America's top banker reveals Wall Street's hottest new trend that could spell financial doom - as he goes all in
JPMorgan Chase chief executive Jamie Dimon is spearheading a pivot for his institution, even as he voices fears about the boom in unregulated, private lending.
Speaking to clients in Miami in February, Dimon compared the practice to the subprime mortgage fad which sparked the 2008 global financial crisis and laid waste to millions of American's livelihoods and sparked tough regulations in banking.
Citing the mistakes bankers made which led to 'everything' blowing up in 2008, Dimon, who is considered the most successful banker in generations, said: 'Parts of direct lending are good, but not everyone does a great job.
'That's what causes problems with financial products.'
Banks issued high-risk home loans to borrowers with poor credit histories, and when the initial low interest rates finally spiked, borrowers found themselves unable to pay their mortgages, triggering the collapse of the US housing market.
These loans sparked a global credit crisis which ravaged the economy, wiping out trillions of dollars of household wealth and driving unemployment to record highs.
Dimon warned the private lending trend - now worth a whopping $700billion - is a similar craze and there 'could be hell to pay' if the market ultimately falters.
These loans are generally so risky that traditional banks would not approve, but highly indebted companies are seeking them out from privatized financial firms, the Wall Street Journal reported.
They took hold in 2015, as private equity giants with money to spare from successful pension funds sought higher returns and began dabbling in corporate lending.
Suddenly, businesses had the means to circumvent the big banks tough regulations, promised loans without the need to secure a credit rating and with more flexible terms.
They could borrow more than banks would traditionally lend, and in exchange would have a higher interest rate, with payments tacked on to the back of the loan.
According to the Federal Reserve's data from 2024, companies that went down the private loan route paid between two to three percent more than with traditional banks.
Defaults have historically remained low, but economists fear this could change swiftly in a sustained recession or market downturn.
As early as 2021, Dimon was warning shareholders that the entire scheme ' looked like a bubble' and would need to be 'assiduously monitored.'
But he was also looking for the safest way to tap into the market.
On the same day Dimon raised the alarm with clients about the risks, JPMorgan released a statement confirming it was increasing its 'direct lending commitment to $50 billion.'
'This strategic move is designed to extend the firm's direct lending capabilities and provide tailored private credit solutions to meet the evolving needs of clients,' the firm said.
Under the new plan, corporate clients have the option to either take on a traditional loan or a private lending option, which could grant them access to more cash but see them saddled with a higher interest rate.
'Since 2021, J.P. Morgan has successfully deployed over $10 billion across more than 100 private credit transactions, serving both corporate and sponsor clients,' JPMorgan said in a February statement.
'This latest commitment underscores the bank's dedication to being a leader in both the broadly syndicated and private credit markets.'
JPMorgan holds onto private loans and collects interest until it matures.
Dimon has considered the risk and sees a path forward for JPMorgan to profit even if a crisis destroys the market.
During the global financial crisis, a handful of bankers who predicted the crash were able to hugely profit by by betting against the very mortgage investments they sold to clients, making money as those investments ultimately collapsed.
The crash happened when millions of Americans began to default on risky home loans, causing the value of those investments to plummet and triggering panic across the global financial system.
Glenn Schorr, a senior analyst for Evercore, said: 'As a bank, you can only watch private credit come from nowhere and get to a trillion dollar industry for so long.
'This is what its clients are asking for.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
25 minutes ago
- Reuters
US appeals court strikes down SEC rule on 'audit trail' funding
WASHINGTON, July 25 (Reuters) - A federal appeals court on Friday struck down 2023 regulations adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on funding a comprehensive market surveillance system, finding that Wall Street's top regulator had not provided a sufficient basis for allowing stock exchanges to pass on its costs to their members, court papers showed. The unanimous decision represented another blow to SEC regulations adopted under the previous Biden administration, which faced concerted opposition from industry and Republican lawmakers. It was also a setback for the Consolidated Audit Trail, a repository of investor and transaction data meant to give regulators overarching visibility into U.S. market operations, but which has faced delays and obstacles for more than a decade. The American Securities Association and Citadel Securities, which brought the lawsuit, both hailed the outcome. The ruling "prevents a tax hike on every American investor who buys or sells a share of stock," ASA President Chris Iacovella said in a statement. The SEC did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Over the objections of its Republican members, the SEC in 2023 split the operating costs among buyers, sellers, and exchanges. Officials said at the time this would divide costs evenly but also allow exchanges several years to recoup hundreds of millions already spent. This drew stiff objections from the investment industry, which said it could be left paying an unfairly large share. The two Republicans are now part of the five-member commission's controlling majority. In an opinion for a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for 11th Circuit, Circuit Judge Andrew Brasher said that, because the SEC had not advanced a sufficient justification in deciding how the system's cost would fall on different actors in the marketplace, "we conclude that the 2023 Funding Order is arbitrary and capricious" and therefore in violation of federal laws governing the crafting of regulations. The appeals court sent the rule back to the SEC for further processing in line with the court's decision. The SEC mandated the CAT's creation in 2012 as a response to the "flash crash" of 2010 when major Wall Street indexes temporarily erased nearly $1 trillion in market value in a matter of minutes. Officials say it can allow regulators to spot market manipulation and have cited its data in enforcement actions.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
