How Crypto Chaos In Pakistan Threatens National Security And Economic Stability
Yet, Pakistan's sudden embrace of cryptocurrency represents a dangerous confluence of geopolitical opportunism and regulatory recklessness that could transform the country into a global hub for illicit financial flows. While the Trump administration's crypto-friendly policies have opened new diplomatic channels, Pakistan's hasty pivot toward digital assets without proper legal frameworks threatens to exacerbate existing challenges with terror financing and money-laundering compliance.[2]
The most glaring contradiction in Pakistan's cryptocurrency strategy lies in its fundamental illegality within the country's own borders. Despite establishing the Pakistan Crypto Council and appointing Bilal bin Saqib as its CEO with ministerial status, cryptocurrency transactions remain prohibited under current Pakistani law.[3] Finance Secretary Imdad Ullah Bosal's categorical statement that "crypto is not a legal tender in Pakistan" exposes the nature of government policy, where officials simultaneously promote Bitcoin initiatives abroad while maintaining domestic prohibitions.
This regulatory chaos becomes particularly troubling when examined through the lens of Pakistan's appointment of Changpeng Zhao as strategic adviser to its crypto council.[4] Zhao, the Chinese-born Canadian co-founder and former CEO of Binance, pleaded guilty to failing to implement proper anti-money-laundering standards and served time in US prison.[5] Binance was found to have facilitated transactions for sanctioned entities including Hamas,[6] resulting in a $4.3 billion settlement.[7] Pakistan's decision to elevate such a controversial figure to guide its cryptocurrency strategy sends alarming signals about the country's commitment to financial integrity and counter-terrorism compliance.
Pakistan's Vulnerability To Terror Financing Through Cryptocurrency
The timing of Pakistan's crypto enthusiasm coincides suspiciously with the Trump administration's dismantling of cryptocurrency enforcement mechanisms. The closure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which had previously scrutinized crypto companies for fraud and risks, has created a regulatory vacuum that Pakistan appears eager to exploit. This alignment with Trump's deregulation agenda suggests Pakistan's cryptocurrency push is less about genuine economic development and more about currying favor with an administration that has significant business interests in the digital asset space.
Pakistan's vulnerability to terror financing through cryptocurrency channels becomes even more pronounced given the country's existing struggles with Financial Action Task Force compliance. The FATF has repeatedly placed Pakistan on its grey list for inadequate measures against money laundering and terror financing. The introduction of cryptocurrency infrastructure without robust regulatory frameworks could provide terrorist organizations with sophisticated new channels for moving funds while maintaining plausible deniability about their origins and destinations.
The technical requirements for FATF compliance in cryptocurrency transactions present particular challenges for Pakistan. The travel rule mandates that companies must provide complete transaction data from origin to beneficiary for up to five years. This requirement necessitates extensive data storage capabilities and uninterrupted electricity supply, resources that Pakistan struggles to provide even for basic economic needs. The country's allocation of 2,000 megawatts of electricity for Bitcoin mining, announced without IMF consultation, highlights the disconnect between cryptocurrency ambitions and economic realities.
Pakistan's attempt to mirror US stablecoin legislation through the GENIUS Bill framework reveals the extent to which American business interests are driving Pakistani policy. The bill's requirement that trading partners maintain similar regulatory structures creates a dependency relationship where Pakistan must align its financial regulations with US preferences to maintain access to dollar-pegged stablecoin markets. This arrangement effectively subordinates Pakistani monetary sovereignty to American commercial interests while potentially exposing the country to new forms of financial instability.
Pakistan's Domestic Cryptocurrency Prohibitions
Pakistan's strategic Bitcoin reserve announcement at the Las Vegas conference represents perhaps the most reckless aspect of its cryptocurrency gamble. Establishing sovereign cryptocurrency holdings without proper legal frameworks or risk assessment mechanisms exposes the national treasury to extreme volatility while potentially facilitating capital flight. The contradiction between promoting Bitcoin reserves internationally while maintaining domestic cryptocurrency prohibitions creates legal and operational uncertainties that could undermine both initiatives.
The International Monetary Fund's concerns about Pakistan's cryptocurrency initiatives reflect broader international skepticism about the country's approach. With Pakistan already dependent on IMF bailout packages and facing stringent conditionality requirements, the unilateral decision to allocate significant resources to cryptocurrency infrastructure without consultation represents a direct challenge to multilateral oversight mechanisms. This defiance could complicate future negotiations and potentially jeopardize essential financial support.
The precedent of El Salvador, where President Nayib Bukele invested 15 percent of GDP in Bitcoin despite IMF objections, provides a troubling model for Pakistan's strategy.[8] While Bukele ultimately secured continued IMF funding with Trump administration support, his country's extreme cryptocurrency exposure has created unprecedented fiscal vulnerabilities. Pakistan's adoption of a similar approach, given its far more precarious economic position and complex security challenges, represents an exponentially greater risk.
