Rubio Defends Trump's Foreign Policy as Democrats Press Him on Gaza Aid and White South Africans
The Associated Press
Secretary of State Marco Rubio testifies before the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations hearing to examine the President's proposed budget request for fiscal year 2026 for the Department of State on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, May 20, 2025.
WASHINGTON (AP) — Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Democratic senators sparred Tuesday over the Trump administration's foreign policies, ranging from Ukraine and Russia to the Middle East, Latin America, the slashing of the U.S. foreign assistance budget and refugee admissions.
Rubio defended the administration's decisions to his former colleagues during a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing, his first since being confirmed on President Donald Trump's Inauguration Day.
He said 'America is back' and claimed four months of foreign-policy achievements, even as many of them remain frustratingly inconclusive. Among them are the resumption of nuclear talks with Iran, efforts to bring Russia and Ukraine into peace talks and efforts to end the war in Gaza between Israel and Hamas.
America's top diplomat praised agreements with El Salvador and other Latin American countries to accept migrant deportees, saying 'secure borders, safe communities and zero tolerance for criminal cartels are once again the guiding principles of our foreign policy.'
He also rejected assertions that massive cuts to his department's budget would hurt America's standing abroad. Instead, he said the cuts would actually improve the U.S. reputation internationally.
Hearing opens with a joke, then turns serious
Committee Chairman Jim Risch opened the hearing with praise for Trump's changes and spending cuts and welcomed what he called the administration's promising nuclear talks with Iran.
Risch also noted what he jokingly called 'modest disagreement' with Democratic lawmakers, who used Tuesday's hearing to confront Rubio about Trump administration moves.
Ranking Democratic member Jeanne Shaheen argued that the Trump administration has 'eviscerated six decades of foreign-policy investments' and given China openings around the world.
'I urge you to stand up to the extremists of the administration,' the New Hampshire senator said.
Other Democrats excoriated the administration for its suspension of the refugee admissions program, particularly while allowing white Afrikaners from South Africa to enter the country.
Some Republicans also warned about drastic foreign assistance cuts, including former Senate leader Mitch McConnell and Susan Collins. They expressed concern that the U.S. is being outmaneuvered by its rivals internationally after the elimination of thousands of aid programs.
'The basic functions that soft power provides are extremely important,' McConnell told Rubio at a second hearing later in the day before the Senate Appropriations Committee. 'You get a whole lot of friends for not much money.'
Rubio says the US is encouraging but not threatening Israel on Gaza aid
Rubio told the Appropriations Committee that the Trump administration is encouraging but not threatening Israel to resume humanitarian aid shipments into Gaza.
He said the U.S. is not following the lead of several European countries that have imposed sanctions or warned of actions against Israel amid the dearth of assistance reaching vulnerable Palestinians. However, he said U.S. officials have stressed in discussions with the Israelis that aid is urgently needed for civilians in Gaza who are suffering during Israel's military operation against Hamas.
'We're not prepared to respond the way these countries have,' but the U.S. has engaged with Israel in the last few days about 'the need to resume humanitarian aid,' Rubio said. 'We anticipate that those flows will increase over the next few days and weeks — it's important that that be achieved.'
And Rubio acknowledged that the administration was approaching foreign governments about taking mass numbers of civilians from Gaza but insisted that any Palestinians leaving would be 'voluntary.'
'There's no deportation,' Rubio said. 'We've asked countries preliminarily whether they will be open to accepting people not as a permanent solution, but as a bridge to reconstruction' in Gaza.
Sen. Jeff Merkley, D-Ore., condemned it as a 'strategy of forced migration.'
Also on the Middle East, Rubio said the administration has pushed ahead with attempts to broker a ceasefire in Gaza and promote stability in Syria.
He stressed the importance of U.S. engagement with Syria, saying that otherwise, he fears the interim government there could be weeks or months away from a 'potential collapse and a full-scale civil war of epic proportions.'
