
How the Defence Forces carried out its most daring operation in decades, with minimal resources
The vessel had just completed a two-week maritime security patrol and was due to spend the next two days in port, allowing most of the crew a trip home to see family.
Those plans were scuppered when, shortly after docking, the captain was summoned to the Naval Operations Command Centre.
An Garda Síochána and Revenue, operating as part of a Joint Task Force, had received word of a massive drugs consignment about to land in Ireland aboard a bulk carrier called the MV Matthew, he was told.
READ MORE
The captain returned to the ship and briefed his crew. All leave was cancelled.
The details of the interdiction of the MV Matthew, which led to the biggest drugs seizure by weight in the history of the State, were detailed in interviews with the military officers directly involved. These include the Yeats's captain, the leader of the Air Corps team and a senior member of the Army Ranger Wing (ARW) special operations unit, whose troops rappelled on to the moving vessel amid heavy swells while Storm Agnes bore down on the country.
The Defence Forces has requested all those involved remain anonymous due to personnel security concerns.
At the start of the mission, which would later be termed Operation Piano, the job of the Yeats was simply to keep Matthew under surveillance, along with a small fishing vessel called the Castlemore.
The taskforce believed the Castlemore was planning to rendezvous with the Matthew off southern coast and take on the cocaine before ferrying it to Ireland. The plan was to let this play out before detaining the Castlemore after it brought the cocaine ashore.
'We know now that didn't happen,' said the naval captain. Instead, the Yeats would spend the next five days taking part in the most ambitious and dramatic operation in Irish naval history, during which it would serve as a warship, a search and rescue vessel and a makeshift prison.
'It was incredibly dynamic,' recalled the naval officer. 'You couldn't write it.'
The eventual success of the operation was all the more remarkable given the extreme constraints on the Defence Forces. While previous major interdictions involved multiple warships, the Yeats was the only one available this time round. Military planners believed four helicopters would be required to guarantee success but just one was accessible – a Defence Forces helicopter assigned to an emergency air ambulance role which had to be recalled and pressed into service.
After picking up a team of gardaí and customs officers, the Yeats sailed to a spot off the south coast where, according to Garda intelligence, the Matthew was to transfer its cargo to the Castlemore.
The Yeats's job was to observe the transfer from a distance. The weather began to deteriorate rapidly, however – thanks to Storm Agnes and its 135kph winds – raising doubts the handover would happen at all.
The MV Matthew being pursued
The next night, the Castlemore finally arrived but there was no sign of the mother ship. The Yeats's captain could see on his screens that, instead of meeting the smaller vessel, the Matthew was sailing up the Irish Sea towards Dublin.
After an hour, the fishing boat sailed back inland, leading authorities to believe it was going to shelter from the increasingly perilous weather at Kilmore Quay in Wexford.
Instead, it sailed past Kilmore. It was becoming increasingly clear to the crew of the Yeats that they were not dealing with experienced seafarers.
They were also having their own problems. The deteriorating weather made it increasingly difficult for their sensors to keep track of the boat. 'At one point, we lost radar contact with the vessel and we had to conduct a search over a couple of hours to regain radar contact,' the captain recalls.
At 11pm, word came through that the Castlemore had run around on a sandbank, stranding its two-man crew.
The Irish Coast Guard led the rescue operation while the Yeats hid over the horizon, ready to assist if needed.
As weather conditions worsened, the Yeats was asked to bring the stricken smugglers ashore. The men were winched up in a Coastguard helicopter before being deposited on the naval ship.
[
Hizbullah and Iran suspected of involvement in MV Matthew smuggling operation
Opens in new window
]
The suspects were housed on the vessel and given food and dry clothes, before being brought ashore the next morning and taken into Garda custody. No drugs were found during a subsequent search of the sandbank and the surrounding waters, meaning the cocaine must still have been aboard the Matthew.
