JFK assassination-related docs lift secrecy veil from CIA covert ops
These materials are reproduced from www.nsarchive.org with the permission of the National Security Archive.
On the day of President John F. Kennedy's inauguration in January 1961, '47 percent of the political officers serving in United States embassies were CAS' – intelligence agents working under diplomatic cover known as Controlled American Sources, White House aide, Arthur Schlesinger Jr. reported in a Top Secret memorandum on 'CIA Reorganization.'
In the U.S. Embassy in Paris, 123 'diplomats' were actually CIA undercover agents; in Chile, 11 of the 13 Embassy 'political officers' were CIA undercover operatives.
'CIA today has nearly as many people under official cover overseas as [the] State [Department] – 3900 to 3700,' Schlesinger reported to President Kennedy. 'About 1500 of those are under State Department cover (the other 2200 are presumably under military or other non-State official cover).' (Document 1)
The memorandum, declassified in full for the first time, is part of a final release of records on the Kennedy assassination under the Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992. Pursuant to a directive from President Trump on January 23, the National Archives released 2,182 records (63,400 pages) in two tranches on the evening of March 18 and noted that more would be released as they were digitalized.
The new release includes hundreds of CIA records as well as White House and NSC documents relating to covert operations abroad – particularly in Latin American nations such as Cuba and Mexico, which are fixtures in the history of the Kennedy assassination.
Most of them were released before but with key redactions to protect intelligence sources and methods and covert operations abroad from being revealed. For the first time, these records on CIA covert operations are being released uncensored.
Among the revelations are completely unredacted copies of:
A key document from the CIA's famed 'Family Jewels' series describing 'examples of activities exceeding the CIA's charter,' including a CIA counterespionage operation against the French embassy in Washington, DC, that included 'breaking and entering and the removal of documents from the French consulate' and Director of Central Intelligence John McCone's dealings with the Vatican, including Pope John XXIII and Pope Paul VI, which 'could and would raise eyebrows in some quarters.' (Document 4)
The CIA Inspector General's report on the 1961 assassination of Rafael Trujillo, dictator of the Dominican Republic, revealing the names of CIA officers and others who assisted in the plot. (Document 6)
A series of summaries of briefings by DCI John McCone to members of the President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board (PFIAB) that provide more details about known CIA political action programs and previously unknown details about 'the Agency's covert financial support to political parties in the fight against communism' around the world. (Document 2)
A CIA inspector general report on the workings of the CIA station in Mexico City providing one of the most detailed views of how the CIA organizes its operations on the ground. (Document 3)
A history of CIA operations in the Western Hemisphere covering 1946-1965, including expenditures by CIA stations in Latin America, and details on CIA payments and influence operations in Bolivia to orchestrate the election of their chosen candidate General René Barrientos. (Document 5)
'There is no doubt that the JFK Records Act has advanced public knowledge of CIA covert operations – who they targeted, how they were conducted and who conducted them – more than any other declassification in the history of access to information,' said National Security Archive senior analyst Peter Kornbluh, who has studied CIA operations for decades. 'Without this law and its implementation over the last 27 years, these operational CIA files would likely have stayed Top Secret for eternity.'
Comparison of page from 1964 CIA history of Mexico City station.
The JFK Records Act
Congress passed the 1992 JFK Act in the wake of a public uproar over Oliver Stone's popular conspiratorial movie, JFK. The film – starring Kevin Costner as New Orleans District Attorney James Garrison, who mounted a failed, conspiracy-driven prosecution of a local businessman for killing Kennedy – finished with a statement that over five million pages of records on the assassination remained secret.
'The suspicions created by government secrecy eroded confidence in the truthfulness of federal agencies in general and damaged their credibility,' noted the Assassination Records Review Board (ARRB) in its final report.
'Finally, frustrated by the lack of access and disturbed by the conclusions of Oliver Stone's JFK, Congress passed the President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992 (JFK Act), mandating the gathering and opening of all records concerned with the death of the President.'
After the JFK Act was passed, the National Security Archive played a role in advising the five-member oversight board and its staff to establish a broad definition of an 'assassination-related' document.
The ARRB mandated the full release of thousands of documents related not only to the immediate crime, but on covert action and espionage operations in Cuba, and Mexico, among other countries, and on FBI operations and the mafia. To date, the documents have produced countless revelations of the CIA and FBI's operational histories.
CIA expenditures in Latin America by country for FY 1961. (See Doc 5)
'The Review Board has worked hard to obtain all records relating to the assassination of President Kennedy and to release the records to the fullest extent possible to the American people,' the Assassination Records Review Board members wrote in a letter to President Clinton in September 1998, when they turned in their final report.
