logo
Five steps to get the best value out of your financial adviser – but do you need one?

Five steps to get the best value out of your financial adviser – but do you need one?

The Citizen8 hours ago
People must first understand what a financial adviser does and how they can benefit from their services
Not everyone struggles financially because they earn too little; sometimes it is due to poor money management. Others simply need guidance to reach their goals, which is where a financial adviser can help.
However, Adrian Hope-Bailie, CEO of fintech investment platform Fynbos Money, says most people do not need a financial adviser to get started on investing.
'If you are just beginning your investment journey, building up an emergency fund and opening a tax-free savings account (TFSA) is a great place to start, and you can do that independently.'
He believes that people must first understand what a financial adviser does and how they can benefit from their services. 'For any partnership to work, it is best to know clearly what you are both getting out of the relationship before you commit.'
ALSO READ: FSCA debars financial adviser for five years, fines him R1.1 million
Hope-Bailie shares five tips to get the best value out of your financial advisers:
1. Start with a plan
He says the most important thing an individual must walk away with from any adviser is a clear, written financial plan.
'Some advisers offer planning for free in exchange for the opportunity to sell you products later. That 'free' advice can lead to high-fee, commission-laden products that do not serve your long-term interests,' he warns.
Hope-Bailie recommends paying a once-off, hourly, or project-based fee for the planning process.
'This gives you control over the advice process. If you later decide to implement the plan with that adviser, you can negotiate a better fee because you have already paid them for the upfront work.
'Even if you don't implement the plan with the adviser, any advice should be documented in writing – ideally via a formal Record of Advice (RoA).'
2. Shop around thoughtfully
He adds that it is important to research different advisers before selecting one.
'Advisers have different pricing structures and different focus areas. Some charge flat-fees per month, and others charge based on the tasks they perform or based on a percentage of your assets.
'He suggests looking for:
A Certified Financial Planner designation via the FPI;
A valid FSP licence number and RE5 exam;
A clearly disclosed service and fee structure.
Hope-Bailie says individuals must ask if the adviser is independent or tied to a specific provider.
'Independence means they can offer a broader range of solutions as they are not obliged to offer you products from their employer.'
ALSO READ: Start 2025 right – questions to ask your financial adviser
3. Understand and negotiate the fees
'When comparing investment fees you should always ask for an estimated annual cost (EAC), which breaks down all fees into a format that allows you to compare apples with apples,' he adds.
But cheaper is not always better. If there is a small ongoing fee that takes a percentage of one's investments away indefinitely, it will end up costing one a lot more than a larger upfront fee.
'If you have engaged a reputable professional planner, they deserve to be paid fairly, just make sure you have full visibility into how they're making their money so that you're confident that the relationship is a win-win.'
4. Separate planning, insurance and investments
He says it is not always best to bundle insurance and investment services together.
'Advisers may earn a very small percentage on investment products they sign you up to, especially if you're just starting out – but they can make a lot more from selling you insurance products. This creates a hidden conflict of interest.'
Hope-Bailie suggests getting a full disclosure on insurance and investment, fees and commissions separately to improve transparency.
'You may end up paying slightly more for planning or investment advice if you don't also buy insurance, but you'll likely save on insurance premiums if they aren't subsidising your advice – most importantly, you'll know exactly who's earning what and why.'
5. Set goals for your adviser
He believes that ongoing adviser relationships need to include measurable expectations on both sides.
'Your financial plan should be reviewed at least annually, or any time there's a major change in your life.'
Hope-Bailie recommends setting out when and how you'll meet, what progress looks like, and how success will be measured.
'You can ask your adviser to draft an investment policy statement (IPS) and a service level agreement (SLA) that outlines these terms. If you have an adviser who has not proactively contacted you for over a year, you are not getting the level of service you should expect.'
NOW READ: This is why you should have a financial adviser in your life
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Five steps to get the best value out of your financial adviser – but do you need one?
Five steps to get the best value out of your financial adviser – but do you need one?

The Citizen

time8 hours ago

  • The Citizen

Five steps to get the best value out of your financial adviser – but do you need one?