Pakistan Risks Transforming Itself Into A Haven For Illicit Financial Flows
The emergence of what could be termed "cryptoplacy" as a new form of diplomatic engagement creates particular dangers for countries like Pakistan with weak institutional frameworks. The ability to gain political access and potentially circumvent traditional oversight mechanisms through cryptocurrency initiatives may prove irresistible to governments seeking international legitimacy, even when such approaches fundamentally undermine domestic stability and security.
Pakistan's cryptocurrency gamble ultimately reflects a broader pattern of prioritizing short-term political gains over long-term institutional development. By embracing digital assets without adequate legal frameworks, appointing compromised individuals to key positions, and aligning financial policy with foreign business interests, Pakistan risks transforming itself into a haven for illicit financial flows while exposing its fragile economy to unnecessary volatility and external manipulation. The country's leaders must recognize that sustainable economic development requires robust institutions and regulatory clarity, not opportunistic alignment with the latest international trends.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Memri
11 hours ago
- Memri
Indian Foreign Ministry Responds To U.S. Tariff Threats Over Russian Oil Purchase: 'It Is Revealing That The Very Nations Criticizing India Are Themselves Indulging In Trade With Russia'
On August 4, 2025, India's Foreign Ministry published a statement, responding to the U.S. threats over an additional unspecified penalty for India's trade with Russia for crude oil. The U.S. administration has already imposed a sweeping 25-percent tariff on all Indian-origin goods, effective August 7, 2025. In the statement, India stated that "the very nations criticizing India are themselves indulging in trade with Russia. Unlike our case, such trade is not even a vital national compulsion." It then added: "Europe-Russia trade includes not just energy, but also fertilizers, mining products, chemicals, iron and steel and machinery and transport equipment. Where the United States is concerned, it continues to import from Russia uranium hexafluoride for its nuclear industry, palladium for its EV industry, fertilizers as well as chemicals." Responding to India's statement, President Donald Trump said he "doesn't know anything" about U.S. imports of fertilizers and chemicals from Russia. During a press conference, Trump was asked: "India says the U.S. buys Russian uranium and fertilizers while criticizing them for buying Russian energy. Your response to that? Trump answered: "I don't know anything about it. We will have to check."[1] President Donald Trump signed an executive order on August 6 to place an additional 25-percent tariff on India for its purchases of Russian oil, bringing the combined tariffs imposed by the U.S. on India to 50 percent.[2] Following is the text of the statement by India's Foreign Ministry:[3] "The Targeting Of India Is Unjustified And Unreasonable" "India has been targeted by the United States and the European Union for importing oil from Russia after the commencement of the Ukraine conflict. In fact, India began importing from Russia because traditional supplies were diverted to Europe after the outbreak of the conflict. The United States at that time actively encouraged such imports by India for strengthening global energy markets stability. "2. India's imports are meant to ensure predictable and affordable energy costs to the Indian consumer. They are a necessity compelled by global market situation. However, it is revealing that the very nations criticizing India are themselves indulging in trade with Russia. Unlike our case, such trade is not even a vital national compulsion. "3. The European Union in 2024 had a bilateral trade of Euro 67.5 billion in goods with Russia. In addition, it had trade in services estimated at Euro 17.2 billion in 2023. This is significantly more than India's total trade with Russia that year or subsequently. European imports of LNG in 2024, in fact, reached a record 16.5mn tonnes, surpassing the last record of 15.21mn tonnes in 2022. "4. Europe-Russia trade includes not just energy, but also fertilizers, mining products, chemicals, iron and steel and machinery and transport equipment. "5. Where the United States is concerned, it continues to import from Russia uranium hexafluoride for its nuclear industry, palladium for its EV industry, fertilizers as well as chemicals. "6. In this background, the targeting of India is unjustified and unreasonable. Like any major economy, India will take all necessary measures to safeguard its national interests and economic security."