'We have done so in the hope that release of these records will shed new evidentiary light on the assassination of President Kennedy, enrich the historical understanding of that tragic moment in American history, and help restore public confidence in the government's handling of the assassination and its aftermath.'
The National Security Archive is just starting to sort through this treasure trove of new revelations. Watch this space for future postings on CIA operations and much more.
Click on a title for full-sized document and discussion:
Document 1
Arthur Schlesinger Jr. to President Kennedy, 'CIA Reorganization,' Secret, June 10, 1961, 5 pp.
Jun 10, 1961
Source
National Archives, JFK Assassination Records, 2025 release, Doc ID: 157-10002-10056
Compare to 2023 release.
Document 2
CIA, Minutes from Meetings of the Presidents Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board (PFIAB), Top Secret, various dates from 1962-1963, 41 pp.
1962-1963
Source
National Archives, JFK Assassination Records, 2025 release, Doc ID: 104-10302-10000
Compare to 2023 release.
Document 3
CIA, Extracts of Inspector General's Survey of Mexico City Station, Secret, 1964, 11 pp.
1964
Source
National Archives, JFK Assassination Records, 2025 release, Doc ID: 104-10301-10010
Compare to 2022 release.
Document 4
CIA, Walter Elder 'Family Jewels' memorandum for William E. Colby, 'Special Activities,' Secret/Sensitive/Eyes Only, June 1, 1973, 7 pp.
Jun 1, 1973
Source
National Archives, JFK Assassination Records, 2025 release, Doc ID: 104-10303-10007
Compare to 2023 release.
Document 5
CIA Historical Staff, 'Western Hemisphere Division, 1946-1965,' Secret, December 1973, 24 pp.
Dec 1973
Source
National Archives, JFK Assassination Records, 2025 release, Doc ID: 104-10301-10001
Compare to 2023 release.
Document 6
CIA Inspector General's Report, 'Trujillo Report' [Report on Assassination of Dominican Dictator Rafael Trujillo], Secret-Eyes Only, Undated [Circa Spring 1967], 64 pp.
Spring 1967
Source
National Archives, JFK Assassination Records, 2025 release, Doc ID: 104-10214-10034
Compare to previous release.
Related links
Final Report of the Assassination Records Review Board
Understanding the CIA: How Covert (and Overt) Operations Were Proposed and Approved during the Cold War
Mar 4, 2019
The Family Jewels: The CIA, Secrecy, and Presidential Power
book by John Prados
The CIA's Family Jewels
Jun 21, 2007
LITEMPO: The CIA's Eyes on Tlatelolco
Oct 18, 2006
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
HKFP
04-06-2025
- HKFP
US President Trump says deal with Chinese leader Xi ‘extremely hard' as steel tariffs double
Donald Trump said on Wednesday that it was 'extremely hard' to reach a deal with Chinese leader Xi Jinping, but the EU touted progress in its own trade talks with Washington even though the US president doubled global metal tariffs. Trump's latest trade moves came as OECD ministers gathered in Paris to discuss the outlook for the world economy in light of a US hardball approach that has rattled world markets. Trump's sweeping tariffs on allies and adversaries have strained ties with trading partners and sparked a flurry of negotiations to avoid the duties. The White House has suggested the president will speak to Xi this week, raising hopes they can soothe tensions and speed up a trade deal between the world's two biggest economies. However, early Wednesday, Trump appeared to dampen hopes for a quick deal. 'I like President XI of China, always have, and always will, but he is VERY TOUGH, AND EXTREMELY HARD TO MAKE A DEAL WITH!!!' he posted on his Truth Social platform. Asked about the remarks during a regular press briefing, Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Lin Jian said: 'The Chinese side's principles and stance on developing Sino-US relations are consistent.' China was the main target of Trump's April tariff blitz, hit with levies of 145 percent on its goods and triggering tit-for-tat tariffs of 125 percent on US goods. Both sides agreed to temporarily de-escalate in May, after Trump delayed most sweeping measures on other countries until July 9. His latest remarks came hours after he increased his tariffs on aluminum and steel from 25 percent to 50 percent, raising temperatures with various partners while exempting Britain from the higher levy. EU trade commissioner Maros Sefcovic said after talks with US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer on the sidelines of the OECD meeting in Paris that raising the metal tariffs 'doesn't help the negotiations'. The two sides were nonetheless 'making progress' in their negotiations, Sefcovic said at a news conference. Goods from the 27-nation bloc will be hit with 50-percent tariffs on July 9 unless it reaches a deal with Washington. The EU has vowed to retaliate. 