People must first understand what a financial adviser does and how they can benefit from their services Not everyone struggles financially because they earn too little; sometimes it is due to poor money management. Others simply need guidance to reach their goals, which is where a financial adviser can help. However, Adrian Hope-Bailie, CEO of fintech investment platform Fynbos Money, says most people do not need a financial adviser to get started on investing. 'If you are just beginning your investment journey, building up an emergency fund and opening a tax-free savings account (TFSA) is a great place to start, and you can do that independently.' He believes that people must first understand what a financial adviser does and how they can benefit from their services. 'For any partnership to work, it is best to know clearly what you are both getting out of the relationship before you commit.' ALSO READ: FSCA debars financial adviser for five years, fines him R1.1 million Hope-Bailie shares five tips to get the best value out of your financial advisers: 1. Start with a plan He says the most important thing an individual must walk away with from any adviser is a clear, written financial plan. 'Some advisers offer planning for free in exchange for the opportunity to sell you products later. That 'free' advice can lead to high-fee, commission-laden products that do not serve your long-term interests,' he warns. Hope-Bailie recommends paying a once-off, hourly, or project-based fee for the planning process. 'This gives you control over the advice process. If you later decide to implement the plan with that adviser, you can negotiate a better fee because you have already paid them for the upfront work. 'Even if you don't implement the plan with the adviser, any advice should be documented in writing – ideally via a formal Record of Advice (RoA).' 2. Shop around thoughtfully He adds that it is important to research different advisers before selecting one. 'Advisers have different pricing structures and different focus areas. Some charge flat-fees per month, and others charge based on the tasks they perform or based on a percentage of your assets. 'He suggests looking for: A Certified Financial Planner designation via the FPI; A valid FSP licence number and RE5 exam; A clearly disclosed service and fee structure. Hope-Bailie says individuals must ask if the adviser is independent or tied to a specific provider. 'Independence means they can offer a broader range of solutions as they are not obliged to offer you products from their employer.' ALSO READ: Start 2025 right – questions to ask your financial adviser 3. Understand and negotiate the fees 'When comparing investment fees you should always ask for an estimated annual cost (EAC), which breaks down all fees into a format that allows you to compare apples with apples,' he adds. But cheaper is not always better. If there is a small ongoing fee that takes a percentage of one's investments away indefinitely, it will end up costing one a lot more than a larger upfront fee. 'If you have engaged a reputable professional planner, they deserve to be paid fairly, just make sure you have full visibility into how they're making their money so that you're confident that the relationship is a win-win.' 4. Separate planning, insurance and investments He says it is not always best to bundle insurance and investment services together. 'Advisers may earn a very small percentage on investment products they sign you up to, especially if you're just starting out – but they can make a lot more from selling you insurance products. This creates a hidden conflict of interest.' Hope-Bailie suggests getting a full disclosure on insurance and investment, fees and commissions separately to improve transparency. 'You may end up paying slightly more for planning or investment advice if you don't also buy insurance, but you'll likely save on insurance premiums if they aren't subsidising your advice – most importantly, you'll know exactly who's earning what and why.' 5. Set goals for your adviser He believes that ongoing adviser relationships need to include measurable expectations on both sides. 'Your financial plan should be reviewed at least annually, or any time there's a major change in your life.' Hope-Bailie recommends setting out when and how you'll meet, what progress looks like, and how success will be measured. 'You can ask your adviser to draft an investment policy statement (IPS) and a service level agreement (SLA) that outlines these terms. If you have an adviser who has not proactively contacted you for over a year, you are not getting the level of service you should expect.' NOW READ: This is why you should have a financial adviser in your life

New Brokerage to Receive Accreditation in South Africa, Expands National Fintech Portfolio
New Brokerage to Receive Accreditation in South Africa, Expands National Fintech Portfolio

IOL News

time11-08-2025

  • IOL News

New Brokerage to Receive Accreditation in South Africa, Expands National Fintech Portfolio

