logo
Indian Armed Forces' PR mechanism is sluggish. Information is warfare now

Indian Armed Forces' PR mechanism is sluggish. Information is warfare now

The Print30-06-2025
The Ministry of Defence (MoD) and Armed Forces' 'wheels within wheels' PR machinery has consistently fallen short during crises, even when we held the initiative. From LoC to the LAC, Balakot to the Brahmos missile incident and Pulwama to Pahalgam, perceptions have often been shaped by adversaries exploiting an information vacuum—created more often than not, by our inability or unwillingness to dominate information space.
This highlights that warfare by information should not be seen just as a subcomponent of warfare but as warfare itself. Despite the global recognition of information warfare's criticality, the Indian Armed Forces seem to be struggling to even reach a reasonable level of information sharing, often confusing it with mere advertisement.
In an increasingly digital world, where conflicts are waged not just on battlefields but in the information space, the Indian Armed Forces face an urgent imperative to redefine their communication strategies. Historical examples like Mahabharata's ' Ashwathama hato hata …..' and recent global conflicts such as Russia- Ukraine and Israel-Hamas, clearly reflect what was famously written by Marshall McLuhan in Culture Is Our Business : 'While World War I & WW II were waged using armies and mobilized economies, WW III will be a guerrilla info war with no division between military & civilian participation.'
This allows the injection of disinformation and turns narratives against our great nation. Existing PR mechanism is sluggish and less effective due to the cumbersome 'elephantine' clearance process, low tolerance to mistakes, often sharing too little, too late and generally 'happy' chasing a narrative which is already in public domain. In stark contrast, adversaries operate with greater aggression, efficiency and agility.
Also read: Army warns veterans against posting 'false narratives' on social media, says pensions could be withheld
Dominating the narrative
The core principle in this battle of narratives is that the digital world rewards virality and has very little or no time for morality or veracity. The fight invariably is on whose story wins; therefore, OUR STORY MUST WIN, it's non-negotiable. This requires a deep understanding of narrative, space, information, and domination.
A narrative is defined as a coherent story influencing perceptions and shaping behaviour to achieve psychological dominance. It's the 'art of storytelling,' demanding a clear target audience and compelling content, even amid the challenges of information overload and disinformation.
Drawing from Sun Tzu's Art of War principle of subduing the enemy without fighting, influence operations must focus on dominating the cognitive space. A Whole of Nation (DIME) approach—integrating diplomatic, information, military, economic, social and diaspora elements—is vital for strategic communication, both domestically and internationally.
Information itself has become a weapon of mass disruption, distraction and deflection, serving as a breeding ground for misinformation and disinformation. Unknown, anonymous, well-informed keyboard warriors on both sides bombard the audience with competing messages and information, which is neither true nor factual.
Domination of information space is even more relevant in today's fast-moving battle of narratives. Social media, a weapon in plain sight, has exponentially amplified the reach of information, breaking down hierarchies and merging local, national, and international boundaries.
It allows alternate facts (fake news), rumours, photoshopped pictures and canards to go viral rapidly, capable of portraying victory as defeat and vice versa, rendering traditional notions of victory obsolete. Hence, this vital virtual ground cannot be ceded to the adversary at any cost.
Also read: There's an all-new N-word now. And India's soft power has become its hard liability
Strategies for countering disinformation
Effective perception management hinges on a clearly identified target audience and end state. Our intent has to be very clear because intent decides the content, content projects our intent and collectively they facilitate the desired connect with the target audience. This necessitates a sharp focus on the message, messenger and target audience. Recognising that advanced media or skillfully packaged information alone are insufficient without addressing the specific audience and information gaps.
The Armed Forces, while proficient in combat, must equally prioritise winning the perception war to prevent adversarial narratives from undermining public psyche and credibility. Therefore, narrative 'management' should be more crucial than the actual act.
Also read: Rafale's Sindoor strike thrilled TV war rooms—'Painted Pakistan red', 'Dharam bata diya'
Integrated and proactive communication
A critical need is to integrate all mediums—print, electronic and cyber —under a unified platform to align political-military aims with credible messaging. This calls for a common Tri-Services Information Warfare (IW)/PR organisation under the Chief of Defence Staff (CDS), replacing the current fragmented structure of multiple information-sharing agencies. The proposed organisation would feature tri-services verticals of IW, Cyber & Electronic Warfare and Strategic Communication, with dedicated officers overseeing various aspects. The three services PROs must be completely delinked from the Directorate of Public Relations (DPR).
With a very vibrant IW Branch at the formation level, the current system of 25 Regional PROs needs to be revisited, preferably done away with. In any case, PROs cannot even share basic information with the Press without clearance from Service HQs. Designated spokespersons (Brigadier/Colonel) at Formation Headquarters to swiftly disseminate initial '5 Ws & 1 H' (Who, What, When, Where, Why & How) on social media, followed by detailed press releases, is strongly recommended. The guiding principles for media engagement should be ABC: Answer, Convey, Bridge and CCD: Confident, Credible, Direct.
Furthermore, the strategy emphasises generating high-quality, transparent and concise communication with strong visual content for emotional engagement. Continuous monitoring of social media for fact-checking and filling information vacuum with speed, credibility, and accuracy is crucial.
The present approach toward information sharing is often ad hoc with no clear end state in mind, driven in isolation by individual media management initiatives and jumping from crisis to crisis. Employment of specialists and academic researchers as part of a military-private partnership in centres of excellence for long-term influence operations, including environment scanning and narrative development, is also recommended.
Therefore, collaboration and corroboration among counter-terrorist operation stakeholders are deemed a strategic necessity. Prompt information sharing prevents impatience and frustration, while 'half-baked information' can be detrimental to national/organisational interests. Hence, proactive damage control, exposing adversaries and preemption through joint rapid response teams for fact-checking are vital to amplify positive narratives.
As Yuval Harari states, 'The power of humanity lies in the capacity to tell great stories: it is the ability of humans to think imaginatively, to fictionalize, weave & tell stories effectively that makes Homo sapiens superior to other species. It is a belief in different stories of religion, history, civilization and cultural notions, laws & rights as also systems of governance that have spawned conflict. Hence, info flow shapes questions of war and peace.'
In conclusion, the outdated Defence Technical Publicity Rules (DTPR) of 2004 demand a new communication strategy for the Indian Armed Forces to convey, control and ensure 'our story to win.' Overcoming the 'sound byte problem' by adopting 'Tell it all, tell it early, tell it yourself' is paramount. The era of chasing narratives is over; being proactive rather than reactive is the imperative for navigating the complexities of modern information warfare.
Col Rajesh Kalia (Retd) was the media coordinator for the historic Siachen trek for civilians in 2007. He has served as the Defence Spokesperson in the North East covering MoD-related events in Assam, Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Manipur & Meghalaya. Views are personal.
(Edited by Theres Sudeep)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Decisive action has replaced ‘politics of appeasement': NDA MPs target Congress
Decisive action has replaced ‘politics of appeasement': NDA MPs target Congress

