Senior advocate Seth Nthai convicted and sentenced for soliciting R5m bribe
Sandton Chronicle reports that Nthai admitted to soliciting a R5m bribe from Italian businessman Mario Marcenaro during a meeting in Sandton on October 10, 2009.
At the time, Nthai was representing the South African government in the high-profile Piero Foresti and others v The Government of the Republic of South Africa case. The bribe was intended to influence the outcome of the arbitration in favour of Marcenaro and his co-claimants.
As part of a plea and sentence agreement, the court imposed a fine of R500 000 or two years' imprisonment. Additionally, Nthai received a five-year sentence, wholly suspended for five years on condition that he is not convicted of a similar offence during the suspension period.
The court noted the severity of the offence, particularly given that the complainant in the matter was the South African government itself. The judge also considered Nthai's guilty plea, co-operation during proceedings, and his age when delivering the sentence.
The National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) regional spokesperson, Phindi Mjonondwane, said the investigations revealed that Nthai had disclosed confidential and strategic information about the case to Marcenaro without authorisation in exchange for the promised bribe.
'Although the R5m was never paid, the court found that the mere solicitation of such a bribe constituted a serious breach of legal and ethical duty,' said Mjonondwane.
'The case had a complex legal history, including extensive trial proceedings and the recusal of the initial presiding judge after several state witnesses had already testified. This led to the matter being restarted before a new judge, ultimately resulting in the current plea agreement.'
She added that they have welcomed the conviction as a significant victory in their ongoing efforts to root out corruption.
'This conviction affirms our commitment to fighting corruption, especially within the legal profession and among public office bearers. The abuse of public trust and the justice system by legal professionals is a serious threat to the rule of law. Mr Nthai's actions were a betrayal of that trust, and this sentence sends a clear message that no one is above the law.'
Mjonondwane explained the importance of maintaining integrity within state institutions. 'This outcome demonstrates that unethical behaviour, regardless of one's status or position, will be prosecuted vigorously. We will continue to act without fear or favour to protect the public interest.'
The NPA has reiterated its ongoing commitment to upholding the rule of law and ensuring accountability across all sectors, particularly in cases involving the manipulation of justice for personal enrichment.
Breaking news at your fingertips… Follow Caxton Network News on Facebook and join our WhatsApp channel.
Nuus wat saakmaak. Volg Caxton Netwerk-nuus op Facebook en sluit aan by ons WhatsApp-kanaal.
Read original story on www.citizen.co.za
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
Farm murder accused says he was forced to feed women's bodies to pigs
During the brief proceedings, a supervisor on the farm turned state witness. One of the three men accused of killing two women and throwing their bodies in a pigsty in Limpopo has told the court he was forced to feed their bodies to pigs. Pig farmer Zackariah Olivier, his co-accused Rudolph de Wet, and Zimbabwean national William Musoro returned to the Polokwane High Court on Monday. Trial National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) regional spokesperson Mashudu Malabi said the murder case was postponed to Thursday, 07 August 2025, to afford legal representatives an opportunity to consult and prepare for trial. 'The trial will commence on Monday, 11 August 2025. Accused number three (William Musora) has been moved out from the previous attorneys. Now he is going to be represented by Legal Aid South Africa.' State witness During the brief proceedings on Monday, the 20-year-old De Wet, a supervisor on the farm, turned state witness, and testified that Olivier shot and killed the two women. De Wet is expected to testify that he was 'under duress' when he was forced to throw their bodies into the pig enclosure, according to his lawyer and the state prosecutor. Charges against De Wet are expected to be dropped when he begins his testimony as a state witness. [WATCH] A Limpopo pig farmer, Zacharia Olivier, and his two workers, accused of killing two women and disposing of their bodies in a pigsty, had their trial postponed to Thursday in the High Court in Polokwane. — SABC News (@SABCNews) August 4, 2025 ALSO READ: Pig farm murder case in Limpopo set for trial in August Charges The 50-year-old Musora and the 60-year-old Olivier have yet to enter a plea and remain behind bars. Olivier, De Wet and Musora are facing two counts of murder, attempted murder, defeating the administration of justice, possession of an unlicensed firearm, and unlawful possession of ammunition. Musora, who is a Zimbabwean national, faces an additional charge of contravening the Immigration Act. In December, a visibly emotional Olivier shook his head when Magistrate Ntilane Felleng announced the postponement of his bail application, meaning he spent Christmas behind bars. Murder Olivier, De Wet and Musora are accused of killing Maria Makgato and Lucia Ndlovu before dumping their bodies in a pigsty at Onvervaght farm in Sebayeng, outside Polokwane, in August. It is the state's case that Makgato and Ndlovu went to the farm to collect expired food that the pigs were eating. They were then allegedly fatally shot and dumped into the pigsty, where the animals consumed their bodies. ALSO READ: Limpopo pigsty murders: Two accused abandon bid for bail