IUX has announced an expansion of its services to South Africa, contributing towards further development of the financial sector in our region. In mid-2025, the globally accredited brokerage firm IUX has announced an expansion of its services to South Africa, contributing towards further development of the financial sector in our region. Such entry to our economy sector aligns with company's track record of regulatory compliance and building customer relations, as IUX continues to engage with emerging market areas, serving over 650K customers in 11 countries. With licenses spanning multiple continents, extension of services by IUX will contribute towards economic development and enhance trading opportunities within rapidly growing South African financial community. One of the primary benefits which an international broker brings to South Africa is heightened credibility and transparency. By introducing reputable standard bars to the local industry, such as client fund segregation, rigorous auditing processes, and stringent Know-Your-Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) protocols, IUX Markets significantly reduces the risk of malpractice and enhances trust among local investors. Furthermore, IUX's membership in international dispute resolution bodies provides South African traders with additional assurance of financial recourse, which is a necessary level of protection needed for our citizens engaging in risky financial activities. Importantly, the platform is backed by a suite of risk management safeguards that cater to both experienced and emerging traders. IUX offers Negative Balance Protection, ensuring that clients can never lose more than their deposited funds, even during sharp market swings. It also features a Zero Stop Level, allowing for tighter control of trades and minimizing the risk of premature liquidations. Additionally, the arrival of a global broker to South Africa presents substantial opportunities for local market development and economic progress. Access to advanced trading technologies and institutional-grade financial tools, typically available only in well-established markets, can dramatically uplift the capabilities of local traders. These innovations enable traders to participate competitively in global markets, thereby promoting skill enhancement, more knowledge, and overall financial literacy. Moreover, brokerage expansion is expected to stimulate healthy competition within the sector, ultimately raising the overall standards of trading practices and client service across the industry. The entry to South Africa is supported through licensing by South Africa's Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) assigned to IUX. The FSCA is widely respected across Africa, recognized for stringent regulatory standards aimed at safeguarding client funds and ensuring fair trading practices. Beyond Africa, IUX has arranged a number of international licenses and memberships. Notably, IUX (MU) Ltd holds a comprehensive license from Mauritius's Financial Services Commission (FSC). Despite Mauritius being considered an offshore jurisdiction, the FSC mandates strict client fund segregation, rigorous auditing, and robust transparency standards. This license not only expands IUX's operational reach within the African and Indian Ocean regions but also underscores its adherence to recognized financial supervisory norms. Moreover, IUX AU Pty Ltd has concluded the licensing process in Australia under the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC). Recognized globally as a tier-one regulatory body, obtaining such license will reinforce global positioning for IUX. The ASIC license is highly sought after due to its stringent oversight standards, which include capital adequacy, effective risk management, and fair client treatment mandates. It is also worth noting that IUX joined the Financial Commission in November 2024, which is another notable arrangement in customer protection. This independent international organization offers dispute mediation services specifically tailored for the forex and CFD industry. Membership in this body provides IUX clients with access to an external dispute resolution process and a Compensation Fund, which secures traders' funds up to €20,000 per complaint. Such memberships go beyond regulatory requirements, exemplifying the brokerage's dedication to client protection and accountability. These numbered regulatory accomplishments serve not merely as symbols of compliance but as genuine trust badges recognized across global markets. Regulatory licensing is increasingly perceived by industry experts as a definitive benchmark of a brokerage's reliability. Brokerages like IUX, with licenses spanning multiple jurisdictions, must uphold consistently rigorous operational standards, significantly reducing risks associated with client fund mismanagement or unfair trading practices. Moreover, IUX global regulatory compliance serves as a foundation for substantial customer trust, contrasting sharply with unregulated entities that frequently engage in shady practices detrimental to investors. By transparently showcasing its licenses and dispute resolution memberships, IUX signals its commitment to operational accountability and investor protection. Such transparency is particularly valuable in markets crowded with opaque entities, providing traders with reassurance and clear avenues for dispute resolution. In comparison with industry peers, IUX is on track with regulatory achievements made. Leading brokerages, including competitors such as HFM (formerly HotForex), similarly adopt multi-jurisdictional licensing strategies as competitive advantages, filtering out unscrupulous market actors and positioning themselves as reliable global operators. The comparable licensing nomenclature across a variety of regions like Africa (FSCA, FSC) and Asia-Pacific (ASIC) will place IUX alongside these globally recognized brokers, providing safeguards and flexibility for its customer base. Obtaining the three mentioned licenses instantly elevates a broker's international profile, demonstrating unequivocal compliance with top-tier regulatory expectations. As a result, IUX entrance to our fintech sector not only signals confidence in South African importance as a thriving financial node, but also sets foundation for sustainable growth, integrity, and prosperity in the region's trading ecosystem. Local traders, in the past being limited by poor access to liquidity and suboptimal trading systems, now can participate in the global market under far more favorable conditions. This move may not only benefit individual investors but also support the broader development of South Africa's trading stage by setting new levels of technological and financial services. We are excited to see our economy welcoming new entities and extending opportunities to the citizens of South Africa and beyond.

