logo
53-year-old's career survived the Dotcom tech crash—her advice for people working in AI now: ‘Don't be a fraud'

53-year-old's career survived the Dotcom tech crash—her advice for people working in AI now: ‘Don't be a fraud'

CNBC2 days ago

Growing up, Gabrielle Heyman, 53, did not know what she wanted to do with her life.
"I thought that I wanted to be in film when I was younger because I'm from L.A. and I have family in film," she says. "But then when I tried it, I found people were just really mean," especially to those in the assistant positions she was taking.
It was while working as an assistant at CBS in 1998 that she decided to apply for a job at the company doing sales for online campaigns. "It was the dawn of the internet," she says, "so they were just building their internet ad sales team." The people were nicer, it turned out, and she found she had a knack for sales.
Heyman continued to build her career with roles at Electronic Arts, Yahoo and BuzzFeed. Today, she serves as vice president of global brand sales and partnerships for video game developer Zynga.
Despite her eventual success, those early days of the World Wide Web were tenuous. Here's how Heyman survived and her advice for anyone starting in a brand-new field — like today's budding AI.
There was a lot of hype around the internet when Heyman started her career.
The 1990s saw lots of investment in internet-based companies, but beginning in 2001, when many of those companies ultimately failed and shut down, the Dotcom bubble burst. As many as 168,395 tech jobs were cut that year alone, according to outplacement company Challenger, Gray & Christmas.
"I was sure I was going to be laid off in the Dotcom crash," she says. She was working at Electronic Arts by then, which cut 250 jobs in October 2001. "And I wasn't laid off."
Heyman believes what helped her hold onto her job was being both good at and passionate about what she was doing. You have to "know your s---" in these moments, she says. "Don't be a fraud."
When industries are the zeitgeist, many people flock to them to try to capitalize on the boom. That includes entrepreneurs creating businesses with no clear path for profitability, she says. The draw is the opportunity to cash in rather than their genuine interest in making something that works, she says. When demand for that field levels out and some of those companies fold, "there's a lot of riff raff cut out," she says of the people who aren't genuinely interested — taking many jobs with them.
To survive in a new field — like AI, for example — you have to care about it. That means reading articles, "being up on what clients are doing, playing with the technology yourself," Heyman says. And be discerning about who you're interviewing with.
"Look at how the company is investing in long-term talent, infrastructure and leadership," she says, adding that, "it's often easy to spot the difference between companies chasing trends and those building for the future."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The GOP's 'big, beautiful bill' would leave 10.9 million more uninsured, CBO says
The GOP's 'big, beautiful bill' would leave 10.9 million more uninsured, CBO says

Yahoo

time14 hours ago

  • Yahoo

The GOP's 'big, beautiful bill' would leave 10.9 million more uninsured, CBO says

The Republican party's "big, beautiful bill" would leave 10.9 million fewer people in the US with health coverage while cutting more than $1 trillion in spending from federal insurance programs over a decade, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office reported on Wednesday. Most of the coverage losses would be due to changes in Medicaid, the health program for low-income, elderly, and disabled children and adults, including new work requirements that are expected to knock millions from its rolls. The rest would be due to reforms to the Affordable Care Act that could make buying insurance through its marketplaces more difficult while also limiting benefits for immigrants. By subscribing, you are agreeing to Yahoo's Terms and Privacy Policy Healthcare experts have described the cuts as unlike any in history and warned that they would undo much of the progress the US has made in reducing the number of people without insurance since the Affordable Care Act passed in 2010. 'This would be the biggest rollback in federal support for healthcare ever,' Larry Levitt, executive vice president for health policy at the think tank KFF said on X. The new numbers are similar to previous estimates from Capitol Hill, but they were updated to reflect the final version of the legislation passed by the House of Representatives last month and to show how different portions of the bill would interact with each other. According to the CBO, the GOP's legislation would reduce Medicaid enrollment by about 7.8 million. Much of the drop would be due to new rules requiring that able-bodied, childless adults spend at least 80 hours a month at work, in community service, or in an education program. The change is expected to shave $344 billion from the program, out of about $780 billion in total cuts. The White House has tried to cast doubt on the CBO's numbers, suggesting with little evidence that its staff may be politically biased. Other Republicans have argued that the office's estimates are simply overblown and that the work rules are a 'common sense' reform that won't reduce coverage for individuals who truly need it. 'You're telling me that you're going to require the able-bodied, these young men, for example, to only work or volunteer in their community for 20 hours a week. And that's too cumbersome for them?" House Speaker Mike Johnson said on this Sunday's "Meet the Press." "I'm not buying it. The American people are not buying it." But other healthcare experts have argued that work requirements are likely to block many Americans from coverage they are legally eligible for simply by piling on paperwork and red tape. They point to Arkansas' brief attempt to impose work rules during the first Trump administration, which led to about 18,000 residents losing coverage even though 'nearly everyone who was targeted by the policy already met the requirements,' as one study found. Many of the bill's changes to the Affordable Care Act are more technical, but together they would narrow the opportunities for individuals to sign up and stay enrolled. They include shortening the open enrollment period and ending the ability of lower-income adults to buy coverage throughout the year. Customers will also no longer be able to automatically reenroll in their health plan from year to year, thanks to new requirements that they annually verify their income and residency. Conservatives have argued that the changes are necessary to prevent fraudulent enrollments on the insurance exchanges, but more left-leaning experts have argued that the bill is simply trying to cut spending by throwing up unnecessary roadblocks. 'What they've done in both the marketplaces and Medicaid is that they've made it much harder to get and maintain your coverage,' said Sara Collins, vice president for healthcare coverage and access at the Commonwealth Fund. Republicans have emphasized that some of their reforms are intended to cut coverage to illegal immigrants. For instance, the bill would ban states from using their own money to extend Medicaid coverage to undocumented residents, which the CBO estimates will lead to about 1.4 million more people uninsured. The majority of coverage losses would fall on American citizens and legal residents, however, with 9.5 million more uninsured. Separately from the GOP bill, the number of Americans without insurance is expected to increase significantly after next year when expanded Obamacare subsidies passed under the Biden Administration are set to expire, significantly increasing premiums. The CBO has forecast that about 4.2 million fewer people will have coverage as a result. Between those losses, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, and regulatory changes the Trump administration has proposed, the office has projected that about 16 million fewer Americans will be insured over the coming decade. Matthew Fiedler, a healthcare expert at the Brookings Institution, estimates that the US uninsured rate will increase to about 12 percent from around 7.7 percent today — undoing about half the decline since the Affordable Care Act was passed in 2010. 'We're on track for a fairly unprecedented increase in the uninsured rate,' he said. Jordan Weissmann is a Senior Reporter at Yahoo Finance. Sign up for the Mind Your Money newsletter