Iraqi News
a day ago
- Iraqi News
Steeper US tariffs take effect on many Brazilian goods
Washington – US tariffs on many Brazilian products surged Wednesday, as President Donald Trump moved ahead with a pressure campaign against the trial of his right-wing ally Jair Bolsonaro. Trump's latest salvo brings duties on various Brazilian goods from 10 percent to 50 percent, although broad exemptions — including for orange juice and civil aircraft — are expected to soften the blow. Brazil's vice president Geraldo Alckmin previously told media that the new tariff would apply to just around 36 percent of Brazil's exports to the United States. But analysts said it still hits key goods like coffee, beef, and sugar. In an executive order announcing the tariffs last week, the Trump administration lashed out at Brazilian officials for 'unjustified criminal charges' against their country's former president Bolsonaro, who is accused of planning a coup. Bolsonaro is on trial for allegedly plotting to hold onto power after losing the 2022 elections to President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. Trump's order, which also criticized Brazil's digital regulation, charged that the Brazilian government's recent policies and actions threatened the US economy, national security, and foreign policy. But analysts have flagged major exclusions in the tariff hike. Valentina Sader, an expert on Brazil at the Atlantic Council, noted that there are nearly 700 exemptions. 'The tariffs are not good, but they expected worse,' Sader said in a recent note. She predicts the Brazilian economy likely 'will withstand the duties.' 'The government seems to be looking to subsidize some of the most impacted sectors, but we might see Brazil looking to diversify its export markets,' she told AFP. The tariff hike on Brazilian goods comes a day before a separate wave of higher US duties are set to take effect on dozens of economies ranging from the European Union to Taiwan — as Trump moves to reshape global trade. Analysts at Pantheon Macroeconomics estimate that these incoming tariff increases are expected to boost the average effective tariff rate for US imports to nearly 20 percent. This marks the highest level since at least the 1930s, according to the Budget Lab at Yale University. – 'Off the table' – But US tensions with Brazil are not likely to dissipate soon, with a Brazilian judge placing Bolsonaro under house arrest on Monday for breaking a social media ban. While the 70-year-old is barred from social media during legal proceedings — with third parties also not allowed to share his public remarks — his allies defied the order on Sunday. Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes — who is presiding over Bolsonaro's trial — reacted furiously. Washington recently imposed sanctions on Moraes as well. Trump's pressure campaign has angered many Brazilians but endeared him to Bolsonaro's conservative base. 'Brazilians have not taken well to what they perceive to be a clear intervention on domestic affairs and an independent judiciary,' Sader of the Atlantic Council said. 'And President Lula has been firm that the government is open to dialogue and negotiations, but not to foreign interference on Brazilian affairs,' she added. 'Brazilian sovereignty is off the table,' she said.
Iraqi News
a day ago
- Iraqi News
Investors walk fine line as Trump tariffs temper rate hopes
Hong Kong – Asian investors trod warily Wednesday amid lingering uncertainty over Donald Trump's trade war, while another round of data indicated further weakness in the US economy but added interest rate cut speculation. The US president's claim that Washington was 'very close to a deal' to extend a China truce provided some optimism, though that was tempered by his warning of fresh levies on pharmaceuticals and chips. After a strong start to the week sparked by hopes that painful jobs data will force the US Federal Reserve to lower rates next month, another batch of figures added fuel to the fire. A closely watched index of services activity showed it had barely grown in July as companies contend with weaker hiring conditions and rising prices. The news came after Friday's jobs data revealed far fewer US jobs were created than expected in May, June and July. 'Market pricing has moved aggressively in favour of a September rate cut by the Federal Reserve, after a weak July jobs report and ugly revisions to May and June signalled the US labour market may finally be cracking under the pressure of tariffs,' said Neil Wilson at Saxo Markets. 'The data pushed the US closer to stagflationary territory,' he said. 'So far, the market has held up and looked beyond the tariff risks, but we may at last be seeing the hard data finally catch up with the soft survey data.' But while bets on a rate cut in September have soared, he remained unsure that such a move was a certainty. Stocks fluctuated through the morning. Tokyo, Shanghai, Sydney, Wellington, Manila and Jakarta rose but Hong Kong, Singapore, Seoul and Taipei were in the red. Confidence remains thin as Trump's tariff threats linger, with several countries — including India and Switzerland — still to hammer out deals before his delayed deadline Thursday, and agreed levies with others begin to kick in. In his latest salvo, Trump told CNBC he was looking at hitting pharmaceuticals with tolls that eventually reach 250 percent, while semiconductors were also in the firing line. He has said he will also hammer India over its purchases of Russian oil. Still, Trump did strike a positive note on China, which is in talks with US officials to continue a truce agreed in May that saw the world's two largest economies pare down their eye-watering triple-digit tariffs. Regarding Chinese President Xi Jinping, Trump told CNBC's 'Squawk Box' that 'I'll end up having a meeting before the end of the year, most likely, if we make a deal. 'If we don't make a deal, I'm not going to have a meeting. I mean, you know, what's the purpose of meeting if we're not going to make a deal? 'But we're getting very close to a deal.' He added that his relationship with Xi was 'very good' and that 'I think we'll make a good deal. It's not imperative, but I think we're going to make a good deal'. – Key figures at around 0230 GMT – Tokyo – Nikkei 225: UP 0.6 percent at 40,802.73 (break) Hong Kong – Hang Seng Index: DOWN 0.2 percent at 24,844.94 Shanghai – Composite: UP 0.1 percent at 3,619.78 Euro/dollar: DOWN at $1.1570 from $1.1582 on Tuesday Pound/dollar: UP at $1.3303 from $1.3294 Dollar/yen: UP at 147.61 yen from 147.55 yen Euro/pound: DOWN at 86.97 pence from 87.01 pence West Texas Intermediate: UP 0.5 percent at $65.46 per barrel Brent North Sea Crude: UP 0.5 percent at $67.96 per barrel New York – Dow: DOWN 0.1 percent at 44,111.74 (close) London – FTSE 100: UP 0.2 percent at 9,142.73 (close)