The Liquidation Cartel: How MTI's R450 Million Vanishing Act Previews Banxso's Fate
The Liquidation Cartel: How MTI's R450 Million Vanishing Act Previews Banxso's Fate

IOL News

time11-08-2025

  • IOL News

The Liquidation Cartel: How MTI's R450 Million Vanishing Act Previews Banxso's Fate

With Judge Le Grange's ruling imminent, Banxso clients fear a repeat of the MTI disaster, where the legal system prioritises profits over justice, leaving ordinary South Africans in financial despair. Image: IOL / Ron AI The stage is set for another potential South African liquidation tragedy. As creditors wait for Judge Le Grange to deliver judgment in a case that could seal the fate of thousands of Banxso clients the anxiety amongst clients is growing. The precedent is terrifying: Mirror Trading International creditors have waited four years for a single cent while liquidators Bester and Van Rooyen have pocketed millions each, and law firm Mostert & Bosman extracted nearly R25 million in fees. Now the same players are circling Banxso, having already rejected a R57 million settlement that would have guaranteed 100% creditor payouts to the liquidation applicants. The message is clear: why settle for full creditor recovery when prolonged liquidation proceedings generate far more lucrative professional fees? How R1.1 Billion Became R627 Million The Mirror Trading International collapse exposes the brutal mathematics of South Africa's liquidation industry. When liquidators recovered 1,280 Bitcoin worth approximately R1.1 billion in 2021, creditors held hope for meaningful recovery. Four years later, the estate has mysteriously shrunk to R627 million, leaving R450 million spent and not a single creditor payment made. The June 2023 liquidation and distribution account reveals the shocking scale of professional extraction. From an estate balance of R803 million at the time of the report being published there was already an amount of around R297,000,000 spent over two and a half years, eight liquidators claimed R138.5 million in fees while creditors received nothing. Masters' fees consumed R275,000, with the South African Revenue Service claiming a staggering R283 million. The remainder has vanished into legal fees and administrative costs, yet not one cent has reached the victims whose investments funded this professional feast. The mathematics of destruction become even more damning when considering lost investment returns. The R1.1 billion recovered in 2021 should have generated substantial interest over four years of liquidation proceedings. Conservative investment returns of 8% annually would have added over R400 million to the estate. Instead, the current R627 million balance suggests this potential growth has also vanished into the professional fee vortex, representing another layer of value destruction that creditors will never recover. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ The disappearing funds tell a damning story. Administrative costs have consumed the estate like acid through metal, devouring not only the principal amount but the investment returns that could have significantly improved creditor recoveries. Professional fees flow freely while creditors subsist on empty promises. The Western Cape High Court declared MTI an unlawful Ponzi scheme in 2023, yet the only people profiting from this designation are the very professionals appointed to serve victim interests. Most cruelly, liquidators promised creditors a second liquidation and distribution account in 2024 that would finally deliver payments. Industry whispers suggested a special dividend of 10 cents per rand of claimed amounts. That promise evaporated with silence taking its place as many creditors now bemoan the lack of transparency and non-existent communications on the matter from the liquidators, leaving creditors with nothing but the bitter taste of false hope while professional fees continued accumulating. A senior insolvency practitioner, speaking anonymously for fear of industry retaliation, revealed the ugly truth: "This has become the perfect legal heist. You seize control of massive estates, generate astronomical fees through manufactured complexity, drag proceedings across years, and by the time creditors realise the con, their money has been professionally laundered into legal accounts." Banxso, The Sequel Nobody Wanted History repeats with mechanical precision in the Banxso liquidation. When stakeholders offered R57 million in security to guarantee full creditor payouts for the liquidation applicants, Mostert & Bosman rejected the proposal without hesitation. The law firm allegedly withheld news of this settlement from clients, who discovered the offer through media reports rather than their supposed legal representatives. Judge Le Grange himself highlighted the matter during the application hearing remarking that it made no sense for a creditor to turn down a 100% offer in favour of long, drawn out and expensive legal proceedings that would surely end up with the same alleged creditor receiving 10 – 15 cents on the Rand in a best-case scenario. A forensic accountant with two decades of corporate insolvency experience explained the perverse dynamics: "These liquidations have transformed into wealth destruction machines. Not only do they consume principal through manufactured legal complexity, but they obliterate the investment returns that should compound over time. The R1.1 billion recovered in 2021 could have grown to R1.5 billion through conservative investments. Instead, it has shrunk to R627 million while generating massive professional fees. This represents systematic value destruction disguised as estate administration." Judge Le Grange raised pointed questions during May hearings about a website promoting Bester and Van Rooyen as preferred liquidators before the application had even been heard by the courts, asking directly and not receiving any substantial answer as to why this would not constitute touting in its worst form. The