Rubio's comments addressed Trump's pledge to lift sanctions burdening Syria's new transitional government, which is led by a former militant chief who led the overthrow of the country's longtime oppressive leader, Bashar Assad, late last year. The U.S. sanctions were imposed under Assad.
Rubio and senators clash over white South Africans entering the country
In two particularly contentious exchanges, Kaine and Van Hollen demanded answers on the decision to suspend overall refugee admissions but to exempt Afrikaners based on what they called 'specious' claims that they have been subjected to massive discrimination by the South African government. Rubio gave no ground.
In one tense exchange, Kaine pressed Rubio to say whether there should be a different refugee policy based on skin color.
'I'm not the one arguing that,' Rubio said. 'Apparently, you are, because you don't like the fact they're white.'
'The United States has a right to pick and choose who we allow into the United States,' he said. 'If there is a subset of people that are easier to vet, who we have a better understanding of who they are and what they're going to do when they come here, they're going to receive preference.'
He added: 'There are a lot of sad stories around the world, millions and millions of people around the world. It's heartbreaking, but we cannot assume millions and millions of people around the world. No country can.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Kyodo News
13 hours ago
- Kyodo News
BOJ not to push rate hikes amid U.S. tariff uncertainty: Ueda
KYODO NEWS - 4 hours ago - 13:30 | All, Japan Bank of Japan chief Kazuo Ueda said Tuesday the central bank will not push hard to raise its policy rate unless economic and price conditions are projected to improve, noting their "extremely high" uncertainty due to hefty U.S. tariffs. Ueda told a parliamentary session that the BOJ will not hike rates just to make room for future monetary easing, while reiterating its policy of further lifting rates if the economy and prices move in line with its expectations. His remarks came after the central bank revised down its economic growth and price projections for the current fiscal year and maintained its short-term policy interest rate at around 0.5 percent in May for the second consecutive meeting. Trade frictions triggered by U.S. President Donald Trump's steep tariffs could cause "the global economy to slow down and squeeze profits of domestic companies," Ueda said, signaling a cautious stance about deciding the timing of future rate hikes. As part of efforts to normalize monetary policy following a decade of unorthodox easing, the BOJ has raised its key interest rate three times since March last year, when it implemented its first hike in 17 years. Related coverage: Trump's steel tariff hike not raised in Japan-U.S. talks: negotiator Trump lauds Nippon Steel as "great partner" for U.S. Steel FOCUS: Tokyo metro election key test for PM Ishiba's long-term prospects
Japan Times
13 hours ago
- Japan Times
Why Japan isn't panicking about Trump's foreign policy
My friend leaned back, perplexed. 'The Japanese don't seem very concerned about Trump,' he said, equal parts question and comment. 'At least, compared to the Europeans.' I checked the impulse to boot up the lecture on Japanese insecurity and Tokyo's hedging. and pondered his statement. The more I thought about it, the more I realized that he might be right. After all, the official line from the Japanese government is that the relationship is good. In March, Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi expressed 'full confidence' that the U.S. will fulfill its obligations under the mutual security treaty and defend Japan, 'using all available capabilities, including nuclear ones.' That statement came after Trump again questioned the pact, claiming that the U.S. was obliged to defend Japan while Tokyo had no such responsibility. Late last month, after a quickly arranged phone call with Trump — at the request of the U.S. — a senior official from the Prime Minister's Office speculated in the Mainichi Shimbun that Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba is 'becoming increasingly confident that he and Trump have chemistry,' a key factor in a relationship dominated by a decision-maker like the U.S. president. Hideshi Tokuchi, a former senior Japanese defense official, provided the backdrop for that optimism in a paper written after Ishiba's February visit to Washington. He explained that the alliance with the U.S. is 'indispensable' for Japan, 'the only reasonable and realistic option.' He quoted Koji Murata, a longtime student of the alliance at Doshisha University, who encouraged the Japanese to 'avoid making self-fulfilling prophesies' and 'to hold an optimistic attitude in the long term.' Murata in turn cited former British Prime Minister Winston Churchill, who famously concluded that 'Americans often