Now four days into the operation, the Yeats was ordered to sail at full speed towards the Matthew, which, by then, was near Rosslare. Back on land, the taskforce began to plan for the possibility of having to take the ship by force.
The Matthew, a 190-metre long bulk carrier, was carrying almost no cargo, meaning it sat high in the water. This would make it extremely difficult for naval personnel in inflatable boats to gain access.
Preliminary plans were drawn up for special operations troops to take the ship from the air. Specifically, the ARW's air assault section – which specialises in the insertion of troops and equipment via helicopter – would fast rope on to the Matthew before taking control of the bridge and securing the crew and cocaine.
The ARW has conducted maritime assault training exercises on a yearly basis since 2009, usually involving a hijacked ferry scenario. This operation, however, had the potential to be significantly more dangerous. Just landing the team on a moving ship, crowded with cranes and cables, during heavy swells would require an immense amount of skill.
The proposed ARW operation was put to one side as a contingency, while it was decided that the safest option, for the time being, was to somehow convince the crew of the Matthew to voluntarily bring the ship into port.
At 5am, on September 26th, the Yeats intercepted the Matthew off the coast and ordered it to sail into Cork Habour. The Matthew responded that it had suffered engine failure and needed 48 hours to make repairs.
By this stage, the situation on board the cargo ship was becoming increasingly chaotic as the crew realised their smuggling operation was a failure.
After failing to rendezvous with the Castlemore, their criminal bosses in Dubai instructed them to put the cocaine in a lifeboat and prepare to land them ashore.
Later, the crew were wrongly advised that the Irish authorities had no legal authority to board their vessel. It subsequently emerged in court the Dubai criminals were relaying legal advice from ChatGPT.
By the 25th, the Matthew's Iranian captain, Soheil Jelveh, had had enough and made a distress call asking for an emergency medical evacuation.
A short time later, he was winched on to a Coast Guard helicopter while carrying $40,000 in two suitcases. Jelveh was arrested by gardaí shortly after when he tried to leave hospital.
This left Harold Estoesta, a 31-year-old Filipino and the ship's second in command, to attempt to stall the Yeats. The captain informed him over the radio, however, that he did not believe his story about engine failure.
Partially-burned cocaine stash inside a lifeboat on the MV Matthew. Photograph: An Garda Síochána/PA Wire
To everyone's surprise, Estoesta then appeared to comply with the Yeats's orders and set a course for Cork Harbour. 'Things kind of calmed down a small bit. It looked like things were going our way and that in the next couple of hours it would make landfall in Cork,' said the Irish naval captain.
It was not to be. An hour later, the Matthew turned south and set a course for Sierra Leone. 'It was apparent to me then that I was in hot pursuit of that ship and that I was authorised to use force, if necessary, to get the vessel to comply with my instruction,' said the captain.
Under Irish law, naval captains may fire across the bow of a fleeing ship to force it to comply. If this does not work, they may fire directly on the ship's engines.
Such action is rarely required but not without precedent. For example, in 1985, LÉ Aisling fired about 600 rounds during a five-hour pursuit of a Spanish fishing vessel which refused to stop.
The captain of the Yeats ordered his crew to fire several bursts in front of the Matthew, initially from assault rifles and then from mounted machine guns.
As this went on, radio communications were becoming increasingly fraught. Estoesta pleaded with the Yeats to cease fire.
The naval captain recalled him saying: 'There's people here who are innocent. We have families at home, wives, children. We don't want to die. Please de-escalate.'
The captain replied that Estoesta was responsible for the outcome of the situation. 'From their point of view, I imagine it got quite frantic on board,' the officer said.
Back on land, it had been decided the helicopter assault was the only viable option left.
'We prepped the aircraft. We got the weapons, loaded up, our armour and our personal weapons,' said the Air Corps Commander.
Planners discussed the risk profile of the mission and at what point it would become too dangerous to continue. Personnel were also briefed by the Defence Forces legal section on the rules of engagement – in other words, where and when they were permitted to use lethal force.