'We did very much focus on these negotiations, and I still believe in them,' Sefcovic said, adding that he was optimistic that a 'positive result' could be reached. Steel tariffs The OECD cut its forecast for global economic growth on Tuesday, blaming Trump's tariff blitz for the downgrade. 'We need to come up with negotiated solutions as quickly as possible, because time is running out,' German economy minister Katherina Reiche warned. French trade minister Laurent Saint-Martin said: 'We have to keep our cool and always show that the introduction of these tariffs is in no one's interest.' Canada, the largest supplier of the metals to the United States, has called Trump's tariffs 'illegal and unjustified'. After talks between UK Trade Secretary Jonathan Reynolds and Greer on Tuesday, London said imports from the UK would remain at 25 percent for now. Both sides needed to work out duties and quotas in line with the terms of a recently signed trade pact. 'We're pleased that as a result of our agreement with the US, UK steel will not be subject to these additional tariffs,' a British government spokesperson said. White House wants offers The Group of Seven advanced economies — Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan and the United States — was due to hold separate talks on trade Wednesday. Mexico will request an exemption from the higher tariff, Economy Minister Marcelo Ebrard said, arguing that it was unfair because the United States exports more steel to its southern neighbour than it imports. 'It makes no sense to put a tariff on a product in which you have a surplus,' Ebrard said. Mexico is highly vulnerable to Trump's trade wars because 80 percent of its exports go to the United States, its main partner. While some of Trump's most sweeping levies face legal challenges, they have been allowed to remain in place for now as an appeals process takes place. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed Tuesday that the Trump administration sent letters to governments pushing for offers by Wednesday as the July 9 deadline approached.
HKFP
04-06-2025
- HKFP
In Pictures: Hong Kong police deploy armoured vehicle in Causeway Bay on Tiananmen crackdown anniversary
Police have deployed an armoured vehicle in Hong Kong's commercial heart, amidst an ongoing heavy security presence on the 36th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square crackdown. The 'Sabertooth' armoured vehicle was spotted on Great George Street in Causeway Bay on Wednesday afternoon, as groups of uniformed officers patrolled areas near Victoria Park, the former site of annual vigils commemorating the 1989 Tiananmen crackdown in Beijing. Hundreds of police officers have also been deployed in Causeway Bay. Officers – both in uniform and plainclothes – are being stationed in the Causeway Bay MTR station, outside the Sogo department store, as well as in and around Victoria Park. Andrew Kan, deputy police commissioner for national security, made an appearance in Causeway Bay at around 5.05pm and walked around for about 10 minutes. Activist Lui Yuk-lin, nicknamed 'Female Long Hair,' was brought into a police van at 4.28pm, shortly after she exited the Causeway Bay MTR station. She clasped her palms in front of her chest without saying anything. It is unclear whether she was under arrest. In Victoria Park, a man holding an electric candle while sitting on a bench was surrounded by police officers at around 4.30pm. The man, wearing a face mask, a white cap, and dressed in black attire, was later brought to a police van. Police did not say whether he was apprehended. Shortly after 6pm, a woman holding up a small white flower on Great George Street was surrounded by police. They searched her belongings and escorted her away to the MTR station. Two women – including a girl holding flowers and wearing what appeared to be a school uniform – were taken into a police van in Victoria Park. Performance artist Chan Mei-tung appeared in Causeway Bay at around 7.15pm and told reporters that she was going to Victoria Park to swim. She was stopped by police as she was approaching the park in the rain and was taken away in a police van at 7.29pm. On Tuesday, Chan was stopped and searched by plainclothes officers outside Sogo, as she was chewing bubble gum. The Tiananmen crackdown occurred on June 4, 1989, ending months of student-led demonstrations in China. It is estimated that hundreds, perhaps thousands, died when the People's Liberation Army cracked down on protesters in Beijing. Keith Yip, deputy police commissioner of operations, appeared in Victoria Park