make mistakes, but they always come back by correcting themselves. That is the resilience of the U.S. It is wrong to ignore the American power for course correction.' U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth provided some assurance in remarks to the Shangri-La Dialogue last weekend in Singapore. Hegseth's SLD speech was the first systematic explanation of the Trump administration's policy about the region and it echoed Japanese thinking. Hegseth said the Indo-Pacific was the United States' 'priority theater' and 'we are here to stay.' Indeed, 'We will continue to be an Indo-Pacific nation — with Indo-Pacific interests — for generations to come.' He called out China for seeking to become 'a hegemonic power,' which through 'its massive military build-up and growing willingness to use military force to achieve its goals, including gray-zone tactics and hybrid warfare... has demonstrated that it wants to fundamentally alter the region's status quo.' He warned of a 'real' threat to invade Taiwan. Hegseth promised that the U.S. 'will not be pushed out of this critical region and we will not let our allies and partners be subordinated and intimidated.' He endorsed 'America's great allies and defense partners' that deter adversaries and 'execute peace through strength.' While he warned of 'uncomfortable and tough conversations' — a reference to demands to further increase defense spending — Hegseth promised that 'We will stand with you and work alongside you.' Ultimately, 'No one should doubt America's commitment to our Indo-Pacific allies and partners.' To prove that wasn't empty rhetoric, Hegseth then met counterparts from Japan, Australia and the Philippines in the second official gathering of 'the Squad,' a group launched at the SLD two years ago. He called the group the most 'strategically positioned to manifest deterrence, to bring about peace.' The statement released after that discussion noted the group's 'serious concern about dangerous conduct by China' and outlined concrete steps they were taking to counter it and to promote regional peace and stability. (Great reporting by Gabriel Dominguez and Jesse Johnson provides details from Hegseth's speech and the Squad meeting.) Still uncertain, I surveyed smarter folks than I and they agreed: Japan isn't as worried as the Europeans when it comes to Trump and U.S. security commitments — and with good reason. Most line up behind a Japanese security scholar, anonymous because of his work with the government, who echoed Tokuchi that the baseline for Tokyo is that it can't face China without the U.S. and therefore 'it has no other option but to do everything to promote ties with the U.S. whoever is the president.' They also credit U.S. actions to date. Administration officials insist that the Indo-Pacific is a priority theater and unlike their visits to Europe, there are no fireworks when they visit this region. When Hegseth visited Japan in March, his meetings with Ishiba and Defense Minister Gen Nakatani went well, with officials finding common ground and no reports of 'frank discussions,' diplomatic lingo for tension, friction or disagreements. Hegseth's SLD speech is the first extended statement about U.S. policy and it checked all the boxes. My scholar friend explained that 'Japanese have trepidations that something big may come but until then they stick to the same set of policies that they have been pursuing since before the Trump administration.' Yoichiro Sato, a professor at Ritsumeikan University, offered another reason for the calm: 'The Japanese side seems to be getting a lot of assurances from the U.S. through their highly personal channels of defense zoku (contacts).' Sato then served up a third, more prosaic, explanation. Appearing to be worried, he said, Tokyo would give away important leverage in tariff negotiations. The most compelling argument, one made by all my interlocutors, is that Japan has done a lot to consolidate the alliance and establish itself as an ally and partner worth defending. Corey Wallace, associate professor at Kanagawa University, explained it well. 'There is a feeling of having greater room for maneuver should Japan be faced with tough choices about the alliance and its national security direction compared to 2016.' Key to this process has been the three national security documents released in 2022 — the National Security Strategy, the National Defense Strategy and the Defense Buildup Program — that allow the country to play a bigger role in regional security and defense. Wallace noted that 'Not only has Japan made important strides since the beginning of Trump 1.0 in terms of spending more and beefing up the Self-Defense Forces, improving capabilities and even enhanced command elements, but Japanese leaders are more sanguine about being able to push through further changes should they be needed.' Wallace highlighted another critical development: the weave of