Just before 1pm on the 26th, then tánaiste and minister for defence Micheál Martin was briefed on the plan. He gave the go ahead and, 20 minutes later, an AW139 helicopter containing the ARW team took off from Waterford Airport and sped towards the Matthew.
The plan envisaged the troops descending by rope on to the deck. Cover would be provided by an ARW sniper who would remain on the aircraft and an Air Corps door gunner operating a machine gun.
Rescue crews sat in Rigid Hulled Inflatable Boats – known as Rhibs – aboard the Yeats, ready to deploy at a moment's notice if the helicopter had to ditch in the sea, while other sailors manned the ship's guns.
As the helicopter approached, an Air Corps maritime patrol aircraft made a low pass over the vessel in a last-ditch effort to convince it to comply.
Instead, the Matthew began to manoeuvre back and forth, significantly increasing the danger faced by the aerial assault team.
The team leaders realised then it would be a 'non-compliant boarding'. To reduce the risk to the team, the pilot positioned the helicopter so that the machine gun and sniper were facing the bridge while the ARW operators fast roped off the other side.
'The deck was very challenging, with whip antennas and high cranes left and right. So, it made us do probably the highest fast rope we've ever done on to a vessel,' said the Air Corps Commander.
All the while, the Matthew continued to turn back and forth. 'So it's an extremely challenging and dangerous insertion,' he said.
The ARW team managed to get on the deck before, with their hands burning from the rope, moving to take control of the ship. Seconds later, the helicopter pulled away, having been unable to drop down several additional bags of equipment for the soldiers.
'We just needed to come off the deck because it was starting to get too dangerous,' said the air Commander.
Although they may appear chaotic, ARW assaults involve 'a really graduated number of steps', said the special operations officer.
'Without getting into operational techniques, the priority generally is to take the vessel under way and control it,' said the officer. 'That means dominating the people on the vessel and taking control of key spaces so it can't be steered in a different direction or rammed into another vessel or scuttled.'
The crew offered little resistance and, within a few minutes the ship was taken, the officer said. 'The lads moved very quickly to dominate. The psychological effect of that, particularly for people who are seamen and not involved in criminal activity, can be quite intimidating.'
A fresh problem faced them immediately, however. Before the boarding, the crew had started to burn the cocaine in the lifeboat. Faced with the prospect of losing the evidence, ARW operators quickly grabbed fire extinguishers and doused the flames.
With the crew in handcuffs, Revenue personnel were brought abroad, while an ARW operator piloted the Matthew, along with its 2.2 tonnes of cocaine, into Cork Harbour.
On Friday, eight members of the crews of the Matthew and Castlemore received prison sentences of between 13 1/2 and 20 years – a combined 129 years in total – after pleading guilty in the Special Criminal Court to possession of €156 million worth of cocaine.
General views of the MV Matthew in Cork. Photograph: Niall Carson/PA Wire
The court heard the drug smuggling operation was organised by a transnational organised crime group based in Dubai, which had 'immense capabilities, unlimited resources and a global reach'.
Today, the Matthew sits rusting in a berth at Passage West in Cork while the Castlemore, or what is left of it, is still stranded on the sandbank off Wexford.
In the aftermath of Operation Piano, those involved received praise domestically and internationally, with other militaries asking the Defence Forces for advice on planning similar operations.
For the Defence Forces, Piano's success was a much-needed morale boost, given recent controversies surrounding abuse of women in the ranks and the organisation's recruitment and retention difficulties.
Some members privately complained, however, that the threadbare resources available for the interdiction only underlined the systemic problems facing the military.
'You need two helicopters at a minimum to provide mutual support and that's a major, major issue because it's a risky operation anyway,' said former ARW officer Cathal Berry after the operation.
'What if the helicopter had to ditch in the sea or if it had a crash on the ship itself?'
Those involved in the operation are more sanguine when asked about the shortages.
'At the end of the day, we had the assets that we had and it was the people that made it work,' said the Yeats's captain.