Indian Express

time44 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Decisive action has replaced ‘politics of appeasement': NDA MPs target Congress

Underlining India's 'new normal' in response to cross-border terrorism, the BJP and its allies on Monday threw their weight behind the replacement of 'dialogue and cooperation' with 'decisive action' as displayed under Operation Sindoor launched in response to the Pahalgam terror attack. During the debate on Monday, the NDA leaders listed instances of the Congress 'surrendering' India's national interest due to reasons ranging from 'lack of courage' to 'politics of appeasement' during its rule for decades. 'The India of today is not the India of 2008…this turnaround, this new normal is because of our changed policies. We must give full credit to our armed forces…in the past, Pakistan-sponsored terrorists were attacking India and killing Indians almost on a daily basis,' Kendrapara BJP MP Baijayant Panda said. Citing terror incidents during the Congress-led UPA's tenure, Panda listed various instances when India sought dialogue with Pakistan in the aftermath of such attacks. 'What is most shameful is that retaliation was considered, it was planned by our armed forces but the then-government did not permit,' he said. 'We kept appeasing them… Putting no pressure on them to stop terror funding…Our approach in the past was only to cooperate… not to teach them a lesson,' he said. Terming Operation Sindoor 'strong, successful and decisive', Narasaraopet TDP MP Lavu Sri Krishna Devarayalu called it (Operation Sindoor) a befitting reply to the Pahalgam 'slaughter'. 'More than violence, it was an assault on the soul of India…tourists were asked about their religion and shot dead in front of their children… wives… it is slaughter…,' Devarayalu said. 'With Operation Sindoor, India has sent a very strong message… India will wait, but will never forget. This is not aggression, this is assertive deterrence,' he added, crediting PM Narendra Modi for moving from 'reactive to resolute, from strategic silence to strategic sovereignty'. Panchayati Raj Minister and Munger JDU MP Rajiv Ranjan Singh also attacked the Congress for not having done enough to counter terrorism when it was in power. 'Between 2004 and 2014 during the UPA's tenure, the terror attacks which took place claimed 615 lives…what action did you take…nothing happened,' Ranjan said, citing the 2008 26/11 Mumbai attacks. Samastipur LSJP(PV) MP Shambhavi said: '…This is the new Bharat that does not light candles after a terrorist attack, it sets fire to their pyres. India wants peace but on its own terms.' Jatin Anand is an Assistant Editor with The Indian Express. Over the last 15 years, he has covered bureaucracy & politics, crime, traffic & intelligence, the Election Commission of India & Urban Development among other beats. He is an English (Literature) graduate from Zakir Husain Delhi College, DU & specialised in Print at the Asian College of Journalism (ACJ), Chennai. He tweets @jatinpaul ... Read More

Home Minister should take responsibility for Pahalgam attack: Congress' Gaurav Gogoi
Home Minister should take responsibility for Pahalgam attack: Congress' Gaurav Gogoi