relationships that Japan has created. Strategic partnerships have become more prominent. At SLD, Defense Minister Nakatani explained the 'One Cooperative Effort Among Nations' (OCEAN) concept for defense partnerships in the Indo-Pacific region. OCEAN will allow countries with shared values to 'have a panoramic perspective of the entire Indo-Pacific and bring new value and benefits to the region.' Defense cooperation is part of the package. (OCEAN is reportedly the newest iteration of the 'one theater' concept I discussed a few weeks ago.) As Wallace explained, 'Japanese leaders feel Japan is establishing itself within a wider security framework/network that might afford it some options and 'room for maneuver.'' Convinced? Color me skeptical. First, my sources distinguished economic and security issues. Their emphasis was on the latter, where there is agreement between the two strategic and bureaucratic communities. Japan is insistent, too, on separating the two. U.S. thinking may not be so neat and clean; indeed, Trump insists that allies take advantage of U.S. security expenditures to create their economic advantage. Second, there is the hold that Japan has on Trump. One of the few constants in his policy pronouncements — since the 1980s — is the assertion that Japan has exploited U.S. largesse and is the source of U.S. economic troubles. Finally, for all the convergence in strategic thinking, Trump has also been reluctant to shed blood in pursuit of foreign policy. He has railed against a foreign policy elite that launched forever wars and meddles in distant affairs. He likes measures that don't risk U.S. lives, such as drone attacks. That renders deterrence a bit shaky. Nor is it clear that Trump's contest with China extends to the military realm, although his national security advisers see the competition in that way. He frames the U.S.-China relationship in economic terms, mostly in the terms of trade. Combine this outlook with his reticence about bloodshed and a source of Japanese confidence dissipates. To my mind, then, Japan should be worried. But my friend was right — thus far, it isn't. Brad Glosserman is a senior adviser at Pacific Forum. His new book on the geopolitics of high-tech is expected to come out from Hurst Publishers this fall.
Yomiuri Shimbun
14 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Harvard Seeks End to US Funding Cuts, Says National Security, Public Health Research in Peril
REUTERS/Faith Students walk on the campus of Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S., May 23, 2025. WILMINGTON, Delaware, June 2 (Reuters) – Harvard University asked a federal judge on Monday to issue a summary judgment ruling to unfreeze $2.5 billion in funding blocked by President Donald Trump's administration, which Harvard said was illegal. Harvard's filing in the U.S. District Court in Boston said that it had received 957 orders since April 14 to freeze funding for research pertaining to national security threats, cancer and infectious diseases and more since the country's oldest and wealthiest school rejected a White House list of demands. Trump has said he is trying to force change at Harvard – and other top-level universities across the U.S. – because in his view they have been captured by leftist 'woke' thought and become bastions of antisemitism. The Trump administration did not immediately respond to a request for comment. U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs has set arguments for July 21 on Harvard's motion for summary judgment, which is a request for a judge to decide a dispute without a trial to determine material facts. Harvard sued the Trump administration in April, alleging the funding freeze violated the school's right to free speech and was arbitrary and capricious. In Monday's court filing, Harvard detailed the terminated grants, including $88 million for research into pediatric HIV, $12 million for increasing Defense Department awareness of emerging biological threats and $8 million to better understand dark energy. The school said ending the funding would destroy ongoing research into cancer treatments, infectious disease and Parkinson's. The Trump administration has opened numerous investigations into Harvard. Some are looking at threats against Jewish students and faculty after pro-Palestinian protests broke out following the Oct. 7, 2023 Hamas attack on Israel and subsequent Israeli military actions in Gaza. Other investigations are probing whether Harvard discriminates based on sex and gender, along with the school's ties to foreign governments and international students. The Trump administration revoked Harvard's ability to enroll international students last month, which a judge temporarily blocked after Harvard sued in a separate case. Harvard and other universities say Trump's attacks are threats to freedom of speech and freedom of academics, as well as threats to the schools' very existence.