'There were periods there where the entire crew was up for 24 hours. But everybody swung up the arms and gave the maximum effort.'
The air Commander said his 'ideal' package for such an operation is four helicopters; two to insert troops and two to provide covering fire.
There is 'doom and gloom but there are positives coming', he said, pointing to the recent purchase of four H145M helicopters capable of deploying advanced weapons systems and the planned procurement of a fleet of larger 'super-medium' helicopters.
Perhaps the biggest sign of hope for the Defence Forces is the recent stabilisation in the number of people leaving for the private sector and green shoots in terms of recruitment.
Meanwhile, the Yeats and its crew have continued their run of success in drug interdiction operations. On Tuesday, the ship played a vital role in intercepting a €31 million cocaine shipment off Courtmacsherry in Cork.
'It's just a lucky ship, I suppose,' said one Defence Forces officer last week.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Extra.ie
an hour ago
- Extra.ie
Carey preyed on cancer patient like ‘Talented Mr Ripley'
A woman dealing with rare blood cancer was 'preyed' upon by former All-Star Kilkenny hurler and five-time All-Ireland champion DJ Carey, who claimed he was battling with the same condition. Speaking exclusively to the Kilkenny mum revealed that she and her husband blew the whistle to the gardaí on Carey and how he had scammed the public out of hundreds of thousands. Last week, the 54-year-old father of two pleaded guilty at Dublin Circuit Court to ten separate charges of defrauding people by inducing them to give him money he said he needed for medical bills by pretending he had cancer. DJ Carey. Pic: ©Fran Veale There were initially 21 charges against him, and 30 witnesses were due to give evidence about how they were defrauded over an eight-year period between 2014 and 2022, with billionaire businessman Denis O'Brien among them. Speaking anonymously, the cancer patient's husband revealed the bombshell moment they realised they were not the only ones conned by Carey. It was while watching an RTÉ documentary about the former hurler's convicted fraudster sister, former international hockey player Catriona, that they realised others could be swindled unless they did something. Pic: Colin Keegan/Collins Dublin The patient's husband revealed: 'There was a Prime Time programme about Catriona Carey on TV, and his MO [modus operandi] seemed to be the same. 'He was so good. You're talking [about] The Talented Mr Ripley here. He was juggling balls and living up a lot. It was a calculated approach. He was so good in his grooming. He was brilliant. It was the work of an artist, and he was consistent to the end. 'When we saw the programme on the telly we said, 'this has to stop' and we came forward to stop it. We took our responsibilities seriously. And it has stopped. 'People giving him money, these were acts of kindness and decency, and it wasn't reciprocated. We didn't come forward ultimately to see him punished or put behind bars. This had nothing to do with retribution.' Carey replied 'guilty' to all ten charges last week and was remanded on continuing bail for a sentencing hearing on October 29. Carey's barrister requested legal aid to cover a psychological report that may be necessary, saying there were 'certain mental health issues'. Judge Ryan granted the application. Carey was not required to address the court again and left shortly after


Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
A Revolut user encounters ‘evasive' customer service after €1,850 fraud
On May 22nd a reader's mother, a woman in her 70s, contacted Vodafone Ireland to report poor wifi and was promised a call back from a technician. The following day the call she was expecting came – or so she thought – but what happened next has left her traumatised and substantially poorer. The caller referenced the wifi issue 'and said she was eligible for a refund,' her son writes. 'She was sent a text link and asked to click it to 'verify' the refund.' She did as she was asked to do by the person claiming to be from Vodafone but after following the link and inputting some key details her banking app was compromised, her Revolut account remotely accessed and €1,850 sent to a sterling account in the UK. READ MORE 'She immediately reported it to Revolut, Vodafone, and An Garda Síochána, submitting screenshots of all the suspicious activity, a signed statement and the full context of the scam,' her son writes. He tells us that she was asked by Revolut 'to upload this same dossier five times [and] Revolut never called her, despite promising to'. He describes Revolut's support system as 'opaque and evasive, consisting of scripted replies and AI loops, with no clear case management or human escalation'. He says that when he asked 'a basic admin question – what documents are needed to file a fraud report in Ireland – they refused to answer, citing GDPR, even though I never asked about her account,' he says. [ 'Sorry you lost the money': Couple loses thousands of euro of wedding savings in Revolut 'ordeal' Opens in new window ] He also says Vodafone has 'not yet explained how someone knew about the wifi complaint and used that to engineer the scam'. Our reader points out that the funds 'were sent to another Revolut account, raising questions about their fraud controls and whether the funds were frozen. 