United News of India

time2 hours ago

  • United News of India

Home Minister should take responsibility for Pahalgam attack: Congress' Gaurav Gogoi

New Delhi, July 28 (UNI) Congress Deputy Leader Gaurav Gogoi today asserted that Home Minister Amit Shah should be held accountable for the April 22 terrorist attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, and cannot deflect responsibility onto J&K Lieutenant Governor Manoj Sinha. Speaking during the discussion on Operation Sindoor in the Lok Sabha, Gogoi said: "The Home Minister comes and says that everything is well arranged. The backbone of terrorism has been broken. Yet, Uri happens, Pulwama happens, and Pahalgam happens. In the end, who takes responsibility? The Lieutenant Governor of J&K? No. If responsibility has to be taken, then Hon'ble Home Minister, it is you who must take the responsibility." He also said that all the blame for the Pahalgam attack was placed on the tour operator, with the claim that the operator took tourists to Pahalgam without permission and without informing the government. He questioned this logic of "evading responsibility", asking how such an argument could be justified. He further pointed out that 100 days have passed since the Pahalgam attack, yet the four terrorists involved have not been apprehended. The terrorists came, were given shelter, carried out an attack in Pahalgam for an hour, and escaped—yet not a single one has been caught. Mr. Gogoi said, 'Those who gave shelter to the terrorists have not been caught, those who supplied them with weapons have not been caught, and those who helped them escape safely after the attack have also not been apprehended. The government has drones, Pegasus, and the Central Reserve Police Force—so why, Home Minister, have the terrorists and their accomplices still not been captured?' He said that in Pahalgam, terrorists fired at unarmed tourists for an hour, and no one came to their aid. Even the ambulance took an hour to reach the scene. 'Who will answer these questions?' he asked. Gogoi further alleged that the central government is so arrogant that no matter how serious its mistakes are, no one is allowed to question it. He said, "At the time of the Pahalgam attack, Prime Minister Narendra Modi was in Saudi Arabia and completed all his scheduled programs there. After returning to India, he did not visit Pahalgam but instead went to Bihar to deliver an election speech. If anyone went to Pahalgam, it was our leader Rahul Gandhi. It would have been much better if he had gone to Pahalgam." The Congress Deputy Leader said, "The phrase "we will strike inside their territory" has been heard often—first after the 2016 terrorist attack, and again after the Pahalgam attack. Now, he said, it is being claimed that Operation Sindoor is still ongoing, which implies that Pakistan will carry out another terrorist attack, and then there will be another response under Operation Sindoor". He further stated that after the ceasefire, it was said, 'Our objective was not war; our objective was not to capture Pakistan-occupied Kashmir.' He questioned, 'If we are not going to take Pakistan-occupied Kashmir now, then when will we?' Gogoi also demanded when the whole Opposition and the country was with the Government then why did the ceasefire happen. "The entire country and the Opposition were with Prime Minister Narendra Modi, but on the evening of May 10, news of a ceasefire emerged. In such a situation, Narendra Modi should explain- Why did this ceasefire happen? When Pakistan was ready to kneel, why did you stop? and Who did you bow to, who did you surrender to?" Union Minister Rajiv Ranjan Singh while participating in the discussion slammed Congress MP Gaurav Gogoi saying that the Jorhat MP failed to acknowledge the sacrifices of Indian soldiers. He also accused the UPA for rise in terrorism in the country. Trinamool Congress MP Kalyan Banerjee raised concerns over the ceasefire decision. He also criticised the Prime Minister for remaining silent on US President Donald Trump's repeated assertions about playing a role in ending the India-Pakistan conflict. 'Why was a ceasefire declared under pressure from the American President?' he questioned. UNI RBE RN

Pahalgam massacre mastermind killed in Op Mahadev, Lok Sabha debates Op Sindoor
Pahalgam massacre mastermind killed in Op Mahadev, Lok Sabha debates Op Sindoor

India Today

time3 hours ago

  • India Today

Pahalgam massacre mastermind killed in Op Mahadev, Lok Sabha debates Op Sindoor

This edition of Five Live delves into Operation Mahadev, a counter-terrorism initiative in the Dachigam forest near Srinagar, where Indian security forces neutralised three Pakistani terrorists linked to the April 22nd Pahalgam attack targeting Hindu tourists. The operation, conducted by the Indian Army, J&K Police, and CRPF, eliminated Hashim Musa, a former Pakistan Army SSG commando, after a 15-day pursuit leveraging technical and human intelligence, including tracking a Chinese satellite phone. The program also examines the recovered intelligence assets, the implications of the Baisaran massacre, and the ongoing parliamentary debate over 'Operation Sindoor,' India's May 7, 2025 retaliatory strike. Defence Minister Rajnath Singh and BJP VP Jay Panda discuss India's shift to a retaliatory defense policy, while Congress MP Gaurav Gogoi critiques the government's counter-terrorism strategy and its inability to prevent attacks like Pahalgam.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store