Daily Maverick
4 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
What does it mean to be South African? Navigating identity in a complex democracy
In a Daily Maverick webinar asking 'What does it mean to be South African?', professors William Gumede and Pierre de Vos joined Zukiswa Pikoli to delve into identity, citizenship and inclusion 30 years into South Africa's democracy. Here are 10 takeaways. 1. Defining South Africanness: A contested and plural concept The webinar highlighted that defining 'South Africanness' is contested terrain, especially 30 years into democracy. Unlike monocultural countries, South Africa's identity is plural and layered, based on multiple identities and an acceptance of difference rather than a single shared culture, language or race. 2. The Constitution as a 'civic religion' While South Africa boasts diverse cultures and languages, the Constitution and its democratic institutions serve as a common civic identity, a 'civic religion' that binds citizens together. It's seen as a crucial pillar for a country with a deeply divided past. 3. Beyond Western models of nationhood Traditional Western models of nationhood, often based on shared culture or language, don't fully apply to South Africa. The country's identity must be more embracing, incorporating the best elements of its diverse past, present, histories and cultures. 4. Addressing xenophobia and exclusion A critical concern raised is the potential for national identity to be used for exclusion, leading to xenophobia and other forms of discrimination. The discussion emphasised the need for a shared commitment and recognition of interdependence to foster a functional constitutional democracy. 5. The role of, and pressure on, the Constitution The Constitution, with its core values of human dignity, equality and freedom, is an aspiration. However, it faces immense pressure as visible inequalities persist, leading some to question whether these values are truly shared or merely promises unfulfilled. The document itself cannot act; it is about how people and institutions behave. 6. Transforming individual identity towards a broader South Africanness A significant challenge is to transform individual, narrow self-identities (e.g. based on race or ethnicity) into a broader South African identity. This requires more engagement in families, schools, workplaces and communities to foster a sense that one's specific group identity is just a piece of a larger South Africanness. 7. Cultivating empathy and solidarity across difference A crucial missing element in South Africa's nation-building project is empathy and solidarity across different groups. People tend to have empathy for those similar to them, but extending this compassion to those who 'don't look like you' is vital for a stronger common South Africanness. This needs to be actively taught and nurtured, starting in schools. 8. The peril of politicised identity The country's national identity is deeply intertwined with politics. When governance is poor, corrupt or incompetent, or when politicians exploit divisions for votes, it undermines the common South African project. There is a strong call for consequences for politicians who sow division. 9. Reimagining commemorations and recognising diverse contributions Commemorative days and national memory-making need to move beyond focusing solely on politicians or political parties. There's a strong need to memorialise the diversity of South African society, including forgotten and excluded individuals, artists, institution builders and sports stars, celebrating a broader range of contributions to the nation. 10. The importance of recognising and refining indigenous identities While recognising and bringing back indigenous identities erased by apartheid is crucial, it is equally important to critically evaluate and remove anti-democratic or anti-constitutional elements within these identities (e.g. patriarchy). The goal is to integrate the valuable aspects of indigenous identities with the constitutional value of equality. The discussion highlighted the ongoing journey of defining and strengthening South Africa's identity, emphasising the complexities of diversity, the role of foundational values and the need for active engagement from all citizens. DM
Daily Maverick
4 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
GNU must take blame for not acting to avert imposition of Trump's exorbitant tariffs