'At this point, we just want honest answers and a fair process. My mum has done everything asked of her, but she's getting nowhere – and it feels like the system is built to exhaust people into giving up.' He says that 'everything is handled by bots with repeated requests for the same info, vague timelines, and generic cut-and-paste responses. Even now, weeks later, she still hasn't received a proper update, and it's genuinely shaken her confidence in using digital banking at all. It's an insane system and the fact you can't talk to a human is ludicrous.' He says that when Revolut wanted his business account, 'the office would receive regular phone calls and emails from reps looking for the business. How could they not provide the same support to existing clients? Has Revolut quietly built a wall between customers and accountability?' There are two troubling strands to this scam. Did the criminals know she had contacted Vodafone and were able to time their first contact with her to coincide with the exact time she was expecting a call from that company? And why are the systems that Revolut have in place so opaque and why has it proved to be impossible for this family to speak to a human being or even get a sense that Revolut is addressing this issue with the seriousness that it deserves? First we contacted Vodafone and shared the details of this scam with them. The company checked its systems and said that there was no evidence of a data breach on its side and a spokesman could not definitively say how it was that our reader – or at least their mother – would receive a call purporting to be from Vodafone less than 24 hours after she had contacted the company. It could be simple coincidence. Scammers make many, many such calls everyday and they must sometimes get lucky. We also contacted Revolut. In a statement the company said it was sorry for this person's experience 'and any instance where our customers are targeted by ruthless and sophisticated criminals. Revolut takes fraud, and the industry-wide risk of customers being coerced by organised criminals, incredibly seriously. Each potential fraud case concerning a Revolut customer is carefully investigated and assessed independently of other cases.' The statement stresses that it has 'a fervent focus on improving the customer experience at Revolut, and the protection of our customers' money is paramount to that. We provide customer support 24/7 in-app via chat because it is the most secure method to communicate with customers, and helps to ensure that they can be certain they are connected with a member of our team. 'Any reported fraud automatically triggers human intervention from our customer service team, ensuring a user's case is handled by skilled live agents with expertise in financial crime.' It said that in recent months it had introduced in-app calls 'to give users a secure way to engage with our customer service team over the phone and help them to expose phone call scams.' Revolut said that last year it had prevented more than €700 million in potential fraud against customers by implementing in-app calls, real-time AI fraud-detection systems, transaction limits, in-app warnings and delayed payments for suspicious transactions, biometric authentication requirements, and providing educational resources to help consumers remain informed about potential risks. 'Revolut's financial crime prevention team now represents almost a third of our global workforce and, alongside many other payments firms, we deploy a number of different interventions that are solely designed to 'break the spell' of scammers and fraudsters,' it said. 'Whilst Revolut is unable to comment on the specifics of these interventions, so as to not provide any insight that could help ruthless criminals socially engineer their victims and bypass these, we are constantly innovating and testing a range of eye-catching warnings. 'While we are fully determined to protect our customers as best we can through our fraud prevention technologies, and go to every length to ensure scams are avoided, there is no denying that fraud is an industry-wide issue that needs to be tackled at source, particularly by the telecoms companies and social media apps that are enabling this. Banks and financial institutions should be the last line of defence, not the only line of defence.' The story does have a happier-than-expected outcome. Initially the company wrote to her and outlined its processes and the steps it had taken to prevent any suspicious transactions taking place before determining that it was not at fault and as such no money would be refunded. A day later we heard back from our reader again. 'You won't believe this. We went from that email yesterday to my mother getting her cash paid back today.' In a letter the company sent to her a representative said that 'upon further investigation of your case, we have identified a mistake in how it was previously handled. Subsequently, we have reclassified the situation as an account-takeover fraud and organised a full reimbursement of €1891.50 along with €150 as a compensation for the stress caused by the whole situation. The payment was sent directly to your Revolut account.'


Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
‘Ireland's first serial killer' will not face rape charges in Britain
British police have carried out a cold case review into a series of rapes allegedly committed by murderer John Shaw, who is known as 'Ireland's first serial killer'. The review said, however, unless new evidence came to light then Shaw (79) should not face any further charges relating to the attacks carried out in the 1970s. This means Shaw, who is Ireland's longest-serving prisoner, will be a free man if he is successful in reapplying for parole early in 2026. Shaw and accomplice Geoffrey Evans had come to Ireland from the UK with the claimed intention of murdering one woman a week. READ MORE In August 1976 Elizabeth Plunkett (23) was abducted and killed near Brittas Bay, Co Wicklow. A month later, Galway woman Mary Duffy was kidnapped and murdered by the men. Both women were subjected to extensive sexual violence. The men were caught shortly afterwards and confessed to their crimes. They received a life sentence each for Ms Duffy's murder. However, charges against Shaw relating to Ms Plunkett's murder were dropped by the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP), something which the Plunkett family only became aware of recently. Elizabeth Plunkett's sisters want the investigation into her death to be reopened Before arriving in Ireland, Shaw and Evans were wanted by various British police forces for allegedly raping three victims over the course of five days in Cheshire and Leigh, northwest England. The attacks bore similarities to what happened to Ms Duffy and Ms Plunkett. During one attack, a 15-year-old girl was kidnapped and raped over the course of eight hours. [ Elizabeth Plunkett: How murdered woman's family discovered they were not 'relevant victims' in serial killer case ] As the police manhunt intensified, Evans and Shaw fled to Ireland where they committed burglaries before being arrested and jailed for a year. After their release, they were rearrested by gardaí for extradition to Britain to face the rape charges. However, the men argued they were not the same suspects as those sought by British police and were released on bail. It was then they started their planned murder spree. Evans (68) died in custody in 2012. Shaw remains in Arbour Hill Prison in Dublin. Last August, on learning Shaw was applying for parole, a cold case team from Greater Manchester Police re-examined the rape offences as a priority. Their goal was to determine if Shaw could be finally extradited to Britain if he was successful in his parole bid. The police force said the cold case unit had completed its review and that 'no new developments have been made' in relation to the case. 'Should any further evidence or information come to light, further reviews would take place and the appropriate actions taken where necessary,' a spokesman said. He clarified that this meant that unless new evidence came to light then the rape cases were in effect closed. The police force did not go into detail on why it was not pursing the rape charges. There are many reasons historical prosecutions cannot go ahead, including the death of witnesses and the loss of vital evidence. Ms Plunkett's sisters, Kathleen Nolan and Bernadette Barry, have called on the Irish authorities to reopen the investigation into her death, with a view to securing a conviction against Shaw and ensuring he is not released. In response to queries, An Garda Síochána said it was up to the DPP to decide on reopening the case. A DPP spokeswoman said it does not comment on individual cases, but said that in general cases cannot be reopened without 'a new Garda investigation file which identified sufficient evidence to provide a reasonable prospect of a successful prosecution of an identified suspect'. The family hopes to gather enough new evidence to reopen the case. Last month, RTÉ began airing a podcast on Ms Plunkett's case. Called Stolen Sister, it has led to multiple women coming forward saying they were targeted by men in the mid-1970s who may have been Shaw and Evans.