coordination suggests an orchestrated campaign that may violate professional conduct standards. A Verdict That Could Doom Thousands Judge Le Grange faces a critical decision that will determine whether Banxso clients receive their funds or feed the liquidation machine. The contrast could not be starker. Approving forced liquidation consigns clients to the MTI fate: years of waiting while professionals extract maximum fees from dwindling assets. The human cost of this decision extends far beyond financial statements. Banxso clients represent ordinary South Africans whose savings, retirement funds, and family security hang in the balance. One investor, who invested R150,000 captured the desperation: "If Banxso wins its case, I can access my money immediately. These liquidators see only the profits they can make from forcing this liquidation through, regardless of what happens to us." An MTI victim whose pension fund vanished into legal fees painted the horrific reality: "Four years of watching lawyers grow rich while I struggle with rent payments. They stole our money twice, first the original scammers, then the professionals meant to protect us. The system is designed to destroy creditors." David Versus the Legal Goliath Unlike MTI's passive collapse, Banxso stakeholders have mounted unprecedented resistance against regulatory and legal pressure. While most companies capitulate when faced with FSCA action, Banxso directors are challenging the regulator at every turn, including now preparing to take the authority to tribunal to overturn the final removal of their Financial Services Provider licence. This defiance represents more than corporate stubbornness. Banxso management recognises that surrendering to the liquidation cartel means abandoning their clients to systematic wealth extraction by professional services. Their R57 million settlement offer, which excluded the large sums held under court order in their bank accounts, demonstrates genuine commitment to creditor protection rather than capitulation to legal machinery designed to enrich lawyers and liquidators. A retired commercial lawyer with 40 years' experience described Banxso's resistance as extraordinary: "Most companies fold immediately when liquidation proceedings begin because fighting the system is expensive and usually futile. Banxso's willingness to challenge both the FSCA and liquidation applicants shows they understand what their clients face if this process continues." The company's tribunal challenge against the FSCA represents a broader fight against regulatory overreach that enables liquidation abuse. By freezing Banxso funds while failing to enforce court orders for their release, the FSCA created the perfect environment for professional fee accumulation at creditor expense. The Professionals Always Win Industry insiders describe a deliberate methodology perfected through countless liquidations. Early settlement offers that benefit creditors face immediate rejection. Proceedings stretch across years through manufactured legal complexity. Friendly professional services receive appointments to maximise fee extraction. Estate assets disappear through administrative costs while creditors receive blame for poor market conditions affecting recovery rates. The pattern extends beyond individual cases into systemic dysfunction. South Africa's liquidation framework has evolved into a sophisticated mechanism where liquidators receive guaranteed payment regardless of creditor outcomes, law firms bill unlimited hours with minimal oversight, administrative costs consistently exceed creditor recoveries, and settlement offers threatening fee income face automatic rejection. The R450 Million Question As judgment approaches, the MTI precedent looms like a financial death sentence. The R450 million that vanished from MTI's estate represents more than accounting irregularities or market volatility. It demonstrates how professional fees can consume entire estates while creditors wait indefinitely for justice that never arrives. A bankruptcy specialist summarised the brutal reality: "This is not incompetence or unfortunate circumstances. It represents a refined business model where creditor suffering generates professional prosperity. The longer estates remain in liquidation, the more fees accumulate. Quick resolutions are bad for business." Justice or Professional Jackpot? Judge Le Grange holds extraordinary power. His decision will either deliver justice to Banxso clients through immediate settlement acceptance or condemn them to the liquidation lottery that has already claimed MTI creditors. The choice represents far more than legal procedure. It determines whether South Africa's courts serve creditor interests or enable professional wealth extraction. The evidence is overwhelming. Banxso stakeholders have fought regulatory pressure, challenged FSCA overreach, and offered complete creditor protection through guaranteed settlement funds. They have demonstrated unprecedented commitment to client welfare in a system designed to sacrifice creditor interests for professional profit. Mostert & Bosman and their preferred liquidators offer the MTI template: years of proceedings, millions in fees, and zero creditor recovery. The Final Reckoning Judge Le Grange's judgment will echo far beyond Banxso. It will signal whether South African courts recognise the liquidation cartel's systematic abuse of creditor rights or enable continued professional profiteering disguised as legal process. Judge Le Grange faces a choice between creditor protection and professional enrichment. The question haunting thousands of Banxso clients is simple: will Judge Le Grange deliver justice or feed the liquidation machine that transforms creditor suffering into professional prosperity? The answer will determine whether South Africa's liquidation system serves justice or perpetuates the most profitable legal scam in the country's history.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store