Elon Musk is criticizing Donald Trump — and Trump isn't hitting back. Why?
Elon Musk is criticizing Donald Trump — and Trump isn't hitting back. Why?

Business Insider

time15 hours ago

  • Business Insider

Elon Musk is criticizing Donald Trump — and Trump isn't hitting back. Why?

If you come at Donald Trump, he's going to respond. Unless, apparently, you're Elon Musk. Trump hasn't said a word about Musk's public complaints about Trump's budget bill. It's hard to imagine Trump staying silent forever. But even this restraint tells you a lot about the Musk/Trump alliance. A pretty fundamental rule of political physics in our age: If you criticize Donald Trump, he roars back. Which makes what's happening now worth noting: Elon Musk is criticizing Donald Trump, and Trump … isn't responding. As you likely know by now, on Tuesday afternoon, Musk used his X account to complain about the Republican budget bill — the one that's supposed to be Trump's signature legislation, and the one that's literally called the " One Big Beautiful Bill" act because that's the name Trump likes. More specifically: Musk called the bill " a disgusting abomination." "Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it," he added. That story — the richest man in the world, and for at least several months, a key Trump ally, blasting a Trump project in public — dominated Tuesday's news cycle. Even Fox News had to cover it. And under normal circumstances, Trump would rage back. Not this time, though. Trump has yet to acknowledge Musk's broadside out loud, or on his Truth Social platform. When a Fox News reporter asked White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt "how mad" Trump would be when he learned about Musk's comments, she had a restrained answer ready: "The president already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill. It doesn't change the president's opinion. This is one big, beautiful bill, and he's sticking to it." And when I asked the White House press office for comment Wednesday morning, they referred me to Leavitt's previous statement. Obvious conclusion: For now, at least, the Trump team is going out of its way not to stoke a feud with Musk. It seems very unlikely that Trump's silence is going to be permanent: Trump loves holding forth in front of the press, so someone's going to ask him about it at some point. Still, this level of what seems to be restraint is remarkable for a man who doesn't usually restrain himself, and who loathes people who poke at him in public. What's happening? For starters, it's worth noting that Trump has already gone through a version of this. Last week, Musk used much more muted language to criticize the same bill in a CBS interview, and those comments also became a news story. And Trump didn't fire back at Musk then, either — even when asked about it at a press conference. It's also worth noting that even though Musk used scathing language to condemn the bill on Tuesday, he never once criticized Trump directly. That gives both men rhetorical wiggle room: Musk can argue that his problems with the bill have nothing to do with the man who's promoting it. And Trump can lump in Musk's critique along with everyone else who has problems with the bill, including some Republicans like Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene. But it's also likely that the most likely thing is the most likely thing: That Donald Trump has enormous admiration for Elon Musk, and treats him differently than just about anyone else in the world. And that even though Musk has officially left his role as a part-time White House advisor, Trump still wants him on his side.

Madden 26 trailer puts the Super Bowl champs front and center in bold Eagles focus
Madden 26 trailer puts the Super Bowl champs front and center in bold Eagles focus

Yahoo

time17 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Madden 26 trailer puts the Super Bowl champs front and center in bold Eagles focus

Everyone's favorite sports simulation is back, and Philadelphia Eagles star Saquon Barkley was chosen to grace the cover. Correction... Everyone's favorite sim is almost ready for its return. August 14 is the release date for Electronic Arts' Madden 26 game, and yes, you read that correctly. That reads 'favorite sim'. No disrespect is intended to the makers and fans of the NBA 2K franchise. They've done a heck of a job with their product. But this is Electronic Arts' Madden NFL franchise. Come on. There's no debate. Madden is the grandaddy of them all, sort of like the Rose Bowl in Pasadena. Madden 26's trailer dropped, and it's Eagles-heavy. This one ranks among the best they've ever done. Don't take anyone else's word for it. Feast your eyes, and take a look for yourselves. This article originally appeared on Eagles Wire: Philadelphia Eagles earn top billing in Madden 26 trailer

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store