The recent decision by US President Donald Trump to increase tariffs from 10% to 30% on most South African imports, effective this past Friday, 1 August 2025, is a damning indictment of our foreign policy shortcomings. At the heart of this unfolding crisis is the African Growth and Opportunity Act (Agoa), which for nearly 25 years has given South African goods duty-free access to US markets. In 2023, more than $3-billion worth of exports flowed to the US under Agoa, sustaining jobs and livelihoods in key industries such as automotive manufacturing, agriculture, and mining. It's difficult to overstate just how beneficial Agoa has been. The US is South Africa's second-largest export market, and Agoa alone accounts for more than $2-billion in exports annually. Entire value chains are built on this preferential access. This has resulted in tens of thousands of jobs created and maintained in export-related industries, especially in the automotive and agricultural sectors. Yet, what once felt like abstract diplomatic tensions have now resulted in exorbitant tariff hikes that could wipe out margins for exporters and put thousands of jobs at risk across key sectors — from citrus and wine to auto manufacturing and metals. While some may point fingers at an increasingly protectionist White House, the Government of National Unity (GNU) must accept responsibility for what is in most parts a self-inflicted wound. Those in the GNU say that jobs and the economy are their number one priority. But when it came to protecting one of our largest export markets and tens of thousands of South African jobs, they sat on their hands and watched the tariffs roll in. This diplomatic misstep will be measured in job losses, declining export revenue, and dwindling investor confidence. Instead of strategic engagement, disarray ensued. Civil society organisations like AfriForum and Solidarity secured high-level meetings in Washington, while our official diplomatic presence remained directionless. Undermining national trade posture Even the Democratic Alliance was accused of undermining our national trade posture through uncoordinated political freelancing, a move that seemingly cost MP Emma Powell her role as the DA's International Relations spokesperson. At the core of Washington's growing frustration is South Africa's erratic and often contradictory foreign policy. Despite claiming to be non-aligned, our government has taken deliberate steps that signal the opposite. The ANC's hosting of senior Hamas representatives in Pretoria, Minister Naledi Pandor's infamous meeting with then Iranian president Ebrahim Raisi, and South Africa's ambiguous stance on Russia's war in Ukraine have all sent provocative messages that clash with global democratic norms. These actions carry real-world consequences, as this latest tariff decision makes painfully clear. Even under the more diplomatic Biden administration, South Africa failed to rebuild trust. We did not use the opportunity to engage, negotiate or reassure. And now, under a more transactional Trump presidency, patience has run out. What is clear is that South Africa urgently needs a foreign policy rooted in clear principles and strategic interests, instead of nostalgia and ideology. Our diplomacy must be led by the state, above party politics, and laser focused on three core objectives: expanding trade and economic growth, defending human rights, and advancing democracy on the continent and beyond. The current bipolar approach, with mixed signals from different actors, is unsustainable and deeply damaging. A government-led, coherent strategy to stabilise and grow our trade relationship with the US is now mission-critical. This strategy must include five immediate actions: South Africa must reassert official leadership in managing our engagement with Washington. Splinter groups and political parties must refrain from back-channelling for narrow political gain. Trade policy is national policy. South Africa must speak with one clear, credible, and united voice. Our government must directly engage with the US Congress, which holds immense sway over trade legislation. Lawmakers on Capitol Hill need to hear not just about Agoa's benefits for South Africa, but for the US too. More than 500,000 American jobs are tied to trade with us. We should use that as leverage. South Africa must table a credible trade and investment plan that showcases the mutual benefits of partnership. Priority sectors like automotive exports (valued at more than $1.2-billion annually), citrus, wine, metals and green technology must be at the forefront. We must position ourselves as a reliable partner for US capital, technology, and innovation as America eyes new partners in the global energy transition. A full economic risk assessment must be urgently commissioned to measure the impact of the proposed tariffs on jobs and industry. Such a study would not only quantify the damage, but guide our negotiating position and enable smarter policy responses, including sector-specific relief or adjustment mechanisms. Perhaps most urgently, we must appoint a capable and credible ambassador to Washington. This needs to be someone who understands both diplomacy and economics. The job now requires high-stakes negotiations to restore market confidence and protect jobs. That seat has remained vacant or ineffective for far too long. The truth is that South Africa's foreign policy has long lacked a future-focused economic dimension. It is too often discussed not in terms of trade, growth or a digital future, but in the context of how liberation movements can remain in power. This mindset has locked us into outdated alliances, including with authoritarian regimes that are neither democratic nor innovative. Meanwhile, we've neglected crucial relationships with long-standing partners like the US, and failed to appoint ambassadors, attend key forums or secure investment guarantees. What is clear is that we cannot afford to respond with more muddled messages, delayed decisions and ideological posturing. If we do not act with clarity, urgency and humility, we risk permanently losing one of our most important trade relationships. Now more than ever, our foreign policy must serve South Africa's economic interests. Jobs, industries and future growth hang in the balance. DM