ALEX BRUMMER: Banks face a fintech coup
The long and winding road back for NatWest from oblivion to robust domestic lender is complete. Paul Thwaite, the bank's chief executive post state shareholding, can enjoy the new freedoms. He has made no secret of his ambition to build on NatWest's already powerful presence through acquisition. As a standalone franchise, NatWest can now say what it thinks again. We know what happened to Thwaite's predecessor Alison Rose when judged to have spoken out of turn about the banking relationship between NatWest's posh offshoot Coutts and Reform leader Nigel Farage. NatWest's chief and his opposite number at Lloyds Charlie Nunn speak as one. With bank profits soaring and some Government members and backbenchers eyeing up the finance and wealth as tax targets, they are concerned. One can see why Labour might regard NatWest's first half operating profits of £3.6billion, up from £3billion in the same period last year, as easy meat. If the bank can afford to buy back £1.5billion of its shares this year, recompense for taxpayers might seem in order. Indeed, the bank has increased its income guidance for the full year to £16.5billion from £16billion. Partly that reflects additional income from the Sainsbury's bank deal, as well as lower than expected bad loans. Good times do not last forever and a profitable bank, with healthy capital, ought to be good for UK growth. NatWest, Lloyds and the other banks have no room for complacency. A note from NatWest-RBS neighbours in Edinburgh, Scottish Mortgage, run by Baillie Gifford, extols fintech. It praises pioneers Stripe, Wise, NuBank, SEA, Revolut and others for building 'scale financial systems' and broadening access. Unless the incumbents can catch the digital train, High Street lenders could – like IBM – become sunset companies, as Microsoft, Nvidia et al sprint off with the prizes. Powell play After ugly scenes in the Oval Office in February, when Donald Trump berated Ukraine's President Zelensky, it might have been hoped self-restraint had been learned. Trump was at it again on Thursday. This time, the victim was Federal Reserve chairman Jay Powell. Trump, as a real estate magnate, has an expertise in renovation, yet quite why he felt it necessary to don a hard hat and tour the repairs to the 90-year-old Fed headquarters is puzzling. As the two men toured, with Trump towering over the diminutive Powell, it was an obvious ambush. Trump magicked a piece of paper from his pocket and questioned alleged $3billion of costs and an overrun. The clash had little to do with concrete and plumbing, and everything to do with central bank independence. Trump is engaged in a crude campaign to bully Powell into cutting the key Fed funds rate from 4.25 per cent to 4.5 per cent to support output. The greater the pressure, the more likely it has been that Powell would hold the line. He has nothing to lose by being obdurate. His most notable legacy could be his bravery in standing up for the Fed. Fashion refit The controlling Lewis family is taking flack for playing hardball with River Island landlords and reshaping its retail portfolio. The objective is to keep the brand on the High Street in long-term ownership rather than condemn it to administration or rapacious private equity ownership. That rarely ends well.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
TD Bank is the latest company to mandate in-office work
The pandemic-era WFH experiment is ending for TD Bank staff, with a strict return‑to‑office order rolling out this fall. All employees must work on‑site at least four days a week by early November, with executives leading the charge from October 6, according to an internal memo seen by Reuters. Melanie Burns, the bank's head of HR, told employees that working in person will boost collaboration and decision making. Burns also said coming into the office could improve individuals career prospects. TD Bank joins the likes of JPMorgan Chase and the Bank of Montreal in marshalling its staff back to the office. It emerged this week, for the first time since the pandemic, more than half of Fortune 100 firms now expect employees to show up five days a week. It is a decisive repositioning with only five percent of the same companies demanding a total return to the office just two years ago in 2023. Now 54 percent of companies that make up the Fortune 100 — the biggest companies in America — are fully in-office and 41 percent are flexible. Larger companies are leading the charge, with smaller operations still favoring flexible work, the latest data has revealed. Starbucks has been among the recent household names that have demanded its corporate workers return to its Seattle headquarters for at least four days a week. Google and Amazon have also pushed their employees to come back to in-person work, citing alleged productivity benefits. Other than the biggest companies in the country, most firms are actually maintaining their flexible working policies. Some 51 percent of employees with remote-capable jobs were working hybrid in 2025, down slightly from 52 percent in 2023, according to recent data from Gallup Poll. The story looks similar for those working completely remotely, with 28 percent working exclusively at home now compared to 29 percent in 2023. Experts argue that the biggest companies in America are pushing for workers to return to the office even if they lose talent because they can afford to do so. It comes as separate data from JLL revealed that Gen Z, who have been characterized by many as work shy, are actually the most eager to get back into the office . Those born between 1997 and 2012 attend the office 3.1 days a week, compared to older age groups who show up between 2.5 and 2.7 days a week, a survey from the company found. Many Gen Z employees have only known remote or hybrid work, having entered the workforce during or after the pandemic. Prominent voices such as JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon have warned that homeworking is holding younger workers back . 'The young generation is being damaged by this,' he said in a leaked recording of a private meeting. 'They're being left behind socially, in sharing ideas, and meeting people.'