at around 7.45pm. A man stood silently in the rain at around 8pm. Minutes later, he was escorted by police and taken into a police van. Louis Doucet, head of press and communications at the French Consulate General in Hong Kong, walked through Victoria Park at around 8.20pm. Around 20 minutes later in the park, police questioned a man wearing a white T-shirt featuring a drawing of the Goddess of Democracy and a Chinese slogan saying, 'Vindication of June 4 Comes Closer and Closer,' before taking him into a police van. At around 9 pm, a man wearing a T-shirt saying 'Core Values of Socialism' was taken away by police in Victoria Park. Police did not say whether he was under arrest. He was also taken away during last year's Tiananmen crackdown anniversary. Just before 9 pm, a man wearing a headpiece that read 'Hong Kong Add Oil' in Chinese was stopped by police at the entrance of Fashion Walk in Causeway Bay and later led into a police van. His dog had on a collared decorated with yellow ribbons and the Chinese word for 'persist.' Two female journalists – one working for Yahoo News and the other for local media outlet The Collective – said they were questioned by police after filming an officer shining a flashlight at reporters outside the H&M store on Great George Street. Speaking to the press after being released at around 9pm, the two journalists said they told the police they were reporters. The officers then took down their personal details and press credentials before letting them go. Hong Kong used to be the only place on Chinese soil – besides Macau – where commemoration of the crackdown could be held in public. Tens of thousands of residents gathered annually in Victoria Park in Causeway Bay for candlelight vigils on June 4 every year to mourn the victims. But authorities banned the Tiananmen vigil gathering at Victoria Park for the first time in 2020, citing Covid-19 restrictions, and imposed the ban again in 2021, nearly a year after a national security law imposed by Beijing came into effect. The vigil organiser – Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China – voted a year later to disband after its former leaders Lee Cheuk-yan, Albert Ho, and Chow Hang-tung were charged with incitement to subversion under the national security law. Chow, who is currently detained pending trial, announced on Sunday that she would launch a 36-hour hunger strike in prison on Wednesday to mark 36 years since the crackdown took place. 'I believe we all will have our own ways to remember the day,' read the post shared by Chow's Patreon account, which is managed by the activist's family and friends. The police set up anti-crash barriers outside the Sogo department store after a blue private vehicle drove onto the pedestrian road. The driver was taken away by the police, and the car was towed. Local media outlet The Collective reported on Wednesday that some police officers were dropped off from a Government Flying Services helicopter at Lion Rock, where banners and signs commemorating the Tiananmen crackdown appeared in previous years. The officers set up camp near the mountaintop, the report read. In an email reply to HKFP's enquiries, the police force said: 'Police will not disclose specific operational details as it may affect the effectiveness of Police's operations.' AsOne Store, a pro-democracy business run by former district councillor Derek Chu in Mong Kok, is distributing commemorative digital candles for free on Wednesday to mark the anniversary of the Tiananmen crackdown. Some candles are wrapped with labels that read 'Tiananmen Mothers,' referring to a group of parents who say their children died during the 1989 crackdown and have since advocated for Beijing to stop treating discussions of the event as taboo. Chu told HKFP on Wednesday afternoon that more than 20 people had gone to the store to get the candles. AsOne also sells candles from another pro-democracy store, Heung Together, which was inspected by Hong Kong customs officers on Tuesday, the eve of the Tiananmen anniversary. 'It is really depressing every day in Hong Kong when you dare not speak up. But on June 4, I see that there are still many people who stand firm in their beliefs. I can still feel the spirit of those who want to safeguard the truth,' Chu said. It is the third consecutive year that the store has displayed candles to commemorate the historic event, after the annual candlelight vigils in Victoria Park were snuffed out. The Tiananmen crackdown occurred on June 4, 1989, ending months of student-led demonstrations in China. It is estimated that hundreds, perhaps thousands, died when the People's Liberation Army cracked down on protesters in Beijing.
