which includes shipping, insurance and other costs—may be higher than the actual purchase price. Currently, the September contract of the benchmark Brent crude on the Intercontinental Exchange is trading at $66.64 per barrel. Another industry participant said the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (Opec), which is led by Saudi Arabia along with the UAE and other West Asian countries, has a spare capacity of 5 million barrels per day and would be easily able to cater to the additional demand from India, the world's third-largest energy importer. New opportunity "It may be an opportunity for India to reopen its oil requirements to suppliers across the globe. India does not necessarily need to look at only one or two options. Multiple countries may willingly compete to re-establish their supplies as a critical and ongoing share of India's crude basket, and it could also help India in terms of supply terms and/or pricing—a potential win-win for all involved," said Gaurav Moda, partner and leader for energy at EY, Parthenon India. India and the US are at loggerheads over the import of Russian oil. US President Donald Trump has imposed 25% tariffs on India for buying Russian energy, taking the total duty to 50%. The additional tariffs are aimed at choking Russia's oil revenues and forcing it to end the war in Ukraine. The new rate will take effect on 27 August. India, however, has maintained that its imports are based on market factors along with the objective of ensuring energy security. In a statement on 6 August, the ministry of external affairs described the tariffs as 'unfair, unjustified and unreasonable". Sanctions, curbs On 2 August, Mint reported that India continues to buy oil from Russia notwithstanding the punishing penalty. In 2022 and 2023, amid deep discounts being offered by Russia, Iraq also increased its supplies to India on the back of discounted oil. India does not purchase oil from Iran and Venezuela, both of which face sanctions; however, there are no sanctions on Russian oil, and India continues to purchase it. However, the G7 nations have set a price cap of $60 per barrel on Russian oil. The European Union last month lowered the cap to about $47 per barrel from September. China and India are the top buyers of Russian oil. Although the US and EU have raised concerns over India's oil purchases from Russia, India has maintained that its energy procurement would depend on its needs. India imports over 88% of its crude oil requirement, and has diversified its oil sources to nearly 40 countries in order to ensure energy security.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
17 minutes ago
- First Post
‘We will never leave...': Zelenskyy refuses to cede Donbas region that could be Putin's 'springboard' for future war
Zelenskyy has ruled out ceding more territory to Russia in return for a ceasefire, saying such a deal would only set the stage for another war. 'We will never leave...': Zelenskyy refuses to cede Donbas region that could be Putin's 'springboard' for future war. AFP Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy on Tuesday (August 12) has rejected a Russian proposal to cede more Ukrainian territory in exchange for a ceasefire, warning that Moscow would simply use any gains as a springboard for a future war. At a press briefing in Kyiv, Zelenskyy said Vladimir Putin was demanding Ukraine withdraw from the final 9,000 square kilometres of Donetsk still under Kyiv's control — a message he said was relayed to him by US officials ahead of Friday's planned summit between Donald Trump and the Russian leader. He stressed that agreeing to such terms would 'merely lay the groundwork for another war'. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Zelenskyy said he did not believe Trump supported Russia's demands and expressed hope the US leader would act as a fair mediator when he meets Putin in Alaska. The Ukrainian president also said there was no sign Russia was preparing to honour a ceasefire, pointing to reports that small sabotage units had breached Ukrainian defences in eastern Donbas, advancing roughly six miles in three days. He further warned that Russia was planning fresh offensives along three sectors of the frontline. Speaking to reporters ahead of the Trump–Putin summit, and a day before a virtual meeting with US and European leaders, Zelenskyy accused Putin of seeking to dominate Ukraine because he 'does not want a sovereign Ukraine'. He warned it would be dangerous for Ukraine to be pressured by the US into accepting Russia's demand to seize the remaining parts of Donbas after the Alaska talks. The territory sought by Moscow amounted to 'about 90,000 square kilometres' of Ukraine, he said. Last week, Russia signalled for the first time that it might consider a ceasefire in return for Ukraine withdrawing from the areas of Donbas still under its control. While Trump suggested the two countries could explore a 'swapping of territories', Zelenskyy said he understood Russia's offer as merely 'not to advance further, not to withdraw from anywhere' — with no genuine swaps on the table. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD


News18
40 minutes ago
- News18
Trump, Vance To Meet Zelenskyy Virtually Before Alaska Summit With Putin: Report
The purpose of the dialogue is to address Ukraine's growing concerns about being side-lined in negotiations. US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin are scheduled to meet in Alaska on August 15 to discuss the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine. The high-stakes summit will take place behind closed doors and will be limited to representatives from the US and Russia, raising significant concerns over Ukraine's exclusion from direct participation. Addressing criticism surrounding Kyiv's absence from the in-person discussions, the White House officials confirmed on Tuesday that President Trump will hold a virtual meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy prior to the summit, ABC News reported. The session is expected to take place on Wednesday. Sources familiar with the development said President Trump and Vice President JD Vance will join the virtual meeting, which will also include key European allies. The purpose of the dialogue is to address Ukraine's growing concerns about being sidelined in negotiations that could shape the outcome of the war and affect its territorial sovereignty. Recently, President Zelenskyy has issued repeated warnings that 'talks about us, without us, will not work." He has also rejected any possibility of agreeing to territorial concessions, especially the withdrawal of Ukrainian troops from the contested Donbas region in the east. The Donbas region, comprising Luhansk and Donetsk, has been a focal point of the war since Russia's full-scale invasion in February 2022. Moscow has since claimed both regions as part of its territory. Zelenskyy also expressed frustration with the Alaska summit, calling the direct Trump-Putin meeting a 'personal victory" for the Russian leader. Although the White House has framed the summit as a 'listening exercise" for President Trump, Ukrainian officials fear their interests may be compromised in backchannel talks. Still, Zelenskyy struck a hopeful tone, revealing that during a recent call with US envoy Steve Witkoff, he received a subtle indication that Russia may be open to negotiating a ceasefire. 'This was the first signal from them," he noted. Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from geopolitics to diplomacy and global trends. Stay informed with the latest world news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.