Asia Times
04-06-2025
- Asia Times
The hard road to a clean and profitable Danantara
The recent inauguration of Danantara, Indonesia's new sovereign wealth fund, marks a remarkable development in the Southeast Asian nation's economic strategy. Established through amendment to the State-Owned Enterprises Law (Law No. 1), Danantara's creation has sparked significant discussion, often drawing comparisons with regional giants such as Singapore's Temasek Holdings and Malaysia's Khazanah Nasional. Yet, a critical aspect often overlooked is the profound disparity in legal frameworks that govern these entities and the implications for Indonesian state-owned enterprises (SOEs). Indonesia's legal framework for managing SOEs has traditionally been rigid and risk-averse. Under the former SOE Law, boards of directors were perpetually at dual risks: navigating business losses and evading potential corruption charges. This ambiguity often stemmed from the blurred legal lines that failed to distinguish between genuine business losses and misappropriation of public funds. Consequently, SOEs were involved in a stringent compliance framework that stifled innovation, promoted bureaucratic conservatism and hindered the development of a dynamic and competitive economy. The reformed SOE Law attempts to mitigate these challenges by reclassifying business losses as corporate losses instead of losses to state finances, significantly reducing the criminal liability under Indonesia's principal anti-corruption law (UU Tipikor). However, a more detailed review of UU Tipikor—particularly Articles 2 and 3—suggests that corruption may still be conducted based on two criteria: losses to state finances ( keuangan negara ) and harm to the state economy ( perekonomian negara ). While the new SOE Law narrows the risk associated with state financial losses, the interpretation of 'harm to the state economy' remains nebulous and broad. Unlike financial losses, which are measurable and direct, harm to the state economy is a much broader notion. It could be interpreted to include impacts on the country's investment climate, economic system stability or other material adverse effects. Governance and oversight weaknesses pose the most immediate risk to Danantara's mission. Unlike well-established funds such as Temasek or Khazanah, which are overseen by independent boards with rigorous checks, Danantara is ultimately controlled by the Executive Office of the President. Its enabling law (Law No. 1 of 2025) places the fund under the president, delegated via the SOE Ministry. This centralized control has raised alarms that Danantara could become a vehicle for political patronage rather than objective investment management. Worryingly, Indonesia's national audit body (BPK) currently lacks a clear mandate to scrutinize SOEs' books at this stage, removing a critical layer of independent oversight. The exclusion of the state audit agency from the fund's oversight framework means billions in public assets could be managed with limited external accountability, a structural flaw that undermines transparency and investor trust. If the foundation of this institution is built on insufficient checks, the door opens to mismanagement or worse. Closely intertwined is the risk of political interference. By design, Danantara's management answers to political authorities, which heightens the possibility of government directives influencing investment decisions. Past governance issues in Indonesian SOEs often stemmed from political interest superseding commercial logic, and Danantara's current setup may not fully solve this. Analysts note that the fund remains 'inherently tied to the government and political influence' under the present structure. That has manifested in market fears, despite presidential assurances of open audits ; there are persistent concerns that the fund could be misused for short-term political goals or the benefit of cronies . Such interference would erode not only Danantara's profitability but also its reputation. The first week of trading after Danantara's launch vividly illustrated this: mere speculation about heavy state control was enough to send Indonesian stocks tumbling and investors fleeing. Legal and structural uncertainties add another layer of risk. Danantara represents a radical reorganization of state assets, and not all roles and responsibilities have been clearly delineated. Tension could emerge between Danantara and existing institutions like the Finance Ministry or the SOE Ministry over who ultimately calls the shots on strategy and budgets. Some experts warn of a potential conflict of authority that could create bureaucratic bottlenecks and confusion in managing the fund's portfolio. Unless comprehensive legal alignment is achieved, Indonesia risks undermining the very goal of creating a more dynamic, innovative and business-friendly SOE sector. To secure Danantara's success and allay early concerns, Indonesia should swiftly implement a set of governance and integrity reforms. First, establish independent oversight by creating a truly independent supervisory board or council for Danantara composed of reputable professionals (including international experts and domestic technocrats) who are not beholden to the current administration. This body should have the authority to oversee the fund's strategy and audit its finances as well as provide checks and balances. Second, strengthen corporate governance and integrity to ensure Danantara and its portfolio SOEs adopt the highest standards of corporate governance, clear performance benchmarks, risk management frameworks, and zero-tolerance policies on corruption. The executives running the fund and the companies under it must be selected based on merit and insulated from political pressure. A code of conduct should bar political office-holders from interfering in day-to-day decisions. Over time, consider partial listings or independent trustees for some holdings to introduce market discipline. These steps will professionalize operations and guard against the fund becoming a 'vehicle for political patronage.' Finally, legally guarantee non-interference by enshrining in law the operational autonomy of Danantara's management. The government should explicitly limit its role to a shareholders-like function, setting broad objectives and risk appetite but not micromanaging investments. Fixed terms for the fund's CEO and directors, removable only for cause, could help shield them from political turnover. Clarify the legal framework to resolve any overlaps; for instance, formalize how the Finance Ministry supports the funds or handles any needed capital injections, to remove uncertainty. Clear, stable regulations will provide the legal certainty global investors need to partner with Danantara. We hope that the government will uphold public trust by strengthening oversight, depoliticizing management, tightening compliance and committing to transparency. If governed with integrity, Danantara can indeed be a powerful engine of growth and a legacy-building institution for Indonesia. But if mismanaged, it risks becoming a US$900 billion liability. We should remain optimistic yet vigilant, ensuring that the government actively mitigates all risks and takes necessary precautions. Ahmad Novindri Aji Sukma is a PhD researcher at the University of Cambridge, specializing in criminology. Arfian Setiaji is a senior legal officer and a University of Washington alumnus specializing in corporate and tech law.
